人类学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (05): 839-852.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0076
韩芳1,2(), 李冀源3(), 乔虹3, 徐海伦2, 何虹霖2, 高璇2, 吕红亮1,2, 杜战伟1,2, 蔡林海3, 甄强3, 马文灵3
收稿日期:
2024-02-06
修回日期:
2024-06-15
出版日期:
2024-10-15
发布日期:
2024-10-10
通讯作者:
李冀源
作者简介:
韩芳,助理研究员/博士,主要研究方向为旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: hanf@scu.edu.cn
基金资助:
HAN Fang1,2(), LI Jiyuan3(), QIAO Hong3, XU Hailun2, HE Honglin2, GAO Xuan2, LYU Hongliang1,2, DU Zhanwei1,2, CAI Linhai3, ZHEN Qiang3, MA Wenling3
Received:
2024-02-06
Revised:
2024-06-15
Online:
2024-10-15
Published:
2024-10-10
Contact:
LI Jiyuan
摘要:
2021年7月和2023年10月,青海省文物考古研究院与四川大学考古文博学院联合开展了环青海湖区域的考古调查工作。调查队在海晏县达玉村甘子河流域新发现细石器地点9处,并发现了其埋藏的原生层位。通过小规模试掘,获得了一些文化遗存,包括石制品、动物骨骼碎片及磨制骨器。初步年代学研究结果显示,遗址的年代为距今9500年左右。本文是对此次调查和发掘结果的初步报告与研究,新发现的石器地点为讨论史前狩猎采集者对青藏高原东北部高海拔区域的利用提供了新材料。
中图分类号:
韩芳, 李冀源, 乔虹, 徐海伦, 何虹霖, 高璇, 吕红亮, 杜战伟, 蔡林海, 甄强, 马文灵. 环青海湖地区细石叶遗存新发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 839-852.
HAN Fang, LI Jiyuan, QIAO Hong, XU Hailun, HE Honglin, GAO Xuan, LYU Hongliang, DU Zhanwei, CAI Linhai, ZHEN Qiang, MA Wenling. New discoveries of microblade sites in the Qinghai Lake region[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(05): 839-852.
地点Localities → 类型Types ↓ | 第1地点Loc. 1 | 第2地点Loc.2 | 第3地点Loc.3 | 第4地点Loc.4 | 第5地点Loc.5 | 第6地点Loc.6 | 第7地点Loc.7 | 第9地点Loc.9 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | ||||||||
完整石片complete flake | 4 | 8.33% | 9 | 6.82% | 13 | 6.63% | 1 | 16.67% | 1 | 0.24% | 2 | 100% | |||||||||||
不完整石片flake fragment | 16 | 33.33% | 34 | 25.76% | 47 | 23.98% | 1 | 16.67% | 82 | 19.48% | 3 | 30% | |||||||||||
细石叶microblade | 1 | 2.08% | 11 | 8.33% | 5 | 2.55% | 24 | 5.70% | |||||||||||||||
碎屑debris | 7 | 14.58% | 65 | 49.24% | 93 | 47.45% | 1 | 16.67% | 1 | 20% | 191 | 45.37% | 4 | 40% | |||||||||
断块shatter | 7 | 14.58% | 23 | 11.73% | 2 | 33.33% | 3 | 60% | 109 | 25.89% | 3 | 30% | |||||||||||
石核断块core fragment | 2 | 4.17% | 1 | 0.51% | 3 | 0.71% | |||||||||||||||||
单台面石核singer platform core | 1 | 2.08% | 1 | 0.76% | 1 | 0.51% | |||||||||||||||||
细石核microblade core | 1 | 2.08% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||||||
端刮器endscraper | 3 | 6.25% | 6 | 4.55% | 5 | 2.55% | 1 | 16.67% | 7 | 1.66% | |||||||||||||
边刮器sidescraper | 5 | 10.42% | 3 | 2.27% | 5 | 2.55% | 2 | 0.48% | |||||||||||||||
作业面更新石片overshot flake | 1 | 2.08% | 3 | 2.27% | 1 | 20% | |||||||||||||||||
台面更新石片tablet | 1 | 0.51% | |||||||||||||||||||||
尖状器point | 1 | 0.51% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||||||
砍砸器chopper | 1 | 0.51% | |||||||||||||||||||||
合计total | 48 | 132 | 196 | 6 | 5 | 421 | 10 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
石英岩quartzite | 16 | 33% | 40 | 30.30% | 55 | 28.06% | 3 | 50% | 235 | 55.82% | 7 | 70% | 2 | 100% | |||||||||
燧石chert | 28 | 58.33% | 83 | 62.88% | 127 | 64.80% | 2 | 33.33% | 5 | 100% | 159 | 37.77% | 3 | 30% | |||||||||
石英quartz | 1 | 2.08% | 6 | 4.55% | 3 | 0.71% | |||||||||||||||||
玛瑙agate | 1 | 2.08% | 1 | 0.51% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||||
硅质细砂岩siliceous fine sandstone | 2 | 4.16% | 2 | 1.52% | 13 | 6.63% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||
N/A | 1 | 0.76% | 5 | 1.19% | |||||||||||||||||||
砂岩sandstone | 1 | 16.67% | 13 | 3.09% | |||||||||||||||||||
石英砂岩quartz sandstone | 4 | 0.95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
合计total | 48 | 132 | 196 | 6 | 5 | 421 | 10 | 2 |
表1 达玉地点采集石制品的类型及石料统计
Tab.1 Types of lithics and raw materials from surface of Dayu Localities
地点Localities → 类型Types ↓ | 第1地点Loc. 1 | 第2地点Loc.2 | 第3地点Loc.3 | 第4地点Loc.4 | 第5地点Loc.5 | 第6地点Loc.6 | 第7地点Loc.7 | 第9地点Loc.9 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | ||||||||
完整石片complete flake | 4 | 8.33% | 9 | 6.82% | 13 | 6.63% | 1 | 16.67% | 1 | 0.24% | 2 | 100% | |||||||||||
不完整石片flake fragment | 16 | 33.33% | 34 | 25.76% | 47 | 23.98% | 1 | 16.67% | 82 | 19.48% | 3 | 30% | |||||||||||
细石叶microblade | 1 | 2.08% | 11 | 8.33% | 5 | 2.55% | 24 | 5.70% | |||||||||||||||
碎屑debris | 7 | 14.58% | 65 | 49.24% | 93 | 47.45% | 1 | 16.67% | 1 | 20% | 191 | 45.37% | 4 | 40% | |||||||||
断块shatter | 7 | 14.58% | 23 | 11.73% | 2 | 33.33% | 3 | 60% | 109 | 25.89% | 3 | 30% | |||||||||||
石核断块core fragment | 2 | 4.17% | 1 | 0.51% | 3 | 0.71% | |||||||||||||||||
单台面石核singer platform core | 1 | 2.08% | 1 | 0.76% | 1 | 0.51% | |||||||||||||||||
细石核microblade core | 1 | 2.08% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||||||
端刮器endscraper | 3 | 6.25% | 6 | 4.55% | 5 | 2.55% | 1 | 16.67% | 7 | 1.66% | |||||||||||||
边刮器sidescraper | 5 | 10.42% | 3 | 2.27% | 5 | 2.55% | 2 | 0.48% | |||||||||||||||
作业面更新石片overshot flake | 1 | 2.08% | 3 | 2.27% | 1 | 20% | |||||||||||||||||
台面更新石片tablet | 1 | 0.51% | |||||||||||||||||||||
尖状器point | 1 | 0.51% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||||||
砍砸器chopper | 1 | 0.51% | |||||||||||||||||||||
合计total | 48 | 132 | 196 | 6 | 5 | 421 | 10 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
石英岩quartzite | 16 | 33% | 40 | 30.30% | 55 | 28.06% | 3 | 50% | 235 | 55.82% | 7 | 70% | 2 | 100% | |||||||||
燧石chert | 28 | 58.33% | 83 | 62.88% | 127 | 64.80% | 2 | 33.33% | 5 | 100% | 159 | 37.77% | 3 | 30% | |||||||||
石英quartz | 1 | 2.08% | 6 | 4.55% | 3 | 0.71% | |||||||||||||||||
玛瑙agate | 1 | 2.08% | 1 | 0.51% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||||
硅质细砂岩siliceous fine sandstone | 2 | 4.16% | 2 | 1.52% | 13 | 6.63% | 1 | 0.24% | |||||||||||||||
N/A | 1 | 0.76% | 5 | 1.19% | |||||||||||||||||||
砂岩sandstone | 1 | 16.67% | 13 | 3.09% | |||||||||||||||||||
石英砂岩quartz sandstone | 4 | 0.95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
合计total | 48 | 132 | 196 | 6 | 5 | 421 | 10 | 2 |
层位Layers → 类型Types ↓ | 地表 surface | layer 2 | layer 3 | layer 4 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | ||||
完整石片complete flake | 1 | 0.69% | 2 | 2.08% | |||||||
不完整石片flake fragment | 75 | 52.08% | 35 | 36.46% | 134 | 29.19% | 25 | 56.82% | |||
细石叶microblade | 9 | 6.25% | 5 | 5.21% | 20 | 4.36% | 5 | 11.36% | |||
碎屑debris | 37 | 25.69% | 20 | 20.83% | 191 | 41.61% | 12 | 27.27% | |||
断块shatter | 7 | 4.86% | 11 | 11.46% | 73 | 15.90% | 1 | 2.27% | |||
自然砾石pebble | 22 | 22.92% | 30 | 6.54% | |||||||
石核断块core fragment | 1 | 0.69% | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||
单台面石核singer platform core | 1 | 0.69% | 1 | 1.04% | 2 | 0.44% | 1 | 2.27% | |||
双台面石核double platform core | 1 | 0.69% | |||||||||
细石核microblade core | 1 | 0.69% | 3 | 0.66% | |||||||
端刮器endscraper | 6 | 4.17% | 2 | 0.44% | |||||||
边刮器sidescraper | 4 | 2.78% | 3 | 0.66% | |||||||
台面更新石片tablet | 1 | 0.69% | |||||||||
合计total | 144 | 96 | 459 | 44 |
表2 达玉第8地点石制品的分布情况
Tab.2 Lithics from the Dayu Locality 8
层位Layers → 类型Types ↓ | 地表 surface | layer 2 | layer 3 | layer 4 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | ||||
完整石片complete flake | 1 | 0.69% | 2 | 2.08% | |||||||
不完整石片flake fragment | 75 | 52.08% | 35 | 36.46% | 134 | 29.19% | 25 | 56.82% | |||
细石叶microblade | 9 | 6.25% | 5 | 5.21% | 20 | 4.36% | 5 | 11.36% | |||
碎屑debris | 37 | 25.69% | 20 | 20.83% | 191 | 41.61% | 12 | 27.27% | |||
断块shatter | 7 | 4.86% | 11 | 11.46% | 73 | 15.90% | 1 | 2.27% | |||
自然砾石pebble | 22 | 22.92% | 30 | 6.54% | |||||||
石核断块core fragment | 1 | 0.69% | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||
单台面石核singer platform core | 1 | 0.69% | 1 | 1.04% | 2 | 0.44% | 1 | 2.27% | |||
双台面石核double platform core | 1 | 0.69% | |||||||||
细石核microblade core | 1 | 0.69% | 3 | 0.66% | |||||||
端刮器endscraper | 6 | 4.17% | 2 | 0.44% | |||||||
边刮器sidescraper | 4 | 2.78% | 3 | 0.66% | |||||||
台面更新石片tablet | 1 | 0.69% | |||||||||
合计total | 144 | 96 | 459 | 44 |
层位Layers → 类型Types ↓ | 地表 surface | layer 2 | layer 3 | layer 4 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | ||||
石英岩quartzite | 76 | 52.78% | 33 | 34.48% | 305 | 66.45% | 38 | 83.36% | |||
燧石chert | 66 | 45.83% | 42 | 43.75% | 121 | 26.36% | 6 | 13.64% | |||
石英quartz | 1 | 0.69% | 2 | 0.44% | |||||||
玛瑙agate | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||||
硅质细砂岩siliceous fine sandstone | 1 | 0.69% | |||||||||
N/A | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||||
砂岩sandstone | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||||
石英砂岩quartz sandstone | |||||||||||
自然砾石 cobble | 21 | 21.88% | 28 | 6.10% |
表3 达玉第8地点石制品石料统计
Tab.3 Raw materials from the Dayu Locality 8
层位Layers → 类型Types ↓ | 地表 surface | layer 2 | layer 3 | layer 4 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | ||||
石英岩quartzite | 76 | 52.78% | 33 | 34.48% | 305 | 66.45% | 38 | 83.36% | |||
燧石chert | 66 | 45.83% | 42 | 43.75% | 121 | 26.36% | 6 | 13.64% | |||
石英quartz | 1 | 0.69% | 2 | 0.44% | |||||||
玛瑙agate | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||||
硅质细砂岩siliceous fine sandstone | 1 | 0.69% | |||||||||
N/A | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||||
砂岩sandstone | 1 | 0.22% | |||||||||
石英砂岩quartz sandstone | |||||||||||
自然砾石 cobble | 21 | 21.88% | 28 | 6.10% |
图4 达玉石器点石制品 1. 2023DY3:1, 2. 2023DY3:47, 细石核Microblade core;3. 2023DY2:118, 4. 2023DY1:4, 作业面更新石片overshot flake;5. 2023DY2:119, 6. 2023DY2:120, 7. 2023DY2:121, 8. 2023DY2:122, 9. 2023DY2:123, 10. 2023DY2:124, 细石叶microblade
Fig.4 Lithic artifacts from Dayu locality
图5 达玉石器点端刮器 1.2021 DY3:132; 2. 2023DY2:109; 3. 2023DY2:111; 4. 2023DY8:107; 5. 2021DY4:1;6. 2023DY8SW③L3:236; 7. 2023DY8SE③L3:203
Fig.5 Sidescrapers from the Dayu localities
图6 达玉8号地点出土动物骨骼 1. 202Y 1. 2023DY8SE(3)L3B3:1, 小型牛科右侧下颌骨带M1、M2 // Right mandible of small Bovidae with M1 and M2;2. 2023SWL3B1:4, 疑似羚羊亚科左侧下颌骨带P3、P4 // Suspected left mandible of Antilopinae with P3 and P4;3. 2023DY8NE(5)L3B1:8, 疑似羚羊亚科(Antilopinae)右侧下颌骨带P2、P3、P4 // Suspected right mandible of Antilopinae with P2, P3 and P4;4. 2023DY8NE(3)L3B14:7, 山羊属右侧下颌骨带dP2、dp3、dP4 // Right mandible of Capra sp. with dP2, dP3 and dP4;5. 2023DY8SW(3)L3screening:2, 小型牛科下颌臼齿// Lower molar of small Bovidae; 6. 2023DY8SE(4)L2 screening:11, 哺乳动物盆骨// Pelvis of Mammalia; 7. 2023DY8NW(4)L2B2:9, 羚羊亚科掌骨或跖骨远端//Distal articulation of metapodial of Antilopinae;8. 2023DY8NE(4)L3 screening:6, 反刍亚目左侧跗骨// Left tarsal of Ruminantia; 9. 2023DY8SE(3)L2 screening:12, 反刍亚目下颌第四前臼齿乳齿// dp4 of Ruminantia; 10. 2023DY8:SE(3)L3B5:5, 反刍亚目第一指骨或趾骨// Proximal phalange of Ruminantia;11. 2023DY8SE(4)L2B3:10, 马属第一指骨或趾骨// Proximal phalange of Equus sp.;12. 2023DY8:3, 马属右侧下颌颊齿(P3/P4/M1/M2) // Right lower cheektooth of Equus sp.
Fig.6 Faunal remains from the Dayu Locality 8
图7 达玉8号地点含人工痕迹的骨骼碎片和骨器 1, 3-8. 火烧痕迹burned mark; 2.切割痕cut mark;9-10.骨锥Bone cones ;11. 骨铲spade
Fig.7 Surface modifications on bone fragments and bone artifacts from the Dayu Locality 8
实验室编号Lab No. | 层位Layer | AMS 14C 年代Age | 误差Error | 校正年代Calibrated date(BP cal, 95.4%) | 样品sample |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta-681736 | 3 | 8630 | 30 | 9678-9536 | 炭屑 |
Beta-681737 | 4 | 8470 | 30 | 9535-9446 | 骨骼 |
表4 达玉第8地点测年数据表
Tab.4 Dating results of the Dayu Locality 8
实验室编号Lab No. | 层位Layer | AMS 14C 年代Age | 误差Error | 校正年代Calibrated date(BP cal, 95.4%) | 样品sample |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta-681736 | 3 | 8630 | 30 | 9678-9536 | 炭屑 |
Beta-681737 | 4 | 8470 | 30 | 9535-9446 | 骨骼 |
[1] | Madsen DB, Ma HZ, Brantingham PJ, et al. The late Upper Paleolithic occupation of the northern Tibetan Plateau margin[J]. Archaeological Science, 2006, 33(10): 1433-1444 |
[2] | Brantingham. PJ, Gao X, Olsen JW, et al. A short chronology for the peopling of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. In: Madsen DB, Chen FH, Gao X(ed). Developments in Quaternary Science[J]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, 129-150 |
[3] | Brantingham PJ, Gao X, Madsen DB, et al. Late occupation of the high-elevation Northern Tibetan Plateau based on cosmogenic, luminescence, and radiocarbon ages[J]. Geoarchaeology, 2013, 28(5): 413-431 |
[4] | Rhode D, Zhang HY, Madsen DB, et al. Epipaleolithic/early Neolithic settlements at Qinghai Lake, western China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2007, 34(4): 600-612 |
[5] | Zhang DJ, Dong GH, Wang H, et al. History and possible mechanisms of prehistoric human migration to the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences. 2016, 59(9): 1765-1778 |
[6] | Sun MJ, Hou GL, Chen YC, et al. Prehistoric human occupation and adaptation on the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau in the Early Holocene[J]. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. 2023, 47(6): 931-949 |
[7] | 仪明洁, 高星, 张晓凌, 等. 青藏高原边缘地区史前遗址2009年调查试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(2): 124-136 |
[8] | 青海省地方志编纂委员会. 青海湖志[M]. 西宁: 青海人民出版社,1998 |
[9] | 海晏县志编纂委员会. 海晏县志[M]. 兰州: 甘肃文化出版社,1994 |
[10] | Bronk Ramsey C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates[J]. Radiocarbon, 2009, 51(1): 337-360 |
[11] |
Reimer PJ, Austin WEN, Bard E, et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0-55 kcal BP)[J]. Radiocarbon, 2020, 62(4): 725-757
doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.41 |
[12] | Wang J, Xia H, Yao JT, et al. Subsistence strategies of prehistoric hunter-gatherers on the Tibetan Plateau during the Last Deglaciation[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2019, 63(3): 395-404 |
[13] | 乙海琳, 宋艳波, 肖永明. 青海化隆县沙隆卡遗址动物遗存研究[J]. 北方文物, 2020, 5: 66-77 |
[1] | 仪明洁, 曹彧. 细石叶技术的起源、二元分化及环境驱动因素[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 355-366. |
[2] | 王华, 李占扬, Thijs van KOLFSCHOTEN. 德国西宁根与中国灵井的骨器比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 214-232. |
[3] | 仝广, 李锋, 赵海龙, 闫晓蒙, 高星. 泥河湾盆地火山角砾岩原料的热处理实验[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 81-90. |
[4] | 仪明洁, 余官玥, 陈福友, 张晓凌. 泥河湾盆地白洗沟遗址出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(05): 590-603. |
[5] | 杜水生, 张婷, 任海云. 2014年山西下川遗址富益河圪梁地点3号探方的发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(05): 638-650. |
[6] | 徐廷, 赵海龙, 顾聆博. 吉林省和龙大洞旧石器遗址2010年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(05): 651-666. |
[7] | 曾晨茹, 仪明洁, 高星. 细石叶功能研究的现状与思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(04): 554-563. |
[8] | 仝广, 李锋, 高星. 楔形细石核压制剥片技术的实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(03): 305-316. |
[9] | 高瑶, 王华, 郎剑锋. 山东小高全新世早期遗址人类对獐的利用[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(02): 238-247. |
[10] | 张乐, 吴秀杰, 张双权. 四川资阳人遗址出土的骨锥[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 1-14. |
[11] | 仝广, 李锋, 高星. 东北亚楔形细石核模拟剥片实验研究的回顾与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 129-136. |
[12] | 杨石霞, 浣发祥, 王宏, 吴振宇, 卢筱洪, 李京亚. 广东西樵山细石叶石核的开发策略[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(05): 804-815. |
[13] | 徐廷, 方启, 赵莹, 石玉鑫, 杨国荣, 闫家海. 吉林汪清新兴遗址第1地点调查与试掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(05): 904-916. |
[14] | 梁琪瑶, 张伟, 陈全家, 田禾. 黑龙江齐齐哈尔洪河遗址出土的骨器[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(05): 751-763. |
[15] | 关莹, 李有骞, 邢松, 黄立平, 程力, 周振宇. 黑龙江省甘南县旧石器地点发现的新材料[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(02): 281-291. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||