人类学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (01): 24-40.

• 人类学学报 • 上一篇    下一篇

旧石器时代的火塘与古人类用火

周振宇; 关莹; 王春雪; 高星   

  • 出版日期:2012-03-15 发布日期:2012-03-15

Remains of human fire-use: an overview of Paleolithic hearth and human fire-use behavior

ZHOU Zhen-yu; GUAN Ying; WANG Chun-xue; GAO Xing   

  • Online:2012-03-15 Published:2012-03-15

摘要: 火塘作为旧石器时代反映古人类行为的重要遗迹一直受到学术界的关注。迄今为止, 我国已经发现了丰富的火塘遗迹及其相关遗留物, 但早期发现的火塘受限于本身保存不完整、当时技术手段的缺乏等客观因素及研究者的重视程度不够, 对其研究并不深入。近年来, 随着新遗址、新发现的增多, 发掘、保存和信息提取手段的完善, 越来越多的火塘信息被保存下来, 为开展旧石器时代火塘研究提供了基础和机遇。本文主要介绍近年来学术界对火塘及其遗留物的研究手段和成果, 同时列举了西方一些学者的研究实例, 简要论述火塘在研究史前人类行为中的重要作用。

关键词: 旧石器时代; 火塘; 类型; 功能; 人类行为

Abstract: Fire utilization and control is considered as a distinguished characteristic of human beings within the evolutionary history. Hearth is the material representation of this characteristic, which is one of the most vital archaeological remains of ancient occupants. However, in the prehistoric time, especially in the Old Stone Age, because of the functional, size, shape, and the duration time varieties, hearths are diverse in dissimilar sites. In our study, we define the hearth as intentionally used, maintained and controlled fire, regardless of the physical structure or the duration.
Hearth remains play a considerable role in the study of the evolution of human behaviors, the innovation of ancient diet, the development of social formation, and the interaction of human and the environment. In this paper, we review the published achievement of hearth study regard of types, functions, and the human behavioral interpretations.
In the Lower and Middle Pleistocene, hearth is hard to be preserved, even the unearthed ones are normally not distinguished and defined. Only in Zhoukoudian Loc.1 (Beijing), Jinniushan Cave (Liaoning) and Longyadong Cave (Shaanxi) sites were found hearth remains. While in the Early Upper Pleistocene, more hearths were discovered in archaeological contexts, although rarely be systematic studied. Zhoukoudian Loc.15 (Beijing), Huanglongdong Cave (Hubei), Gezidong Cave (Liaoning), and the like, are all notable with defined earth hearths and the associated remains, such as burnt bones and charcoals. Until the last stage of Pleistocene, which is associated with Late Paleolithic period, the adaptability of human beings was dramatically enhanced, as a result, the surviving mode subsequently varied. Therefore, fire-use activity became to be common and universal. One of the most notable sites from which distinguished hearth remains were found is Hutouliang open air site (Hebei). In Zhijidong Cave site (Henan), Dahe site (Yunnan), Shuidonggou site (Ningxia), Xishan site (Jilin), Chuandong Cave (Guizhou), Heimahe site (Qinghai), Shizitan (Shanxi), earth hearths were also found in situ. These finding provide abundant of information of fire use and management in East Asia during the Pleistocene.
Based on the ethnographic record, prehistoric hearths are divided into two types: the low-investment category, covering the open hearths which is basically a shallow hole in the ground and set fire inside; and the high-investment category, which refer to any other type beyond low-investment category, including structured hearth and oven.
The hearth functions are strongly related to the daily activities of ancient occupants. Therefore, hearth could be used for multiple purposes, including cooking, sleeping by, giving warmth and light and acting as the point around which people relax, chat, social interaction, or perform ceremonies.
Hearth study would bring great significance to Paleolithic archaeology. As the product of comprehensive human behaviors, hearth does not only yield burnt soil, charcoal, ash, etc, but also provide the remains of the ancient cooking. These remnant could considerably help us in paleodiet reconstruction, and the pursuit of the hunting and gathering activities; the distribution and variety of hearth forms could offer the information of the movement of ancient population; meanwhile, the examination of charcoal and ash could help to figure out the fuel, and subsequently indicate the paleoenvironment, speculate the adaptability of ancient occupants.
However, there are several limitations of hearth study. First of all, hearth found in archaeological context is normally incomplete or destroyed, which takes a lot of information away; secondly, hearth with a very short duration in the temporary or seasonal camps are very hard to be preserved and defined. Most of hearths were destroyed during the post-deposit process. Thus, when estimating the properties and functions of a hearth remain, these factors should be considered, while the subjective speculation should be avoided; thirdly, the post-deposition and contamination issues could mislead the researchers and disturb our estimation.
In China, sites with hearths are abundant within large time range including Early and Late Paleolithic period; the sites were recovered in both open air and cave area; the types and forms of hearths are also various. Recent years, with the refining of excavation methods, more and more intact hearths were found. These materials provide the great potential and perspectives of hearth study, and would give great contribute to the interpretation of human behaviors evolution.

Key words: Paleolithic; Hearth; Typology; Human behavior