人类学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (01): 1-13.

• 人类学学报 •    下一篇

从中国和西亚旧石器及道县人牙化石看中国现代人起源

吴新智;徐欣   

  • 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-15

The Origin of Modern Humans in China Viewed from the Paleolithic Data and Daoxian Human Fossils

WU Xinzhi, XU Xin   

  • Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-03-15

摘要: 中国古老型人类在中国现代人起源中的作用主要有三种假说:多地区进化说、取代说和2010年后兴盛的同化说。本文拟就中国13万年来的旧石器和西亚的旧石器以及湖南道县福岩洞人牙化石检验这些假说。考古学研究已经查明,在取代说或同化说所主张的最初居住于近东的现代人所惯用的石器技术属于第3模式。按常理推测,如果其后裔于大约6万年前到达中国而且完全或大部取代原住民,此时中国的石器应表现从第1模式到第3模式的巨变,因为在此时之前第1模式是中国旧石器的主流。表1显示中国不存在如某些遗传学论文所推测的从10万年前到5万年前的人类"断层",从13万年前以来中国旧石器主流仍旧是第1模式,没有发生按照取代说和同化说都必然会导致的在大约6万年前或更早时发生石器技术从第1模式到第3模式的巨变。2015年公布的道县12_8万年前人牙化石表明中国的现代人形态不是如DNA研究所主张的在6万年前才从境外移入的。这些都与多地区进化说的推论一致。

关键词: 旧石器;道县人牙化石;中国;现代人起源

Abstract: In the scenario suggested by both Recent Out of Africa and Assimilation hypotheses the Paleolithic prevalent in Levant during the time of inhabitation of the first population of modern humans in Asia was of Mode III. The proponents of ROA believe that it is most reasonable to infer that the descendants of this population arrived in China around 60kyr and thereafter totally replaced the indigenous population. Because Mode I is persisted in China since its occurrence so a sudden big change from Mode I to Mode III or other derived technique would happen in China during the replacement of the indigenous population by the immigrants. The Assimilation Hypothesis is somewhat different only in that the replacement was subtotal instead of total. To test the main hypotheses debating on the origin of modern humans in China, the authors present almost all Paleolithic sites of China with chronometric dates later than 130kyr in Table 1 in which the name, latitude and longitude of sites, dates, techniques of dating and Modes can be easily understood by English speaking people. This Table shows the technique of most of the sites are of Mode I, only a few are of Mode III, Mode IV and Mode V. The Mode III occurred as late as nearly 40kyr ago at Shuidonggou site. This circumstance is in accordance with the Multiregional Evolution hypothesis which predicts the persistence of Mode I in China before and after any date of the postulated replacement of indigenous population in China. In addition, the much fewer existence of Paleolithic sites of Modes other than Mode I supports the hypothesis of “Continuity with Hybridization” for human evolution in China. Other more Paleolithic sites without chronometric date but being attributed to Late Pleistocene based on faunal and stratigraphical correlations and yielding stone artefacts of Mode I further strengthen the conclusions of this paper. The newely published Daoxian human fossil teeth of 120-80 kya provide further evidence that the modern huamn morphology of China is more probably originated in native territory than from immigrants.

Key words: Modern human origin; China; Paleolithic; Daoxian human fossils