人类学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (02): 228-240.

• 人类学学报 • 上一篇    下一篇

现代各主要人群额骨3D几何形态的对比

崔娅铭   

  • 出版日期:2018-06-15 发布日期:2018-06-15

Comparison of frontal morphology among modern major populations: A 3D geometric morphometric study

CUI Yaming   

  • Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-06-15

摘要: 额骨是连接面颅和脑颅的重要头骨组成部分,关于现代各个人种的额骨形态是否存在明显的差别,这些人种额骨的基本形态如何,变异范围以及与其他人群的相似与差异等问题都尚未完全厘清。而额骨的很多特征由于技术手段的限制很难进行测量和准确的描述比较。鉴于这些问题,本文将采用基于三维表面半标志点的几何形态测量方法,研究东亚现代人额骨的表面形态及其变异范围,并与欧洲,东南亚,美洲,非洲以及澳洲的现代人群的额骨形态进行对比,为对比不同人群的形态研究建立基础数据。结果显示,额骨形态的变异主要表现在:1)额骨鳞部的额结节和正中矢状脊共同向前隆起或回缩以及相对额骨宽度;2)眉弓的粗壮程度,额结节的侧向发育程度和正中矢状脊的发育情况。为了进一步揭示中国现代人与其他人群在额骨形态上的关系,本文还探讨了额骨大小在不同人群中的差异。结果显示,东亚现代人和欧洲现代人额骨中心大小值的中位数最大,澳洲现代人的最小。东亚现代人的额骨形态与澳洲,欧洲和非洲均有非常显著的差异。为了检验额骨的形态是否与遗传距离一致,作者还对额骨形态距离和遗传距离做了相关性分析。结果显示,不同人群的额骨形态与其遗传距离呈显著的相关性,说明本研究结果中不同人群额骨形态上的差异大小可以在一定程度上反映其遗传距离,并可能进一步反映人群历史。东亚现代人的额骨平均形态在与各个人群比较过程中表现出一致性特征,可能在一定程度上反映了东亚现代人群的进化过程是相对独立的。未来额骨的三维几何形态测量可通过扩大标本数量进一步探讨不同性别和不同演化阶段之间的差异。

关键词: 额骨;现代人;三维;几何形态测量

Abstract: The frontal bone is the important cranial part that connects the facial and neurocranial parts of the cranium. Little is known about the variance of the frontal shapes of the major populations in the world. In addition, the complicated surface morphology of frontal bone limits the possibility of further research. The current study aims to investigate the morphological variation of the frontal bone of East Asian modern human population, and the comparisons with other major modern human populations of geographically dispersed locations (Europe, Southeast Asia, America, Africa and Australia), using three-dimensional surface landmarks based geometric morphometric methods. 11 landmarks, 31 curve semi-landmarks and 418 surface semi-landmarks on the frontal bone for each specimen. We then performed 3D geometric morphometric analyses to quantify the frontal shapes. Within the populations included in this study, the main variation is exhibited in following ways: 1) the robusticity of the frontal tubercle of the frontal squama and the relative width of the frontal bone; 2) the development of the superciliary arches, frontal tubercles, and mid-sagittal crest. To further explore the relationships between the frontal morphology of the East Asian population and other populations, we carried out analyses of frontal size and comparisons. The results show that East Asian and European modern human populations exhibits the greatest median of the centroid size of the frontal bone, and Australian the smallest. Permutation test shows that the East Asian and Indian American populations share the closest frontal morphology in terms of Procrustes distance. Statistically significant differences were observed between Australian aboriginals and all the other populations. And the frontal morphology of the East Asian population exhibit significant difference between Australian aboriginals, Europeans and African modern humans. The current study also tested the association between frontal morphology and the genetic distance. The result shows that they are significantly correlated (r=0.214, p=0.002), suggesting that the morphological differences reflect genetic differences to some extent. The frontal morphologies of East Asian population show unique features in the comparison to all the populations included in this study, possibly suggesting a relatively isolated evolutionary history for the East Asian population. Future analyses of geometric morphometrics on the frontal surface will continue to explore the difference between specimens of different gender, and evolutional stage through expanding the sample size of cranial materials.

Key words: Frontal bone; modern human; three dimension; geometric morphometrics