俄罗斯马特盖奇克遗址、卡缅内洛卡遗址试掘简报

doi:10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0022

人类学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 148-156.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0022cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0022

俄罗斯马特盖奇克遗址、卡缅内洛卡遗址试掘简报

高磊¹^,²(), 邹后曦¹^,², 汪伟¹^,², 代玉彪¹^,², Nikolay Ivanovich DROZDVO³

1.重庆市文化遗产研究院,重庆 400013
2.重庆文化遗产保护中心,重庆 400013
3.俄罗斯科学院西伯利亚分院考古学与民族学研究所

收稿日期:2019-07-16 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-15
作者简介:高磊,馆员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。Email: gaoleinwu@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类：XDB26030203)

A preliminary report on the investigation and excavation of Matkechik site and Kamennyy Log site in Russia

GAO Lei¹^,²(), ZOU Houxi¹^,², WANG Wei¹^,², DAI Yubiao¹^,², Nikolay Ivanovich DROZDVO³

1. Chongqing Cultural Heritage Research Institute, Chongqing 400013
2. Chongqing Cultural Heritage protection center, Chongqing 400013
3. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Received:2019-07-16 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

2017年8~9月,重庆市文化遗产研究院同俄罗斯科学院西伯利亚分院考古学与民族学研究所组成联合考古队,对西伯利亚两处旧石器时代遗址进行考古调查与试掘。通过调查与试掘,在叶尼塞河支流—阿巴坎河流域确认了一处旧石器时代晚期遗址—马特盖奇克遗址,该遗址石制品主要包括石核、石片和石器,原料主要是火山岩、燧石和石英岩。通过阶地比对,初步认为该遗址时代为旧石器时代晚期。另外,对库尔塔克卡缅内洛卡遗址的再次发掘出土了44件石制品,包含石核、石片和石器,原料主要是燧石、石英岩和火山岩。此次发掘进一步充实了该遗址的考古材料,也有利于进一步完善该遗址的考古年代学序列。

关键词: 西伯利亚, 旧石器晚期, 马特盖奇克遗址, 卡缅内洛卡遗址

Abstract:

In order to have a further understanding of paleolithic sites in Siberia, a joint archaeological team of Chongqing Institute of Cultural Heritage and Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences was established in 2017. From August to September, two paleolithic sites in the Yenisei river were investigated and excavated, and a new paleolithic site named Matkechik in the valley of the Abakan River was surveyed. Matkechik site (near the village of Matkechik) is located in Abakan city, Republic of Khakassia. The artifacts excavated from the site include pebble cores, flakes and tools. The main raw material of the lithics are volcanics, chert and quartzite. Compared with other sites in the same terrace and similar burial context in the Yenisei River Basin, the age of the Matkechik site should be dated to the late Pleistocene.

Besides, an re-excavation was carried out in Kamennyy Log site, which is located in Kurtak geo-archaeological district. An area of 8 m² was excavated, 44 pieces of artifacts excavated from Cultural Horizon 1 and a piece of stone artifacts was excavated from the profile surface of Cultural Horizon 2. The stone assemblage includes flak cores, flakes, chips and retouched tools, such as scrappers and drill. The raw material can be classified into 4 types, namely chert, vein quartz, quartzite and volcanics, while only chert and vein quartz were major raw materials. This excavation further enriched the archaeological materials of the site and was also conducive to further improving the archaeological chronology sequence of the site.

Key words: Siberia, Late Paleolithic, Matkechik site, Kamennyy Log site

中图分类号:

K871.11

高磊, 邹后曦, 汪伟, 代玉彪, Nikolay Ivanovich DROZDVO. 俄罗斯马特盖奇克遗址、卡缅内洛卡遗址试掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(01): 148-156.

GAO Lei, ZOU Houxi, WANG Wei, DAI Yubiao, Nikolay Ivanovich DROZDVO. A preliminary report on the investigation and excavation of Matkechik site and Kamennyy Log site in Russia[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(01): 148-156.

图/表 5

图1 马特盖奇克遗址地理位置图

Fig.1 Geographic location of the Matkechik site

图2 马特盖奇克遗址TG1地层堆积示意图

Fig.2 Stratigraphic profile of the Matkechik site TG1

图5 马特盖奇克遗址、卡缅内洛卡遗址出土石制品 1.圆头刮削器(2017RHM-II-15);2.近端石片(2017RHM-II-14);3.远端石片(2017RHM-II-15);4.两面器毛坯(2017RHMI-1);5.凹刃刮削器(2017RHM-II-27);6-8. 刮削器(2017RKK-32, 2017RKK-17, 2017RKK-36);9.钻(2017RKK-2);10.石片 (2017RKK-45)。（1-5:马特盖奇克遗址,6-10:卡缅内洛卡遗址）

Fig.5 Lithic artifacts from the Matkechik site and Kamennyy Log site

图3 卡缅内洛卡遗址位置图

Fig.3 Geographic location of the Kamennyy Log site

图4 卡缅内洛卡遗址地层堆积示意图

Fig.4 Stratigraphic profile of the Kamennyy Log site

参考文献 16

[1]	高星. 周口店第15地点石器原料开发方略与经济形态研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20(3): 186-200
[2]	卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A].见:第八届古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001: 209-218
[3]	Абрамова З.А. Палеолит Енисея[M]. Ленинград, 1991: 37-38
[4]	Гурина ВИ. Мезолит и неолит на поселении Бирюса[J]. Этногенез народов Северной Азии. Новосибирск, 1969, Вып.1
[5]	Акимова EB. Поздний палеолит красноярского водохранилища[J]. Иркутского Госудрственного Университета Серия Геоархеология, 2011, 10(7): 111-118
[6]	Zander A, Frechen M, Zykina V, et al. Luminescence chronology of the Upper Pleistocene loess record at Kurtak in Middle Siberia[J]. Quaternary ence Reviews, 2003, 22(10): 999-1010
[7]	Frechen M, et al. The loess record from the section at Kurtak in Middle Siberia[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2005, 228: 228-244 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.004 URL
[8]	Kuzmin YV, Orlova LA. Radiocarbon Chronology of the Siberian Paleolithic[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 1998, 12(1): 1-53 doi: 10.1023/A:1022431307503 URL
[9]	VasiI’ev SA. The Late Paleolithic of the Yenisei: A New Outline[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 1992, 6(3): 1-47 doi: 10.1007/BF00997584 URL
[10]	Derevianko AP, Shimkin DB, Powers WR. The Paleolithic of Siberia: new discoveries and interpretations[M]. Champaign: Illinois University Press, 1998
[11]	Drozdov NI, Chekha VP, Laukhin SA, et al. Chronostratigraphy of Palaeolithic sites of Central Siberia (the Yenisei Basin)[A]. In: Chronostgratigraphy of Palaeolithic of Northern, Central and Eastern Asia, and America[C]. Novosibirsk, 1990, 7-64
[12]	Cherkinskiy AE, Akimova EV, Bokarev AA, et al. Radiocarbon dating of Palaeolithic sites in the Yenisei River valley in the Eastern Sayan Foothills[A]. In: The Kurtak Archaeological Region: New Data on Chronostratigraphy of the Kurtak Archaeological Region (Palaeoecological Aspects)[C]. Krasnoyarsk, 1990, 10-18
[13]	Orlova IL, Laukhin SA, Chekha VP. Radiocarbon dates of the Kurtak Pedocomplex[A]. In: Chronostgratigraphy of Palaeolithic of Northern, Central and Eastern Asia, and America[C]. Krasnoyarsk, 1990, 3-9
[14]	Svezhentsev, Yu C, Lisitsin NF, et al. Radiocarbon chronology of the Yenisei Palaeolithic[A]. In: Chronostgratigraphy of Palaeolithic of Northern, Central and Eastern Asia, and America[C]. Novosibirsk, 1990, 57-64
[15]	Chlachula J. Pleistocene climate change, natural environments and palaeolithic occupation of the upper Yenisei area, south-central Siberia[J]. Quaternary International, 2001, 80-81: 101-130 doi: 10.1016/S1040-6182(01)00022-2 URL
[16]	Chlachula J. The Siberian loess record and its significance for reconstruction of Pleistocene climate change in north-central Asia[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2003, 22: 1879-1906 doi: 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00182-3 URL

俄罗斯马特盖奇克遗址、卡缅内洛卡遗址试掘简报

A preliminary report on the investigation and excavation of Matkechik site and Kamennyy Log site in Russia

在线阅读

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 16

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	成楠, 夏文婷, 杨青, 吉学平, 字兴, 范斌, 邹梓宁, 余童, 张俞, 石林, 张吾奇, 郑洪波. 云南巍山三鹤洞地点的石制品及年代与环境[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 392-404.
[2]	李昱龙, 杨剑, 霍耀, 马建东. 宁夏海原县南华山旧石器考古调查[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(03): 491-500.
[3]	武仙竹, 陈育芝, Drozdov NI. 西伯利亚李斯特文卡遗址的大缺齿鼹化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(06): 1032-1040.
[4]	关莹;蔡回阳;王新金;许春华;魏屹;周振宇;高星. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址1985年出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(03): 304-317.
[5]	仪明洁;高星;王惠民;裴树文;陈福友. 水洞沟第12地点2007年出土石核研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(02): 166-179.
[6]	范雪春; 吴金鹏; 黄运明; 左子娟. 福建晋江深沪湾潮间带旧石器遗址[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(03): 299-306.
[7]	张东菊; 陈发虎; 吉笃学; L Barton; PJ Brantingham; 王辉. 甘肃苏苗塬头地点石制品特征与古环境分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(03): 289-298.
[8]	陈全家,张乐. 吉林延边珲春北山发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(02): 138-145.
[9]	朱泓. 内蒙古宁城山嘴子辽墓契丹族颅骨的人类学特征[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 10(04): 278-287.
[10]	朱泓. 扎赉诺尔汉代墓葬第三次发掘出土颅骨的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1989, 8(02): 0-130、200.
[11]	尤玉柱. 论华北旧石器晚期遗址的分布、埋藏以及地质时代问题[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(01): 68-75.