人类学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (05): 638-650.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0023cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0023

• 简报/发掘报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

2014年山西下川遗址富益河圪梁地点3号探方的发掘报告

杜水生1(), 张婷1, 任海云2()   

  1. 1.北京师范大学历史学院,北京100875
    2.山西省考古研究所,太原030001
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-31 修回日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 任海云,博士,主要研究方向为旧石器时代考古。E-mail: haiyunren@163.com
  • 作者简介:杜水生,博士,主要研究方向为旧石器时代考古。E-mail: ssdu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目(20&ZD257)

2014 excavation report of the Fuyihegeliang Locality Pit 3 of Xiachuan site, Shanxi

DU Shuisheng1(), ZHANG Ting1, REN Haiyun2()   

  1. 1. Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
    2. Shanxi Archaological Institute, Taiyuan 030001
  • Received:2022-07-31 Revised:2022-10-31 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

摘要:

2014年夏季,我们对下川遗址的富益河圪梁地点北部进行了发掘,本文对其3号探方(QX2014-T3)的发掘成果进行了报道。T3的面积为6 m2,出土石制品1036件;其中,183件出自上文化层,853件出自下文化层。石制品原料主要为石英砂岩和黑色燧石,另外还有少量的玛瑙、硅质泥岩等。下文化层石制品包括石核、石片和石器等;其中,石器的类型包括重型石斧、研磨器、石锤和轻型刮削器、凹缺器、尖状器、锯齿状器、楔形析器、圆头刮削器、齿状器、琢背小刀,赤铁矿;打片和修理均采用为简单的锤击法;年代为40~30 kaBP。上文化层发现的石制品以细石叶产品为主,石核包括普通的多台面石核、锥形细石核、船形细石核,石片为普通石片和细石叶共存,石器包括刮削器、圆头刮削器等;年代晚于30 kaBP。

关键词: 下川, 石制品, 细石叶, 旧石器时代晚期

Abstract:

In summer 2014, we excavated the Fuyihegeliang Locality Pit 3(named QX2014T3, 35°26′22′′N, 112°0′43′′E) for 6 m2 in area, which is an important locality of the Xiachuan site. There were 1036 stone artifacts recovered from the pit, with 853 pieces from the Lower Cultural Layer and 183 from the Upper Cultural Layer. The lower layer dated to 40~30 kaBP with the upper layer formed after 30 kaBP.

Exotic black flint was the predominant raw material, and included light-duty tools such as scrapers, pièces esquillées, denticulates, endscrapers and backed segments. In the Lower Cultural Layer, heavy-duty implements such as grinding tools, stone axes and adze-like tools were mostly of local quartz sandstone. There was also a small amount of agate and siliceous mudstone used.

The Lower Cultural Layer objects were formed directly from hard hammer percussion without prepared cores. Products lacked standardization. In the Upper Cultural Layer, pressure flaking was widely used in producing microblades and retouched tools.

Heavy-duty tools (stone axes and adze-like tools) were missing from the Upper Cultural Layer, which also showed different retouching methods. For example, endscapers were mostly processed by hard hammer in the Lower Cultural Layer, in contrast to pressure flaking of the Upper Cultural Layer.

In general, the cultural technology of these two layers was different. The Lower Culture Layer belonged to a simple core-flake technology with heavy-duty tools (stone axes, grinding tools, stone hammers) and light-duty tools (scrapers, notches, points, denticulates, pièces esquillées, endscrapers, spur-like tools, backed segments). The Upper Cultural Layer was mostly microblade technology, with burins, endscraper and pièces esquillées as the main tool types. These findings offer new materials for research of the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition and the emergence of microblade technology in China.

Key words: Xiachuan, Lithics, Microblade, Upper Paleolithic

中图分类号: