人类学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (02): 259-272.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0021
收稿日期:
2022-12-26
修回日期:
2023-11-09
出版日期:
2024-04-15
发布日期:
2024-04-02
通讯作者:
李法军,教授,主要从事生物人类学研究。E-mail: 作者简介:
叶梓琪,博士研究生,主要从事生物人类学研究。E-mail: yezq5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
YE Ziqi1,2(), HE Anyi3, LIANG You3, LI Fajun1,4()
Received:
2022-12-26
Revised:
2023-11-09
Online:
2024-04-15
Published:
2024-04-02
摘要:
距今约7000~6000年的广西灰窑田遗址是顶蛳山文化的重要遗址之一,其所出人类遗骸为探讨岭南地区史前时期渔猎-采集型人群的肢体活动方式、活动强度以及两性劳动分工等问题提供了重要的研究样本。髌骨作为膝关节的重要组成,其形态变异特征在一定程度上可以反应个体膝关节的活动程度与特点。本文采用三维几何形态测量方法对该遗址出土的43例人类髌骨进行分析,从侧别对称性、性别二态性以及年龄差异性等三个方面考察了髌骨的大小和形态差异。研究结果表明,该遗址古人类髌骨发育存在明显的左侧优势,髌尖呈右偏趋势。男性髌骨尺寸较大,但两性髌骨形态未见显著差异。该遗址个体髌骨形态随年龄增长呈现出与股四头肌力量增强、屈伸运动强度与频率增加相关的变化特征。
中图分类号:
叶梓琪, 何安益, 梁优, 李法军. 广西灰窑田史前遗址人类髌骨的形态变异[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 259-272.
YE Ziqi, HE Anyi, LIANG You, LI Fajun. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of patella morphology of the Neolithic people from Huiyaotian site in South China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 259-272.
图1 右侧髌骨上15个地标点位置示意图 注:1. 内侧缘最突出点(II类点,以下简称II)Most projecting point in the medial external margin (Landmark Type II, abbreviated as II below); 2. 股四头肌附着区边缘与内侧缘交点(I类点,以下简称I)Cross of the edge of the m. quadriceps enthesis with the medial external margin (Landmark Type I, abbreviated as I below); 3. 股四头肌附着边缘最突出点(II)The most projecting point on the edge of the m. quadriceps enthesis (II); 4. 股四头肌与股外侧肌斜肌附着区边缘交点(I)Cross of the edge of the m. quadriceps enthesis with the m. vastus lateralis oblique enthesis (I); 5. 股外侧肌斜肌附着区边缘与外侧缘交点(I)Cross of the edge of the m. vastus lateralis oblique enthesis with the lateral external margin (I); 6. 外侧缘最突出点(II)Most projecting point in the lateral external margin (II); 7. 外侧缘最突出点与髌尖间弧线曲率最大点(II)Point of the maximum lateral curvature between the most projecting point and the apex (II); 8. 髌尖, 即远端最突出点(I)Apex; most projected distal point (I); 9. 内侧缘最突出点与髌尖间弧线曲率最大点(II)Point of the maximum medial curvature between the most projecting point and the apex (II); 10. 垂直脊最上点(I)The uppermost point of the vertical ridge (articular surface) (I); 11. 股外侧肌斜肌附着点与关节面上缘交点(I)Cross of the edge of the m. vastus lateralis oblique enthesis with the upper margin of articular surface (I); 12. 垂直脊最凹点(II)The deepest point of the vertical ridge (articular surface) (II); 13. 垂直脊最下点(I)The lowermost point of the vertical ridge (articular surface) (I); 14. 外侧关节面最深点(II)Deepest point of the lateral facet (II); 15. 内侧关节面最深点(II)Deepest point of the medial facet (II)
Fig.1 Location of 15-landmark set on a right patella
图2 髌骨几何形态变异主成分分析 a. 主成分分析PC1-2散点图,使用性别、体侧分组标注散点scatter plot of PC1-2 by sex and side;b. PC1-2变形网格可视化所示主要成分变异极值形状,红色箭头表示变形方向 3D shape features of PC1-2, with TPS grids showing the grand mean shape (consensus) and the red arrows noting the deformation trends
Fig.2 Principle component analysis of the patellae
分组Group | 方差分析AV | 普氏方差分析 Procrustes AV | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
自由度 df | 离差平方和Ss | 均方 Sm | R2 | 统计量 F | 显著性Pr(>F) | 自由度 df | 离差平方和Ss | 均方 Sm | R2 | 统计量 F | 显著性Pr(>F) | ||
个体Individual | 9 | 271.57 | 30.17 | 0.86 | 13.42 | ** | 9 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.48 | 2.53 | ** | |
侧别Side | 1 | 24.42 | 24.42 | 0.08 | 10.86 | * | 1 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 15.43 | ** | |
波动不对称性 indi×side | 9 | 20.24 | 2.25 | 0.06 | 9 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.19 |
表2 基于侧别、性别和年龄分组的质心尺寸及形状差异方差分析结果
Tab.2 PAA results of centroid sizes and shape variation by side
分组Group | 方差分析AV | 普氏方差分析 Procrustes AV | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
自由度 df | 离差平方和Ss | 均方 Sm | R2 | 统计量 F | 显著性Pr(>F) | 自由度 df | 离差平方和Ss | 均方 Sm | R2 | 统计量 F | 显著性Pr(>F) | ||
个体Individual | 9 | 271.57 | 30.17 | 0.86 | 13.42 | ** | 9 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.48 | 2.53 | ** | |
侧别Side | 1 | 24.42 | 24.42 | 0.08 | 10.86 | * | 1 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 15.43 | ** | |
波动不对称性 indi×side | 9 | 20.24 | 2.25 | 0.06 | 9 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.19 |
组别Groups | 配对样本数 n | 质心尺寸Centriod size | 普氏距离值Procrustes distance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
σ | p | σ | p | |||||
年龄Age(a) | 15~19 | 2 | 58.86 | 1.76 | - | 0.00030 | 0.000008 | - |
20~29* | 4 | 59.71 | 1.54 | 0.03 | 0.00032 | 0.000052 | 0.37 | |
30~39* | 8 | 67.15 | 2.67 | 0.14 | 0.00029 | 0.000045 | 0.95 | |
40~49* | 4 | 65.67 | 2.53 | 0.96 | 0.00030 | 0.000020 | 0.80 | |
50~59 | 2 | 67.19 | 2.35 | - | 0.00025 | 0.000016 | - | |
性别Sex | 男Male* | 16 | 65.75 | 3.58 | 0.04 | 0.00029 | 0.000040 | 0.81 |
女Female* | 4 | 59.71 | 1.54 | 0.03 | 0.00030 | 0.000052 | 0.37 | |
配对样本 Paired samples | 左L* | 20 | 65.64 | 3.79 | 0.01 | 0.00029 | 0.000048 | 0.79 |
右R* | 63.43 | 4.25 | 0.00029 | 0.000032 |
表3 成对样本的质心尺寸、普氏距离分布及对应配对t检验结果
Tab.3 The centroid sizes, Procrustes distances, and results of pairwise t test for paired specimens
组别Groups | 配对样本数 n | 质心尺寸Centriod size | 普氏距离值Procrustes distance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
σ | p | σ | p | |||||
年龄Age(a) | 15~19 | 2 | 58.86 | 1.76 | - | 0.00030 | 0.000008 | - |
20~29* | 4 | 59.71 | 1.54 | 0.03 | 0.00032 | 0.000052 | 0.37 | |
30~39* | 8 | 67.15 | 2.67 | 0.14 | 0.00029 | 0.000045 | 0.95 | |
40~49* | 4 | 65.67 | 2.53 | 0.96 | 0.00030 | 0.000020 | 0.80 | |
50~59 | 2 | 67.19 | 2.35 | - | 0.00025 | 0.000016 | - | |
性别Sex | 男Male* | 16 | 65.75 | 3.58 | 0.04 | 0.00029 | 0.000040 | 0.81 |
女Female* | 4 | 59.71 | 1.54 | 0.03 | 0.00030 | 0.000052 | 0.37 | |
配对样本 Paired samples | 左L* | 20 | 65.64 | 3.79 | 0.01 | 0.00029 | 0.000048 | 0.79 |
右R* | 63.43 | 4.25 | 0.00029 | 0.000032 |
图3 髌骨尺寸及形状年龄差异的量化 a.各年龄段髌骨质心尺寸分布箱式图Boxplots of centroid size by age;b.各年龄段的髌骨平均形状The mean shape of each age group, with TPS grids showing the grand mean shape
Fig.3 Quantification of patella bilateral asymmetry in size and morphology
图4 人类髌骨主要解剖学特征(以右侧为例) 1.股外侧肌斜肌附着区Enthesis of vastus lateralis oblique muscle; 2.髌外侧支持带附着区Enthesis of lateral retinaculum; 3.股直肌-内侧肌附着区Enthesis of rectus femoris and vastus medialis muscle; 4.髌面Patellar surface; 5.内侧关节面Medial articular surface; 6.外侧关节面Lateral articular surface; 7.内侧支持带附着区Enthesis of medial retinaculum
Fig.4 Main anatomical features of human patella (Right patella)
[1] | 李珍, 黄云忠. 南宁市灰窑田新石器时代遗址[C].见:国家文物局.2006年中国重要考古发现[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2007, 381-382 |
[2] | 梁优, 何安益. 广西壮族自治区南宁市青秀区灰窑田新石器时代贝丘遗址[Z].见:中国考古学会.中国考古学年鉴(2017)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2017, 380-381 |
[3] | Matsumura H, Hung HC, Li Z, et al. Bio-anthropological studies of early Holocene hunter-gatherer sites at Huiyaotian and Liyupo in Guangxi, China[M]. Tokyo: National Museum of Nature and Science Monographs, No.47, 2017 |
[4] | 李珍. 邕宁顶蛳山贝丘遗址[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2008, 5: 119-122 |
[5] | Hung H, Zhang C, Matsumura H, et al. Neolithic transition in Guangxi: A long development of hunting-gathering society in southern China[A]. In: Matsumura H, Hung HC, Li Z, et al (eds). Bio-anthropological studies of early Holocene hunter-gatherer sites at Huiyaotian and Liyupo in Guangxi, China[C]. Tokyo: National Museum of Nature and Science Monographs, No.47, 2017, 205-228 |
[6] | 何安益, 彭长林, 刘资民, 等. 广西资源县晓锦新石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2004, 3: 7-30 |
[7] | 张弛, 洪晓纯. 华南和西南地区农业出现的时间及相关问题[J]. 南方文物, 2009, 3: 64-71 |
[8] | 李法军. 鲤鱼墩遗址史前人类行为模式的骨骼生物力学分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(2): 193-215 |
[9] | 李法军. 华南地区史前人类骨骼的生物力学特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(4): 599-615 |
[10] | 梅欣欣. 广西崇左冲塘-何村古人类长骨生物力学研究[D]. 广州: 中山大学硕士学位论文, 2020 |
[11] |
McHenry HM. Biomechanical interpretation of the early hominid hip[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1975, 4(5): 343-355
doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(75)90017-2 URL |
[12] |
Turley K, Guthrie EH, Frost SR. Geometric morphometric analysis of Tibial shape and presentation among catarrhine taxa[J]. Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 294(2): 217-230
doi: 10.1002/ar.21307 pmid: 21234995 |
[13] |
Knigge RP, Tocheri MW, Orr CM, et al. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of talar morphology in extant gorilla taxa from highland and lowland habitats[J]. Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 2015, 298(1): 277-290
doi: 10.1002/ar.23069 pmid: 25338937 |
[14] |
Lovejoy CO. The natural history of human gait and posture: Part 3. The knee[J]. Gait & posture, 2007, 25(3): 325-341
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.001 URL |
[15] |
Frelat MA, Shaw CN, Sukhdeo S, et al. Evolution of the hominin knee and ankle[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2017, 108: 147-160
doi: S0047-2484(17)30116-1 pmid: 28622927 |
[16] | 惠家明. 现代人股骨远端形态变异及其功能适应性——以全新世中国人群为例[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学硕士学位论文, 2020 |
[17] |
Lanyon LE, Goodship AE, Pye C, et al. Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling[J]. Journal of biomechanics, 1982, 15(3): 141-154
pmid: 7096367 |
[18] |
Ruff C, Holt B, Trinkaus E. Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?:“Wolff's law” and bone functional adaptation[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2006, 129(4): 484-498
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.v129:4 URL |
[19] | Dwek JR, Chung CB. The patellar extensor apparatus of the knee[J]. Pediatric Radiology, Springer, 2008, 38(9): 925-935 |
[20] | 杜清太. 长春地区出土的髌骨测量[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(2): 114-117 |
[21] | 周盛斌, 张飚, 荣玉山, 等. 中国汉族成人髌骨性别判别初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1997, 1: 32-38 |
[22] | 张继宗. 法医人类学基础[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007 |
[23] |
Morimoto I. Secular Trend in Emargination of the Japanese Patella, with Special Reference to the Skeletal Gracility of the Earliest Jomon People[J]. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon, 1975, 83(1): 85-94
doi: 10.1537/ase1911.83.85 URL |
[24] | Martin R, Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie II[M]. Stuttgart: G.Fischer, 1957 |
[25] |
Wiberg G. Roentgenographs and anatomic studies on the femoropatellar joint: with special reference to chondromalacia patellae[J]. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1941, 12(1-4): 319-410
doi: 10.3109/17453674108988818 URL |
[26] | 朱泓 (主编). 体质人类学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004 |
[27] | White T D, Folkens P A. The human bone manual[M]. Burlington: Elsevier, 2005 |
[28] | Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 |
[29] |
Rosas A, Agustina BL, García-Martínez D, et al. Analyses of the neandertal patellae from El Sidrón (Asturias, Spain) with implications for the evolution of body form in Homo[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 141: 102738
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102738 URL |
[30] |
Menéndez LP. Comparing methods to assess intraobserver measurement error of 3D craniofacial landmarks using geometric morphometrics through a digitizer arm[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2017, 62(3): 741-746
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13301 pmid: 27874192 |
[31] |
Palancar CA, Torres-Tamayo N, García-Martínez D, et al. Comparative anatomy and 3D geometric morphometrics of the El Sidrón atlases (C1)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 149: 102897
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102897 URL |
[32] |
Adams DC, Otárola-Castillo E. Geomorph: An R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013, 4(4): 393-399
doi: 10.1111/mee3.2013.4.issue-4 URL |
[33] | Schlager S. Chapter 9 - morpho and rvcg-shape analysis in R: R-packages for geometric morphometrics, shape analysis and surface manipulations[A]. In: Zheng G, Li S, Székely G(eds). Statistical shape and deformation analysis[M]. New York: Academic Press, 2017, 217-256 |
[34] |
Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2011, 11(2): 353-357
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x pmid: 21429143 |
[35] |
Schaefer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, et al. Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids[J]. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger, 2004, 186(5): 471-478
doi: 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80086-4 URL |
[36] |
Klingenberg CP. Size, shape, and form: Concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics[J]. Development Genes and Evolution, 2016, 226(3): 113-137
doi: 10.1007/s00427-016-0539-2 pmid: 27038023 |
[37] | Renaud S, Ecalle B, Claisse P, et al. Patterns of bilateral asymmetry and allometry in late Devonian Polygnathus conodonts[J]. Palaeontology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2021, 64(1): 137-159 |
[38] | Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: Analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods[J]. Evolution, Wiley Online Library, 1998, 52(5): 1363-1375 |
[39] |
Trinkaus E. Functional aspects of Neandertal pedal remains[J]. Foot and Ankle, 1983, 3(6): 377-390
pmid: 6409716 |
[40] |
Marchi D, Walker C S, Wei P, et al. The thigh and leg of Homo naledi[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2017, 104: 174-204
doi: S0047-2484(16)30124-5 pmid: 27855981 |
[41] |
Rosas A, Agustina BL, García-Martínez D, et al. Analyses of the neandertal patellae from El Sidrón (Asturias, Spain) with implications for the evolution of body form in Homo[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 141: 102738
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102738 URL |
[42] | Scuderi GR, Kibiuk LV, Insall JN. The patella[M]. New York: Springer, 1995 |
[43] |
Trinkaus E. Human patellar articular proportions: recent and Pleistocene patterns[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 2000, 196(3): 473-483
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19630473.x URL |
[44] | Wheatley MGA, Clouthier AL, Thelen DG, et al. Patella Apex Influences Patellar Ligament Forces and Ratio[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2021, 143(8): 081014 |
[45] |
Pina M, Almécija S, Alba DM, et al. The middle Miocene ape Pierolapithecus catalaunicus exhibits extant great ape-like morphometric affinities on its patella: Inferences on knee function and evolution[J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9(3): e91944
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091944 URL |
[46] | Hahn T, Foldspang A. The Q angle and sport[J]. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, Wiley Online Library, 1997, 7(1): 43-48 |
[47] | Livingston LA. The quadriceps angle: A review of the literature[J]. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1998, 28(2): 105-109 |
[48] |
Livingston LA, Mandigo JL. Bilateral Q angle asymmetry and anterior knee pain syndrome[J]. Clinical biomechanics, 1999, 14(1): 7-13
doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00045-x pmid: 10619085 |
[49] |
Raveendranath R, Nachiket S, Sujatha N, et al. Bilateral variability of the quadriceps angle (Q angle) in an adult indian population[J]. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2011, 14(5): 465
pmid: 23493777 |
[50] |
Prakash S, Choudhary M, Manjappa C. Influence of gender and bilateral variability of the quadriceps angle (Q angle) among adults[J]. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 2019, 5(2): 688-691
doi: 10.22271/ortho URL |
[51] |
Shultz SJ, Nguyen AD. Bilateral asymmetries in clinical measures of lower-extremity anatomic characteristics[J]. Clinical journal of sport medicine, 2007, 17(5): 357-361
pmid: 17873547 |
[52] |
Eckhoff DG, Jacofsky DJ, Springer BD, et al. Bilateral symmetrical comparison of femoral and tibial anatomic features[J]. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(5): 1083-1090
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.021 URL |
[53] | 郑靖中. 西安地区现代人胫骨的人类学研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1987, 6(1): 19-27 |
[54] |
Introna F, Di Vella G, Campobasso CP. Sex determination by discriminant analysis of patella measurements[J]. Forensic Science International, 1998, 95(1): 39-45
pmid: 9718670 |
[55] |
Auerbach BM, Ruff CB. Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: Variability and commonality among modern humans[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2006, 50(2): 203-218
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.09.004 pmid: 16310833 |
[1] | 吴妍, 谢光茂, 赵克良, 蒙长旺, 陈冠翰, 汪静怡, 林强. 广西崇左江西岸遗址人类的生存方式[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 380-391. |
[2] | 张颖奇, Terry HARRISON. 化石人猿超科成员指趾骨弯曲程度与位移行为[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(04): 659-673. |
[3] | 王元, 王一飒, 王奕迪, 秦超, 秦大公, 金昌柱. 广西扶绥岩亮洞与巨猿伴生的鼠亚科及其动物群的层序对比[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(06): 1041-1054. |
[4] | 雷蕾, 贺乐天, 李大伟, 李浩. 三维几何形态测量方法在石制品分析中的应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(06): 970-980. |
[5] | 潘雷, 廖卫, 王伟, 刘建辉, 吉学平, 杨晓梅, 郝以鑫. 禄丰古猿蝴蝶种下第四前臼齿釉质-齿质交界面的三维几何形态[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(04): 555-563. |
[6] | 魏偏偏. 云南丽江古人类股骨的形态结构[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(04): 616-631. |
[7] | 崔娅铭. 现代各主要人群额骨3D几何形态的对比[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(02): 228-240. |
[8] | 周亚威;刘明明;冯春艳;韩长松. 徐堡遗址龙山文化居民颅骨的形态学研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(01): 18-28. |
[9] | 周璇;玉洪荣;李炎;周丽宁;龚继春;龚建古;徐林;刘鹏;邓琼英. 广西少数民族成年女性体成分的差异及年龄变化规律[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(02): 260-267. |
[10] | 王元;秦大公;严亚玲;金昌柱. 广西崇左泊岳山巨猿洞早更新世的鼠科化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(04): 561-571. |
[11] | 张亚盟;魏偏偏;吴秀杰. 现代人头骨断面轮廓的性别鉴定——基于几何形态测量的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(02): 172-180. |
[12] | 王芳;沈茂祥;张继宗;杨超朋. 中国汉族男性不同年龄阶段面貌特征的编码[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(02): 300-308. |
[13] | 崔娅铭. 现代各主要人群中面部3D几何形态的对比[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(01): 89-100. |
[14] | 徐钦琦;金昌柱;张颖奇;王元;朱敏;严亚玲;王乃文;何希贤;李素萍. 关于广西崇左地区早更新世的三次生物事件[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(01): 121-124. |
[15] | 周丽宁;龚继春;伦军;邓琼英;覃耀春. 广西毛南族DXS7133、DXS8378、DXS6789和DXS7423基因座遗传多态性[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(03): 397-403. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||