人类学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (02): 314-320.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0028

• 简报/发掘报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

天津蓟州区朝阳洞遗址2号地点发掘简报

魏天旭1(), 王春雪1(), 张雪微1, 王家琪1, 盛立双2   

  1. 1.吉林大学考古学院,长春 130012
    2.天津市文化遗产保护中心,天津 300170
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-15 修回日期:2023-12-05 出版日期:2024-04-15 发布日期:2024-04-02
  • 通讯作者: 王春雪
  • 作者简介:魏天旭,博士,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: weitianxu0817@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    科技部国家重点研发计划(2020YFC1521500)

A preliminary report of the excavation of Chaoyang Cave 2 in Jizhou County, Tianjin City

WEI Tianxu1(), WANG Chunxue1(), ZHANG Xuewei1, WANG Jiaqi1, SHENG Lishuang2   

  1. 1. School of Archaeology Jilin University, Changchun 130012
    2. Protection Center of Cultural Heritage in Tianjin, Tianjin 300170
  • Received:2023-10-15 Revised:2023-12-05 Online:2024-04-15 Published:2024-04-02
  • Contact: WANG Chunxue

摘要:

朝阳洞遗址是天津市首个发掘的旧石器时代洞穴遗址。该遗址在2015年旧石器专项调查中发现。2019年7-9月,天津市文化遗产保护中心联合吉林大学考古学院对其进行发掘。该遗址由1号地点和2号地点组成,1号地点出土了陶器、石制品和动物化石,2号地点仅出土了石制品。本文只研究2号地点出土的石制品,包括石片和石器。从石片特征判断,2号地点剥片技术为直接锤击法。石器的类型简单,只有刮削器和凹缺器两类,均以石片为毛坯。通过地质地层对比以及石器工业面貌,推测其年代应为旧石器时代晚期。朝阳洞遗址的发现不仅为构建天津地区旧石器时代的年代序列增添了新材料,而且对揭示该地区的早期人类行为具有重要意义。

关键词: 晚更新世, 石制品, 天津蓟州区, 朝阳洞遗址

Abstract:

Jizhou District, located in the northern part of Tianjin, contains all the Paleolithic sites found in Tianjin, which is of vital importance for research on ancient human activity in the region, so it can be called as the cradle of Paleolithic archaeology in Tianjin. In May 2015, an archaeological survey of Paleolithic sites in Jizhou, Tianjin was conducted by a team led by the Protection Center of Cultural Heritage in Tianjin and School of Archaeology Jilin University.More than ten open-air Paleolithic site was newly discovered in this survey. The Chaoyang Cave site, sitting in the northern mountainous region of Jizhou District, was discovered during this survey and was formally excavated from July to September 2019, making it the first excavated Paleolithic cave site in Tianjin. The site consists of Cave 1 and Cave 2, with pottery, stone artifacts and animal fossils unearthed from Cave 1 and stone artifacts unearthed from Cave 2. This article only studies the stone artifacts unearthed from Cave 2.The cultural deposits is about 4 m thick. The stratigraphy of the site consisted of 4 layers (from top to bottom): Layer 1, humus soil layer(containing angular gravel); Layer 2, Clay layer(containing angular gravel); Layer 3, cultural deposits including artifacts; and Layer 4, bedrock (limestone). Stone artifacts from Cave 2 were excavated form Layer 3. A total of 66 stone artifacts were collected from deposits and include flakes and retouched tools. Raw materials were mainly High-quality flint, probably selected from river gravels. Flakes were generally micro to small in size. Hard-hammer percussion was more common than bipolar percussion. The type of tools is simple, including only scrapers and notch, whereas most of their blanks are flakes. Technological analysis suggests that flake-tool production system based mainly on small flake blanked scrapers. The small number of stone artifacts at the site, including only stone flakes and a very small number of retouched tools, and the absence of other types of relics, suggest that Chaoyang Cave 2 was a temporary camp. The dating results of Cave 2 are not yet available but based on the analysis of the stone artifacts and sediments, together with comparative studies with other Paleolithic sites and localities in Tianjin, it is assumed that the date could be not later than the Upper Paleolithic. Research on the Chaoyang Cave site is important for exploring the relationship between different stone-tool industries in Tianjin, improving the chronological sequence of the Paleolithic and revealing early human behaviors in the area.

Key words: Late Pleistocene, Stone artifacts, Jizhou District in Tianjin, Chaoyang Cave Site

中图分类号: