人类学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 12-20.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0006cstr: 32091.14.j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0006
杨石霞1,2,3, 岳健平1,2,4
收稿日期:
2017-10-25
出版日期:
2020-02-15
发布日期:
2020-07-17
作者简介:
杨石霞(1988-),女,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所副研究员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail:yangshixia@ivpp.ac.cn
基金资助:
YANG Shixia1,2,3, YUE Jianping1,2,4
Received:
2017-10-25
Online:
2020-02-15
Published:
2020-07-17
摘要:
石器原料研究一直是史前考古学研究工作的一项重要内容。在探明石器原料质量和来源的基础上,将原料的选择和利用方式与石器技术、环境背景等相结合,可以进一步解读当时人类的认知和活动能力。本文立足于原料性质和原料来源两个方面,总结了现有的主要石制品原料研究方法及其应用情况。在此基础上,结合近年来我国泥河湾及东北地区相关研究案例,讨论石器原料研究及多学科研究方法对于解读史前人类资源认知和开发能力的重要作用。
中图分类号:
杨石霞, 岳健平. 史前人类对资源的认知和开发能力——石器原料研究的方法与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(01): 12-20.
YANG Shixia, YUE Jianping. The raw material study and its application on explanation of prehistoric habitants’ cognitive level and behavioral pattern[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(01): 12-20.
原料/Raw material | Layer 2 | Layer 3 | Layer 4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
玻屑凝灰岩/vitric tuff | 16 | 2.55 | 53 | 2.64 | 245 | 89.09 |
晶屑凝灰岩/crystal tuff | 144 | 22.97 | 1394 | 69.49 | 2 | 0.73 |
流纹岩/rhyolite | 3 | 0.48 | 233 | 11.62 | 14 | 5.07 |
红柱石角岩/andalusite-hornfels | 167 | 26.63 | 214 | 10.67 | 13 | 5.11 |
燧石/chert | 4 | 0.64 | 52 | 2.59 | -- | -- |
玛瑙/agate | 247 | 39.39 | 18 | 0.9 | -- | -- |
石英砂岩/quartz sandstone | 3 | 0.48 | 34 | 1.69 | -- | -- |
页岩/shale | 20 | 3.19 | 2 | 0.1 | -- | -- |
石英/quartz | 8 | 1.28 | 4 | 0.2 | -- | -- |
其他/others | 14 | 2.39 | 2 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.36 |
总计/Total | 627 | 100 | 2006 | 100 | 275 | 100 |
表1 桃山遗址各文化层的石制品原料类型
Tab.1 Raw material types of the stone artifacts of Taoshan site
原料/Raw material | Layer 2 | Layer 3 | Layer 4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
玻屑凝灰岩/vitric tuff | 16 | 2.55 | 53 | 2.64 | 245 | 89.09 |
晶屑凝灰岩/crystal tuff | 144 | 22.97 | 1394 | 69.49 | 2 | 0.73 |
流纹岩/rhyolite | 3 | 0.48 | 233 | 11.62 | 14 | 5.07 |
红柱石角岩/andalusite-hornfels | 167 | 26.63 | 214 | 10.67 | 13 | 5.11 |
燧石/chert | 4 | 0.64 | 52 | 2.59 | -- | -- |
玛瑙/agate | 247 | 39.39 | 18 | 0.9 | -- | -- |
石英砂岩/quartz sandstone | 3 | 0.48 | 34 | 1.69 | -- | -- |
页岩/shale | 20 | 3.19 | 2 | 0.1 | -- | -- |
石英/quartz | 8 | 1.28 | 4 | 0.2 | -- | -- |
其他/others | 14 | 2.39 | 2 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.36 |
总计/Total | 627 | 100 | 2006 | 100 | 275 | 100 |
原料类型/raw material type | 数量(n) | 具石皮标本数/ with cortex (n) | % |
---|---|---|---|
玻屑凝灰岩/vitric tuff | 314 | 0 | 0 |
晶屑凝灰岩/crystal tuff | 1540 | 459 | 29.8 |
流纹岩/rhyolite | 250 | 121 | 48.4 |
红柱石角岩/andalusite-hornfels | 394 | 110 | 27.92 |
玛瑙/agate | 265 | 37 | 13.96 |
燧石/chert | 66 | 17 | 25.76 |
表2 桃山遗址主要原料石皮保留情况统计
Tab.2 Cortex percentage on stone artifacts by raw material at Taoshan
原料类型/raw material type | 数量(n) | 具石皮标本数/ with cortex (n) | % |
---|---|---|---|
玻屑凝灰岩/vitric tuff | 314 | 0 | 0 |
晶屑凝灰岩/crystal tuff | 1540 | 459 | 29.8 |
流纹岩/rhyolite | 250 | 121 | 48.4 |
红柱石角岩/andalusite-hornfels | 394 | 110 | 27.92 |
玛瑙/agate | 265 | 37 | 13.96 |
燧石/chert | 66 | 17 | 25.76 |
[1] |
Binford LR . Organization and formation processes: Looking at curated technologies[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1979,35:255-273
doi: 10.1086/jar.35.3.3629902 URL |
[2] |
Shott MJ . Technological organization and settlement mobility: An ethnographic examination[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1986,42:15-51
doi: 10.1086/jar.42.1.3630378 URL |
[3] |
Potts R . Why the Oldowan? Plio-Pleistocene toolmaking and the transport of resources[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1991,47:153-176
doi: 10.1086/jar.47.2.3630323 URL |
[4] |
Potts R . Variables versus models of early Pleistocene hominid land-use[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1994,27:7-24
doi: 10.1006/jhev.1994.1033 URL |
[5] |
Potts R, Behrensmeyer AK, Ditchfield P . Paleolandscape variation and Early Pleistocene hominid activities: Members 1 and 7, Olorgesailie Formation, Kenya[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1999,37(5):747-788
doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0344 URL pmid: 10536090 |
[6] |
Goodman ME . The physical properties of stone tool materials[J]. American Antiquity, 1944,9:415-433
doi: 10.2307/275093 URL |
[7] | Andrefsky Jr W . Raw-material availability and the organization of technology[J]. American Antiquity, 1994: 21-34 |
[8] |
Church T . Lithic resources of the Bearlodge Mountains, Wyoming: Description, distribution, and implications[J]. Plains Anthropologist, 1996,41:135-164
doi: 10.1080/2052546.1996.11931804 URL |
[9] |
Negash A, Shackley MS, Alene M . Source provenance of obsidian artifacts from the Early Stone Age (ESA) site of Melka Konture, Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2006,33:1647-1650
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.11.001 URL |
[10] |
Eren MI, Lycett SJ, Roos CI , et al. Tool stone constraints on knapping skill: Levallois reduction with two different raw materials[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011,38:2731-2739
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.06.011 URL |
[11] | Doronicheva E, Kulkova M, Shackley M . Exploitation of lithic raw material in the northwestern Caucasus Upper Paleolithic[J]. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2013,41(2):40-53 |
[12] |
Bamforth DB . Settlement, raw material, and lithic procurement in the central Mojave Desert[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1990,9:70-104
doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(90)90006-Y URL |
[13] |
Brantingham PJ, Olsen JW, Rech JA , et al. Raw material quality and prepared core technologies in northeast Asia[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2000,27:255-271
doi: 10.1006/jasc.1999.0456 URL |
[14] |
Fernandes P, Raynal JP, Moncel MH . Middle Palaeolithic raw material gathering territories and human mobility in the southern Massif Central, France: First results from a petro-archaeological study on flint[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008,35:2357-2370
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.02.012 URL |
[15] |
Orton J . A useful measure of the desirability of different raw materials for retouch within and between assemblages: The raw material retouch index (RMRI)[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008,35:1090-1094
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.002 URL |
[16] | 胡松梅 . 略谈我国旧石器时代石器原料的选择与岩性的关系[J]. 考古与文物, 1992, ( 2):40-45 |
[17] | 黄慰文 . 石器时代人类对工具原料的选择和打制[J]. 龙骨坡史前文化志, 1999(1):159-163 |
[18] | 裴树文, 侯亚梅 . 东谷坨遗址石制品原料利用浅析[J]. 人类学学报, 2001,20(4):271-281 |
[19] | 杜水生 . 泥河湾盆地旧石器中晚期石制品原料初步分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2003,22(2):121-130 |
[20] | 周振宇, 郇勇, 刘薇 , 等. 石料力学性能分析在旧石器考古学研究中的应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2016,35(3):407-417 |
[21] |
Stout D, Quade J, Semaw S , et al. Raw material selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2005,48:365-380
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.10.006 URL pmid: 15788183 |
[22] |
Braun D, Harris J, Maina D . Oldowan raw material procurement and use: Evidence from the Koobi Fora Formation[J]. Archaeometry, 2009,51:26-42
doi: 10.1111/arch.2009.51.issue-1 URL |
[23] | Callahan E . The basics of biface knapping in the Eastern fluted point tradition: A manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts[J]. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 1979,7:1-180 |
[24] |
Cotterell B, Kamminga J . The formation of flakes[J]. American Antiquity, 1987,52(4):675-708
doi: 10.2307/281378 URL |
[25] |
Cotterell B, Kamminga J, Dickson FP . The essential mechanics of conchoidal flaking[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1985,29(4):205-221
doi: 10.1007/BF00125471 URL |
[26] |
Domanski M, Webb JA, Boland J . Mechanical properties of stone artefact materials and the effect of heat treatment[J]. Archaeometry, 1994,36:177-208
doi: 10.1111/arch.1994.36.issue-2 URL |
[27] | Holdaway SJ, Stern N. A record in stone: The study of Australia's flaked stone artefacts[M]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Press, 2004 |
[28] |
Eren MI, Roos CI, Story BA , et al. The role of raw material differences in stone tool shape variation: An experimental assessment[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014,49:472-487
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.034 URL |
[29] |
Browne CL, Wilson L . Evaluating inputs to models of hominin raw material selection: Map resolution and path choices[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2013,40(11):3955-3962
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.012 URL |
[30] |
Alberti J, Cardillo M . Primary and secondary lithic raw material sources along the western coast of San Matías Gulf (Río Negro province, Argentina): A first approach to their spatial variability[J]. Quaternary International, 2015,373:63-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.09.061 URL |
[31] |
Zhu TQ, Huang H, Wang HM , et al. 2011. Comparison of celadon from the Yaozhou and Xicun kilns in the Northern Song Dynasty of China by X-ray fluorescence and microscopy[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011,38:3134-3140.
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.017 URL |
[32] |
Yang SX, Zhang YX, Zhu TQ , et al. Provenancing hornfels in the Dingcun industry: The exploitation of the vicinity source[J]. Quaternary International, 2017,434:138-147.
doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.017 URL |
[33] |
Frahm E, Feinberg JM, Monnier GF , et al. Lithic raw material units based on magnetic properties: A blind test with Armenian obsidian and application to the Middle Palaeolithic site of Lusakert Cave 1[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2016,74:102-123
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.09.001 URL |
[34] |
Blades BS . Aurignacian lithic economy and early modern human mobility: New perspectives from classic sites in the Vézère valley of France[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1999,37:91-120
URL pmid: 10375477 |
[35] | Kuhn SL. Mousterian lithic technology: An ecological perspective[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014 |
[36] | Yang SX, Hou YM, Yue JP , et al. The lithic assemblages of Xiaochangliang, Nihewan Basin: Implications for Early Pleistocene hominin behaviour in North China. PLoS ONE, 2016,11(5):e0155793 |
[37] | 尤玉柱, 汤英俊, 李毅 . 泥河湾组小长梁遗址的发现及其意义[J]. 科学通报, 1979, ( 8):365-367 |
[38] | 黄慰文 . 小长梁石器再观察[J]. 人类学学报, 1985,4(4):301-307 |
[39] | 李炎贤 . 关于小长梁石制品的进步性[J]. 人类学学报, 1999,18(4):241-254 |
[40] | 陈淳, 沈辰, 陈万勇 , 等. 河北阳原小长梁遗址1998年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1999,18(3):225-239 |
[41] | 陈淳, 沈辰, 陈万勇 , 等. 小长梁石工业研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2002,21(1):23-40 |
[42] | 谢飞, 李珺, 刘连强 . 泥河湾旧石器文化[M]. 石家庄: 花山文艺出版社, 2006 |
[43] | 常阳, 侯亚梅, 杨石霞 , 等. 黑龙江省伊春市桃山遗址2013年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2016,35(2):223-237 |
[44] | 岳健平, 侯亚梅, 杨石霞 , 等. 黑龙江省桃山遗址2014年度发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2017,36(2):180-192 |
[45] |
Yang SX, Zhang YX, Li YQ , et al. Environmental change and raw material selection strategies at Taoshan: a terminal Late Pleistocene to Holocene site in north-eastern China[J]. Journal of Quaternary Science, 2017,32(5):553-563
doi: 10.1002/jqs.v32.5 URL |
[46] | 张森水 . 中国北方旧石器工业的区域渐进与文化交流[J]. 人类学学报, 1990,9(4):322-333 |
[47] | Schick KD. The Movius Line reconsidered: Perspectives on the earlier Paleolithic of eastern Asia[A]. In: Corruccini RS, Ciochon RL (eds). Integrative Pathways to the Past: Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell[C]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994, 569-596 |
[48] |
Bar-Yosef O, Wang Y . Paleolithic archaeology in China[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2012,41:319-335
doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145832 URL |
[49] | 陈淳 . 旧石器研究:原料、技术及其他[J]. 人类学学报, 1996,15(3):268-275 |
[50] |
Brantingham PJ . Measuring forager mobility[J]. Current Anthropology, 2006,47(3):435-459
doi: 10.1086/503062 URL |
[51] | Adams B, Blades B (eds) . Lithic Materials and Paleolithic Societies[C]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2009 |
[1] | 申旭科, 李婷, 张东菊. 中国旧石器原料开发策略的研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(02): 161-176. |
[2] | 林壹, 刘拓, 顾万发, 汪松枝, 王幼平. 河南登封方家沟遗址的石料产地[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 25-35. |
[3] | 李三灵, 李浩. 旧石器时代早期石核分类方法试析[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(02): 194-207. |
[4] | 王益人. 从河流埋藏环境看丁村遗址群的文化性质——与张森水先生商榷[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 21(02): 158-169. |
[5] | 高星. 周口店第15地点石器原料开发方略与经济形态研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20(03): 186-200. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||