人类学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (04): 664-678.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0011cstr: 32091.14.j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0011
曹家望(), 燕君, 李黎明, 乔辉, 孙畅, 文少卿, 谭婧泽()
收稿日期:
2019-01-18
修回日期:
2019-11-08
出版日期:
2021-08-15
发布日期:
2021-08-17
通讯作者:
谭婧泽
作者简介:
曹家望(1990-),男,学士,学生,人类生物学。Email: 基金资助:
CAO Jiawang(), YAN Jun, LI Liming, QIAO Hui, SUN Chang, WEN Shaoqin, TAN Jingze()
Received:
2019-01-18
Revised:
2019-11-08
Online:
2021-08-15
Published:
2021-08-17
Contact:
TAN Jingze
摘要:
传统体质人类学研究中的样本采集方法是手工测量以及肉眼观察,采集过程中会存在较大的主观性,易产生误差,同时在采集大样本时费时费力。近年来,三维摄像系统被越来越多的应用于人脸分析,其优势是快速高效和准确,并且涵盖了传统测量方法无法精确获取的表型特征信息,可以更加细化地分析人脸表型特征和特征之间的相互关系。本研究探索性地基于三维人脸模型图像,利用曲率和邻域信息的点筛查方法定位了面部的一些关键测量点,建立一套简单、有效、准确率较高的三维人脸模型图像关键点定位方法,能较准确地定位98%以上的眼内角点和鼻尖点,并在此基础上确定了鼻根点、鼻下点、左右鼻翼点和鼻翼外侧最低点等其他面部关键点。并且还提出了在三维人脸模型图像基础上量化部分面部观察类表型特征,如鼻侧深度、鼻根高度、面部扁平度等,尝试性地将这些观察类性状转化为能够测量的性状,建立了一套可以计算的描述方法,具有一定的创新性。本研究还结合三维人脸模型提取数据和人工测量数据,探讨了现代中国人群(以江淮汉族为例)面部表型特征的性别差异,发现大多数面部表型特征在现代中国人群中都存在明显的男女性别差异,鼻侧深度、鼻根高度、面部扁平度的性别差异最为显著,其Z检验的p值均小于0.01。结果显示男性的鼻部整体比女性更大更前凸,而女性的面部更为扁平。
中图分类号:
曹家望, 燕君, 李黎明, 乔辉, 孙畅, 文少卿, 谭婧泽. 基于三维人脸模型及人工测量数据分析现代中国人群面部表型的性别差异[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(04): 664-678.
CAO Jiawang, YAN Jun, LI Liming, QIAO Hui, SUN Chang, WEN Shaoqin, TAN Jingze. Analysis of sexual dimorphism based on three-dimensional face model and artificial measurement data of maxillofacial morphology in modern Chinese population[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(04): 664-678.
ID | 性别Gender | Y_en | Y_prn | Y_en_prn-2 (①) | Y_zy (②) | ②-① |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | M | 21.882 | -17.620 | 0.131 | -0.728 | -0.859 |
3 | M | 22.524 | -9.454 | 4.535 | 5.758 | 1.223 |
4 | M | 16.613 | -18.978 | -3.183 | -2.110 | 1.073 |
5 | M | 24.957 | -6.436 | 7.261 | 6.020 | -1.241 |
6 | M | 35.766 | -2.063 | 14.852 | 12.070 | -2.782 |
8 | M | 15.074 | -17.576 | -0.749 | -0.738 | 0.011 |
9 | M | 15.380 | -12.626 | 0.754 | -0.829 | -1.583 |
10 | M | 12.158 | -21.971 | -11.813 | -11.300 | 0.513 |
11 | M | 20.797 | -15.098 | 3.699 | 3.660 | -0.039 |
14 | M | 15.844 | -19.676 | -5.832 | -5.373 | 0.459 |
1 | F | 14.501 | -16.336 | -2.918 | -3.835 | -0.917 |
7 | F | 17.296 | -15.22 | -0.962 | 1.407 | 2.369 |
12 | F | 11.84 | -23.136 | -7.648 | -4.61 | 3.038 |
13 | F | 9.143 | -23.045 | -8.951 | -8.769 | 0.182 |
30 | F | 4.436 | -25.304 | -12.434 | -13.105 | -0.671 |
31 | F | 24.17 | -5.693 | 7.239 | 6.355 | -0.884 |
32 | F | 18.509 | -19.882 | -2.687 | -1.797 | 0.890 |
33 | F | 13.157 | -20.433 | -5.638 | -5.612 | 0.026 |
34 | F | 18.287 | -14.693 | -0.203 | -1.522 | -1.319 |
35 | F | 15.395 | -15.704 | -1.155 | -2.063 | -0.908 |
表1 不同标记点的Y坐标
Tab.1 Y-value of the marked points
ID | 性别Gender | Y_en | Y_prn | Y_en_prn-2 (①) | Y_zy (②) | ②-① |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | M | 21.882 | -17.620 | 0.131 | -0.728 | -0.859 |
3 | M | 22.524 | -9.454 | 4.535 | 5.758 | 1.223 |
4 | M | 16.613 | -18.978 | -3.183 | -2.110 | 1.073 |
5 | M | 24.957 | -6.436 | 7.261 | 6.020 | -1.241 |
6 | M | 35.766 | -2.063 | 14.852 | 12.070 | -2.782 |
8 | M | 15.074 | -17.576 | -0.749 | -0.738 | 0.011 |
9 | M | 15.380 | -12.626 | 0.754 | -0.829 | -1.583 |
10 | M | 12.158 | -21.971 | -11.813 | -11.300 | 0.513 |
11 | M | 20.797 | -15.098 | 3.699 | 3.660 | -0.039 |
14 | M | 15.844 | -19.676 | -5.832 | -5.373 | 0.459 |
1 | F | 14.501 | -16.336 | -2.918 | -3.835 | -0.917 |
7 | F | 17.296 | -15.22 | -0.962 | 1.407 | 2.369 |
12 | F | 11.84 | -23.136 | -7.648 | -4.61 | 3.038 |
13 | F | 9.143 | -23.045 | -8.951 | -8.769 | 0.182 |
30 | F | 4.436 | -25.304 | -12.434 | -13.105 | -0.671 |
31 | F | 24.17 | -5.693 | 7.239 | 6.355 | -0.884 |
32 | F | 18.509 | -19.882 | -2.687 | -1.797 | 0.890 |
33 | F | 13.157 | -20.433 | -5.638 | -5.612 | 0.026 |
34 | F | 18.287 | -14.693 | -0.203 | -1.522 | -1.319 |
35 | F | 15.395 | -15.704 | -1.155 | -2.063 | -0.908 |
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 男性 Males (Manual) | P-value | 女性 Females(3D) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 39.46 | > 0.50 | 37.65 | 36.99 | > 0.50 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 50.77 | > 0.50 | 47.94 | 47.28 | > 0.50 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 41.17 | > 0.50 | 38.07 | 38.08 | > 0.50 |
表2 三维人脸模型提取数据与现场人工采集数据对比分析
Tab.2 Comparison between three-dimensional face model measurements and manual measurements of geometric morphometric features (mm)
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 男性 Males (Manual) | P-value | 女性 Females(3D) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 39.46 | > 0.50 | 37.65 | 36.99 | > 0.50 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 50.77 | > 0.50 | 47.94 | 47.28 | > 0.50 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 41.17 | > 0.50 | 38.07 | 38.08 | > 0.50 |
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 女性 Females (3D) | P-value | 男性 Males (Manual) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 37.65 | < 0.01 | 39.46 | 36.99 | < 0.01 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 47.94 | < 0.01 | 50.77 | 47.28 | < 0.01 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 38.07 | < 0.01 | 41.17 | 38.08 | < 0.01 |
鼻深 Nasal depth | 16.95 | 15.62 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻侧深度Nasal lateral depth | 24.51 | 19.66 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻根高度 Nasion height | 8.96 | 7.19 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
面宽 Face breadth | — | — | — | 148.25 | 141.77 | < 0.01 |
形态面高 Morphological facial height | — | — | — | 114.91 | 108.05 | < 0.01 |
额最小宽 Minimum frontal breadth | — | — | — | 108.80 | 108.28 | 0.317 |
表3 测量性状平均值的男女性别差异检验
Tab.3 Comparison of measurement results between sexes (mm)
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 女性 Females (3D) | P-value | 男性 Males (Manual) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 37.65 | < 0.01 | 39.46 | 36.99 | < 0.01 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 47.94 | < 0.01 | 50.77 | 47.28 | < 0.01 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 38.07 | < 0.01 | 41.17 | 38.08 | < 0.01 |
鼻深 Nasal depth | 16.95 | 15.62 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻侧深度Nasal lateral depth | 24.51 | 19.66 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻根高度 Nasion height | 8.96 | 7.19 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
面宽 Face breadth | — | — | — | 148.25 | 141.77 | < 0.01 |
形态面高 Morphological facial height | — | — | — | 114.91 | 108.05 | < 0.01 |
额最小宽 Minimum frontal breadth | — | — | — | 108.80 | 108.28 | 0.317 |
截面Profiles/Items | Y_en_prn+2 | Y_en_prn | Y_en_prn-2 | Y_en_prn-4 | Y_en_prn-6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 Males | 0.1498 | 0.1579 | 0.1570 | 0.1714 | 0.1771 |
女性 Females | 0.1140 | 0.1153 | 0.1169 | 0.1202 | 0.1178 |
P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
表4 不同位置的截面提取的面部扁平度的平均值及性别差异检验
Tab.4 The average value of facial flatness in different lateral profile
截面Profiles/Items | Y_en_prn+2 | Y_en_prn | Y_en_prn-2 | Y_en_prn-4 | Y_en_prn-6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 Males | 0.1498 | 0.1579 | 0.1570 | 0.1714 | 0.1771 |
女性 Females | 0.1140 | 0.1153 | 0.1169 | 0.1202 | 0.1178 |
P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
性状Variable | 男性Males | 女性Females | P-value | (M-F):F(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽/形态面高 | 0.3440 | 0.3429 | 0.696 | 0.32 |
鼻高/形态面高 | 0.4422 | 0.4378 | 0.044 | 1.01 |
鼻高(3D)/形态面高 | 0.4512 | 0.4441 | 0.004 | 1.60 |
鼻宽/形态面高 | 0.3590 | 0.3531 | 0.010 | 1.67 |
鼻宽(3D)/形态面高 | 0.3585 | 0.3528 | 0.014 | 1.62 |
鼻根高度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.0783 | 0.0667 | < 0.01 | 17.27 |
鼻深(3D)/形态面高 | 0.1476 | 0.1436 | < 0.01 | 2.79 |
鼻侧深度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.2136 | 0.1822 | < 0.01 | 17.23 |
鼻根高度(3D)/鼻侧深度(3D) | 0.3646 | 0.3682 | 0.634 | 0.99 |
额最小宽/形态面高 | 0.9380 | 1.001 | < 0.01 | -6.29 |
面宽/形态面高 | 1.2921 | 1.3143 | < 0.01 | -1.69 |
表5 标准化后若干性状平均值的性别比较
Tab.5 The comparison of standardized geometric morphometric features between sexes
性状Variable | 男性Males | 女性Females | P-value | (M-F):F(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽/形态面高 | 0.3440 | 0.3429 | 0.696 | 0.32 |
鼻高/形态面高 | 0.4422 | 0.4378 | 0.044 | 1.01 |
鼻高(3D)/形态面高 | 0.4512 | 0.4441 | 0.004 | 1.60 |
鼻宽/形态面高 | 0.3590 | 0.3531 | 0.010 | 1.67 |
鼻宽(3D)/形态面高 | 0.3585 | 0.3528 | 0.014 | 1.62 |
鼻根高度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.0783 | 0.0667 | < 0.01 | 17.27 |
鼻深(3D)/形态面高 | 0.1476 | 0.1436 | < 0.01 | 2.79 |
鼻侧深度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.2136 | 0.1822 | < 0.01 | 17.23 |
鼻根高度(3D)/鼻侧深度(3D) | 0.3646 | 0.3682 | 0.634 | 0.99 |
额最小宽/形态面高 | 0.9380 | 1.001 | < 0.01 | -6.29 |
面宽/形态面高 | 1.2921 | 1.3143 | < 0.01 | -1.69 |
图5 鼻侧深度(Nasal lateral depth)与鼻根高度(Nasion height)的一元线性回归
Fig.5 The analysis of simple linear regression model between the nasal lateral depth and the nasion height
[1] |
Fagertun J, Harder S, Rosengren A, et al. 3D facial landmarks: Inter-operator variability of manual annotation[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2014, 14(1):35
doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-35 URL |
[2] |
Hutton TJ, Buxton BF, Hammond P, et al. Estimating average growth trajectories in shape-space using kernel smoothing[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2003, 22(6):747-53
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.814784 URL |
[3] |
Hammond P. The use of 3D face shape modeling in dysmorphology[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2007, 92(12):1120-1126
doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.103507 URL |
[4] |
Hammond P, McKee S, Suttie M, et al. Opposite effects on facial morphology due to gene dosage sensitivity[J]. Hum Genet, 2014, 133:1117-1125
doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1455-z pmid: 24889830 |
[5] |
Guo JY, Mei X, Tang K. Automatic landmark annotation and dense correspondence registration for 3D human facial images[J]. Bmc Bioinformatics, 2013, 14(14):227-235
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-227 URL |
[6] |
Chen W, Qian W, Wu G, et al. Three-dimensional human facial morphologies as robust aging markers[J]. Cell Research, 2015, 25:574-587
doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.36 URL |
[7] | Wirthlin J, Kau CH, English JD, et al. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging[J]. International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2013, 42(9):1100-1107 |
[8] | Matthew CC, Wendy WW, Zachary F, et al. A quantitative analysis of periorbital aging with three-dimensional surface imaging[J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2011, 64:148-154 |
[9] |
Anic-Milosevic S, Mestrovic S, Prlić A, et al. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method[J]. Journal of CranioMaxilloFacial Surgery, 2010, 38(2):90-95
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.013 URL |
[10] |
Liu Y, Kau CH, Pan F, et al. A 3-Dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology Among Chinese and Greek Population[J]. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2013, 24(4).e353-8
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182902e5d URL |
[11] | Wong WW, Davis DG, Camp MC, et al. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: A three-dimensional analysis[J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009, 63:2032-2039 |
[12] | Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, et al. Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology[J]. Forensic Science International, 2010, 200(1-3).182.e1-7 |
[13] | Lu X, Colbry D, Jain AK. Three-dimensional model based face recognition[A]. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition[C]. 2004, 1:362-366 |
[14] |
Hennessy RJ, Mclearie S, Kinsella A. Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral-craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 2005, 207(3):283-295
pmid: 16185253 |
[15] |
Gor T, Kau CH, English JD, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas[J]. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010, 137(3):424-432
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.022 URL |
[16] |
Hayley G, Darren C. Sexual dimorphism in Southeast Asian crania: A geometric morphometric approach[J]. HOMO, 2009, 60:517-534
doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.001 pmid: 19853250 |
[17] |
Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex[J]. HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 2010, 61:16-32
doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.004 URL |
[18] |
Coquerelle M, Bookstein FL, Braga J, et al. Sexual Dimorphism of the Human Mandible and Its Association With Dental Development[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2010, 145:192-202
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.v145.2 URL |
[19] | McDonald JH. Earlobes ranging from unattached (upper left) to attached (lower right)[EB/OL]. URL: http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/mythearlobe.html. 2011-12-8 |
[20] | Moreno AB, Sanchez A, Velez FJ, et al. Face recognition using 3D surface extracted descriptors[A]. In: Irish Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference[C]. 2003 |
[21] |
Colombo A, Cusano C, Schettini R. 3D face detection using curvature analysis[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2006, 39(3):444-455
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.09.009 URL |
[22] |
Nair P, Cavallaro A. 3D Face Detection, Landmark Localization, and Registration Using a Point Distribution Model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2009, 11(4):611-623
doi: 10.1109/TMM.2009.2017629 URL |
[23] | 吴汝康, 吴新智, 张振标. 人体测量方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984, 32-38. |
[24] | Rogers T. Sex determination and age estimation: skeletal evidence fromSt. Thomas’ Cemetery Belleville, Ontario [M.A. thesis][D]. Hamilton: McMaster University, 1991 |
[25] |
Rosas A, Bastir M. Thin-Plate Spline Analysis of Allometry and Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Craniofacial Complex[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2002, 117(3):236-245
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644 URL |
[26] | Hutton TJ, Buxton BF, Hammond P. Automated Registration of 3D Faces using Dense Surface Models[A]. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference[C]. Surrey: BMVA Press, 2003, 439-448 |
[27] |
Besl P, McKay N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes[J]. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell, 1992, 14:239-256
doi: 10.1109/34.121791 URL |
[28] |
Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, et al. Active shape models—their trainingand application[J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1995, 61(1):38-59
doi: 10.1006/cviu.1995.1004 URL |
[1] | 王旭, 万腾淑, 刘雪敏, 李孟思, 翟家淇, 赵春旺. 河南汉族儿童头面部的形态特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 813-827. |
[2] | 吕婧祎, 肖瑶, 宇克莉, 程智, 聂浩波, 高新颖, 姚玥彤, 包金萍, 郑连斌, 张兴华. 中国黄衣佤族的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 549-560. |
[3] | 张兴华, 肖瑶, 岩坎翁, 玉应香, 高雯芳, 包金萍, 程智, 高新颖, 姚玥彤, 刘鑫, 宇克莉. 中国曼咪人的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 561-573. |
[4] | 宇克莉, 张兴华, 程智, 郑连斌. 中国不同人群的头面部特征及其差异[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 574-585. |
[5] | 李欣, 姜帅, 黄婷, 钟华, 温有锋. 内蒙古与新疆达斡尔族头面部特征比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 586-596. |
[6] | 张海国. 中国肤纹表型组的研究现状与对策[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 675-686. |
[7] | 李海军, 姚雪纯, 翁敏洁, 杨筱雨. 人类鼻形态研究概述[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 687-700. |
[8] | 赵瑞敏, 刘凯, 孙鹏, 张忠良. 基于拇指与食指指纹组合特征分析人的性别及年龄[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 427-439. |
[9] | 王法岗, 杨石霞, 葛俊逸, 岳健平, 赵克良, Andreu Ollé, 李文艳, 杨海勇, 刘连强, 关莹, 谢飞, Francesco d’Errico, Michael Petraglia, 邓成龙. 泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址2013年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 143-156. |
[10] | 李咏兰, 于会新, 张兴华, 宇克莉, 包金萍, 郑连斌. 中国不同地理分区人群的头面部特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(06): 793-806. |
[11] | 张宝帅, 吴晓桐, 吴高, 金正耀, 范安川. 釉原蛋白微损分析方法鉴定人骨性别的有效性与优化[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(04): 472-487. |
[12] | 张咸鹏, 温有锋, 李文慧, 李欣, 曲泉颖, 徐国昌. 中国阿尔泰语系人群头面部的表型特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(03): 342-358. |
[13] | 张明, 平婉菁, YANG Melinda Anna, 付巧妹. 古基因组揭示史前欧亚大陆现代人复杂遗传历史[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(03): 412-421. |
[14] | 杜抱朴, 殷钰喆, 谭伊, 张宇格, 范博, 姚植正, 郭航. 中国现代人群两性身高差异分布及其影响因素[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(02): 191-200. |
[15] | 孙晓璠, 张全超, 牟萍媛, 杨及耘, 曹俊. 山西洪洞西冯堡清代墓地缠足女性的骨骼损伤和关节疾病[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(02): 201-213. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||