人类学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (01): 88-97.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2017.0037
收稿日期:
2016-04-18
修回日期:
2016-12-07
出版日期:
2019-02-15
发布日期:
2020-09-11
通讯作者:
张兴华
作者简介:
魏榆(1994-),女,四川人,硕士研究生,主要从事体质人类学研究。E-mail: 基金资助:
WEI Yu1(), ZHANG Xinghua1,*(), YAN Shi2, WANG Zishan1
Received:
2016-04-18
Revised:
2016-12-07
Online:
2019-02-15
Published:
2020-09-11
Contact:
ZHANG Xinghua
摘要:
对四川、云南尔苏人、木雅人、空格人、八甲人4个族群进行了6项不对称行为特征(扣手、利手、叠臂、利足、叠腿、起步)的调查,结果显示:1)4个族群中,仅尔苏人、木雅人、八甲人叠臂以L型出现率偏高以外,其余不对称行为特征均为R型出现率较高;2)4个族群6项不对称行为特征均不存在性别间差异,但木雅人、尔苏人与八甲人在扣手这一不对称行为特征上存在族群间差异,木雅人与空格人在叠臂这一不对称行为特征上存在族群间差异;3)统计分析了6项不对称行为特征之间的相关性,仅八甲人多数不对称行为特征之间存在相关性。
中图分类号:
魏榆, 张兴华, 严实, 王子善. 中国木雅人、尔苏人、八甲人与空格人6项不对称行为的特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(01): 88-97.
WEI Yu, ZHANG Xinghua, YAN Shi, WANG Zishan. Research on six behavioral traits of lateral functional dominance in the Muya, Ersu, Bajia and Kongge peoples in China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(01): 88-97.
民族 Ethnic group | 性别 Sex | 人数 n | 扣手Hand clasping(%) | 利手Handedness(%) | 叠臂Arm folding(%) | 叠腿Leg folding(%) | 利足Foot preference(%) | 起步Stride type(%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | |||
尔苏人Ersu | 男M | 69 | 42.0 | 58.0 | 4.3 | 95.7 | 56.5 | 43.5 | 13.0 | 87.0 | 10.1 | 89.9 | 34.8 | 65.2 |
女F | 51 | 37.3 | 62.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 13.7 | 86.3 | 13.7 | 86.3 | 43.1 | 56.9 | |
合计T | 120 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 2.5 | 97.5 | 54.2 | 45.8 | 13.3 | 86.7 | 11.7 | 88.3 | 38.3 | 61.7 | |
u值 | 0.35 | 1.49 | 0.39 | 0.09 | 0.52 | 0.62 | ||||||||
木雅人Muya | 男M | 77 | 36.4 | 63.6 | 1.3 | 98.7 | 55.8 | 44.2 | 10.4 | 89.6 | 9.1 | 90.9 | 45.5 | 54.5 |
女F | 80 | 46.3 | 53.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 68.8 | 31.3 | 11.3 | 88.8 | 10.0 | 90.0 | 30.0 | 70.0 | |
合计T | 157 | 41.4 | 58.6 | 0.6 | 99.4 | 62.4 | 37.6 | 10.8 | 89.2 | 9.6 | 90.4 | 37.6 | 62.4 | |
u值 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 1.19 | ||||||||
空格人Kongge | 男M | 45 | 26.1 | 73.9 | 6.5 | 93.5 | 43.5 | 56.5 | 19.6 | 80.4 | 13.0 | 87.0 | 45.7 | 54.3 |
女F | 25 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 48.0 | 52.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 16.0 | 84.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | |
合计T | 70 | 31.0 | 69.0 | 4.2 | 95.8 | 45.1 | 54.9 | 19.7 | 80.3 | 14.1 | 85.9 | 43.7 | 56.3 | |
u值 | 1.01 | 1.27 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.19 | ||||||||
八甲人Bajia | 男M | 61 | 26.2 | 73.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 54.1 | 45.9 | 13.1 | 86.9 | 9.8 | 90.2 | 47.5 | 52.5 |
女F | 97 | 24.7 | 75.3 | 1.0 | 99.0 | 59.8 | 40.2 | 14.4 | 85.6 | 12.4 | 87.6 | 48.5 | 51.5 | |
合计T | 158 | 25.3 | 74.7 | 0.6 | 99.4 | 57.6 | 42.4 | 13.9 | 86.1 | 11.4 | 88.6 | 48.1 | 51.9 | |
u值 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.42 | 0.18 | 0.40 | 0.07 |
表1 4个族群6项不对称行为特征的出现率
Tab.1 Frequency of six behavioral traits in four ethnic groups
民族 Ethnic group | 性别 Sex | 人数 n | 扣手Hand clasping(%) | 利手Handedness(%) | 叠臂Arm folding(%) | 叠腿Leg folding(%) | 利足Foot preference(%) | 起步Stride type(%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | |||
尔苏人Ersu | 男M | 69 | 42.0 | 58.0 | 4.3 | 95.7 | 56.5 | 43.5 | 13.0 | 87.0 | 10.1 | 89.9 | 34.8 | 65.2 |
女F | 51 | 37.3 | 62.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 13.7 | 86.3 | 13.7 | 86.3 | 43.1 | 56.9 | |
合计T | 120 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 2.5 | 97.5 | 54.2 | 45.8 | 13.3 | 86.7 | 11.7 | 88.3 | 38.3 | 61.7 | |
u值 | 0.35 | 1.49 | 0.39 | 0.09 | 0.52 | 0.62 | ||||||||
木雅人Muya | 男M | 77 | 36.4 | 63.6 | 1.3 | 98.7 | 55.8 | 44.2 | 10.4 | 89.6 | 9.1 | 90.9 | 45.5 | 54.5 |
女F | 80 | 46.3 | 53.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 68.8 | 31.3 | 11.3 | 88.8 | 10.0 | 90.0 | 30.0 | 70.0 | |
合计T | 157 | 41.4 | 58.6 | 0.6 | 99.4 | 62.4 | 37.6 | 10.8 | 89.2 | 9.6 | 90.4 | 37.6 | 62.4 | |
u值 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 1.19 | ||||||||
空格人Kongge | 男M | 45 | 26.1 | 73.9 | 6.5 | 93.5 | 43.5 | 56.5 | 19.6 | 80.4 | 13.0 | 87.0 | 45.7 | 54.3 |
女F | 25 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 48.0 | 52.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 16.0 | 84.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | |
合计T | 70 | 31.0 | 69.0 | 4.2 | 95.8 | 45.1 | 54.9 | 19.7 | 80.3 | 14.1 | 85.9 | 43.7 | 56.3 | |
u值 | 1.01 | 1.27 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.19 | ||||||||
八甲人Bajia | 男M | 61 | 26.2 | 73.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 54.1 | 45.9 | 13.1 | 86.9 | 9.8 | 90.2 | 47.5 | 52.5 |
女F | 97 | 24.7 | 75.3 | 1.0 | 99.0 | 59.8 | 40.2 | 14.4 | 85.6 | 12.4 | 87.6 | 48.5 | 51.5 | |
合计T | 158 | 25.3 | 74.7 | 0.6 | 99.4 | 57.6 | 42.4 | 13.9 | 86.1 | 11.4 | 88.6 | 48.1 | 51.9 | |
u值 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.42 | 0.18 | 0.40 | 0.07 |
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 0 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 5 | 43 | 5 | 43 | 5 | 9 | ||
R | 3 | 69 | 41 | 31 | 11 | 61 | 9 | 63 | 41 | 65 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 2.05 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |||
R | 46 | 71 | 15 | 102 | 12 | 105 | 46 | 71 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 0.56 | 1.91 | 10 | 55 | 11 | 54 | 25 | 40 | ||||
R | 6 | 49 | 3 | 52 | 21 | 34 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 0.59 | 1.07 | 0.52 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 9 | |||||
R | 10 | 94 | 39 | 65 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 0.12 | 9.03** | 3.80 | 3.18 | 5 | 9 | ||||||
R | 41 | 65 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 0.05 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.05 | |||||||
R |
表2 尔苏人6项不对称行为特征的相关性检验
Tab.2 Chi-square values of correlation analysis for the Ersu(χ2, n)
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 0 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 5 | 43 | 5 | 43 | 5 | 9 | ||
R | 3 | 69 | 41 | 31 | 11 | 61 | 9 | 63 | 41 | 65 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 2.05 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |||
R | 46 | 71 | 15 | 102 | 12 | 105 | 46 | 71 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 0.56 | 1.91 | 10 | 55 | 11 | 54 | 25 | 40 | ||||
R | 6 | 49 | 3 | 52 | 21 | 34 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 0.59 | 1.07 | 0.52 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 9 | |||||
R | 10 | 94 | 39 | 65 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 0.12 | 9.03** | 3.80 | 3.18 | 5 | 9 | ||||||
R | 41 | 65 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 0.05 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.05 | |||||||
R |
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 0 | 65 | 43 | 22 | 9 | 56 | 8 | 57 | 8 | 7 | ||
R | 1 | 91 | 55 | 37 | 8 | 84 | 7 | 85 | 51 | 91 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||
R | 59 | 97 | 17 | 139 | 15 | 141 | 59 | 97 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 0.66 | 0.61 | 11 | 87 | 12 | 86 | 40 | 58 | ||||
R | 6 | 53 | 3 | 56 | 19 | 40 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 1.05 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 5 | 12 | 9 | 8 | |||||
R | 10 | 130 | 50 | 90 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 0.97 | 0.11 | 2.18 | 8.70** | 8 | 7 | ||||||
R | 51 | 91 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 1.75 | 0.61 | 1.16 | 1.92 | 1.75 | |||||||
R |
表3 木雅人6项不对称行为特征的相关性检验
Tab.3 Chi-square values of correlation analysis for theMuya(χ2, n)
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 0 | 65 | 43 | 22 | 9 | 56 | 8 | 57 | 8 | 7 | ||
R | 1 | 91 | 55 | 37 | 8 | 84 | 7 | 85 | 51 | 91 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||
R | 59 | 97 | 17 | 139 | 15 | 141 | 59 | 97 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 0.66 | 0.61 | 11 | 87 | 12 | 86 | 40 | 58 | ||||
R | 6 | 53 | 3 | 56 | 19 | 40 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 1.05 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 5 | 12 | 9 | 8 | |||||
R | 10 | 130 | 50 | 90 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 0.97 | 0.11 | 2.18 | 8.70** | 8 | 7 | ||||||
R | 51 | 91 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 1.75 | 0.61 | 1.16 | 1.92 | 1.75 | |||||||
R |
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 2 | 20 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 5 | ||
R | 1 | 48 | 19 | 30 | 12 | 37 | 6 | 43 | 26 | 35 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 1.86 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
R | 30 | 38 | 14 | 54 | 9 | 59 | 30 | 38 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 2.53 | 0.14 | 6 | 26 | 5 | 27 | 18 | 14 | ||||
R | 8 | 31 | 5 | 34 | 13 | 26 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 2.27 | 0.77 | 0.03 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | |||||
R | 10 | 47 | 26 | 31 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 0.44 | 0.96 | 0.11 | 2.86 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
R | 26 | 35 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 0.19 | 0.14 | 3.75 | 0.45 | 0.19 | |||||||
R |
表4 空格人6项不对称行为特征的相关性检验
Tab.4 Chi-square values of correlation analysis for theKongge(χ2, n)
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 2 | 20 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 20 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 5 | ||
R | 1 | 48 | 19 | 30 | 12 | 37 | 6 | 43 | 26 | 35 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 1.86 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
R | 30 | 38 | 14 | 54 | 9 | 59 | 30 | 38 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 2.53 | 0.14 | 6 | 26 | 5 | 27 | 18 | 14 | ||||
R | 8 | 31 | 5 | 34 | 13 | 26 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 2.27 | 0.77 | 0.03 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | |||||
R | 10 | 47 | 26 | 31 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 0.44 | 0.96 | 0.11 | 2.86 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
R | 26 | 35 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 0.19 | 0.14 | 3.75 | 0.45 | 0.19 | |||||||
R |
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 1 | 39 | 17 | 23 | 6 | 34 | 10 | 30 | 12 | 6 | ||
R | 0 | 118 | 74 | 44 | 16 | 102 | 8 | 110 | 64 | 76 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 2.97 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
R | 75 | 82 | 21 | 136 | 17 | 140 | 75 | 82 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 5.00* | 1.09 | 12 | 79 | 7 | 84 | 7 | 43 | ||||
R | 10 | 57 | 11 | 56 | 28 | 39 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 0.05 | 6.22* | 0.10 | 8 | 14 | 13 | 9 | |||||
R | 10 | 126 | 63 | 73 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 9.82** | 7.83** | 2.91 | 15.79** | 12 | 6 | ||||||
R | 64 | 76 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 2.80 | 1.09 | 10.55** | 1.24 | 2.80 | |||||||
R |
表5 八甲人6项不对称行为特征的相关性检验
Tab.5 Chi-square values of correlation analysis for theBajia(χ2, n)
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | ||
扣手Hand clasping | L | 1 | 39 | 17 | 23 | 6 | 34 | 10 | 30 | 12 | 6 | ||
R | 0 | 118 | 74 | 44 | 16 | 102 | 8 | 110 | 64 | 76 | |||
利手Handedness | L | 2.97 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
R | 75 | 82 | 21 | 136 | 17 | 140 | 75 | 82 | |||||
叠臂Arm folding | L | 5.00* | 1.09 | 12 | 79 | 7 | 84 | 7 | 43 | ||||
R | 10 | 57 | 11 | 56 | 28 | 39 | |||||||
叠腿Leg folding | L | 0.05 | 6.22* | 0.10 | 8 | 14 | 13 | 9 | |||||
R | 10 | 126 | 63 | 73 | |||||||||
利足Foot preference | L | 9.82** | 7.83** | 2.91 | 15.79** | 12 | 6 | ||||||
R | 64 | 76 | |||||||||||
起步Stride type | L | 2.80 | 1.09 | 10.55** | 1.24 | 2.80 | |||||||
R |
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手 Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木雅-尔苏Muya-Ersu | 0.03 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.01 |
木雅-八甲Muya-Bajia | 4.58** | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 1.78 |
木雅-空格Muya-Kongge | 1.12 | 1.83 | 3.00** | 1.64 | 0.51 | 0.38 |
尔苏-八甲Ersu-Bajia | 3.40** | 0.84 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
尔苏-空格Ersu-Kongge | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.26 |
空格-八甲Kongge-Bajia | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.55 | 0.62 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
表6 4个族群间不对称行为特征的比较(u test)
Tab.6 Comparison of six behavioral traits among the four ethnic groups (u test)
扣手 Hand clasping | 利手 Handedness | 叠臂 Arm folding | 叠腿 Leg folding | 利足 Foot preference | 起步 Stride type | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木雅-尔苏Muya-Ersu | 0.03 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.01 |
木雅-八甲Muya-Bajia | 4.58** | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 1.78 |
木雅-空格Muya-Kongge | 1.12 | 1.83 | 3.00** | 1.64 | 0.51 | 0.38 |
尔苏-八甲Ersu-Bajia | 3.40** | 0.84 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
尔苏-空格Ersu-Kongge | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.26 |
空格-八甲Kongge-Bajia | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.55 | 0.62 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
民族Ethnic group | 人数 n | 扣手Hand clasping(%) | 利手Handed-ness(%) | 叠臂Arm folding(%) | 叠腿Leg folding(%) | 利足Foot preference(%) | 起步Stride type(%) | 文献Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
四川尔苏人Ersu(Sichuan) | 120 | 60.0 | 97.5 | 45.8 | 86.7 | 88.3 | 61.7 | |
四川木雅人Muya(Sichuan) | 157 | 58.6 | 99.4 | 37.6 | 89.2 | 90.4 | 62.4 | |
云南空格人Kongge(Yunnan) | 70 | 69.0 | 95.8 | 54.9 | 80.3 | 85.9 | 56.3 | |
云南八甲人Bajia(Yunnan) | 158 | 74.7 | 99.4 | 42.4 | 86.1 | 88.6 | 51.9 | |
贵州布依族Bouye (Guizhou) | 320 | 69.7 | 90.9 | 68.7 | 85.0 | 93.4 | 70.6 | [14] |
四川汉族Han (Sichuan) | 497 | 51.9 | 96.0 | 50.1 | 74.3 | 89.9 | 56.7 | [28] |
贵州汉族Han (Guizhou) | 684 | 82.8 | 90.2 | 64.8 | 71.2 | 74.4 | 57.5 | [29] |
云南怒族Nu (Yunnan) | 170 | 65.9 | 94.1 | 54.1 | 78.8 | 93.5 | 37.7 | [17] |
云南佤族Wa (Yunnan) | 252 | 71.4 | 93.3 | 56.4 | 83.3 | 94.8 | 67.1 | [18] |
云南独龙族Derung (Yunnan) | 124 | 57.3 | 92.7 | 54.8 | 76.6 | 85.5 | 45.2 | [19] |
四川彝族Yi (Sichuan) | 314 | 59.6 | 88.9 | 53.5 | 82.5 | 91.4 | 52.2 | [30] |
广西仫佬族Mulao (Guangxi) | 309 | 65.7 | 97.1 | 60.2 | 71.2 | 96.4 | 68.0 | [31] |
湖南苗族Miao (Hunan) | 321 | 62.6 | 99.1 | 47.4 | 88.5 | 95.6 | 33.6 | [15] |
湖南侗族Dong (Hunan) | 327 | 66.7 | 97.2 | 45.0 | 81.4 | 88.7 | 34.4 | [15] |
表7 不同民族间6项不对称行为特征的比较
Tab.7 Comparison of six behavioral traits among ethnic groups
民族Ethnic group | 人数 n | 扣手Hand clasping(%) | 利手Handed-ness(%) | 叠臂Arm folding(%) | 叠腿Leg folding(%) | 利足Foot preference(%) | 起步Stride type(%) | 文献Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
四川尔苏人Ersu(Sichuan) | 120 | 60.0 | 97.5 | 45.8 | 86.7 | 88.3 | 61.7 | |
四川木雅人Muya(Sichuan) | 157 | 58.6 | 99.4 | 37.6 | 89.2 | 90.4 | 62.4 | |
云南空格人Kongge(Yunnan) | 70 | 69.0 | 95.8 | 54.9 | 80.3 | 85.9 | 56.3 | |
云南八甲人Bajia(Yunnan) | 158 | 74.7 | 99.4 | 42.4 | 86.1 | 88.6 | 51.9 | |
贵州布依族Bouye (Guizhou) | 320 | 69.7 | 90.9 | 68.7 | 85.0 | 93.4 | 70.6 | [14] |
四川汉族Han (Sichuan) | 497 | 51.9 | 96.0 | 50.1 | 74.3 | 89.9 | 56.7 | [28] |
贵州汉族Han (Guizhou) | 684 | 82.8 | 90.2 | 64.8 | 71.2 | 74.4 | 57.5 | [29] |
云南怒族Nu (Yunnan) | 170 | 65.9 | 94.1 | 54.1 | 78.8 | 93.5 | 37.7 | [17] |
云南佤族Wa (Yunnan) | 252 | 71.4 | 93.3 | 56.4 | 83.3 | 94.8 | 67.1 | [18] |
云南独龙族Derung (Yunnan) | 124 | 57.3 | 92.7 | 54.8 | 76.6 | 85.5 | 45.2 | [19] |
四川彝族Yi (Sichuan) | 314 | 59.6 | 88.9 | 53.5 | 82.5 | 91.4 | 52.2 | [30] |
广西仫佬族Mulao (Guangxi) | 309 | 65.7 | 97.1 | 60.2 | 71.2 | 96.4 | 68.0 | [31] |
湖南苗族Miao (Hunan) | 321 | 62.6 | 99.1 | 47.4 | 88.5 | 95.6 | 33.6 | [15] |
湖南侗族Dong (Hunan) | 327 | 66.7 | 97.2 | 45.0 | 81.4 | 88.7 | 34.4 | [15] |
[1] | 巫达. 尔苏语言文字与尔苏人的族群认同[J]. 中央民族大学学报, 2005,6(32):133-138 |
[2] | 刘刚. 云南空格人调查以曼坝约村空格人为例[J]. 民族研究, 2003,2:44-50 |
[3] |
Pelecanos M. Some Greek data on handedness hand clasping and arm folding[J]. Hum Biol, 1969,41:275-278
URL pmid: 5808789 |
[4] |
Haryck C, Goldman R, Petrinovich L. Handedness and sex, race and age[J]. Hum Biol, 1975,47(3):369-375
URL pmid: 1176108 |
[5] | Plato CC, Fox KM, Garruto RM. Measures of lateral functional dominance: Foot preference, eye preference, digital interlocking, arm foot overlapping[J]. Hum Biol, 1985,57(3):321-334 |
[6] |
Datta U, Mitashree M, Singhrol CS. A study of nine anthroposcopic traits among the three tribes of Bastar district in Madhya Pradesh[J]. Am Nat, 1989,47(1):57-71
doi: 10.1086/279328 URL |
[7] | 韩在柱, 陆舜华, 郑连斌, 等. 兴安盟3各民族7种不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001,20(2):137-143 |
[8] | Lutz FE. The inheritance of the manner of clasping the hands[J]. India Anthrop Anz, 1908,42(495):195-196 |
[9] |
Wiener AS. Observations on the manner of clasping the hands and folding the arms[J]. Am Nat, 1932,66(705):365-370
doi: 10.1086/280443 URL |
[10] | Kawabe M. A study on the mode of clasping the hands[J]. Trans Sapporo Nat Hist Soc, 1949,18:49-52 |
[11] |
Lail YC, Walsh RJ. The patterns of hand clasping in different ethnic groups[J]. Hum Biol, 1965,37(3):312-319
URL pmid: 5836191 |
[12] | 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 李晓卉, 等. 汉、回、蒙古族拇指类型、环食指长、扣手、交叉臂及惯用手的研究[J]. 遗传, 1998,20(4):12-17 |
[13] |
Freire-Maia N, Quelce-Salgado A, Freire-Maia A. Hand clasping in different ethnic groups[J]. Hum Biol, 1958,30(4):281-291
URL pmid: 13620294 |
[14] | 赵洲, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 等. 布依族7项不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 天津师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005,25(1):23-27 |
[15] | 皮建辉, 雷鸣枝, 吴亿中, 等. 湖南苗族、侗族不对称行为特征分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2006,40(1):95-99 |
[16] |
Zheng L, Zheng Q, Lu S, et al. Study on seven asymmetric behavioral traits in three Mongolian groups[J]. Anthrop. Sci. , 2003,111(2):231-244
doi: 10.1537/ase.111.231 URL |
[17] | 罗东梅, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 等. 怒族 7项不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008,63(4):71-77 |
[18] | 于会新, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 等. 佤族的6项不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2007,25(1):87-91 |
[19] | 张兴华, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 等. 云南独龙族7项不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 天津师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008,28(4):27-30 |
[20] | 郑连斌, 周丹. 天津地区汉族7种不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 天津师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2003,23(4):19-22 |
[21] | 符碧, 杜道林, 杨应华, 等. 黎族7项不对称行为特征的群体遗传学研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007,32(5):108-111 |
[22] | 陆舜华, 郑连斌, 李咏兰, 等. 鄂伦春、鄂温克、达斡尔族一侧优势功能特征研究[J]. 遗传, 2000,22(5):287-291 |
[23] | Mian A, Bhutta AM, Mushtaq R. Genetic studies in some ethnic groups of Pakistan(southern Punab): Colour blindness, ear lobe attachment and behavioral traits[J]. Anthropol Biol, 1994,52(1):17-32 |
[24] | Pons J. Hand clasping and arm folding among Shias and Sunnis of Lucknow[J]. Anthropolanz, 1985,34(2):124-125 |
[25] | Pons J. Hand clasping (Spanish data)[J]. Ann Hum, 1961,25(2):327-334 |
[26] | Karev GB. Arm folding, hand clasping and dematoglyphical symmetry in Bulgarians[J]. Anthropolanz, 1993,51(1):69-71 |
[27] | Arrieta I, Aragones A, Gonzale ZE, et al. Hand clasping and arm folding in the Basque population[J]. Anthrop Anz, 1985,43(3):227-230 |
[28] | 闫春燕, 郑连斌, 胡莹, 等. 四川资阳汉族7项不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 山西大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,34(3):507-512 |
[29] | 刘静, 彭静, 余跃生, 等. 贵州汉族7种不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 黔南民族医专学报, 2009,22(3):157-160 |
[30] | 廖颖, 黎霞, 周芳, 等. 四川凉山彝族7项不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 四川师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,34(5):761-765 |
[31] | 杨建辉, 陈利红, 郑连斌. 仫佬族7项不对称行为的研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2011,38(8):1470-1475 |
[32] | 周希澄, 郭平仲, 冀耀如, 等. 遗传学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1987 |
[33] | 周群华. 党项、“弭药”与四川西夏遗民[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 1993,4:50-56 |
[34] | 刘辉强. “藏彝走廊”的民族语言[J]. 藏学学刊, 2005, 179-184 |
[35] | 李志雄. 西双版纳“特殊人”[J]. 旅游, 2008,12:72-79 |
[1] | 包金萍, 郑连斌, 宇克莉, 王雅萱, 杜慧敏. 从体型特征来探讨中国夏尔巴人的族源[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(04): 653-663. |
[2] | 张兴华;杨亚军;王子善;郑连斌. 中国八甲人与空格人的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(02): 268-279. |
[3] | 韩在柱,陆舜华,郑连斌,栗淑媛,李咏兰,杨海云,郭晓熊. 兴安盟3个民族7种不对称行为特征的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20(02): 137-1443. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||