旧石器时代早期石制品分析方案

doi:10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0046

人类学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (04): 547-567.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0046

所属专题：特邀文章

• 特邀文章 • 下一篇

旧石器时代早期石制品分析方案

Ignacio de la TORRE¹(), Rafael MORA², 裴树文³^,⁴(), 马东东³^,⁴^,⁵

1.西班牙高级科学研究委员会(CSIC）历史研究所,西班牙马德里 28037
2.巴塞罗那自治大学文学院史前系,西班牙巴塞罗那 08193
3.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
4.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
5.中国科学院大学,北京 100049

收稿日期:2020-12-10 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-08-15 发布日期:2021-08-17
通讯作者: 裴树文
作者简介:Ignacio de la Torre,男,研究员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。Email: ignacio.delatorre@cchs.csic.es
基金资助:
European Research Council-Advanced Grant(832980);European Research Council-Advanced Grant(BICAEHFID);国家自然科学基金项目(41872029);国家自然科学基金项目(41372032)

A methodological protocol for the analysis of Early Stone Age lithic assemblages

Ignacio de la TORRE¹(), Rafael MORA², PEI Shuwen³^,⁴(), MA Dongdong³^,⁴^,⁵

1. Instituto de Historia, CSIC, 28037 Madrid, Spain
2. División de Prehistoria, Facultat de Lletres, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
3. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
4. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2020-12-10 Revised:2021-03-10 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-17
Contact: PEI Shuwen

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文提出一种应用于旧石器时代早期石制品研究的分析方案。本方案以宏观分析方法为主,不包括同样重要的微观分析方法,主要应用于旧石器时代早期石制品的技术-类型学分析,不涉及特定地区和特殊石制品的讨论。在旧大陆旧石器时代早期石器研究中,鉴于学者们使用的技术学与类型学分析方案总体相似,我们认为在研究中使用标准化的分析方案会提高地区间石器面貌的可比性,并有助于理解旧石器时代早期旧大陆古人类的技术行为模式。从这个角度出发,本文将回顾旧石器时代早期石器研究的主要理论和方法,并提出分析视角和术语建议,希望有助于研究中对描述剥片类、废片类、锤击工具、拼合工具和传统石制品的测量与绘图惯例。

关键词: 石器技术, 理论性视角, 分析方案, 旧石器时代早期

Abstract:

This paper proposes an analytical protocol for the study of early Palaeolithic stone tools. Our proposal follows a macroscopic approach and therefore does not cover the equally-important analysis of microscopic traces. Also, it focuses on techno-typological attributes of pre-Middle Palaeolithic artefact, thus avoiding entering into the discussion of the techno-morphological and regional particularities inherent to the lithic record from the Middle Stone Age onwards. Given the overall similarities of technological solutions employed during the Early Stone Age lithic assemblages and their relative typological homogeneity across the Old World, we argue that using standardized protocols in the description of stone tool collections may improve comparability and help understanding global patterns of technological behaviour across the early Palaeolithic. From this perspective, this paper will review the main theoretical approaches to the study of Early Stone Age stone assemblages and will propose analytical perspectives and terminologies in the description of flaked, detached and pounded tools, as well in the study of refits and conventions in artefact measuring and illustration.

Key words: Lithic technology, Theoretical perspectives, Analytical protocols, Early Stone Age

中图分类号:

K871.11

Ignacio de la TORRE, Rafael MORA, 裴树文, 马东东. 旧石器时代早期石制品分析方案[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(04): 547-567.

Ignacio de la TORRE, Rafael MORA, PEI Shuwen, MA Dongdong. A methodological protocol for the analysis of Early Stone Age lithic assemblages[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(04): 547-567.

图/表 15

图1 石片和石核的主要属性特征石片/Flake (from EF-HR, Olduvai, Tanzania);(B) 石核/Core (from Peninj, Tanzania)

Fig.1 Main features of flake and core

图2 石片台面特征与背面片疤方向说明台面类型/Types;B)台面片疤/Facets;C)台面形态/Morphology; D) 石片背面片疤方向/Scar directionality in the dorsal face of flakes

Fig.2 Features of the flake striking platform and scar directionality in the dorsal face of flakes

图3 石片或残片上的剥片事故裂片/siret fracture;（B）横向断片/transverse fracture;（C）远端/termination

Fig.3 Knapping accidents in flakes/ flake fragments

图4 锤击法剥片石核的理想模型

Fig.4 Idealized schemes of free-hand core reduction

图5 EF-HR的石刀（奥杜威,坦桑尼亚）

Fig.5 Knife from EF-HR (Olduvai, Tanzania)

图6 EF-HR遗址出土的手镐（奥杜威,坦桑尼亚）

Fig.6 Pick from EF-HR (Olduvai, Tanzania)

图7 薄刃斧的形态学和技术学特征坦桑尼亚Natron湖Peninj遗址出土的薄刃斧/Cleaver from Peninj, in Lake Natron (Tanzania);B）薄刃斧的技术学分类, 修改自Tixier[57]/Technological classification of cleavers;C）薄刃斧的类型学分类,修改自Clark and Kleindienst[59]/Typological classification of cleavers

Fig.7 typological and technological morphotypes of cleavers

图8 Mieso 43遗址的两面器（Miese峡谷,坦桑尼亚）

Fig.8 Biface from Mieso 43 (Mieso valley, Ethiopia)

图9 飞梁和麻地沟遗址的修理工具（泥河湾盆地）飞梁遗址的刮削器[60]/Scraper from Feiliang;B）麻地沟E2地点的锯齿刃器[61]/Denticulate from MDG E2;C）飞梁遗址的尖状器[60]/Point from Feiliang

Fig.9 Retouched tools from Feiliang and Madigou site (Nihewan basin)

图10 修理或修型的描述（参照Laplace[49]和Mora[48]等）

Fig.10 Description of retouch/shaping

图11 石锤 FLK遗址北1-2层出土的剥片石锤（奥杜威峡谷,坦桑尼亚）/Knapping hammerstone from FLK North Level 1-2 (Olduvai Gorge), Tanzania; B）Gadeb 2E遗址带有裂痕的石锤（埃塞俄比亚）/Hammerstone with fracture angles from Gadeb 2E (Ethiopia)

Fig.11 Hammerstone

图12 在砸击实验过程中石砧剥离的产品（修改自de la Torre等[50]）

Fig.12 Positives detached from anvils during experimental battering processes

图13 石砧的其他功能

Fig.13 Alternative functions of stone anvils

图14 奥杜威砸击实验的石制品拼合组（修改自de la Torre等[26]）拼合线的玫瑰花图/Rose diagram of refit lines;B）拼合重建/Refit connections;C）Kernel密度图/Kernel density map

Fig.14 Experimental refit set of Olduvai bipolar lithics

图15 EF-HR遗址中的两面器(A-B）和石刀(C-D）（奥杜威,坦桑尼亚）及技术符号说明线图/Artistic drawing;B）历时性变化的符号轮廓图/Diacritic and chronology of removals over sketch;C）照片与符号轮廓图的结合/Diacritic interpretation over photograph;D）与C图中相同石制品的3D模型/3D model of same piece as in C;E）技术符号类别/Symbols used in diacritic schemes：1.台面有打击点的石片/Location of striking point on the flake butt;2.不具打击点的石片/Inferred location of butt;3.裂片/Location of striking point on Siret (split) flake;4.可观测到打击点的片疤方向/Flaking direction of scar with percussion point;5.不可以观测到打击点的片疤方向/Flaking direction of scar where percussion point is absent;6.推测的片疤方向/Inferred flaking direction of scar;7.砸击石片疤/Bipolar scar;8.对应的剥片面上的片疤的打击点/Percussion point of scar on the adjacent flaking surface;9.对应剥片面上无打击点的石片疤/Location of scar lacking percussion point on the adjacent flaking surface

Fig.15 Biface (A-B) and knife (C-D) from EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania), and symbols used in diacritic schemes

参考文献 85

[1]	Nelson MC. The Study of Technological Organization[A]. In: Schiffer MB (Ed.). Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol 3[C]. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991: 57-100
[2]	Kelly RL. The three sides of a biface[J]. American Antiquity, 1988, 53(4):717-734 doi: 10.2307/281115 URL
[3]	Ricklis RA, Cox KA. Examining lithic technological organization as a dynamic cultural subsystem: the advantages of an explicitly spatial approach[J]. American Antiquity, 1993, 58(3):444-461 doi: 10.2307/282106 URL
[4]	Geneste JM. L´approvisionnement en matières premières dans les systemes de production lithique: la dimension spatiale de la technologie[A]. In: Mora R, et al (Eds.). Tecnología y cadenas operativas líticas[C]. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 1991: 1-36
[5]	Lemonnier P. Topsy turvy techniques. Remarks on the social representation of techniques[J]. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1990, 9(1):27-37
[6]	Bordes F. Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen[M]. Bordeaux: Institut de Préhistoire de l´Université de Bordeaux, 1961
[7]	Leakey MD. Olduvai Gorge, Vol 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960-1963[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971
[8]	Binford LR. Archaeology as Anthropology[J]. American Antiquity, 1962, 28(2):217-225 doi: 10.2307/278380 URL
[9]	Isaac GL. The Archaeology of Human Origins: Studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa 1971-1981[A]. In: Wendorf F, Close AE (Eds.). Advances in World Archaeology[C]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984: 1-87
[10]	Isaac GL. Foundation stones: early artifacts as indicators of activities and abilities[A]. In: Bailey GN, Callow P (Eds.). Stone Age Prehistory: studies in Memory of Charles McBurney[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 221-241
[11]	Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya; An Experimental Approach[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982
[12]	Toth N. The Oldowan Reassessed: a Close Look at Early Stone Artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985, 12(2):101-120 doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90056-1 URL
[13]	Potts R. Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai[M]. New York: Aldine and Gruyter, 1988
[14]	Potts R. Why the Oldowan? Plio-Pleistocene toolmaking and the transport of resources[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1991, 47(2):153-176 doi: 10.1086/jar.47.2.3630323 URL
[15]	Isaac GL, Harris JWK, Kroll EM. The Stone Artefact Assemblages: A Comparative Study[A]. In: Isaac GL (Ed.). Koobi Fora Research Project, Volume 5: Plio-Pleistocene Archaeology[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 262-362
[16]	Semaw S. The World´s Oldest Stone Artefacts from Gona, Ethiopia: Their Implications for Understanding Stone Technology and Patterns of Human Evolution Between 2.6-1.5 Million Years Ago[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2000, 27:1197-1214 doi: 10.1006/jasc.1999.0592 URL
[17]	Reti JS. Quantifying Oldowan Stone Tool Production at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(1):e0147352 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147352 URL
[18]	Karlin C, Julien M. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science?[A]. In: Renfrew C, Zubrow EBW (Eds.). The ancient mind. Elements of cognitive archaeology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 152-164
[19]	Delagnes A, Roche H. Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2005, 48:435-472 pmid: 15857650
[20]	Roche H, Texier PJ. La notion de complexité dans un ensemble lithique. Application aux séries acheuléenes d´Isenya (Kenya)[A]. In: APDCA-Juan-les-Pins (Eds). 25 ans d´études technologiques en Préhistoire[C]. Ville D’antibes: Le centre de recherches archéologiques du CNRS, 1991, 99-108
[21]	Roche H, Texier PJ. Evaluation of Technical Competence of Homo erectus in East Africa During the Middle Pleistocene[A]. In: Bower JRF, Sartorno S (Eds.). Human Evolution in its Ecological Context[M]. Leiden: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1996: 153-167
[22]	Texier PJ, Roche H. The impact of predetermination on the development of some Acheulean chaînes opératoires[A]. In: José Maria Bermudez, Eudald Carbonell i Roura, Juan Luis Arsuaga (Eds.). Evolución humana en Europa y los yacimientos de la Sierra de Atapuerca, Vol 2[C]. Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León, 1995, 403-420
[23]	de la Torre I. The Early Stone Age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the Developed Oldowan / early Acheulean in East Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011, 60:768-812 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.009 URL
[24]	de la Torre I, Mora R, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, et al. The Oldowan industry of Peninj and its bearing on the reconstruction of the technological skills of Lower Pleistocene hominids[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003, 44:203-224 doi: 10.1016/S0047-2484(02)00206-3 URL
[25]	Mora R, de la Torre I. Percussion tools in Olduvai Beds I and II (Tanzania): Implications for early human activities[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2005, 24:179-192 doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.12.001 URL
[26]	de la Torre I, Mora R. Oldowan technological behaviour at HWK EE (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120:236-273 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.04.001 URL
[27]	de la Torre I, Mora R. Technological behaviour in the early Acheulean of EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120:329-377 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.01.003 URL
[28]	Leroi-Gourhan A. Le geste et la parole. I- Technique et language. II- La mémoire et les rythmes[M]. Paris: Albin Michel, 1964
[29]	Leroi-Gourhan A. L´homme et la matière[M]. Paris: Albin Michel, 1971
[30]	Pelegrin J. Réflexions sur le comportement technique[A]. In: Otte M (Ed.). La Signification Culturelle des Industries Lithiques. Actes du Colloque de Liège du 3 an 7 octobre 1985[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 239, 1985: 72-91
[31]	Pelegrin J. Prehistoric Lithic Technology: Some Aspects of Research[J]. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1990, 9(1):116-125
[32]	Pelegrin J, Karlin K, Bodu P. “Chaînes opératoires”: un outil pour le préhistorien[J]. Technologie Prehistorique. Notes et Monographies Techniques, 1988, 25:55-62
[33]	Boëda E. Approche de la variabilité des systèmes de production lithique des industries du Paléolithique inférieur et moyen: chronique d´une variabilité attendue[J]. Techniques et Culture, 1991, (17-18):37-79
[34]	Boëda E, Geneste J M, Meignen L. Identification de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen[J]. Paléo, 1990, 2:43-80 doi: 10.3406/pal.1990.988 URL
[35]	Geneste JM. Analyse lithique d´industries mousteriennes du Périgord: una aproche technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paléolitique Moyen[D]. Bordeaux: Université de Bordeaux I, 1985
[36]	Pelegrin J. Les savoir-faire: Une très longue histoire[J]. Terrain, 1991, 16:106-113
[37]	Karlin C, Bodu P, Pelegrin J. Processus techniques et chaînes opératoires; comment les préhistoriens s´approprient un concept élaboré par les ethnologues[A]. In: Balfet H (Ed.). Observer l Áction Technique[C]. 1991, 101-117
[38]	de la Torre I, Mora R. Remarks on the Current Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Study of Early Technological Strategies in Eastern Africa[A]. In: Hovers E, Braun DR (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Oldowan[C]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009: 15-24
[39]	Perlès C. Ecological determinism, group strategies, and individual decisions in the conception of prehistoric stone assemblages[A]. In: Berthelet A, Chavaillon J (Eds.). The Use of Tools by Human and Non-humans Primates[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, 267-277
[40]	Young DE, Bonnichsen R. Understanding Stone Tools: A Cognitive Approach[M]. Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man, Peopling of the Americans series, Vol. 1, University of Maine at Orono, 1984: 312
[41]	Isaac GL. The Food-sharing Behavior of Protohuman Hominids[J]. Scientific American, 1978, 238(4):90-108 pmid: 418504
[42]	Isaac GL. The earliest archaeological traces[A]. In: Clark JD (Ed.). Cambridge History of Africa. Volume 1. From the Earliest Times to c500 BC[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982: 157-247
[43]	Edmonds M. Description, understanding and the chaine operatoire[J]. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1990, 9(1):55-70
[44]	Henry DO. Prehistoric Cultural Ecology and Evolution: Insights from the Southern Jordan[M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1995
[45]	Marks AE. Prehistory and Paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel[M]. Dallas: Southern Methodist University, 1977
[46]	Perlès C. In Search of Lithic Strategies. A Cognitive Approach to Prehistoric Chipped Stone Assembages[A]. In: Gardin JC, Peebles CS (Eds.). Representations in Archaeology[C]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992, 223-247
[47]	Inizan ML, Reduron-Balliner M, Roche H, et al. Technologie de la pierre taillée[M]. Meudon: CREP, 1995
[48]	Mora R, Martínez J, Terradas X. Un proyeto de análisis: el Sistema Lógico Analítico (SLA)[A]. In: Mora R, et al (Eds.). Tecnología y cadenas operativas líticas[C]. Barcelona: Treballs d´Arqueologia, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 1991, 173-199
[49]	Laplace G. La typologie analytique et structurale: Base rationnelle d’étude des industries lithiques et osseuses[J]. Colloques nationaux du Centre National de la Recherche scientifique. Banques de données aechéologiques, 1972, 932:91-143
[50]	de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Arroyo A, et al. Experimental protocols for the study of battered stone anvils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2013, 40(1):313-332 doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.007 URL
[51]	Cziesla E. On refitting of stone artefacts[A]. In: Cziesla E, Eickhoff E. The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts[C]. Holos: Verlag Bonn, 1990, 9-44
[52]	de la Torre I, Martínez-Moreno J, Mora R. When bones are not enough: lithic refits and occupation dynamics in the Middle Palaeolithic Level 10 of Roca dels Bous (Catalonia, Spain)[A], In: Seetah K, Gravina B (Eds.). Bones for Tools - Tools for Bones: the Interplay Between Objects and Objectives[M]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2012, 13-23
[53]	Peresani M. Discoid Lithic Technology: Advances and implications[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1120, 2003
[54]	Texier PJ, Roche H. Polyèdre, sub-sphéroïde, sphéroïde et bola: des segments plus ou moins longs d´une même chaîne opératoire[J]. Cahier Noir, 1995, 7:31-40
[55]	Schick KD, Toth N. Early Stone Age Technology in Africa: a Review and Case Study into the Nature and Function of Spheroids and Subspheroids[A]. In: Corruchini RS, Ciochon RL (Eds.). Integrative Paths to the Past. Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994, 429-449
[56]	Kleindienst MR. Component of the East African Acheulian assemblage: an analytic approach[A]. In: Mortelmans G, Nenquin J (Eds.). Actes du IV Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l´Etude du Quaternaire, Leopoldville, 1959[C]. Tervuren: Belgie Annalen, Musée Royal de l´Afrique Centrale, 1962, 81-108
[57]	Tixier J. Le hachereau dans l’Acheuléen Nord-Africain: notes typologiques[A]. In: Congrès préhistorique de France(Eds.). Congrès préhistorique de France: comptes rendus de la XVème session, Poitiers’Angoulème, July 15-22, 1956[C]. Société Préhistorique Française, 1956, 914-923
[58]	Isaac GL. Olorgesailie. Archeological Studies of a Middle Pleistocene Lake Basin in Kenya[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977
[59]	Clark JD, Kleindienst MR. The Stone Age cultural sequence: terminology, typology and raw material[A]. In: Clark JD (Ed.). Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, III: The Earlier Cultures: Middle and Earlier Stone Age[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 34-65
[60]	Pei S, Xie F, Deng C, et al. Early Pleistocene archaeological occurrences at the Feiliang site, and the archaeology of human origins in the Nihewan Basin, North China[J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(11):e0187251 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187251 URL
[61]	Pei S, Deng C, de la Torre I, et al. Magnetostratigraphic and archaeological records at the Early Pleistocene site complex of Madigou (Nihewan Basin): Implications for human adaptations in North China[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 2019, 530:176-189 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.014 URL
[62]	Arroyo A, de la Torre I. Pounding tools in HWK EE and EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania): Percussive activities in the Oldowan-Acheulean transition[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120:402-421 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.10.005 URL
[63]	Clark JD. The stone ball: its associations and use by prehistoric man in Africa[A]. In: Balout L (Ed.). II Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire, Alger. Actes de la IIe session[C]. Paris: Arts et Métieres graphiqies, 1955: 403-417
[64]	Clark JD, Kleindienst MR. The Stone Age cultural sequence: terminology, typology, and raw material[A]. In: Clark JD (Ed.). Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, Vol 2[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974: 71-106
[65]	Willoughby PR. Spheroids and Battered Stones in the African Early Stone Age[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 321, 1987
[66]	Sahnouni M, Schick K, Toth N. An Experimental Investigation into the Nature of Faceted Limestone “Spheroids” in the Early Palaeolithic[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1997, 24:701-713 doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0152 URL
[67]	Jones PR. Results of experimental work in relation to the stone industries of Olduvai Gorge[A]. In: Leakey MD, Roe DA (Eds.). Olduvai Gorge. Volume 5. Excavations in Beds III, IV and the Masek Beds, 1968-1971[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 254-298
[68]	Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G, Melamed Y, et al. Nuts, nut cracking, and pitted stones at Gesher Benot Ya´aqov, Israel[J]. PNAS, 2002, 99(4):2455-2460 pmid: 11854536
[69]	Kleindienst MR, Keller CM. Towards a functional analysis of handaxes and cleavers: the evidence from Eastern Africa[J]. Man, 1976, 11(2):176-187 doi: 10.2307/2800203 URL
[70]	Shen C, Wang S. A preliminary study of the anvil-chipping technique: experiments and evaluations[J]. Lithic Technology, 2000, 25(2):81-100 doi: 10.1080/01977261.2000.11720966 URL
[71]	de la Torre I, Mora R, Arroyo A, et al. Acheulean technological behaviour in the Middle Pleistocene landscape of Mieso (East-Central Ethiopia)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014, 76:1-25 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.008 URL
[72]	Villa P. Conjoinable Pieces and Site Formation Processes[J]. American Antiquity, 1982, 47(2):276-290 doi: 10.2307/279901 URL
[73]	Deschamps M, Zilhão J. Assessing site formation and assemblage integrity through stone tool refitting at Gruta da Oliveira (Almonda karst system, Torres Novas, Portugal): A Middle Paleolithic case study[J]. Plos One, 2018, 13(2):e0192423 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192423 URL
[74]	Blumenschine RJ, Masao FT, Tactikos J C, et al. Effects of distance from stone source on landscape-scale variation in Oldowan artifact assemblages in the Paleo-Olduvai Basin, Tanzania[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 35:76-86 doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.009 URL
[75]	Pei WC. Paleolithic Industries in China[A]. In: MacCurdy GG (Ed.). Early Man[M]. Philadephia: J. B. Lippincott, 1937, 221-232
[76]	Pei WC. Preliminary study on a new Paleolithic station known as locality 15 within the Choukoutien region[J]. Bull. Geol. S China, 1939, 19(2):147-187
[77]	张森水. 中国旧石器文化[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 1987
[78]	张森水. 丁村54:100地点石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(3):195-213
[79]	李炎贤. 关于砾石石器分类的一些问题[A].见: 封开县博物馆,等(编).纪念黄岩洞遗址发现三十周年论文集[C]. 广州: 广东旅游出版社, 1991, 147-153
[80]	王幼平. 石器研究–旧石器时代考古方法初探[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006
[81]	卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(2):85-96
[82]	卫奇. 石制品观测格式探讨[A].见: 邓涛,王原(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2002, 209-218
[83]	裴树文. 旧石器时代石制品室内观测项目探讨[A].见: 董为(主编).第十四届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2014, 181-194
[84]	黄慰文. 东亚和东南亚旧石器初期重型工具的类型学——评Movius的分类体系[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(4):297-304
[85]	裴树文. 奥杜威工业石制品分类综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3):329-342

旧石器时代早期石制品分析方案

A methodological protocol for the analysis of Early Stone Age lithic assemblages

在线阅读

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 85

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	Omry BARZILAI. 以色列内盖夫沙漠的发现对黎凡特石器工业来源与去向的启示[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(05): 626-637.
[2]	赵宇超, 李锋, 周静, 陈福友, 高星. 甘肃杨上旧石器遗址剥片技术与策略[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(05): 604-615.
[3]	范文田, 杨晓冬. 泥河湾盆地南山根地点发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(02): 260-271.
[4]	张改课, 郭小宁, 弋双文, 张红艳, 赵汗青, 王社江. 黄河中游晋陕峡谷陕西侧龙门至壶口段新发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(03): 470-480.
[5]	关莹, 周振宇. 数据科学在旧石器考古学中的应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(01): 169-179.
[6]	高立红, 侯亚梅, 黄秋艳, 李金燕, 陆正勤, 黄德奖. 百色盆地六林岭旧石器遗址试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(01): 135-147.
[7]	杨石霞, 裴树文, 邓成龙. 早-中更新世中国古人类演化及其与气候环境的关系[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 436-453.
[8]	李三灵, 李浩. 旧石器时代早期石核分类方法试析[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(02): 194-207.
[9]	牛东伟, 裴树文, 王惠民, 高星. 宁夏水洞沟遗址第7地点石制品的剥片与修理技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(03): 367-378.
[10]	陈胜前, 叶灿阳. 细石叶工艺起源研究的理论反思[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(04): 547-562.
[11]	王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(04): 565-576.
[12]	李浩. 中国旧石器时代早、中期石器技术多样性研究的新进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(04): 602-612.
[13]	王幼平. 华北旧石器晚期环境变化与人类迁徙扩散[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(03): 341-351.
[14]	李锋;高星. 东亚现代人来源的考古学思考:证据与解释[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(02): 176-191.
[15]	刘拓. 伊朗旧石器考古简史及早期文化的发现与研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(01): 49-61.