盘状石核剥片实验及对华北石片石器研究的启示

doi:10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0055

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

盘状石核以两面交互打击、向心剥片为主要特征,在中国旧石器文化发展中具有重要地位。本文针对华北石片石器中盘状石核与非定型石核长期共存这一文化现象,展开剥片实验,分析了这两种剥片策略所获得的石片之间的差异。研究发现,石片的台面类型、背面片疤方向、保留石核台面边缘特征石片比例这三个指标可以有效区分这两种剥片策略,石片的技术分析对于理解华北石片石器工业的剥片策略同样具有重要价值。

关键词: 实验, 盘状石核, 剥片, 石片石器

Abstract:

The discoidal core characterized by the bifacial centripetal flaking method has played an essential role in the Chinese Paleolithic. This research focused on the long-term coexistence of discoidal and amorphous cores in Flake Tool Industry discovered in Northern China, and highlighted the differences between flakes produced by these two different methods. As a result, this study shows that three indexes can be used to distinguish the two methods: platform type, dorsal scar direction, and the proportion of flakes retaining the edge of the core platform. This study also implies technological analysis on flake is important to understand the reductional strategy of the Flake Tool Industry in North China.

Key words: Experiment, Discoidal core, Flaking, Flake tool industry

中图分类号:

K871.11

李文成. 盘状石核剥片实验及对华北石片石器研究的启示[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(03): 514-522.

LI Wencheng. Experimental analysis on flaking of discoidal cores and its application in understanding the flake tool industry in North China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(03): 514-522.

图/表 6

表1 实验标本剥片前后尺寸对比

Tab. 1 Dimensions of blanks and cores in experimental study

类型Type	编号No.	毛坯 Blank			石核 Core			剥片数量 n of flaking
类型Type	编号No.	长L(mm)	宽b(mm)	厚d(mm)	长L(mm)	宽b(mm)	厚d(mm)	剥片数量 n of flaking
盘状石核Discoidal core	19XLL:3	72	95.6	47.4	20.5	50.4	37	20
	19XLL:5	116.4	141.7	56.8	26.2	51.5	42.1	36
	19XLL:6	76.4	90.9	32.3	22.4	43.6	38	24
	19XLL:7	96.4	142.3	44.7	39.7	70.3	64.6	19
	19XLL:8	58.6	91.8	40.1	31	50.7	44.8	18
非定型石核剥片Amorphous core	19XLL:9	72.2	83.4	52	47	55.3	31.8	13
	19XLL:10	87.6	93.5	50.9	28	50.9	34.4	27
	19XLL:11	94.8	107.9	45.4	89.7	55.7	41.8	23
	19XLL:12	52.8	82.7	26.9	40.1	44.5	21	15
	19XLL:13	88.8	134	43.4	67	71.8	49.9	32

图1 标本19XLL:5不同剥片阶段形态变化 a.毛坯形态Morphology of the blank;b.成功剥取20件完整石片后石核形态Morphology of the core after 20 flake removals;c.成功剥取36件完整石片后剥片行为终止时石核形态Morphology of the core at the end of reduction, 36 flakes removals

Fig. 1 Morphological change of 19XLL:5 in different reductional stages

图2 盘状石核与非定型石核石片对比

Fig. 2 Comparison of attributes of flakes produced by discoidal and amorphous cores

表2 盘状石核与非定型石核石片台面性质

Tab. 2 Platform type of flakes produced by discoidal and amorphous cores

台面类型Type of platform	盘状 Discoidal		非定型 Amorphous
台面类型Type of platform	数量n	百分比%	数量n	百分比%
自然面Cortical	4	3.4%	0	0
自然面+石片疤Cortical + Scar	5	4.3%	0	0
素台面Plain	39	33.3%	94	85.5%
节理面+石片疤Joint surface + Scar	2	1.7%	0	0
有疤（≥2个片疤）Dihedral + Faceted	44	37.6%	10	9.1%
线状Linear	6	5.1%	3	2.7%
点状Punctiform	12	10.3%	3	2.7%
脊状Ridge	5	4.3%	0	0
总计Total	117	100%	110	100%

图3 石片背面片疤方向数量

Fig.3 Number of dorsal scar direction

图4 保留石核台面边缘特征的石片 a. A类Type A;b. B1类Type B1;c. B2类Type B2;d. C类Type C其中灰色箭头指示打击方向与打击点位置Grey arrows show the striking direction and location of striking point

Fig. 4 Different types of flakes retaining the edge of the core’s platform

参考文献 30

[1]	Terradas X. Discoid flaking method: conception and technological variability[A]. In: Peresani M (Eds.). Discoid Lithic Technology: Advances and Implications[C]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1120, 2003, 19-32
[2]	Inizan M L, Roche H, Tixier J. Technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary[M]. Meudon: CREP, 1992, 47
[3]	陈淳, 沈辰, 陈万勇, 等. 小长梁石工业研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 21(1): 23-40
[4]	Yang S X, Petraglia M D, Hou Y M, et al. The lithic assemblages of Donggutuo, Nihewan basin: Knapping skills of Early Pleistocene hominins in North China[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(9): e0185101 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185101 URL
[5]	贾兰坡, 卫奇. 阳高许家窑旧石器时代文化遗址[J]. 考古学报, 1976 (2): 97-114
[6]	高星. 周口店第 15 地点剥片技术研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(3): 199-215
[7]	Li H, Lotter M G. Lithic production strategies during the late Middle Pleistocene at Dali, Shaanxi Province, China: implications for understanding late archaic humans[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11(5): 1701-1712 doi: 10.1007/s12520-018-0626-6 URL
[8]	Li H, Li Z, Gao X, et al. Technological behavior of the early Late Pleistocene archaic humans at Lingjing (Xuchang, China)[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11(7): 3477-3490 doi: 10.1007/s12520-018-0759-7 URL
[9]	任进成, 李锋, 王晓敏, 等. 河北阳原县板井子旧石器时代遗址2015年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2018 (11): 3-14
[10]	陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 盘状石核相关问题探讨[J]. 考古, 2016 (2): 88-94
[11]	Kei Y M. The Middle Palaeolithic in China: a review of current interpretations[J]. Antiquity, 2012, 86(333): 619-626 doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00047803 URL
[12]	王社江, 沈辰, 胡松梅, 等. 洛南盆地1995-1999年野外地点发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(2): 87-103
[13]	Yang S X, Hou Y M, Pelegrin J. A Late Acheulean Culture on the Chinese Loess Plateau: The techno-economic behavior of the Dingcun lithic industry[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 400: 73-85 doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.043 URL
[14]	Lenoir M, Turq A. Recurrent centripetal debitage (Levallois and Discoidal): continuity and discontinuity[A]. In: Dibble H, Bar-Yosef O (Eds.). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, Monographs in World Archaeology 23[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 249-256
[15]	Boëda E. Levallois: a volumetric construction, methods, a technique[A]. In: Dibble H, Bar-Yosef O (Eds.). The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 41-65
[16]	Picin A, Vaquero M. Flake productivity in the Levallois recurrent centripetal and discoid technologies: New insights from experimental and archaeological lithic series[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2016, 8: 70-81 doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.062 URL
[17]	于建军, 王幼平, 何嘉宁, 等. 新疆吉木乃县通天洞遗址[J]. 考古, 2018 (7): 3-14
[18]	Li F, Kuhn S L, Chen F, et al. The easternmost middle paleolithic (Mousterian) from Jinsitai cave, north China[J]. Journal of human evolution, 2018, 114: 76-84 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.10.004 URL
[19]	Toth N. The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985, 12(2): 101-120 doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90056-1 URL
[20]	卫奇. 裴树文石片研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(4): 454-469
[21]	王幼平. 织机洞的石器工业与古人类活动[J]. 考古学研究, 2008, 136-148
[22]	刘扬, 侯亚梅. 石英岩硬锤直接剥片的实验考古学研究[J]. 考古学报, 2019 (2): 283-300
[23]	Driscoll K. Vein quartz in lithic traditions: an analysis based on experimental archaeology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, 38(3): 734-745 doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.027 URL
[24]	Debenath A, Dibble HL. Handbook of Paleolithic Typology-Volume One: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe[M]. Philadelphia: University Museum University of Pennsylvania, 1994, 10-20
[25]	李炎贤. 关于石片台面的分类[J]. 人类学学报, 1984 (3): 253-258
[26]	李炎贤. 关于石片台面研究的一些问题——兼与卫奇先生商榷[J]. 江汉考古, 2004 (2): 35-42
[27]	卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A]. 见: 第八届古脊椎动物学术年会文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218
[28]	卫奇. 关于石片台面研究问题的问题[J]. 文物春秋, 2006 (4): 1-12
[29]	卫奇. 就石片台面研究问题答李炎贤[J]. 江汉考古, 2006(4): 86-91
[30]	de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Proffitt T. The impact of hydraulic processes in Olduvai Beds I and II, Tanzania, through a particle dimension analysis of stone tool assemblages[J]. Geoarchaeology, 2018, 33(2): 218-236 doi: 10.1002/gea.21629 URL