人类学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (01): 1-14.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0002cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0002
• 研究论文 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2022-05-09
修回日期:
2022-05-30
出版日期:
2023-02-15
发布日期:
2023-02-20
作者简介:
张乐,副研究员,主要从事动物考古、骨制品和装饰品工艺技术等研究。E-mail: 基金资助:
ZHANG Yue1(), WU Xiujie1, ZHANG Shuangquan1,2
Received:
2022-05-09
Revised:
2022-05-30
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-02-20
摘要:
四川资阳人遗址因人类头骨化石的发现而备受关注,但该遗址1951年出土的唯一一件有机质工具——骨锥却鲜被提及。该骨锥长度约为10 cm,距今超过7500年。本文利用体视显微镜、扫描电镜能谱和激光元素仪等技术手段,对这件骨锥的形态、原料选择、制作技术、使用与废弃过程及锥尖部的红色残留物进行了观察分析。研究结果显示,骨锥的制作原料取自大型鹿类胫骨骨干;主要采用刮削技术制作而成,但刮削痕迹并不规整,推测制作者更侧重器型的规整和对称;锥尖部的磨圆、抛光和横向擦痕可能是穿孔过程中产生的,其工作对象主要应为兽皮等软性材料。值得注意的是,锥尖部还发现有赭石粉末残余,表明当时的人类已经掌握了利用赭石处理皮毛及缝制衣物的技术。资阳骨锥应是中国史前规范骨器中一器多用的典型例证,也是中国首次发现的沾染赭石的有机质工具。
中图分类号:
张乐, 吴秀杰, 张双权. 四川资阳人遗址出土的骨锥[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 1-14.
ZHANG Yue, WU Xiujie, ZHANG Shuangquan. A study of the bone awl from the Ziyang Man site, Sichuan Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 1-14.
图1 资阳人遗址出土的骨锥 A.从左到右为左侧面、背面、右侧面和腹面观left lateral, dorsal, right lateral, and ventral views (from left to right);腹面观图片示意了骨锥各部位的划分different portions are divided in ventral view;B、C.资阳骨锥与大型鹿胫骨骨干的形态特征对比Morphometric comparisons of the bone awl with the tibia mid-shaft of large sized deer.
Fig.1 The bone awl from the Ziyang Man site
图2 骨锥表面微痕 A. 上部尖背面dorsal aspect of the distal portion; B. 上部尖腹面ventral aspect of the distal portion;C. 上部肩shoulder of the distal portion;D. 下部尖侧面lateral side of the proximal portion; E. 下部尖背面dorsal aspect of the proximal portion;F. 下部尖腹面ventral aspect of the proximal portion.
Fig.2 The micro-wears on the bone awl
图3 骨锥表面残留的赭石 A、B. 骨锥上部尖的腹面分布红色残留物red residues on the ventral aspect of the distal portion;C. 扫描电镜下的红色残留物富集区及对比区域样品,其中1、2为红色残留物富集区测试点,3、4为不见红色残留物的对比区域测试点Area in which red residues (No.1 and 2 spots) and the comparative background (No.3 and 4 spots) were sampled under SEM;D、E. 图C中1、2位置的能谱图 SEM-EDS spectra showing the chemical composition of No.1 and 2 spots;F、G. 图C中3、4位置的能谱图SEM-EDS spectra showing the chemical composition of No.3 and 4 spots;H. 激光元素分析曲线图,其中红色曲线代表红色残留物富集区的测试值,蓝色曲线代表对比区域的测试值Results of the analysis of the red residues by LIBS (the red line is for the sampled spot of the red residues and the blue line is for the sampled spot from the comparative background).
Fig.3 The ochre residues on the distal extremity of the bone awl
元素 Elements | 红色残留物Red residues | 非红色残留物Non red residues | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No.1 | No.2 | No.3 | No.4 | ||||||||
质量Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | 质量 Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | 质量 Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | 质量 Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | ||||
C | 27.32% | 58.13% | 35.88% | 60.13% | 39.41% | 53.23% | 35.75% | 50.56% | |||
O | 10.39% | 16.59% | 17.69% | 22.26% | 34.93% | 35.42% | 33.17% | 35.22% | |||
Na | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.4% | 0.28% | 0.47% | 0.35% | |||||
P | 8.29% | 4.34% | 9.7% | 5.32% | |||||||
Al | 2.28% | 2.16% | 2.5% | 1.87% | |||||||
Si | 4.12% | 3.75% | 7.22% | 5.17% | |||||||
S | 4.19% | 3.34% | 4.11% | 2.58% | 0.46% | 0.23% | 0.64% | 0.34% | |||
K | 0.53% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.23% | |||||||
Ca | 1.23% | 0.78% | 0.74% | 0.37% | 14.86% | 6.01% | 17.77% | 7.53% | |||
Mn | 0.51% | 0.24% | 0.35% | 0.1% | 0.35% | 0.11% | |||||
Fe | 18.44% | 8.44% | 11.26% | 4.06% | 1.31% | 0.38% | 1.63% | 0.49% | |||
Zn | 2.18% | 0.85% | 0.69% | 0.21% | |||||||
Ba | 28.81% | 5.36% | 19.09% | 2.8% | 0.52% | 0.06% | |||||
总量Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
表1 红色残留物富集区及对比区域样品的扫描电镜测试数值
Tab.1 Data for the elemental composition of the red residues and control sample analysed with SEM-EDS
元素 Elements | 红色残留物Red residues | 非红色残留物Non red residues | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No.1 | No.2 | No.3 | No.4 | ||||||||
质量Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | 质量 Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | 质量 Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | 质量 Mass% | 原子 Atomic% | ||||
C | 27.32% | 58.13% | 35.88% | 60.13% | 39.41% | 53.23% | 35.75% | 50.56% | |||
O | 10.39% | 16.59% | 17.69% | 22.26% | 34.93% | 35.42% | 33.17% | 35.22% | |||
Na | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.4% | 0.28% | 0.47% | 0.35% | |||||
P | 8.29% | 4.34% | 9.7% | 5.32% | |||||||
Al | 2.28% | 2.16% | 2.5% | 1.87% | |||||||
Si | 4.12% | 3.75% | 7.22% | 5.17% | |||||||
S | 4.19% | 3.34% | 4.11% | 2.58% | 0.46% | 0.23% | 0.64% | 0.34% | |||
K | 0.53% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.23% | |||||||
Ca | 1.23% | 0.78% | 0.74% | 0.37% | 14.86% | 6.01% | 17.77% | 7.53% | |||
Mn | 0.51% | 0.24% | 0.35% | 0.1% | 0.35% | 0.11% | |||||
Fe | 18.44% | 8.44% | 11.26% | 4.06% | 1.31% | 0.38% | 1.63% | 0.49% | |||
Zn | 2.18% | 0.85% | 0.69% | 0.21% | |||||||
Ba | 28.81% | 5.36% | 19.09% | 2.8% | 0.52% | 0.06% | |||||
总量Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
图4 马鞍山遗址和水洞沟第12地点出土的骨锥 1-5.马鞍山遗址出土的骨锥Bone awls from the Ma’anshan site;6-8.水洞沟第12地点出土的骨锥Bone awls from the Shuidonggou Locality 12;A. 图1方框处的放大图Close-up view of the tip area in figure 1;B. 图3方框处的放大图Close-up view of the tip area in figure 3;C. 图7方框处的放大图Close-up view of the tip area in figure 7;D. 图8方框处的放大图Close-up view of the tip in figure 8.
Fig.4 Bone awls from the Ma’anshan site and the Shuidonggou Locality 12
[1] | Gates Saint-Pierre C, Walker RB. Bones as Tools: Current Methods and Interpretations in Worked Bone Studies[J]. British Archaeological Reports International Series. Vol 1622. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007, 1-182 |
[2] | Backwell LR, d’Errico F. The first use of bone tools: a reappraisal of the evidence from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[J]. Palaeontologia africana, 2004, 40(9): 95-158 |
[3] |
Ma S, Doyon L. Animals for Tools: The Origin and Development of Bone Technologies in China[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9: 784313
doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.784313 URL |
[4] | Klein RG. The Human Career:Human Biological and Cultural Origins (3rd Edition)[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009 |
[5] | Mellars P. Renfrew C (ed). The character of the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition in south-west FranceIn: Renfrew C (ed). The Explanation of Culture Change:Models in Prehistory[C]. London: Duckworth, 1973, 255-276 |
[6] |
McBrearty S, Brooks AS. The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2000, 39(5): 453-563
doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435 URL |
[7] |
Henshilwood CS, d’Errico F, Marean CW, et al. An early bone tool industry from the Middle Stone Age at Blombos Cave, South Africa: implications for the origins of modern human behaviour, symbolism and language[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2001, 41 (6): 631-678
pmid: 11782112 |
[8] |
d’Errico F, Henshilwood C, Lawson G, et al. Archaeological evidence for the emergence of language, symbolism, and music-an alternative multidisciplinary perspective[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2003, 17(1): 1-70
doi: 10.1023/A:1023980201043 URL |
[9] | 安家瑗. 华北地区旧石器时代的骨、角器[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20: 319-330 |
[10] | Breitborde R. A functional bone tool analysis[D]. M.A Thesis. Northridge: california state university northridge, 1983 |
[11] | Keddie G. Bone Awls: Bridging or Widening the Gaps between Archaeology and Ethnology[J]. The Midden, 2016, 44 (1): 10-12 |
[12] | Owen L. distoring the past[M]. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag, 2005 |
[13] | Wilbur CK. The New England Indians[M]. Chester, Connecticut: Globe Pequot Press, 1978 |
[14] | Miles C. Indian and Eskimo Artifacts of North America[M]. New York: American Legacy Press, 1963 |
[15] | Birket-Smith K. Ethnological collections from the northwest passage[J]. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition, 1921-24. Vol 6. Copenhagen: Nordisk Forlag; 1945 |
[16] | d’Errico F, Julien M, Liolios D, et al. Many awls in our argument. Bone tool manufacture and use in the Châtelperronian and Aurignacian levels of the Grotte du Renne at Arcy-sur-Cure[A]. In: Zilhao J, d’Errico F (eds). The Chronology of the Aurignacian and of the Transitional Technocomplexes: Dating, Stratigraphies, Cultural Implications: Proceedings of Symposium 6.1 of the XIVth Congress of the UISPP[C]. Lisbon: Instituto Portugués de Arqueología, 2003, 247-270 |
[17] |
d’Errico F, Backwell LR, Wadley L. Identifying regional variability in Middle Stone Age bone technology: The case of Sibudu Cave[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2012, 39 (7):2479-2495
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.040 URL |
[18] |
Zhang S, Doyon L, Zhang Y, et al. Innovation in bone technology and artefact types in the late Upper Palaeolithic of China: Insights from Shuidonggou Locality 12[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2018, 93 (3): 82-93
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.003 URL |
[19] | 刘旻, 王运辅, 付永旭, 等. 简论贵州高原史前时代的骨角铲、锥系统[J]. 南方文物, 2019, 5: 210-219 |
[20] |
Jacobs Z, Duller GA, Wintle AG, et al. Extending the chronology of deposits at Blombos Cave, South Africa, back to 140ka using optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2006, 51(3): 255-273
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.03.007 URL |
[21] |
d’Errico F, Henshilwood CS. Additional evidence for bone technology in the southern African middle stone age[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2007, 52(2): 142-163
pmid: 16996574 |
[22] |
Backwell L, d’Errico F, Wadley L. Middle Stone Age bone tools from the Howiesons Poort Layers, Sibudu Cave, South Africa[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 35(6): 1566-1580
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.11.006 URL |
[23] |
d’Errico F, Borgia V, Ronchitelli A. Uluzzian bone technology and its implications for the origin of behavioural modernity[J]. Quaternary International, 2012, 259: 59-71
doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.03.039 URL |
[24] |
d’Errico F. The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2003, 12(4): 188-202
doi: 10.1002/evan.10113 URL |
[25] | 北京师范大学历史学院, 洛阳市文物考古研究院, 栾川县文物管理所. 河南栾川龙泉洞遗址2011年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2017, 2: 227-248 |
[26] |
Du S, Li X, Zhou L, et al. Longquan Cave: an early Upper Palaeolithic site in Henan Province, China[J]. Antiquity, 2016, 90(352): 876-893
doi: 10.15184/aqy.2016.108 URL |
[27] |
Zhang S, d’Errico F, Backwell LR, et al. Ma’anshan cave and the origin of bone tool technology in China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2016, 65: 57-69
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.11.004 URL |
[28] | 裴文中, 吴汝康, 资阳人. 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所甲种专刊(第1号)[J]. 北京:科学出版社, 1957, 1-71 |
[29] | 成都地质学院第四纪科研组. 资阳人化石地层时代问题的商榷[J]. 考古学报, 1974, 2: 111-124 |
[30] | 安志敏. 关于我国若干原始文化年代的讨论[J]. 考古, 1972, 42(1): 57-89 |
[31] | 李宣民, 张森水. 资阳人B地点发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(3): 215-224 |
[32] | 吴汝康, 吴新智. 中国古人类遗址[M]. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 1999 |
[33] | 吴秀杰, 严毅. 资阳人头骨化石的内部解剖结构[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(4): 511-520 |
[34] | 中国科学院考古研究所实验室. 放射性碳素测定年代报告(一)[J]. 考古, 1972, 11: 52-56 |
[35] |
d’Errico F, Doyon L, Zhang S, et al. The origin and evolution of sewing technologies in Eurasia and North America[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2018, 125: 71-86
doi: S0047-2484(18)30085-X pmid: 30502899 |
[36] |
Zhang Y, Gao X, Pei SW, et al. The bone needles from Shuidonggou locality 12 and implications for human subsistence behaviors in North China[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 400: 149-157
doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.06.041 URL |
[37] |
Zhang Y, Doyon L, Peng F, et al. An Upper Paleolithic Perforated Red Deer Canine With Geometric Engravings From QG10, Ningxia, Northwest China[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10: 814761
doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.814761 URL |
[38] | Lyman RL. Vertebrate Taphonomy[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 1-552 |
[39] |
Dominguez-Rodrigo M, de Juana S, Galan AB, et al. A new protocol to differentiate trampling marks from butchery cut marks[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2009, 36(12): 2643-2654
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.07.017 URL |
[40] |
Buc N. Experimental series and use-wear in bone tools[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, 38(3):546-557
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.009 URL |
[41] | Griffitts JL. Bone tools and technological choice: change and stability on the Northern Plains[D]. Ph.D Dissertation. Arizona: University of Arizona, 2006 |
[42] |
Legrand A, Radi G. Manufacture and use of bone points from Early Neolithic Colle Santo Stefano, Abruzzo, Italy[J]. Journal Of Field Archaeology, 2008, 33(3): 305-320
doi: 10.1179/009346908791071196 URL |
[43] | Legrand A, Sidéra I. Gates St-Pierre C, Walker R eds. Methods, means and results when studying European bone industries[A]. In: Gates St-Pierre C, Walker R(eds). Bones as Tools: Current Methods and Interpretations in Worked Bone Studies[C]. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1622. Oxford:Archaeopress, 2007, 291-304 |
[44] |
LeMoine GM. Use wear on bone and antler tools from the Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories[J]. American Antiquity, 1994, 59 (2): 316-334
doi: 10.2307/281935 URL |
[45] | Buc N, Loponte D. Bone Tool Types and Microwear Patterns: Some Examples from the Pampa Region, South America[J]. In: Gates St-Pierre C, Walker R(eds). Bones as Tools: Current Methods and Interpretations in Worked Bone Studies[C]. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 1622. Archaeopress, 2007, 143-157 |
[46] | Pasveer J. Bone Artefacts from Liang Lemdubuand Liang Nabulei Lisa, Aru Islands[J]. Terra Australis, 2007, 22: 235-254 |
[47] | Pasveer JM. The Djief Hunters, 26,000 Years of Rainforest Exploitation on the Bird’s Head of Papua, Indonesia[J]. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia. Vol 17. Lisse: A. A. Balkema, 2004 |
[48] | Sillitoe P. Made in Niugini: technology in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea[M]. London: British Museum Publications, 1988 |
[49] | St-Pierre CG. Bone awls of the St. Lawrence Iroquoians: a microwear analysis[A]. In: Gates St-Pierre C, Walker R(eds). Bones as Tools: Current Methods and Interpretations in Worked Bone Studies, BAR International Series[C]. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007, 107-118 |
[50] | Bradfield J. Use-trace analysis of bone tools: a brief overview of four methodological approaches[J]. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 2015, 70(201): 3-14 |
[51] | Williamson B. Subsistence Strategies in the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu Cave: The Microscopic Evidence from Stone Tool Residues[A]. In: d’Errico F, Backwell L(eds). From Tools to Symbols: From Early Hominids to Modern Humans[C]. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2005, 493-511 |
[52] |
Rifkin RF. Assessing the Efficacy of Red Ochre as a Prehistoric Hide Tanning Ingredient[J]. Journal of African Archaeology, 2011, 9(2): 131-158
doi: 10.3213/2191-5784-10199 URL |
[53] |
Henshilwood CS, Sealy JC, Yates R, et al. Blombos Cave, Southern Cape, South Africa: Preliminary Report on the 1992-1999 Excavations of the Middle Stone Age Levels[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2001, 28(4): 421-448
doi: 10.1006/jasc.2000.0638 URL |
[54] |
d’Errico F, Backwell L, Villa P, et al. Early evidence of San material culture represented by organic artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(33): 13214-13219
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204213109 pmid: 22847420 |
[55] |
Wang FG, Yang SX, Ge JY, et al. Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago[J]. Nature, 2022, 603: 284-289
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04445-2 URL |
[56] |
d’Errico F. La vie sociale de l’art mobilier Paléolithique. Manipulation, transport, suspension des objets on os, bois de cervidés, ivoire[J]. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 1993, 12(2): 145-174
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.1993.tb00289.x URL |
[57] |
Qu TL, Bar-Yosef O, Wang Y, et al. The Chinese Upper Paleolithic: Geography, Chronology and Techno-typology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Research, 2013, 21(1): 1-73
doi: 10.1007/s10814-012-9059-4 URL |
[58] | Pasveer JM, Bellwood P. Prehistoric bone artefacts from the northern Moluccas, Indonesia[A]. In: Keates SG, Pasveer JM (eds). Quaternary Research in Indonesia[C]. Lisse: A.A. Balkema Publishers, 2004, 301-359 |
[59] | 柳州市博物馆, 广西壮族自治区文物工作队. 柳州市大龙潭鲤鱼嘴新石器时代贝丘遗址[J]. 考古, 1983, 9: 769-774 |
[60] | 张森水. 穿洞史前遗址(1981年发掘)初步研究[J]. 人类学学报. 1995, 14(2): 132-146 |
[61] | 毛永琴, 曹泽田. 贵州穿洞遗址1979年发现的磨制骨器的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(4): 335-343 |
[1] | 李尧, 陈虹, 徐廷. 黑曜岩实验打制品使用后的痕迹特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 727-743. |
[2] | 韩芳, 李冀源, 乔虹, 徐海伦, 何虹霖, 高璇, 吕红亮, 杜战伟, 蔡林海, 甄强, 马文灵. 环青海湖地区细石叶遗存新发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 839-852. |
[3] | 王华, 李占扬, Thijs van KOLFSCHOTEN. 德国西宁根与中国灵井的骨器比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 214-232. |
[4] | 许竞文, 浣发祥, 杨石霞. 旧石器时代考古中出土的赭石及相关遗物的研究方法[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 331-343. |
[5] | 王法岗, 杨石霞, 葛俊逸, 岳健平, 赵克良, Andreu Ollé, 李文艳, 杨海勇, 刘连强, 关莹, 谢飞, Francesco d’Errico, Michael Petraglia, 邓成龙. 泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址2013年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 143-156. |
[6] | 徐廷, 陈虹, 李尧. 吉林和龙大洞遗址2010年出土雕刻器的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(06): 751-763. |
[7] | 李三灵. 旧石器时代早中期刻划遗存的发现与研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(02): 288-303. |
[8] | 杨石霞, 许竞文, 浣发祥. 古人类对赭石的利用行为在其演化中的意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(04): 649-658. |
[9] | 崔天兴, 宋炜玮. 激光共聚焦显微镜在微痕定量分析中的应用综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(01): 180-192. |
[10] | 梁琪瑶, 张伟, 陈全家, 田禾. 黑龙江齐齐哈尔洪河遗址出土的骨器[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(05): 751-763. |
[11] | 赵海龙, 仝广, 闫晓蒙, 杨淼燃, 谭培阳. 河北泥河湾盆地下卜庄遗址端刮器功能的实验分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(04): 600-610. |
[12] | 杨露雅, 朱剑, 岳超龙, 唐际根. 殷墟玉器孔道内部微痕分类辨析[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(02): 249-260. |
[13] | 华李成, Peter S UNGAR. 牙齿微痕研究在古食性重建中应用的简述[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(02): 292-306. |
[14] | 徐哲, 张晓凌, 裴树文. 射击类带尖石制品使用微痕动态形成过程的实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(02): 208-222. |
[15] | 余官玥, 仪明洁, 张晓凌, 陈福友. 水洞沟地区白云岩细石叶的微痕实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(02): 193-207. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||