东北亚楔形细石核模拟剥片实验研究的回顾与展望

doi:10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0061

人类学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (01): 129-136.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0061cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0061

东北亚楔形细石核模拟剥片实验研究的回顾与展望

仝广¹^,²^,³^,⁴(), 李锋⁵, 高星¹^,²^,³()

1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室，中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所，北京 100044
2.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心，北京 100044
3.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
4.河北省文物研究所，石家庄 050031
5.北京大学考古文博学院，北京 100871

收稿日期:2021-12-13 修回日期:2022-03-10 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-02-20
通讯作者: 高星，研究员，主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: gaoxing@ivpp.ac.cn
作者简介:仝广，博士研究生，主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: tongpaleolithic@qq.com
基金资助:
中国科学院“战略性先导科技专项”(XDB26030203);国家社科基金中国历史研究院重大历史问题研究专项(21@WTK001);国家重点研发专项(2020YFC1521500)

Review and prospective of the experimental study on the simulated flaking of wedge-shaped microblade cores in Northeast Asia

TONG Guang¹^,²^,³^,⁴(), LI Feng⁵, GAO Xing¹^,²^,³()

1. Laboratory for Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of CAS at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
4. Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics, Shijiazhuang 050031
5. School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2021-12-13 Revised:2022-03-10 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旧石器时代晚期东北亚地区涌现出大量细石叶技术遗存，楔形细石核是该技术组合中的重要代表。楔形细石核因为多样的类型、广泛的分布受到学术界的关注，研究者从不同方面对其展开分析，其中模拟剥片实验发挥着关键作用。20世纪80年代以来，多位学者对东北亚地区广泛分布的楔形细石核进行了模拟剥片实验，尝试使用直接打击法、间接打击法、压制法从该类石核上剥制细石叶，设计了多种与剥片工艺配合使用的石核固定方式，还从原料选择策略、石核预制方法等角度展开讨论。本文从选用原料、预制石核、剥片工艺与固定方式等方面对这些实验取得的成果与存在的问题进行了梳理、总结和剖析，并对模拟实验在细石叶技术研究中的作用与发展前景进行分析和展望，以期为相关研究提供信息、启示并起到推动作用。

关键词: 东北亚, 细石叶技术, 楔形细石核, 剥片实验

Abstract:

There are many microblade assemblages emerged in Northeast Asia during the Upper Paleolithic. Among them, the wedge-shaped microblade cores are noteworthy in terms of their varied forms and extensive distribution throughout Northeast Asia. This kind of core reduction technique has been examined from multiple aspects by scholars using various methods, among which the knapping experiments have played a significant role in such studies, and yielding a wealth of information regarding microblade technology and ancient human behavior. Since 1980s, three knapping techniques, including direct percussion, indirect percussion, and pressing, have been employed by some scholars during the replication experiments for producing microblades from wedge-shaped blanks like those found in Northeast Asia. Moreover, Various methods of securing cores during flaking process have been designed to correspond with knapping techniques. Based upon these knapping experiments, strategies of raw material selection and core preparation have been discussed, and a lot of valuable information and inferences have been generated by these experiments, which are difficult to infer from archaeological data alone. Here, we attempt to provide a comprehensive review of these experimental studies, including aspects of raw material procurement and selection, core preparation, methods of securing cores, and the fabrication of end products. Furtherly, some deficiencies of these experimental studies are summarized and their prospects are also discussed. We hope this review provides some useful information and could inspire further research of microblade technology in Northeast Asia as well as promote more in-depth experimental studies in the future.

Key words: Northeast Asia, Microblade technology, Wedge-shaped microblade core, Knapping experimentation

中图分类号:

K871.1

仝广, 李锋, 高星. 东北亚楔形细石核模拟剥片实验研究的回顾与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 129-136.

TONG Guang, LI Feng, GAO Xing. Review and prospective of the experimental study on the simulated flaking of wedge-shaped microblade cores in Northeast Asia[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 129-136.

图/表 3

参考文献 42

[1]	Keates S. Microblade Technology in Siberia and Neigbouring Regions: An Overview[C]. In: Kuzmin YV, Keates SG, Shen C. Origin and spread of microblad technology in Northern Asia and North America [M]. Burnaby: Archaeology Press, 2007, 115-124
[2]	Norton CJ, Bae K, Lee H, et al. A Review of Korean Microlithic Industries[C]. In: Kuzmin YV, Keates SG, Shen C. Origin and Spread of Microblade Technology in Northern Asia and North America[M]. Burnaby: Archaeology Press, 2007, 91-102
[3]	Sato H, Tsutsumi T. The Japanese Microblade Industries: Technology, Raw Material Procurement[C]. In: Kuzmin YV, Keates SG, Shen C. Origin and Spread of Microblade technology in Northern Asia and North America[M]. Burnaby: Archaeology Press, 2007, 53-78
[4]	Chen C. Techno-typological comparison of microblade cores from East Asia and North America[C]. In: Kuzmin YV, Keates SG, Shen C. Origin and Spread of Microblade Technology in Northern Asia and North America[M]. Burnaby, British Columbia: Archaeology Press Simon Fraser University, 2007, 7-38
[5]	Nelson NC. Notes on Cultural Relations between Asia and America[J]. American Antiquity, 1937, 2(4): 267-272 doi: 10.2307/275463 URL
[6]	裴文中. 中国石器时代[M]. 北京: 中国青年出版社,1963
[7]	安志敏. 海拉尔的中石器遗存——兼论细石器的起源和传统[J]. 考古学报, 1978, 3: 289-316
[8]	梅惠杰. 关于楔形石核系统分类的相关认识[J]. 考古学研究, 2008, 265-271
[9]	加藤真二. 试论华北细石器工业的出现[J]. 华夏考古, 2015, 2: 56-67
[10]	盖培. 阳原石核的动态类型学研究及其工艺思想分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(3): 244-252
[11]	Seong C. Microblade Technology in Korea and Adjacent Northeast Asia[J]. Asian Perspectives, 1998, 37(2): 245-278
[12]	安志敏. 中国细石器发现一百年[J]. 考古, 2000, 5: 45-56
[13]	岳健平, 王晗, 加藤真二. 日本北海道地区细石叶技术研究概述[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(3): 392-403
[14]	Flenniken JJ. The Paleolithic Dyuktai pressure blade technique of Siberia[J]. Arctic Anthropology, 1987, 24(2): 117-132
[15]	Ohnuma K. Exprerimental Studies in the Determination of Manners of Micro-blade Detachment[J]. Al-Rafidan, 1993, 14: 477-494
[16]	Tabarev AV. Paleolithic Wedge-Shaped Microcores and Experiments with Pocket Devices[J]. Lithic technology, 1997, 22(2): 139-149 doi: 10.1080/01977261.1997.11754539 URL
[17]	赵海龙. 细石叶剥制实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(1): 22-31
[18]	Pelegrin J. New Experimental Observations for the Characterization of Pressure Blade Production Techniques[C]. In: Desrosiers P M. The Emergence of Pressure Blade Making: From Origin to Modern Experimentation[M]. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, 465-500
[19]	大場正善. 細石刃核をどう持つか:北海道奥白滝Ⅰ遺跡と上白滝8 遺跡の細石刃資料の動作連鎖概念に基づく技術学的分析[J]. 旧石器研究, 2014, 10: 41-66
[20]	大場正善. 細石刃核をどう持つか(2): 南九州出土細石刃関連資料を中心とした同さ連鎖に基づく石器技術学分析[J]. 鹿儿岛考古, 2019, 49: 31-44
[21]	Takakura J. Towards improved identification of obsidian microblade and microblade-like debitage knapping techniques: A case study from the Last Glacial Maximum assemblage of Kawanishi-C in Hokkaido, Northern Japan[J]. Quaternary International, 2021, 596: 65-78 doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2021.04.003 URL
[22]	田川, 徐廷, 关莹, 等. 吉林抚松枫林遗址细石核研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(1): 19-32
[23]	万晨晨, 陈全家, 方启, 等. 吉林和龙大洞遗址的调查与研究[J]. 考古学报, 2017, 1: 1-30
[24]	Yue J, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Lithic raw material economy at the Huayang site in Northeast China: localization and diversification as adaptive strategies in the Late Glacial[J]. Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2020, 12(6): 1-13 doi: 10.1007/s12520-019-00958-6 URL
[25]	杜水生, 王晶, 王益人, 等. 山西沁水下川遗址小白桦圪梁地点2015年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2019, 3: 383-408
[26]	盖培, 卫奇. 虎头梁旧石器时代晚期遗址的发现[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1977, 15(4): 287-300
[27]	王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 565-576
[28]	Nian X, Gao X, Xie F, et al. Chronology of the Youfang site and its implications for the emergence of microblade technology in North China[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 347: 113-121 doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.053 URL
[29]	张弛. 中国新石器时代的石叶技术——汉水中游仰韶文化石叶石镞[J]. 江汉考古, 2021, 6: 71-78
[30]	Feng Y. Microblades in MIS 2 Central China: Cultural Change and Adaptive Strategies[J]. PaleoAmerica, 2020, 6(2): 139-157 doi: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1728872 URL
[31]	Zhao C, Wang Y, Gu W, et al. The emergence of early microblade technology in the hinterland of North China: a case study based on the Xishi and Dongshi site in Henan Province[J]. Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2021, 13(6): 1-16 doi: 10.1007/s12520-020-01240-w URL
[32]	Yue J, Yang S, Li Y, et al. Human adaptations during MIS 2: Evidence from microblade industries of Northeast China[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2021, 567
[33]	王幼平. 华北旧石器晚期环境变化与人类迁徙扩散[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(3): 341-351
[34]	陈胜前. 细石叶工艺的起源——一个理论与生态的视角[J]. 考古学研究, 2008, 244-264
[35]	余官玥, 仪明洁, 张晓凌, 等. 水洞沟地区白云岩细石叶的微痕实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 193-207
[36]	陈虹. 华北细石叶工艺的文化适应研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2011
[37]	仪明洁. 中国北方的细石叶技术与社会组织复杂化早期进程[J]. 考古, 2019, 9: 70-78
[38]	杜水生. 楔形石核的类型划分与细石器起源[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(增刊): 211-222
[39]	王建, 王益人. 下川细石核形制研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 10(1): 1-8
[40]	陈淳. 中国细石核类型和工艺初探——兼谈与东北亚、西北美的文化联系[J]. 人类学学报, 1983, 2(4): 331-341
[41]	靳英帅, 张晓凌, 仪明洁. 楔形石核概念内涵与细石核分类初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(2): 307-319
[42]	陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 试论华北旧石器时代晚期细石核的类型、组合与分期[J]. 考古, 2022, 1: 75-83

实验者	黑曜岩	燧石	热处理	预制技法	剥片工艺	实验性质
J. Flenniken		●	●	湧别技法	压制	技术复原
Andrei Tabarev	●	●	●	湧别技法	压制	技术复原
大沼克彦	●	●		湧别技法	压制、直接、间接	技术分析
赵海龙	●			随机	压制、直接、间接	技术分析
Jacques Pelegrin	●			湧别技法	压制	技术复原
大場正善	●			峠下技法，福井技法	压制、间接、直接	技术复原

实验者	黑曜岩	燧石	热处理	预制技法	剥片工艺	实验性质
J. Flenniken		●	●	湧别技法	压制	技术复原
Andrei Tabarev	●	●	●	湧别技法	压制	技术复原
大沼克彦	●	●		湧别技法	压制、直接、间接	技术分析
赵海龙	●			随机	压制、直接、间接	技术分析
Jacques Pelegrin	●			湧别技法	压制	技术复原
大場正善	●			峠下技法，福井技法	压制、间接、直接	技术复原

东北亚楔形细石核模拟剥片实验研究的回顾与展望

Review and prospective of the experimental study on the simulated flaking of wedge-shaped microblade cores in Northeast Asia

在线阅读

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 42

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冯玥, 梅惠杰, 谢飞, 孙秀丽, 王幼平. 河北阳原马鞍山遗址1997-1998年发掘基本材料与初步认识[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 67-80.
[2]	靳英帅, 张晓凌, 仪明洁. 楔形石核概念内涵与细石核分类初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(02): 307-319.
[3]	岳健平, 王晗, 加藤真二. 日本北海道地区细石叶技术研究概述[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(03): 392-403.
[4]	陈淳;张萌. 细石叶工业研究的回顾与再思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(04): 577-589.
[5]	王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(04): 565-576.
[6]	韩芳;蔡林海;杜玮;何元洪;李佩;马春燕;吕红亮. 青南高原登额曲流域的细石叶工艺[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(01): 53-69.
[7]	任进成;周静;李锋;陈福友;高星. 甘肃石峡口旧石器遗址第1地点发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(01): 1-16.
[8]	仪明洁;高星;王惠民;裴树文;陈福友. 水洞沟第12地点2007年出土石核研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(02): 166-179.