人类学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (01): 46-60.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0052cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0052
叶芷1,2,3(), 杜雨薇1,2,3, 裴树文1,2(), 丁馨4, 徐哲1,2,3, 马东东1,2
收稿日期:
2021-10-26
修回日期:
2022-01-08
出版日期:
2023-02-15
发布日期:
2023-02-20
作者简介:
叶芷,硕士研究生,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: 基金资助:
YE Zhi1,2,3(), DU Yuwei1,2,3, PEI Shuwen1,2(), DING Xin4, XU Zhe1,2,3, MA Dongdong1,2
Received:
2021-10-26
Revised:
2022-01-08
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-02-20
摘要:
泥河湾盆地发育着我国北方第四纪典型的河湖相沉积体系,因其间富集众多早-中更新世旧石器时代遗址为学术界所关注。本文对泥河湾盆地蔚县吉家庄遗址(JJZ-B和JJZ-E地点)的遗址成因进行分析。地貌和沉积物特点表明,JJZ-B地点埋藏于湖滨相环境的湿地或沼泽环境,JJZ-E地点则属于湖滨相环境下的沙坝沉积体系。遗物的多项指标(遗物空间分布特点、石制品风化磨蚀状况、石制品技术组合与空间产状特征等)分析显示,JJZ-B地点属于近原地埋藏,形成过程中受到微弱的入湖片流改造,遗址完整性较高;JJZ-E地点的遗物连同砾石被湖滨片流搬运至遗址堆积区,后期受到了湖水的淘洗作用,显示异地埋藏的特点。研究表明,泥河湾古湖在中更新世仍保留有丰富的古人类活动信息,湖滨不同部位对遗址成因产生重要影响;该研究对正确解读古人类对吉家庄遗址不同地点的利用方式具有重要意义。
中图分类号:
叶芷, 杜雨薇, 裴树文, 丁馨, 徐哲, 马东东. 蔚县盆地吉家庄旧石器遗址的形成过程[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 46-60.
YE Zhi, DU Yuwei, PEI Shuwen, DING Xin, XU Zhe, MA Dongdong. A study of the formation process of Jijiazhuang Paleolithic site in Yuxian Basin[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 46-60.
图1 吉家庄旧石器遗址地理位置及地貌图 a-b.蔚县盆地和吉家庄遗址地理位置Map showing the location of the Yuxian basin and Jijiazhuang site; c.吉家庄遗址及周边遗址地理位置Geomorphologic location of different site in the adjacent area of Jijiazhuang site;d. JJZ-B地点地貌景观Geomorphologic location of JJZ-B site;e. JJZ-E地点地貌景观Geomorphologic location of JJZ-E site(CJG-蔡家沟遗址;QSY-前上营遗址;JJZ-吉家庄遗址)
Fig.1 Geographic and geomorphologic location of Jijiazhuang Paleolithic site
图2 JJZ-B和JJZ-E地点的地层剖面图 a.JJZ-B地点地层剖面图Stratigraphic section of JJZ-B;b.JJZ-B地点文化层沉积特征Sedimentary feature of cultural layer at JJZ-B;c.JJZ-E地点地层剖面图Stratigraphic section of JJZ-E;d.JJZ-E地点文化层沉积特征Sedimentary feature of cultural layer at JJZ-E
Fig.2 Stratigraphic profiles of JJZ-B and JJZ-E sites
粒度分级 size classes | 遗址剖面 stratigraphic profile | 文化层 archaeological layer |
---|---|---|
中粗砂以上large than granules (d≥0.25 mm) | 2.65% | 6.70% |
细砂fine sand (0.25<d≤0.125 mm) | 4.78% | 16.10% |
极细砂very fine sand (0.125<d≤0.063 mm) | 16.85% | 26.50% |
粉砂silt (0.063<d≤0.002 mm) | 75.20% | 50.54% |
黏土clay (d<0.002mm) | 0.52% | 0.16% |
表1 JJZ-B地点地层剖面和文化层粒度占比分析
Tab.1 Percentage of the grain size analysis of stratigraphic profile and archaeological layer from JJZ-B site
粒度分级 size classes | 遗址剖面 stratigraphic profile | 文化层 archaeological layer |
---|---|---|
中粗砂以上large than granules (d≥0.25 mm) | 2.65% | 6.70% |
细砂fine sand (0.25<d≤0.125 mm) | 4.78% | 16.10% |
极细砂very fine sand (0.125<d≤0.063 mm) | 16.85% | 26.50% |
粉砂silt (0.063<d≤0.002 mm) | 75.20% | 50.54% |
黏土clay (d<0.002mm) | 0.52% | 0.16% |
图4 JJZ-B、JJZ-E地点标本分布热力图、标本三维空间分布图,不同长度石制品空间分布图 a.JJZ-B标本空间分布热力图spatial distributions and k-densities of excavated remains of JJZ-B;b.JJZ-B标本三维空间分布图the 3D distributions of remains of JJZ-B;c.JJZ-B不同大小石制品空间分布图the spatial distributions in different size of lithics from JJZ-B;d.JJZ-E标本空间分布热力图spatial distributions and k-densities of excavated remains of JJZ-E;e.JJZ-E标本三维空间分布图the 3D distributions of remains of JJZ-E;f.JJZ-E不同大小石制品空间分布图the spatial distributions in different size of lithics from JJZ-E
Fig.4 Spatial distributions and k-densities of excavated remains, the 3D distributions of remains, the spatial distributions in different size of lithics from JJZ-B and JJZ-E
图5 JJZ-B、JJZ-E出土废片长度分布图,石质标本原料饼状图,石制品风化和磨蚀等级图 a.JJZ-B和JJZ-E出土废片长度分布图the size of debitage distribution pattern from JJZ-B and JJZ-E;b.JJZ-B和JJZ-E石质标本原料饼状图:A) JJZ-B石制品,B) JJZ-B非人工痕迹石料,C)JJZ-E石制品,D)JJZ-E非人工痕迹石料the raw materials of stone remains pie chart from JJZ-B and JJZ-E: A)lithics of JJZ-B, B)unmodified pieces of JJZ-B, C)lithics of JJZ-E, D)unmodified pieces of JJZ-E;c. JJZ-B和JJZ-E石制品风化等级图the weathering stages of lithics from JJZ-B and JJZ-E;d.JJZ-B和JJZ-E石制品磨蚀等级图the abrasion stages of lithics from JJZ-B and JJZ-E
Fig.5 The size of debitage distributions pattern, the raw materials of stone remains pie chart, the stages of weathering and abrasion of lithics from JJZ-B and JJZ-E
图6 JJZ-B、JJZ-E出土标本走向、倾向分布玫瑰图,倾角分布图 (a)和(b)分别表示JJZ-B地点和JJZ-E地点的出土标本走向、倾向分布玫瑰图、倾角分布图(a) and (b) rose diagrams separately showing orientation and inclination of remains, and the diagram showing the dip distribution of remains from JJZ-B and JJZ-E;A:石质标本走向orientation of stone materials (A1:石质标本长度size of stone materials, L<4 cm; A2:石质标本长度size of stone materials, L≥4 cm);B:动物化石走向orientation of fossils;C:出土所有标本走向orientation of all remains;D:石质标本倾向inclination of stone materials (D1: 石质标本长度size of stone materials, L<4 cm,D2: 石质标本长度size of stone materials, L≥4 cm);E:动物化石倾向inclination of fossils;F:出土所有标本倾向inclination of all remains;G:石质标本倾角dip distribution of stone materials;H:动物化石倾角dip distribution of fossils;I:出土所有标本倾角dip distributions of all remains.
Fig.6 Rose diagrams showing orientation and inclination of remains, and the diagram showing the dip distributions of remains from JJZ-B and JJZ-E
地点Site | 类型Type | 个数(n) | 长度L(mm) | 质量m(g) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lmin | Lmax | 平均L(average) | mmin | mmax | 平均m(average) | 总质量m(Total) | |||
JJZ-B | 石制品 | 162 | 11 | 98 | 37.1 | 0.4 | 590 | 31.6 | 5116.4 |
砾石 | 62 | 7.2 | 121.6 | 32 | 0.2 | 769 | 36.9 | 2290.4 | |
岩块 | 15 | 18 | 85 | 39.3 | 1 | 100 | 24.9 | 373 | |
JJZ-E | 石制品 | 59 | 6.2 | 102 | 39.7 | 0.1 | 885 | 51.5 | 2989.4 |
砾石 | 355 | 5.9 | 68.9 | 14.8 | 0.1 | 99.6 | 2.4 | 836.5 | |
岩块 | 9 | 13 | 62.3 | 27.6 | 0.9 | 101.8 | 15.4 | 138.9 |
表2 JJZ-B和JJZ-E地点石质标本长度和质量统计表
Tab.2 Size and weight of stone materials from JJZ-B and JJZ-E sites
地点Site | 类型Type | 个数(n) | 长度L(mm) | 质量m(g) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lmin | Lmax | 平均L(average) | mmin | mmax | 平均m(average) | 总质量m(Total) | |||
JJZ-B | 石制品 | 162 | 11 | 98 | 37.1 | 0.4 | 590 | 31.6 | 5116.4 |
砾石 | 62 | 7.2 | 121.6 | 32 | 0.2 | 769 | 36.9 | 2290.4 | |
岩块 | 15 | 18 | 85 | 39.3 | 1 | 100 | 24.9 | 373 | |
JJZ-E | 石制品 | 59 | 6.2 | 102 | 39.7 | 0.1 | 885 | 51.5 | 2989.4 |
砾石 | 355 | 5.9 | 68.9 | 14.8 | 0.1 | 99.6 | 2.4 | 836.5 | |
岩块 | 9 | 13 | 62.3 | 27.6 | 0.9 | 101.8 | 15.4 | 138.9 |
[1] | Isaac GL. Towards the interpretation of occupation debris: some experiments and observations[J]. Kroeber Anthropology Society Paper, 1967, 37: 31-57 |
[2] | Schiffer MB. Formation process of the archaeological record[M]. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1987 |
[3] | Hassan FA. Sediments in Archaeology: methods and implications for paleoenvironmental and cultural analysis[J]. Journal of Field Archaeology, 1978, 5: 197-213 |
[4] |
Petraglia MD, Potts R. Water flow and the formation of Early Pleistocene artifact sites in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1994, 13(3): 228-254
doi: 10.1006/jaar.1994.1014 URL |
[5] | 李浩, 张玉柱, 李意愿, 等. 沉积物特征与旧石器遗址的形成过程[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(3): 363-377 |
[6] | Morton AGT. Archaeological Site Formation: Understanding Lake Margin Contexts[M]. Oxford:BAR International Series 1211, 2004 |
[7] | 裴树文. 中国古人类活动遗址形成过程研究的进展与思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(3): 349-362 |
[8] | 谢飞. 泥河湾[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2006 |
[9] | 卫奇, 李珺, 裴树文. 旧石器遗址与古人类活动信息[A]. 见:袁宝印,夏正楷,牛平山(主编). 泥河湾裂谷与古人类[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011, 132-219 |
[10] | 裴树文, 贾真秀, 马东东, 等. 泥河湾盆地麻地沟E5旧石器地点的遗址成因与石器技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35 (4): 493-508 |
[11] | 贾真秀. 泥河湾盆地早更新世古人类遗址成因与石器技术比较研究-以东谷坨、麻地沟和飞梁遗址为例[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2018 |
[12] |
Pei SW, Xie F, Deng CL, et al. Early Pleistocene archaeological occurrences at the Feiliang site, and the archaeology of human origins in the Nihewan Basin, North China[J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(11): e0187251
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187251 URL |
[13] |
Jia ZX, Pei SW, Benito-Calvo A, et al. Site formation processes at Donggutuo: a major Early Pleistocene site in the Nihewan basin, North China[J]. Journal of Quaternary Science, 2019, 34(8): 621-632
doi: 10.1002/jqs.3151 URL |
[14] | 王法岗, 刘连强, 谢飞. 蔚县盆地前上营遗址发现的旧石器[A]. 见:董为(主编).第十三届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2012, 165-170 |
[15] | 裴树文, 马东东, 贾真秀, 等. 蔚县盆地吉家庄旧石器遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37: 510-528 |
[16] | 夏正楷, 刘锡清. 泥河湾层古地理环境的初步认识[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1984, 103-112 |
[17] | 周廷儒, 李华章, 李容全, 等. 泥河湾盆地新生代古地理研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991: 1-162 |
[18] | 李潇丽. 泥河湾盆地吉家庄遗址地层易溶盐沉积记录的古气候信息[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2000, 40(5): 149-159 |
[19] | 裴树文. 旧石器时代旷野遗址形成过程研究综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(1): 1-18 |
[20] | Schick KD. Stone Age sites in the making: experiments in the formation and transformation of archaeological occurrences[D]. Oxford:British Archaeological Reports Series 319, 1986 |
[21] |
Schick KD. Modeling the formation of early stone age artifact concentration[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1987, 16(7-8): 789-807
doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90024-8 URL |
[22] |
Pei SW, Niu DW, Guan Y, et al. Middle Pleistocene hominin occupation in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China: studies of formation processes and stone technology of Maling 2A site[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, 53: 391-407
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.10.022 URL |
[23] |
Shea J. Artifact Abrasion, Fluvial Processes, and “Living Floors” from the Early Paleolithic Site of ’Ubeidiya (Jordan Valley, Israel)[J]. Geoarchaeology, 1999, 14(2): 191-207
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(199902)14:2<191::AID-GEA4>3.0.CO;2-K URL |
[24] | 任进成, 王法岗, 李锋, 等. 泥河湾盆地板井子旧石器时代遗址的形成过程[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(3): 378-392 |
[25] | 任进成. 泥河湾盆地板井子旧石器时代遗址形成过程与石器技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2019 |
[26] |
Sahnouni M, Heinzelin J. The site of Ain Hanech revisited: new investigations at this Lower Pleistocene site in North Algeria[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1998, 25(11): 1083-1101
doi: 10.1006/jasc.1998.0278 URL |
[27] |
Schick KD. Geoarchaeological analysis of an Acheulean site at Kalambo Falls, Zambia[J]. Geoarchaeology, 1992, 7(1): 1-16
doi: 10.1002/gea.3340070102 URL |
[28] |
de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Proffitt T. The impact of hydraulic processes in Olduvai Beds I and II, Tanzania, through a particle dimension analysis of stone tool assemblages[J]. Geoarchaeology, 2018, 33(2): 218-306
doi: 10.1002/gea.21629 URL |
[29] |
Yang SX, Deng CL, Zhu RX, et al. The Paleolithic in the Nihewan Basin, China: Evolutionary history of an Early to Late Pleistocene record in Eastern Asia[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2020, 29(3): 125-142
doi: 10.1002/evan.21813 URL |
[1] | 崔祚文, 王春雪, 陈全家, 曾庆硕, 张楠. 2021年河南南召新发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 853-864. |
[2] | 周士航, 何湘栋, 徐静玥, 李潇丽, 牛东伟. 蔚县盆地东沟遗址2017年度发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 132-142. |
[3] | 裴树文, 徐哲, 叶芷, 马东东, 贾真秀. 泥河湾盆地中更新世气候转型期人类的适应行为[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 19-39. |
[4] | 吴秀杰. 中更新世晚期许家窑人化石的研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 5-18. |
[5] | 杜雨薇, 张乐, 叶芷, 裴树文. 蔚县盆地吉家庄旧石器遗址动物骨骼的埋藏学分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(03): 359-372. |
[6] | 别婧婧, 夏楠, 王社江, 弋双文, 鹿化煜, 夏文婷, 张改课, 李葭萌. 陕西洋县绿豆梁旧石器遗址出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(01): 15-24. |
[7] | 仪明洁, 裴树文, 牛东伟, 马宁. 丹江口库区王庄、吴家外和岳沟地点发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(06): 959-966. |
[8] | 战世佳, 董哲, 弋双文, 张红艳, 李浩, 裴树文. 安徽巢湖地区2019年旧石器考古调查的新发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(05): 927-935. |
[9] | 牛东伟, 闫晓蒙, 马东东, 徐哲, 裴树文. 蔚县盆地2019-2020年旧石器考古调查[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(05): 936-944. |
[10] | 刘武, 吴秀杰. 中更新世晚期中国古人类化石的形态多样性及其演化意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(04): 563-575. |
[11] | 裴树文, 蔡演军, 董哲, 同号文, 盛锦朝, 金泽田, 吴秀杰, 刘武. 安徽东至华龙洞遗址洞穴演化与古人类活动[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(04): 593-607. |
[12] | 董哲, 战世佳. 安徽省宁国市安友庄旧石器遗址调查及发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(02): 334-341. |
[13] | 陆莹, 孙雪峰, 王社江, 鹿化煜. 早、中更新世中国古人类年代序列与区域演化特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 411-426. |
[14] | 姬昊, 刘春茹, 宋为娟, 魏传义, 敖红, 李建平, 尹功明. 泥河湾盆地三棵树遗址ESR年代学[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 427-435. |
[15] | 杨石霞, 裴树文, 邓成龙. 早-中更新世中国古人类演化及其与气候环境的关系[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 436-453. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||