人类学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (01): 67-80.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0046

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

河北阳原马鞍山遗址1997-1998年发掘基本材料与初步认识

冯玥1,2(), 梅惠杰3(), 谢飞4, 孙秀丽5, 王幼平1,2   

  1. 1.北京大学中国考古学研究中心,北京 100871
    2.北京大学考古文博学院,北京 100871
    3.河北师范大学,石家庄 050024
    4.河北省文物考古研究院,石家庄 050033
    5.中国文化遗产研究院,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-15 出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2024-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 梅惠杰,副教授,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: pkumhj@126.com
  • 作者简介:冯玥,助理教授,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: fengyuearchaeology@pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“马鞍山遗址1997-1998年发掘资料整理与综合研究”(22CKG004)

Preliminary Results of the 1997-1998 Excavation of the Ma’anshan Site in Yangyuan, Hebei

FENG Yue1,2(), MEI Huijie3(), XIE Fei4, SUN Xiuli5, WANG Youping1,2   

  1. 1. School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 100871
    2. Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024
    3. Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archeology, Shijiazhuang 050033
    4. China Academy of Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100029
  • Received:2023-06-15 Online:2024-02-15 Published:2024-02-06

摘要:

马鞍山遗址位于泥河湾盆地桑干河北岸二级阶地,是虎头梁遗址群的重要组成部分。1997-1998年发掘获得多层古人类活动面,石制品和动物化石数以万计,编号标本3549件,遗迹包括十余处火塘和一个可能为储藏坑的遗迹。14C测年的贝叶斯模型显示,遗址校正后的年代大致距今1.7-1.5万年。石制品以火山角砾岩为主要原料,以楔形细石核技法为主要特征,石器类型多样;动物化石数量较少,主要为羊、马、牛等大中型偶蹄动物,还有少量鸵鸟蛋皮串珠和1件骨锥。这些发现为认识泥河湾盆地与东北亚地区在更新世末期的人群交流与文化互动提供了重要线索,也是探讨华北北部地区旧石器-新石器过渡阶段历史过程的关键材料。

关键词: 马鞍山遗址, 楔形细石核, 虎头梁遗址群, 东北亚细石器, 旧石器-新石器过渡

Abstract:

The Ma’anshan site is located on the second terrace of the Sanggan River, Nihewan Basin, and is an important locality of the Hutouliang site group. Excavations in 1997-1998 revealed multiple occupational horizons and tens of thousands of lithics and faunal remains, including 3549 pieces of labeled specimens, together with dozens of fireplaces and a unique structure resembling a storage pit. The original cultural layer (Layer 3) is further divided into 6 sublayers (layers 3A-3F). AMS radiocarbon dates with Bayesian analysis suggest the site was dated approximately 17-15 ka cal BP. The microblade industry at the site mostly exploited Yubetsu technology, with the toolkit containing side- and end- scrapers, notches, denticulates, burins, bifaces, adze-shaped tools and spearheads. Raw materials were dominated by volcanic breccia, while siliceous mudstone, flint and chalcedony were also important components. Faunal remains were relatively limited in number, and most identifiable pieces recognized as medium-to-large sized angulates, such as Bovidae and Equidae. For bone tools and ornaments, there were several ostrich shell beads and one broken bone awl.

Based on its stratigraphy, dates, features and artifacts, cultural development at the Ma’anshan Site can be divided into two stages. The early stage (sublayers 3F-3B, 17.1-16.3 ka cal BP) was dominated by Yubetsu microblade technology, and around 1/3 of the tools were unifacially or bifacially worked. Volcanic breccia made up over 85% of all raw materials, while flint composed less than 5%. The density of artefacts was extremely high, and activities were well-organized, centering around fireplaces. This settlement pattern suggested that the site was a central base camp of the Hutouliang site group during this time. During the late stage (sublayer3A, 15.8-15.0 ka cal BP), there was an obvious rise of non-Yubetsu methods of microblade production, and end scrapers became more important in the tool assemblage. At the Yujiagou site, which was close to and dated to a similar period (16-13.8 ka cal BP), new tool types appeared such as a partly polished spearhead, grinding stone and some pottery. Volcanic breccia declined in percentage, composing around 70% of all raw materials, while small flint cobbles increased significantly. The subsistence strategy clearly became more complicated. In layer 3A, a “storage pit” was discovered, which was possibly related to the exploitation of botanic resources. At Yujiagou, juvenile angulates might have been kept for storage.

The prevalence of Yubetsu microblade technology at Ma’anshan demonstrated intimate connection with findings in Northeast Asia, which were very different from microblade sites in southern parts of North China. Microblade cores at the site also differed from those at another, the Erdaoliang site, an earlier site in the Nihewan Basin with boat-shaped microblade cores. This technological preference exhibited human migration and cultural exchange between North China and Northeast Asia, rather than inheritance of previous regional traditions. Several significant changes took place at the Ma’anshan site after 16 ka cal BP, including diversification in technology, complexity in subsistence and decline in mobility. These innovations provide crucial evidence for understanding the trajectory of Paleolithic-Neolithic transition in North China.

Key words: Ma’anshan ite, Yubetsu microblade core, Hutouliang site group, Northeast Asian microblades, Paleolithic-Neolithic Transition

中图分类号: