人类学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04): 613-628.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0050
祝海歌1(), 乔辉1, 杨晨1, 管海娟1, 张航2, 文少卿1, 夏斌2, 谭婧泽1()
收稿日期:
2023-12-04
修回日期:
2024-05-07
出版日期:
2024-08-15
发布日期:
2024-08-13
通讯作者:
谭婧泽,副教授,主要从事体质人类学研究。E-mail: jztan@fudan.edu.cn作者简介:
祝海歌,硕士研究生,主要从事体质人类学研究。E-mail: 20210700109@fudan.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHU Haige1(), QIAO Hui1, YANG Chen1, GUAN Haijuan1, ZHANG Hang2, WEN Shaoqing1, XIA Bin2, TAN Jingze1()
Received:
2023-12-04
Revised:
2024-05-07
Online:
2024-08-15
Published:
2024-08-13
摘要:
研究表明牙齿形态特征具有高度遗传性,在不同群体中存在明显差异。本研究针对中国汉族、回族、蒙古族、苗族和维吾尔族5个人群的牙齿形态特征,进行侧别、性别、年龄等检验,并对这5个人群与其他中国人群及日本、东北亚、东南亚、欧洲、非洲等地区人群进行多元统计分析。研究结果显示,5个人群的多数牙齿特征未见侧别和性别差异,多数牙齿特征与年龄无显著相关性。汉族、维吾尔族的铲形门齿和双铲形门齿出现率较高及Y型沟纹出现率偏低与东北亚人群相似;苗族的铲形门齿和双铲形门齿出现率也偏高;蒙古族、回族的铲形门齿和双铲形门齿出现率较低与东南亚人群相似;维吾尔族的四尖型出现率较高与欧洲人群相似。多元统计分析结果证实蒙古人种牙齿复合体及巽他型齿、中国型齿是客观存在的。
中图分类号:
祝海歌, 乔辉, 杨晨, 管海娟, 张航, 文少卿, 夏斌, 谭婧泽. 中国汉族、回族、蒙古族、苗族和维吾尔族的牙齿形态[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 613-628.
ZHU Haige, QIAO Hui, YANG Chen, GUAN Haijuan, ZHANG Hang, WEN Shaoqing, XIA Bin, TAN Jingze. Teeth morphology of Han, Hui, Mongolia, Miao and Uyghur peoples in China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(04): 613-628.
图1 牙齿形态特征变量相关图 A.世界人群World Populations ;B.东亚人群East Asia Populations;1.铲形门齿Shoveling (SUI1); 2.双铲形门齿Double Shoveling (DSUI1); 3.近中嵴Mesial Ridge (MRUC); 4.卡氏尖Carabelli’s Trait (CCUM1); 5.第5尖Cusp 5 (C5UM1); 6.四尖型Cusp 4 (C4LM2); 7.Y型沟纹Y-Groove (GPYLM2); 8.第6尖Cusp 6 (C6LM1); 9.第7尖Cusp 7 (C7LM1); 10.转向皱纹Deflecting Wrinkle (DWLM1)
Fig.1 Variables Correlation of Dental Morphological Traits
人群Populations | 编号No. | 铲形门齿Shoveling (I1) | 双铲形门齿Double Shoveling(I1) | 近中嵴Mesial Ridge (C) | 卡氏尖Carabelli’s Trait (M1) | 第5尖 Cusp 5 (M1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | |||
5个中国人群Five Chinese populations | 泰州汉族 Taizhou Han | 1 | 381 | 80% | 381 | 29% | 358 | 6% | 381 | 21% | 381 | 11% |
宁夏回族 Ningxia Hui | 2 | 421 | 22% | 435 | 7% | 435 | 11% | 435 | 37% | 435 | 31% | |
内蒙古蒙古族 Neimenggu Mongolia | 3 | 390 | 23% | 434 | 6% | 434 | 8% | 434 | 27% | 434 | 30% | |
贵州苗族 Guizhou Miao | 4 | 256 | 45% | 278 | 14% | 278 | 7% | 277 | 39% | 274 | 49% | |
新疆维吾尔族 Xinjiang Uyghur | 5 | 227 | 39% | 227 | 22% | 227 | 10% | 227 | 67% | 227 | 7% | |
中国其他人群Other Chinese populations | 苗族Miao[ | 6 | 92 | 61% | 94 | 17% | 94 | 13% | 96 | 10% | 83 | 17% |
普米族Pumi[ | 7 | 76 | 63% | 84 | 11% | 80 | 8% | 85 | 22% | 75 | 24% | |
纳西族Naxi[ | 8 | 92 | 64% | 97 | 13% | 90 | 11% | 89 | 6% | 87 | 13% | |
哈尼族Hani[ | 9 | 80 | 55% | 86 | 15% | 76 | 8% | 90 | 16% | 86 | 17% | |
傣族Dai[ | 10 | 89 | 34% | 93 | 45% | 90 | 0% | 93 | 16% | 93 | 29% | |
达斡尔族Dafur[ | 11 | 172 | 51% | 172 | 32% | 166 | 11% | 163 | 36% | 159 | 17% | |
回族Hui[ | 12 | 162 | 58% | 155 | 47% | 167 | 10% | 157 | 46% | 166 | 24% | |
朝鲜族Chaoxian[ | 13 | 167 | 69% | 165 | 50% | 166 | 11% | 157 | 50% | 153 | 27% | |
满族Man[ | 14 | 208 | 62% | 200 | 43% | 211 | 8% | 212 | 34% | 212 | 26% | |
辽宁汉族Liaoning Han[ | 15 | 145 | 57% | 143 | 23% | 147 | 5% | 135 | 16% | 130 | 20% | |
布侬族Bunun[ | 16 | 95 | 77% | 90 | 42% | 86 | 7% | 94 | 47% | 90 | 36% | |
阿美人Ami[ | 17 | 146 | 71% | 141 | 33% | 135 | 6% | 146 | 42% | 138 | 26% | |
雅美人Yami[ | 18 | 192 | 70% | 191 | 23% | 155 | 10% | 197 | 37% | 192 | 41% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 1[ | 19 | 542 | 72% | 545 | 29% | 615 | 3% | 774 | 16% | 633 | 24% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 2[ | 20 | 200 | 84% | 213 | 30% | 255 | 2% | 374 | 30% | 295 | 28% | |
香港Hong Kong[ | 21 | 307 | 64% | 299 | 28% | 305 | 3% | 301 | 38% | 276 | 22% | |
华南South China[ | 22 | 35 | 74% | 33 | 24% | 55 | 4% | 99 | 25% | 62 | 16% | |
史前台湾Prehistric Taiwan[ | 23 | 22 | 59% | 21 | 0% | 10 | 0% | 15 | 33% | 9 | 22% | |
日本人群 Japanese populations | 现代日本Recent Japan 1[ | 24 | 276 | 66% | 267 | 20% | 365 | 3% | 458 | 15% | 390 | 20% |
现代日本Recent Japan 2[ | 25 | 276 | 66% | 267 | 19% | 365 | 3% | 458 | 31% | 390 | 20% | |
绳文Jomon 1[ | 26 | 117 | 26% | 138 | 1% | 136 | 2% | 181 | 2% | 146 | 32% | |
绳文Jomon 2[ | 27 | 117 | 26% | 138 | 1% | 136 | 2% | 181 | 8% | 146 | 32% | |
东北亚人群Northeast Asia populations | 贝加尔湖Lake Baikal[ | 28 | 13 | 92% | 10 | 50% | 16 | 6% | 10 | 30% | 3 | 67% |
阿穆尔Amur[ | 29 | 16 | 69% | 18 | 44% | 27 | 11% | 60 | 27% | 42 | 21% | |
东南亚人群 Southeast Asia populations | 巴厘岛Bali[ | 30 | 172 | 25% | 169 | 12% | 173 | 2% | 169 | 59% | 168 | 29% |
菲律宾Philippines[ | 31 | 54 | 43% | 29 | 17% | 76 | 3% | 146 | 37% | 132 | 27% | |
泰国Thailand[ | 32 | 127 | 37% | 111 | 9% | 143 | 8% | 179 | 40% | 143 | 29% | |
缅甸Burma[ | 33 | 15 | 13% | 13 | 0% | 33 | 6% | 93 | 30% | 72 | 33% | |
尼泊尔Nepal[ | 34 | 10 | 20% | 11 | 9% | 17 | 0% | 50 | 26% | 50 | 32% | |
史前东南亚Early Southeast Asia 1[ | 35 | 184 | 31% | 182 | 16% | 235 | 6% | 262 | 19% | 328 | 32% | |
史前东南亚Early Mainland SE Asia 2[ | 36 | 99 | 32% | 100 | 10% | 120 | 3% | 140 | 37% | 132 | 37% | |
东南亚人群 Southeast Asia populations | 现代东南亚Recent Southeast Asia 1[ | 37 | 261 | 35% | 199 | 12% | 366 | 6% | 701 | 21% | 581 | 31% |
现代东南亚Recent SE Asia 2[ | 38 | 13 | 46% | 14 | 29% | 39 | 3% | 93 | 42% | 74 | 14% | |
现代印尼-马来西亚Recent Indomalaysia[ | 39 | 49 | 24% | 36 | 11% | 82 | 6% | 207 | 46% | 177 | 36% | |
史前马来群岛Early Malay Archipelago[ | 40 | 71 | 30% | 67 | 28% | 103 | 10% | 100 | 23% | 90 | 24% | |
东马来群岛East Malay Archipelago[ | 41 | 12 | 8% | 3 | 0% | 16 | 6% | 28 | 50% | 22 | 45% | |
欧洲人群 European populations | 西欧Western Europe[ | 42 | 186 | 3% | 184 | 4% | 230 | 4% | 249 | 27% | 238 | 12% |
北欧Northern Europe[ | 43 | 46 | 2% | 100 | 5% | 125 | 0% | 138 | 18% | 140 | 26% | |
非洲人群 African populations | 北非North Africa[ | 44 | 194 | 8% | 175 | 9% | 261 | 6% | 200 | 20% | 357 | 19% |
西非West Africa[ | 45 | 41 | 7% | 39 | 3% | 55 | 29% | 61 | 21% | 48 | 63% | |
南非South Africa[ | 46 | 220 | 9% | 282 | 2% | 398 | 13% | 246 | 11% | 439 | 22% | |
科伊桑Khoisan[ | 47 | 155 | 13% | 79 | 0% | 77 | 35% | 155 | 17% | 66 | 35% |
表1 10项牙齿形态特征在世界人群中的频率分布(1)
Tab.1 Frequencies of 10 dental morphological characteristics in the World Populations (1)
人群Populations | 编号No. | 铲形门齿Shoveling (I1) | 双铲形门齿Double Shoveling(I1) | 近中嵴Mesial Ridge (C) | 卡氏尖Carabelli’s Trait (M1) | 第5尖 Cusp 5 (M1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | |||
5个中国人群Five Chinese populations | 泰州汉族 Taizhou Han | 1 | 381 | 80% | 381 | 29% | 358 | 6% | 381 | 21% | 381 | 11% |
宁夏回族 Ningxia Hui | 2 | 421 | 22% | 435 | 7% | 435 | 11% | 435 | 37% | 435 | 31% | |
内蒙古蒙古族 Neimenggu Mongolia | 3 | 390 | 23% | 434 | 6% | 434 | 8% | 434 | 27% | 434 | 30% | |
贵州苗族 Guizhou Miao | 4 | 256 | 45% | 278 | 14% | 278 | 7% | 277 | 39% | 274 | 49% | |
新疆维吾尔族 Xinjiang Uyghur | 5 | 227 | 39% | 227 | 22% | 227 | 10% | 227 | 67% | 227 | 7% | |
中国其他人群Other Chinese populations | 苗族Miao[ | 6 | 92 | 61% | 94 | 17% | 94 | 13% | 96 | 10% | 83 | 17% |
普米族Pumi[ | 7 | 76 | 63% | 84 | 11% | 80 | 8% | 85 | 22% | 75 | 24% | |
纳西族Naxi[ | 8 | 92 | 64% | 97 | 13% | 90 | 11% | 89 | 6% | 87 | 13% | |
哈尼族Hani[ | 9 | 80 | 55% | 86 | 15% | 76 | 8% | 90 | 16% | 86 | 17% | |
傣族Dai[ | 10 | 89 | 34% | 93 | 45% | 90 | 0% | 93 | 16% | 93 | 29% | |
达斡尔族Dafur[ | 11 | 172 | 51% | 172 | 32% | 166 | 11% | 163 | 36% | 159 | 17% | |
回族Hui[ | 12 | 162 | 58% | 155 | 47% | 167 | 10% | 157 | 46% | 166 | 24% | |
朝鲜族Chaoxian[ | 13 | 167 | 69% | 165 | 50% | 166 | 11% | 157 | 50% | 153 | 27% | |
满族Man[ | 14 | 208 | 62% | 200 | 43% | 211 | 8% | 212 | 34% | 212 | 26% | |
辽宁汉族Liaoning Han[ | 15 | 145 | 57% | 143 | 23% | 147 | 5% | 135 | 16% | 130 | 20% | |
布侬族Bunun[ | 16 | 95 | 77% | 90 | 42% | 86 | 7% | 94 | 47% | 90 | 36% | |
阿美人Ami[ | 17 | 146 | 71% | 141 | 33% | 135 | 6% | 146 | 42% | 138 | 26% | |
雅美人Yami[ | 18 | 192 | 70% | 191 | 23% | 155 | 10% | 197 | 37% | 192 | 41% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 1[ | 19 | 542 | 72% | 545 | 29% | 615 | 3% | 774 | 16% | 633 | 24% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 2[ | 20 | 200 | 84% | 213 | 30% | 255 | 2% | 374 | 30% | 295 | 28% | |
香港Hong Kong[ | 21 | 307 | 64% | 299 | 28% | 305 | 3% | 301 | 38% | 276 | 22% | |
华南South China[ | 22 | 35 | 74% | 33 | 24% | 55 | 4% | 99 | 25% | 62 | 16% | |
史前台湾Prehistric Taiwan[ | 23 | 22 | 59% | 21 | 0% | 10 | 0% | 15 | 33% | 9 | 22% | |
日本人群 Japanese populations | 现代日本Recent Japan 1[ | 24 | 276 | 66% | 267 | 20% | 365 | 3% | 458 | 15% | 390 | 20% |
现代日本Recent Japan 2[ | 25 | 276 | 66% | 267 | 19% | 365 | 3% | 458 | 31% | 390 | 20% | |
绳文Jomon 1[ | 26 | 117 | 26% | 138 | 1% | 136 | 2% | 181 | 2% | 146 | 32% | |
绳文Jomon 2[ | 27 | 117 | 26% | 138 | 1% | 136 | 2% | 181 | 8% | 146 | 32% | |
东北亚人群Northeast Asia populations | 贝加尔湖Lake Baikal[ | 28 | 13 | 92% | 10 | 50% | 16 | 6% | 10 | 30% | 3 | 67% |
阿穆尔Amur[ | 29 | 16 | 69% | 18 | 44% | 27 | 11% | 60 | 27% | 42 | 21% | |
东南亚人群 Southeast Asia populations | 巴厘岛Bali[ | 30 | 172 | 25% | 169 | 12% | 173 | 2% | 169 | 59% | 168 | 29% |
菲律宾Philippines[ | 31 | 54 | 43% | 29 | 17% | 76 | 3% | 146 | 37% | 132 | 27% | |
泰国Thailand[ | 32 | 127 | 37% | 111 | 9% | 143 | 8% | 179 | 40% | 143 | 29% | |
缅甸Burma[ | 33 | 15 | 13% | 13 | 0% | 33 | 6% | 93 | 30% | 72 | 33% | |
尼泊尔Nepal[ | 34 | 10 | 20% | 11 | 9% | 17 | 0% | 50 | 26% | 50 | 32% | |
史前东南亚Early Southeast Asia 1[ | 35 | 184 | 31% | 182 | 16% | 235 | 6% | 262 | 19% | 328 | 32% | |
史前东南亚Early Mainland SE Asia 2[ | 36 | 99 | 32% | 100 | 10% | 120 | 3% | 140 | 37% | 132 | 37% | |
东南亚人群 Southeast Asia populations | 现代东南亚Recent Southeast Asia 1[ | 37 | 261 | 35% | 199 | 12% | 366 | 6% | 701 | 21% | 581 | 31% |
现代东南亚Recent SE Asia 2[ | 38 | 13 | 46% | 14 | 29% | 39 | 3% | 93 | 42% | 74 | 14% | |
现代印尼-马来西亚Recent Indomalaysia[ | 39 | 49 | 24% | 36 | 11% | 82 | 6% | 207 | 46% | 177 | 36% | |
史前马来群岛Early Malay Archipelago[ | 40 | 71 | 30% | 67 | 28% | 103 | 10% | 100 | 23% | 90 | 24% | |
东马来群岛East Malay Archipelago[ | 41 | 12 | 8% | 3 | 0% | 16 | 6% | 28 | 50% | 22 | 45% | |
欧洲人群 European populations | 西欧Western Europe[ | 42 | 186 | 3% | 184 | 4% | 230 | 4% | 249 | 27% | 238 | 12% |
北欧Northern Europe[ | 43 | 46 | 2% | 100 | 5% | 125 | 0% | 138 | 18% | 140 | 26% | |
非洲人群 African populations | 北非North Africa[ | 44 | 194 | 8% | 175 | 9% | 261 | 6% | 200 | 20% | 357 | 19% |
西非West Africa[ | 45 | 41 | 7% | 39 | 3% | 55 | 29% | 61 | 21% | 48 | 63% | |
南非South Africa[ | 46 | 220 | 9% | 282 | 2% | 398 | 13% | 246 | 11% | 439 | 22% | |
科伊桑Khoisan[ | 47 | 155 | 13% | 79 | 0% | 77 | 35% | 155 | 17% | 66 | 35% |
人群Populations | 编号No. | 四尖型Cusp 4 (m2) | Y型沟纹Y-Groove (m2) | 第6尖Cusp 6(m1) | 第7尖Cusp 7(m1) | 转向皱纹Deflecting Wrinkle (m1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比 R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比 R | |||
5个中国人群 Five Chinese populations | 泰州汉族 Taizhou Han | 1 | 366 | 36% | 373 | 5% | 357 | 19% | 381 | 4% | 381 | 15% |
宁夏回族 Ningxia Hui | 2 | 430 | 24% | 435 | 32% | 424 | 18% | 425 | 10% | 435 | 8% | |
内蒙古蒙古族 Neimenggu Mongolia | 3 | 433 | 23% | 434 | 17% | 408 | 21% | 416 | 13% | 434 | 5% | |
贵州苗族 Guizhou Miao | 4 | 271 | 14% | 274 | 15% | 253 | 33% | 267 | 9% | 274 | 22% | |
新疆维吾尔族 Xinjiang Uyghur | 5 | 227 | 70% | 227 | 7% | 221 | 8% | 226 | 8% | 225 | 15% | |
中国其他人群 other Chinese populations | 苗族 Miao[ | 6 | 68 | 18% | 77 | 10% | 68 | 35% | 89 | 6% | 80 | 0% |
普米族Pumi[ | 7 | 72 | 50% | 71 | 4% | 57 | 21% | 77 | 1% | 64 | 2% | |
纳西族Naxi[ | 8 | 76 | 34% | 80 | 5% | 64 | 23% | 81 | 1% | 68 | 1% | |
哈尼族Hani[ | 9 | 79 | 53% | 79 | 4% | 76 | 8% | 88 | 3% | 67 | 1% | |
傣族Dai[ | 10 | 90 | 49% | 90 | 4% | 86 | 30% | 90 | 4% | 82 | 1% | |
达斡尔族Dafur[ | 11 | 155 | 33% | 160 | 4% | 150 | 54% | 157 | 10% | 158 | 22% | |
回族Hui[ | 12 | 147 | 30% | 153 | 5% | 159 | 34% | 160 | 8% | 159 | 33% | |
朝鲜族Chaoxian[ | 13 | 160 | 34% | 161 | 3% | 153 | 40% | 156 | 6% | 152 | 7% | |
满族Man[ | 14 | 207 | 36% | 209 | 3% | 209 | 34% | 208 | 6% | 209 | 28% | |
辽宁汉族Liaoning Han[ | 15 | 112 | 28% | 115 | 1% | 115 | 41% | 115 | 5% | 107 | 31% | |
中国其他人群 Other Chinese populations | 布侬族Bunun[ | 16 | 85 | 27% | 84 | 6% | 76 | 47% | 79 | 9% | 70 | 31% |
阿美人Ami[ | 17 | 144 | 40% | 146 | 5% | 137 | 34% | 142 | 12% | 122 | 31% | |
雅美人Yami[ | 18 | 141 | 22% | 144 | 8% | 190 | 46% | 188 | 5% | 188 | 26% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 1[ | 19 | 639 | 21% | 646 | 8% | 538 | 36% | 721 | 8% | 343 | 16% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 2[ | 20 | 258 | 17% | 338 | 7% | 211 | 37% | 341 | 9% | 89 | 29% | |
香港Hong Kong[ | 21 | 296 | 24% | 228 | 7% | 267 | 34% | 295 | 9% | 215 | 10% | |
华南South China[ | 22 | 77 | 19% | 80 | 13% | 60 | 40% | 85 | 11% | 39 | 18% | |
史前台湾Prehistric Taiwan[ | 23 | 21 | 19% | 19 | 11% | 15 | 47% | 33 | 6% | 9 | 44% | |
日本人群 Japanese populations | 现代日本Recent Japan 1[ | 24 | 345 | 14% | 352 | 13% | 314 | 43% | 382 | 6% | 262 | 15% |
现代日本Recent Japan 2[ | 25 | 345 | 14% | 352 | 13% | 314 | 43% | 382 | 7% | 262 | 15% | |
绳文Jomon 1[ | 26 | 244 | 29% | 290 | 32% | 214 | 47% | 285 | 3% | 162 | 5% | |
绳文Jomon 2[ | 27 | 244 | 29% | 290 | 32% | 214 | 47% | 285 | 5% | 162 | 5% | |
东北亚人群Northeast Asia populations | 贝加尔湖Lake Baikal[ | 28 | 18 | 22% | 21 | 5% | 9 | 33% | 21 | 19% | 2 | 0% |
阿穆尔Amur[ | 29 | 52 | 12% | 56 | 13% | 44 | 50% | 55 | 7% | 38 | 39% | |
东南亚人群Southeast Asia populations | 巴厘岛Bali[ | 30 | 155 | 41% | 51 | 0% | 157 | 20% | 162 | 8% | 146 | 13% |
菲律宾Philippines[ | 31 | 122 | 28% | 123 | 13% | 98 | 39% | 129 | 6% | 74 | 19% | |
泰国Thailand[ | 32 | 163 | 26% | 176 | 19% | 120 | 28% | 178 | 6% | 80 | 19% | |
缅甸Burma[ | 33 | 28 | 21% | 33 | 6% | 21 | 52% | 35 | 9% | 14 | 0% | |
尼泊尔Nepal[ | 34 | 28 | 54% | 30 | 23% | 21 | 43% | 34 | 6% | 14 | 7% | |
史前东南亚Early Southeast Asia 1[ | 35 | 314 | 32% | 348 | 18% | 248 | 40% | 370 | 8% | 150 | 22% | |
史前东南亚Early Mainland SE Asia 2[ | 36 | 163 | 39% | 187 | 17% | 136 | 37% | 217 | 10% | 76 | 32% | |
现代东南亚Recent Southeast Asia 1[ | 37 | 555 | 30% | 587 | 18% | 418 | 33% | 588 | 7% | 290 | 16% | |
现代东南亚Recent SE Asia 2[ | 38 | 79 | 32% | 83 | 16% | 61 | 28% | 84 | 7% | 36 | 19% | |
现代印尼-马来西亚[ | 39 | 134 | 30% | 142 | 18% | 97 | 36% | 137 | 13% | 66 | 11% | |
史前马来群岛Early Malay Archipelago[ | 40 | 130 | 25% | 139 | 19% | 99 | 45% | 131 | 5% | 66 | 11% | |
东马来群岛East Malay Archipelago[ | 41 | 24 | 46% | 25 | 20% | 18 | 39% | 25 | 4% | 17 | 0% | |
欧洲人群 European populations | 西欧Western Europe[ | 42 | 284 | 71% | 257 | 27% | 217 | 8% | 291 | 5% | 154 | 5% |
北欧Northern Europe[ | 43 | 225 | 84% | 319 | 21% | 130 | 17% | 179 | 5% | 75 | 16% | |
非洲人群 African populations | 北非North Africa[ | 44 | 381 | 66% | 402 | 31% | 352 | 8% | 414 | 9% | 267 | 8% |
西非West Africa[ | 45 | 75 | 12% | 67 | 33% | 47 | 45% | 71 | 44% | 30 | 17% | |
南非South Africa[ | 46 | 370 | 30% | 392 | 46% | 362 | 19% | 385 | 27% | 298 | 18% | |
科伊桑Khoisan[ | 47 | 88 | 7% | 89 | 72% | 85 | 5% | 87 | 26% | 60 | 17% |
表2 10项牙齿形态特征在世界人群中的频率分布(2)
Tab.2 Frequencies of 10 dental morphological characteristics in the World Populations (2)
人群Populations | 编号No. | 四尖型Cusp 4 (m2) | Y型沟纹Y-Groove (m2) | 第6尖Cusp 6(m1) | 第7尖Cusp 7(m1) | 转向皱纹Deflecting Wrinkle (m1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比 R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比R | 样本n | 占比 R | |||
5个中国人群 Five Chinese populations | 泰州汉族 Taizhou Han | 1 | 366 | 36% | 373 | 5% | 357 | 19% | 381 | 4% | 381 | 15% |
宁夏回族 Ningxia Hui | 2 | 430 | 24% | 435 | 32% | 424 | 18% | 425 | 10% | 435 | 8% | |
内蒙古蒙古族 Neimenggu Mongolia | 3 | 433 | 23% | 434 | 17% | 408 | 21% | 416 | 13% | 434 | 5% | |
贵州苗族 Guizhou Miao | 4 | 271 | 14% | 274 | 15% | 253 | 33% | 267 | 9% | 274 | 22% | |
新疆维吾尔族 Xinjiang Uyghur | 5 | 227 | 70% | 227 | 7% | 221 | 8% | 226 | 8% | 225 | 15% | |
中国其他人群 other Chinese populations | 苗族 Miao[ | 6 | 68 | 18% | 77 | 10% | 68 | 35% | 89 | 6% | 80 | 0% |
普米族Pumi[ | 7 | 72 | 50% | 71 | 4% | 57 | 21% | 77 | 1% | 64 | 2% | |
纳西族Naxi[ | 8 | 76 | 34% | 80 | 5% | 64 | 23% | 81 | 1% | 68 | 1% | |
哈尼族Hani[ | 9 | 79 | 53% | 79 | 4% | 76 | 8% | 88 | 3% | 67 | 1% | |
傣族Dai[ | 10 | 90 | 49% | 90 | 4% | 86 | 30% | 90 | 4% | 82 | 1% | |
达斡尔族Dafur[ | 11 | 155 | 33% | 160 | 4% | 150 | 54% | 157 | 10% | 158 | 22% | |
回族Hui[ | 12 | 147 | 30% | 153 | 5% | 159 | 34% | 160 | 8% | 159 | 33% | |
朝鲜族Chaoxian[ | 13 | 160 | 34% | 161 | 3% | 153 | 40% | 156 | 6% | 152 | 7% | |
满族Man[ | 14 | 207 | 36% | 209 | 3% | 209 | 34% | 208 | 6% | 209 | 28% | |
辽宁汉族Liaoning Han[ | 15 | 112 | 28% | 115 | 1% | 115 | 41% | 115 | 5% | 107 | 31% | |
中国其他人群 Other Chinese populations | 布侬族Bunun[ | 16 | 85 | 27% | 84 | 6% | 76 | 47% | 79 | 9% | 70 | 31% |
阿美人Ami[ | 17 | 144 | 40% | 146 | 5% | 137 | 34% | 142 | 12% | 122 | 31% | |
雅美人Yami[ | 18 | 141 | 22% | 144 | 8% | 190 | 46% | 188 | 5% | 188 | 26% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 1[ | 19 | 639 | 21% | 646 | 8% | 538 | 36% | 721 | 8% | 343 | 16% | |
中国蒙古族China Mongolia 2[ | 20 | 258 | 17% | 338 | 7% | 211 | 37% | 341 | 9% | 89 | 29% | |
香港Hong Kong[ | 21 | 296 | 24% | 228 | 7% | 267 | 34% | 295 | 9% | 215 | 10% | |
华南South China[ | 22 | 77 | 19% | 80 | 13% | 60 | 40% | 85 | 11% | 39 | 18% | |
史前台湾Prehistric Taiwan[ | 23 | 21 | 19% | 19 | 11% | 15 | 47% | 33 | 6% | 9 | 44% | |
日本人群 Japanese populations | 现代日本Recent Japan 1[ | 24 | 345 | 14% | 352 | 13% | 314 | 43% | 382 | 6% | 262 | 15% |
现代日本Recent Japan 2[ | 25 | 345 | 14% | 352 | 13% | 314 | 43% | 382 | 7% | 262 | 15% | |
绳文Jomon 1[ | 26 | 244 | 29% | 290 | 32% | 214 | 47% | 285 | 3% | 162 | 5% | |
绳文Jomon 2[ | 27 | 244 | 29% | 290 | 32% | 214 | 47% | 285 | 5% | 162 | 5% | |
东北亚人群Northeast Asia populations | 贝加尔湖Lake Baikal[ | 28 | 18 | 22% | 21 | 5% | 9 | 33% | 21 | 19% | 2 | 0% |
阿穆尔Amur[ | 29 | 52 | 12% | 56 | 13% | 44 | 50% | 55 | 7% | 38 | 39% | |
东南亚人群Southeast Asia populations | 巴厘岛Bali[ | 30 | 155 | 41% | 51 | 0% | 157 | 20% | 162 | 8% | 146 | 13% |
菲律宾Philippines[ | 31 | 122 | 28% | 123 | 13% | 98 | 39% | 129 | 6% | 74 | 19% | |
泰国Thailand[ | 32 | 163 | 26% | 176 | 19% | 120 | 28% | 178 | 6% | 80 | 19% | |
缅甸Burma[ | 33 | 28 | 21% | 33 | 6% | 21 | 52% | 35 | 9% | 14 | 0% | |
尼泊尔Nepal[ | 34 | 28 | 54% | 30 | 23% | 21 | 43% | 34 | 6% | 14 | 7% | |
史前东南亚Early Southeast Asia 1[ | 35 | 314 | 32% | 348 | 18% | 248 | 40% | 370 | 8% | 150 | 22% | |
史前东南亚Early Mainland SE Asia 2[ | 36 | 163 | 39% | 187 | 17% | 136 | 37% | 217 | 10% | 76 | 32% | |
现代东南亚Recent Southeast Asia 1[ | 37 | 555 | 30% | 587 | 18% | 418 | 33% | 588 | 7% | 290 | 16% | |
现代东南亚Recent SE Asia 2[ | 38 | 79 | 32% | 83 | 16% | 61 | 28% | 84 | 7% | 36 | 19% | |
现代印尼-马来西亚[ | 39 | 134 | 30% | 142 | 18% | 97 | 36% | 137 | 13% | 66 | 11% | |
史前马来群岛Early Malay Archipelago[ | 40 | 130 | 25% | 139 | 19% | 99 | 45% | 131 | 5% | 66 | 11% | |
东马来群岛East Malay Archipelago[ | 41 | 24 | 46% | 25 | 20% | 18 | 39% | 25 | 4% | 17 | 0% | |
欧洲人群 European populations | 西欧Western Europe[ | 42 | 284 | 71% | 257 | 27% | 217 | 8% | 291 | 5% | 154 | 5% |
北欧Northern Europe[ | 43 | 225 | 84% | 319 | 21% | 130 | 17% | 179 | 5% | 75 | 16% | |
非洲人群 African populations | 北非North Africa[ | 44 | 381 | 66% | 402 | 31% | 352 | 8% | 414 | 9% | 267 | 8% |
西非West Africa[ | 45 | 75 | 12% | 67 | 33% | 47 | 45% | 71 | 44% | 30 | 17% | |
南非South Africa[ | 46 | 370 | 30% | 392 | 46% | 362 | 19% | 385 | 27% | 298 | 18% | |
科伊桑Khoisan[ | 47 | 88 | 7% | 89 | 72% | 85 | 5% | 87 | 26% | 60 | 17% |
图2 5个目标人群与世界人群的牙齿形态特征群体关系图 A.主成分分析 Principal Component Analysis (PCA);B.多维尺度分析Multidimensional Scaling (MDS);C.邻接网络分析Neighbor-Net。本研究人群数据信息来源及人群序号与表1、表2一致The population data for this study and the population numbers are consistent with table 1 & table 2
Fig.2 Dental Morphological Traits Relationship of the Five Populations and the World Populations
图3 5个目标人群与东亚人群的牙齿形态特征群体关系图 A.主成分分析 Principal Component Analysis (PCA);B.多维尺度分析 Multidimensional Scaling (MDS);C.邻接网络分析Neighbor-Net。本研究人群数据信息来源和人群序号与表1、表2一致The population data for this study and the population numbers are consistent with table 1 & table 2
Fig.3 Dental Morphological Traits Relationship of the Five Populations and the East Asia Populations
[1] | Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the deciduous dentition with special reference to the dentition of the Ainu[J]. The Journal of Anthropological Society of Nippon, 1970, 78(1): 3-17 |
[2] |
Turner CG II. Late Pleistocene and Holocene population history of East Asia based on dental variation[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1987, 73(3): 305-321
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330730304 pmid: 3303958 |
[3] |
Turner CG II. Teeth and prehistory in Asia[J]. Scientific American, 1989, 260(2): 88-96
pmid: 2643828 |
[4] |
Turner CG II. Major features of Sundadonty and Sinodonty, including suggestions about East Asian microevolution, population history, and late Pleistocene relationships with Australian aboriginals[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1990, 82(3): 295-317
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330820308 pmid: 2375382 |
[5] | 刘武. 《牙齿人类学进展》评介[J]. 人类学学报, 1996, 15(1): 89-91 |
[6] | Hrdlička A. Shovel-shaped teeth[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1920, 3(4): 429-465 |
[7] | 李春芳, 皮昕, 陈国栋, 等. 卡氏尖名称的探讨[J]. 口腔医学纵横杂志, 1995, 11(4): 237-238 |
[8] | Dietz VH. A common dental morphotropig factor the carabelli cusp[J]. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1944, 31(11): 784-789 |
[9] | Dahlberg AA. Materials for the establishment of standards for classification of tooth characters, attributes, and techniques in morphological studies of the dentition[D]. Chicago: Zollar Laboratory of Dental Anthropology, University of Chicago (mimeo), 1956, 34-681 |
[10] | Turner CG II, Nichol CR, Scott GR. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: the Arizona State University dental anthropology system[A]. In: Kelley M, Larsen CS(eds). Advances in Dental Anthropology[C]. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc, 1991, 13-31 |
[11] | Scott GR, Turner CG II. The anthropology of modern human teeth[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018: 23-52, 216-219, 253-262, 285-295 |
[12] |
Turner CG II. Expression count: A method for calculating morphological dental trait frequencies by using adjustable weighting coefficients with standard ranked scales[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1985, 68(2): 263-267
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330680213 pmid: 4061615 |
[13] | 金力, 席焕久, 谭婧泽. 中华民族体质表型调查方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2024, 151-168 |
[14] | Jacob C. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: differences between correlation coefficients[M]. Academic Press, 1977, 109-143 |
[15] | Buda A, Jarynowski A. Life time of correlations and its applications[M]. ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva Press, 2010, 132-153 |
[16] | 金泽英作, 佐竹隆, 佐佐木佳世子, 等. 中国云南省5个少数民族人群的牙齿性状[J]. 现代人类学通讯, 2009, 15: 77-84 |
[17] | Chikushi S. Dental charasteristics in the Dafurs tribe of Inner Mongoria, China.[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 2001, 55(3): 189-205 |
[18] | Kiyosue T. Dental characteristics in the Hui of Liao-ning, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 2000, 54(6): 510-520 |
[19] | Jin H. Dental characteristics in the Chaoxian of Liao-ning province, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1999, 53(5): 529-537 |
[20] | Fukunari F. Dental characteristics in the Manchu tribe of Xin-Bin, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1999, 53(1): 63-88 |
[21] | Kikuti N. Dental characteristics in the Han of Liao-Ning, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1997, 51(1): 193-216 |
[22] | Manabe Y, Rokutanda A, Kitagawa Y, et al. Genealogical position of native Taiwanese(Bunun Tribe) in East Asian populations based on tooth crown morphology[J]. The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon, 1991, 99(1): 33-47 |
[23] |
Manabe Y, Rokutanda A, Kitagawa Y. Nonmetric tooth crown traits in the Ami tribe, Taiwan aborigines: comparisons with other east Asian populations[J]. Human Biology, 1992, 64(5): 717-726
pmid: 1398612 |
[24] | Yamaguchi Y. Dental characteristics in Balinese[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1996, 50(4): 663-680 |
[25] |
Corruccini RS, Potter RHY. Developmental correlates of crown component asymmetry and occlusal discrepancy[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1981, 55: 21-31
pmid: 7196159 |
[26] | Mizoguchi Y. Mirror imagery and genetic variability of lateral asymmetries in the mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth[J]. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, 1987, 13: 11-19 |
[27] |
Townsend GC, Brown T. Dental asymmetry in Australian aboriginals[J]. Human Biology, 1980, 52: 661-673
pmid: 7203440 |
[28] |
Scott GR. Classification, Sex dimorphism, Association, and Population variation of the canine distal accessory ridge[J]. Human Biology, 1977, 49(3): 453-469
pmid: 892765 |
[29] |
Townsend GC, Brown T. The Carabelli trait in Australian Aboriginal dentition[J]. Archives of Oral Biology, 1981, 26(10): 809-814
doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(81)90177-1 pmid: 6949523 |
[30] |
Scott GR. Population Variation of Carabelli’s Trait[J]. Human Biology, 1980, 52: 63-78
pmid: 7364428 |
[31] | Tan J, Peng Q, Li J, et al. Characteristics of dental morphology in the Xinjiang Uyghurs and correlation with the EDARV370A variant[J]. Science in China: Life Sciences, 2014, 57(5): 510-518 |
[32] | Matthew W. Tocheri. The Effects of Sexual Dimorphism, Asymmetry, and Inter-trait Association on the Distribution of Thirteen Deciduous Dental Nonmetric Traits in a Sample of Pima Amerindians[J]. Dental Anthropology Journal, 2002, 15 |
[33] | Khamis M. Jane AT, Samsudin A. et al. Variation in dental crown morphology in Malaysian populations[J]. Dental Anthropology Journal, 2018, 19(2): 49-60 |
[34] | Burnett SE, Irish JD, Fong MR. Wear’s the problem? Examining the effect of dental wear on studies of crown morphology. Anthropological Perspectives on Tooth Morphology[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2013, 535-554 |
[35] |
Stojanowski CM, Johnson KM. Observer error, dental wear, and the inference of new world sundadonty[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2015, 156(3): 349-362
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22653 pmid: 25363296 |
[36] | Molnar S. Sex, age, and tooth position as factors in the production of tooth wear[J]. American Antiquity, 1971, 36(2): 182-188 |
[37] |
Tomenchuk J, Mayhall JT. A correlation of tooth wear and age among modern Igloolik Eskimos[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1979, 51(1): 67-77
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330510109 pmid: 453346 |
[38] | Wen B, Li H. Genetic evidence supports demic diffusion of Han culture[J]. Nature, 2004, 431(7006): 302-305 |
[39] |
Xu S, Yin X, Li S, et al. Genomic dissection of population substructure of Han Chinese and its implication in association studies[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2009, 85(6): 762-774
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.015 pmid: 19944404 |
[40] | Qiao H, Tan JZ, Wen SQ, et al. De novo dissecting the three-dimensional facial morphology of 2379 Han Chinese individuals[J]. Phenomics, 2024, 4: 1-12 |
[41] | 李紫君. 头面部观察类形态特征揭示现代汉族的多样性[D].硕士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2020, 57-61 |
[42] | 殷杏. 中国汉族头面部测量特征的南北差异性研究[D].硕士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2020, 78-88 |
[43] | 吴佳姿. 现代汉族人群体部测量表型的差异研究[D].硕士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2021, 61-91 |
[44] | 陆艳, 蔡晓云, 李辉. 苗瑶与孟高棉人群的遗传同源[J]. 现代人类学通讯, 2011, 5: 214-223 |
[45] | 李辉, 金雯俐. 人类起源和迁徙之谜[M]. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2020, 144-173 |
[46] | Wang CC, Yan S, Qin ZD, et al. Late Neolithic expansion of ancient Chinese revealed by Y chromosome haplogroup O3a1c-002611[J]. J Syst Evol, 2013, 51 (3): 280-286 |
[47] | 韦兰海. 东欧亚人群父系Y染色体谱系树的更新[D].博士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2016, 60-62 |
[48] |
Ma X, Yang W, Gao Y, et al. Genetic Origins and Sex-Biased Admixture of the Huis[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2021, 38(9): 3804-3819
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab158 pmid: 34021754 |
[49] | 郑连斌, 陆舜华. 我国23个群体体质的聚类分析与主成分分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1997, 16(2): 151-158 |
[50] | 张兴华, 张尚才, 宇克莉, 等. 山东、安徽汉族与我国19个族群体质特征的聚类分析与主成分分析[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34(3): 76-80 |
[51] | 祝海歌, 乔辉, 杨晨, 等. 中国5个人群的牙齿形态特征对比研究[J]. 复旦学报 (自然科学版), 2023, 62(6): 765-774 |
[52] | Yu K, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Physical characteristics of the Uyghurs: anthropometric data from Kashgar[J]. Science in China: Life Sciences, 2020, 50(9): 983-995 |
[53] | Feng Q, Lu Y, Ni X, et al. Genetic History of Xinjiang’s Uyghurs Suggests Bronze Age Multiple-Way Contacts in Eurasia[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2017, 34(10): 2572-2582 |
[54] |
陆九正, 乔辉, 孙畅, 等. 汉族、黎族、维吾尔族和藏族头面部测量特征比较[J]. 解剖学报, 2022, 53(4): 526-1356
doi: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2022.04.017 |
[1] | 王旭, 万腾淑, 刘雪敏, 李孟思, 翟家淇, 赵春旺. 河南汉族儿童头面部的形态特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 813-827. |
[2] | 吕婧祎, 肖瑶, 宇克莉, 程智, 聂浩波, 高新颖, 姚玥彤, 包金萍, 郑连斌, 张兴华. 中国黄衣佤族的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 549-560. |
[3] | 张兴华, 肖瑶, 岩坎翁, 玉应香, 高雯芳, 包金萍, 程智, 高新颖, 姚玥彤, 刘鑫, 宇克莉. 中国曼咪人的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 561-573. |
[4] | 宇克莉, 张兴华, 程智, 郑连斌. 中国不同人群的头面部特征及其差异[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 574-585. |
[5] | 李欣, 姜帅, 黄婷, 钟华, 温有锋. 内蒙古与新疆达斡尔族头面部特征比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 586-596. |
[6] | 李彦雷. 河北汉族成年男性身高与足迹的相关性[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 657-667. |
[7] | 汤挺兵, 叶先才, 张军, 陈光平, 范晓文, 叶晓鸥. 浙江汉族大学生指长比与心理状况的关系[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 668-674. |
[8] | 成芷菡, 种建荣, 孙战伟, 杨磊, 靖晓亭, 王继红, 何嘉宁. 人类股骨头颈处的非测量特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 415-426. |
[9] | 曾浩然, 刘康康, 罗亚平. 指纹皱纹研究的现状及展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 518-528. |
[10] | 许竞文, 浣发祥, 杨石霞. 旧石器时代考古中出土的赭石及相关遗物的研究方法[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 331-343. |
[11] | 张振, 王莹, 李月丛. 泥河湾盆地旧石器时代人类活动与环境关系的研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 184-198. |
[12] | 倪喜军. 人类起源研究中的哲学问题[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(06): 709-720. |
[13] | 何嘉宁, 冉智宇. 中国史前人类的头骨变形[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(05): 575-589. |
[14] | 孙蕾, 李彦桢, 武志江. 河南郑州站马屯遗址仰韶晚期人骨的颅面形态[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(03): 331-341. |
[15] | 王邦彦, 王久存, 文少卿. 古代强直性脊柱炎的诊断标准及国内研究回顾[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(03): 422-434. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||