丹江口库区大土包子旧石器遗址发掘简报

  • 李浩 ,
  • 李超荣 ,
  • 雷蕾
展开
  • 1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    2.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
李浩(1985-),男,河南长葛人,博士,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所副研究员,主要从事石器技术与人类演化方面的研究。E-mail: lihao@ivpp.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2019-03-14

  修回日期: 2019-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-31

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDB26000000);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA19050102);中国科学院百人计划;南水北调工程湖北丹江库区文物保护研究课题(NK02)

A preliminary report on the excavation of the Datubaozi Paleolithic site in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region

  • Hao LI ,
  • Chaorong LI ,
  • Lei LEI
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2019-03-14

  Revised date: 2019-04-08

  Online published: 2020-08-31

摘要

大土包子遗址位于汉水上游的丹江口库区。遗址发掘出土标本58件,类型包括石核、石片、断块和工具等。原料主要来自附近河滩砾石,以石英为主,附以石英岩、千枚岩和粗面岩。石核多以砾石面或先前剥片片疤为台面进行单向、多向和向心剥片。工具包含以砍砸器、手斧为代表的大型工具制作体系,以及以刮削器、凹缺器为代表的小型工具制作体系,两者原料选择不同,前者以千枚岩为原料,后者主要采用石英原料。对比分析显示,大土包子遗址与区域内汉水第三级阶地其他遗址均存在出土石制品数量少、分布密度低的现象,可能指示遗址间的同质性以及古人类高频流动性等信息。这一现象在年代较晚的第二级阶地遗址中仍然存在,这一方面暗示了古人类行为的连续性与稳定性,另一方面也反映了技术革新与行为可塑性的缺乏。该遗址年代初步推断属于中更新世早中期。

本文引用格式

李浩 , 李超荣 , 雷蕾 . 丹江口库区大土包子旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2020 , 39(03) : 349 -356 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0042

Abstract

The Datubaozi site, located within the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region (DRR) of the Hanshui River, contains a small lithic assemblage of 58 artifacts that comprises cores, flakes, chunks and retouched formal tools. These artifacts are produced on a range of raw materials, sourced from nearby river gravels, and quartz is most favored followed thereafter by small proportions of quartzite, phyllite and trachyte. Clear strategies are employed in both reduction of cores and production of formal tools. For the former, cores illustrate a mix of reduction strategies evidenced by an array of unidirectionally, multi-directionally and discoidally flaked pieces, and for the latter, formal tools show two distinct production techniques that give rise to a clear size differential based on raw material selection. The first technique is characterized by the production of large tools on phyllite, such as chopper and handaxe, whereas the second is characterized by the production of small tools on quartz, such as scraper and notch.

Comparative analysis, between the Datubaozi site and others located on the third terrace of the Hanshui River, shows that artifact densities overall are low for sites in this region, which may be indicative of high mobility patterns in human populations. Such a phenomenon has been observed at younger terrace two sites, and since this trend has now been documented across both terraces. This implies that there is continuity and stability in human behavior and that there is potentially a lack of technological innovation, through time. The preliminary age for the Datubaozi site can be assigned to the early-middle stages of the Middle Pleistocene.

参考文献

[1] 黄学诗, 郑绍华, 李超荣, 等. 丹江库区脊椎动物化石和旧石器的发现与意义[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1996,34(3):228-234
[2] 李超荣. 丹江口库区发现的旧石器[J]. 中国历史博物馆馆刊, 1998,1:4-12
[3] 李超荣, 冯兴无, 李浩. 1994年丹江口库区调查发现的石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2009,28(4):337-354
[4] 李浩, 李超荣, 冯兴无. 2004年丹江口库区调查发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2012,31(2):113-126
[5] Li H, Li CR, Kuman K, et al. The Middle Pleistocene Acheulean site of Shuangshu in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014,52:391-409
[6] 谢树成, 易轶, 刘育燕. 中国南方更新世网纹红土对全球气候变化的响应: 分子化石记录. 中国科学 (D辑:地球科学), 2003,33(5):411-417
[7] 尹秋珍, 郭正堂. 中国南方的网纹红土与东亚季风的异常强盛期. 科学通报, 2006,51(2):186-193
[8] 袁宝印, 夏正楷, 李保生, 等. 中国南方红土年代地层学与地层划分问题. 第四纪研究, 2008,28(1):1-13
[9] 裴树文, 关莹, 高星. 丹江口库区彭家河旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2008,27(2):95-110
[10] 周振宇, 王春雪, 高星. 丹江口北泰山庙旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2009,28(3):246-261
[11] 方启, 陈全家, 卢悦. 湖北丹江口北泰山庙2号旧石器地点发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2012,31(4):344-354
[12] 李浩, 李超荣, Kuman K. 丹江口库区果茶场II旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2013,32(2):144-155
[13] 陈全家, 陈晓颖, 方启. 丹江口库区水牛洼旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2014,33(1):27-38
[14] 李英华, 孙雪峰. 湖北郧县后房旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 江汉考古, 2013,126(1):6-15
[15] 李英华, 周玉端, 孙雪峰. 湖北郧县后房遗址石器工业的年达、操作链及其意义[J]. 江汉考古, 2018,155(2):36-47
[16] 唐斑, 肖玉军, 祁钰, 等. 湖北省郧县滴水岩旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 华夏考古, 2018,6:43-55
[17] 陈昌富, 张居中, 杨晓勇. 丹江口库区双河一号旧石器地点发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2016,35(3):359-370
[18] 牛东伟, 马宁, 裴树文, 等. 丹江口库区宋湾旧石器地点发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2012,31(1):11-23
[19] Pei SW, Niu DW, Guan Y, et al. Middle Pleistocene hominin occupation in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China: studies of formation processes and stone technology of Maling 2A site[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015,53:391-407
[20] Norton CJ, Bae K, Harris JWK, et al. Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2006,51:527-536
[21] Norton CJ, Bae K. The Movius Line sensu lato (Norton et al., 2006) further assessed and defined[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008,55:1148-1150
[22] Petraglia MD, Shipton C. Large cutting tool variability west and east of the Movius Line[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008,55:962-966
[23] Shipton C, Petraglia MD. Inter-continental variation in Acheulean bifaces[A]. Norton CJ, Braun DR. Asian Paleoanthropology: From Africa to China and Beyond[C]. Springer Press, 2010, 49-55
[24] Wang W, Bae CJ, Huang S, et al. Middle Pleistocene bifaces from Fengshudao (Bose Basin, Guangxi, China)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014,69:110-122
[25] Wang SJ. Perspectives on Hominid Behaviour and Settlement Patterns: a Study of the Lower Palaeolithic Sites in the Luonan Basin, China[M]. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series, vol.1406, 2005
[26] Lycett SJ, Bae CJ. The Movius Line controversy: the state of the debate[J]. World Archaeology, 2010,42(4):521-544
[27] Wang W, Lycett SJ, Cramon Taubadel N, et al. Comparison of handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the western Acheulean indicates convergence of form, not cognitive differences[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012,7(4):1-7
[28] Li H, Kuman K, Li CR. Re-examination of the morphological variability of East Asian handaxes from a comparative perspective[J]. World Archaeology, 2014,46(5):705-733
文章导航

/