研究论文

贵州毕节韦家洞古人类遗址年代测定及人牙的形态学意义

  • 郭林 ,
  • 赵凌霞 ,
  • 郑远文 ,
  • 张立召 ,
  • 杜抱朴 ,
  • 戴犁 ,
  • 蔡回阳 ,
  • 王新金
展开
  • 1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京100044
    2.中国科学院大学地球与行星科学学院,北京100049
    3.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京100044
    4.贵州省毕节市文物局,毕节 551700
    5.首都医科大学基础医学院,人体解剖与组织胚胎学系,北京100069
    6.贵州省博物馆,贵阳550001
    7.贵州省文物考古研究所,贵阳550003
郭林,硕士研究生。Email: guolin@ivpp.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2020-08-10

  修回日期: 2020-09-04

  网络出版日期: 2021-04-14

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项 B 类(XDB26000000)

Mosaic dental morphology of a newly discovered human upper premolar and AMS 14C dating of the Weijiadong cave site in Guizhou province, South China

  • Lin GUO ,
  • Lingxia ZHAO ,
  • Yuanwen ZHENG ,
  • Lizhao ZHANG ,
  • Baopu DU ,
  • Li DAI ,
  • Huiyang CAI ,
  • Xinjin WANG
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    3. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    4. Bijie Relics of Guizhou, Bijie 551700
    5. Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069
    6. Guizhou Provincial Museum, Guiyang 550001
    7. Guizhou Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Guiyang 550003

Received date: 2020-08-10

  Revised date: 2020-09-04

  Online published: 2021-04-14

摘要

2007年贵州毕节韦家洞首次发现古人类活动遗物。2016~2018年对遗址做深入考察,发现韦家洞是一个严重破坏的晚更新世古人类遗址,在深度破坏的扰乱层中出土了大量古人类活动证据,包括石制品、动物烧骨和人类牙齿,2018年在洞口和洞内深处发现残留的原生文化层。本文报告了韦家洞原生文化层的14C年代测定结果,距今1.2~2.7万年前,属于晚更新世末期。同时,观察描述了韦家洞出土的一枚古人类上颌第四前臼齿化石,对牙齿形态测量进行了研究比较,发现韦家洞人牙测量值落在现代中国人变异范围内,牙冠咬合面及釉质-齿质交界面EDJ形态简单,牙根短,根管简单纤细,与现代人相似。牙冠颊舌径大,具有三角形隆起和齿带,牙冠颊侧和舌侧均有垂直沟,近中和远中缘有边缘副结节,牙根中部膨大,这些特征显示了韦家洞人牙形态的原始性。综合比较国内外出土的古人类上颌第四前臼齿的形态特点及其演化趋势,结合遗址年代测定结果,我们认为韦家洞出土的人类上颌第四前臼齿形态特点体现了古人类牙齿演化的镶嵌性,为晚更新世东亚早期现代人的形态变异及其演化增添了新证据。

本文引用格式

郭林 , 赵凌霞 , 郑远文 , 张立召 , 杜抱朴 , 戴犁 , 蔡回阳 , 王新金 . 贵州毕节韦家洞古人类遗址年代测定及人牙的形态学意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2021 , 40(06) : 931 -942 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0054

Abstract

Weijiadong Paleolithic cave site located in Bijie City, Guizhou province in southern China, was first discovered in 2007. Further excavations conducted during the field season of 2016~2018, where thousands of paleolithic artifacts, rich animal bone fragment remains, and human teeth were discovered from the upper disturbed layer. In 2018, the original lower deposit layer was uncovered at the front part of cave entrance and inner part of the cave back. The approach of 14C AMS dates the geological age of the Paleolithic layer as old as 12-27 ka BP in the termination of late-Pleistocene. One human right upper P4 (WJD-H4) was discovered in 2016 from the disturbed layer. In the present paper, we described in detail followed by comparison with modern and fossil humans in dental measurements and morphological traits. The crown size, mesial-distal length 6.9 mm, buccal-lingual width 10.8 mm, is within the range of modern Chinese. However, the buccal-lingual width is much wider at the superior limit of modern humans, also larger than the superior limit of early modern humans within east Asia and comparable to some middle Pleistocene fossils from China. The morphology study indicates the mosaic of its modern and primitive traits. The occlusal enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) is relatively simple without accessory ridges, and a single root with Vertucci Type I canal is common within the modern population. Considering the geological background of this site, WJD-H4 would represent members of early modern humans. However, several primitive traits are present, such as buccal triangular swelling, cingulum, buccal and lingual vertical grooves in the crown of outer enamel surface (OES) and EDJ, swelling in the middle of the root, and those are quite common in middle Pleistocene hominins. Especially, lingual vertical grooves are the first case in the late Pleistocene specimen in China. Marginal accessory tubercles were presented in WJD-H4 as well, a medium high-frequently regional trait in the modern populations in East Asia. In conclusion, the human upper premolar morphology from the Weijiadong cave site indicates the mosaic evolution of early modern humans in the Late Pleistocene.

参考文献

[1] 赵凌霞, 蔡回阳, 王新金. 消息与动态:贵州大方响水发现石器时代遗址[J]. 人类学学报, 2007, 26(4):310
[2] Guo L, Zhao LX, et al, A newly discovered late Pleistocene lower third premolar and the high frequency occurrence of Tomes’ root in the human fossil record from China[J]. Bulletin of the International Association for Paleodontology, 2019, 13(2):31-40
[3] Smith BH. Patterns of molar wear in hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists[J]. American journal of physical anthropology, 1984, 63(1):39-56
[4] Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar[J]. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine & Oral Pathology, 1974, 38(3):456-464
[5] Liao W, Xing S, Li D, et al. Mosaic dental morphology in a terminal Pleistocene hominin from Dushan Cave in southern China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):1-14
[6] 王惠芸. 牙体解剖生理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1958, 1-237
[7] 刘武, 吴秀杰, 邢松, 等. 中国古人类化石[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014, 1-378
[8] 吴汝康, 贾兰坡. 周口店新发现的中国猿人化石[J]. 古生物学报, 1954(3): 3-24+84-90
[9] Weidenreich F. The dentition of Sinanthropus pekinensis: a comparative odontography of the hominids[M]. Pehpei: The Geological Survey of China, Paleontology Sinica, New Series D 1, 1937, 1-180
[10] 吴汝康, 吴新智. 河南淅川的人类牙齿化石[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1982(1):1-9
[11] 吕遵谔, 孟振亚. 山东沂源猿人化石[J]. 人类学学报, 1989(4):301-313
[12] 吴汝康, 董兴仁. 湖北郧县猿人牙齿化石[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1980(2): 62-69+107
[13] 何嘉宁. 金牛山人化石牙齿初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(3):216-225
[14] Liu W, Martinón-Torres M, Cai Y, et al. The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China[J]. Nature, 2015, 526(7575):696
[15] Robinson JT. The Dentition of the Australopithecinae[M]. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum, 1956
[16] Suwa G. A comparative analysis of hominid dental remains from the Sungura and Usno Formations, Omo Valley, Ethiopia[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1990
[17] Wood BA, Uytterschaut HT. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. III. Mandibular premolar crowns[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 1987, 154:121-156
[18] Xing S, Martinón-Torres M, Bermúdez de Castro JM, et al. Middle Pleistocene Hominin Teeth from Longtan Cave, Hexian, China[J]. PlOS ONE, 2014, 9(12):e114-265
[19] Martinón-Torres M, Bermúdez de Castro JM, Gómez-Robles A, et al. Dental remains from Dmanisi (Republic of Georgia): Morphological analysis and comparative study[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55(2):249-273
[20] Martinón-Torres M, Bermúdez de Castro JM, Gómez-Robles A, et al. Morphological description and comparison of the dental remains from Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos site (Spain)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2012, 62(1):7-58
[21] Yousuke K, Kono RT, Thomas S, et al. Unique Dental Morphology of Homo floresiensis and Its Evolutionary Implications[J]. PlOS ONE, 2015, 10(11):e0141614
[22] Xing S. Morphological variation of Zhoukoudian Homo erectus teeth[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Science, 2012
[23] Xing S, Sun C, Martinón-Torres M, et al. Hominin teeth from the Middle Pleistocene site of Yiyuan, Eastern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2016, 95:33-54
[24] Johanson DC, White TD, Coppens Y. Dental remains from the Hadar formation, Ethiopia: 1974-1977 collections[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1982
[25] Ward CV, Leakey MG, Walker A. Morphology of Australopithecus anamensis from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2001, 41(4):255-368
[26] Patte E. La dentition des Néanderthaliens[M]. Paris: Masson and Cie, 1962
[27] Turner CG, Nichol CR, Scott GR. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: The Arizona State University dental anthropology system[A]. In: MA Kelley, CS Larsen (Eds.). Advances in Dental Anthropology[M]. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1991: 13-31
[28] Scott GR, Irish JD. Tooth Crown and Root Morphology: The Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017
[29] Buchegger L. Variation of outer and inner crown morphology in upper premolars[D]. Wien: Universitat wien, 2015: 1-84
[30] Bailey SE. Neandertal dental morphology: Implications for modern human origins[D]. Phoenix: Arizona State University, 2002, 1-238
[31] Benazzi S, Viola B, Kullmer O, et al. A reassessment of the Neanderthal teeth from Taddeo cave (southern Italy)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011, 61, 377-387
[32] Xing S, Martinón-Torres M, Bermúdez de Castro JM. The fossil teeth of the Peking Man[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):2066
[33] Hanihara T. Morphological variation of major human populations based on nonmetric dental traits[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2008, 136:169-182
[34] Reyes-Centeno H, Rathmann H, Hanihara T, et al. Testing modern human Out-of-Africa dispersal models using dental nonmetric data[J]. Current Anthropology, 2017, 58, 406-417
[35] Adams DM, George RL. Fuzzy inference systems (FIS) as a novel approach to forensic ancestry estimation[A]. In: Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences[C]. Seattle: American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2018
[36] Adams D, Swenson VM, Scott GR. Global Distribution of Marginal Accessory Tubercles of the Maxillary Premolars[J]. Dental Anthropology Journal, 2019, 32(1):8-15
[37] Caliskan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetcioglu F, et al. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population[J]. Journal of Endodontics, 1995, 21(4):200-204
[38] 岳保利, 吴友农. 中国人恒牙及根管形态图谱[M]. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 1995: 49-56
[39] 汪平, 王宇, 杨亚宁, 等. 离体上颌第二前磨牙根管和牙根情况的研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2004, 18(6):562-563
[40] 商维荣, 李洪涛, 孟祥勇. 上颌第二前磨牙牙根及根管形态的观察[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2005, 28(2):32-33
[41] 王淑芳, 刘芳, 赵守亮. 广西地区693颗壮族人恒牙解剖形态测量[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2009, 23(5):497-499
[42] Kartal N, Ozcelik B, Cinilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars[J]. Journal of Endodontics, 1998, 24(6):417-419
[43] 孔倩颖, 梁立中, 王广勇, 等. 颌前磨牙牙根及根管形态的锥形束CT研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(4):246-251
文章导航

/