综述

盘状石核剥片实验及对华北石片石器研究的启示

  • 李文成
展开
  • 首都师范大学历史学院,北京 100089
李文成,博士,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。Email: liwencheng@cnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2020-12-11

  修回日期: 2021-04-15

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-16

基金资助

中华之源与嵩山文明研究会重大项目(DZ-7);国家社科基金重大项目(11&ZD120);郑州大学“中华文明根系研究”(XKZDJC202006);国家社科基金青年项目(20CKG005)

Experimental analysis on flaking of discoidal cores and its application in understanding the flake tool industry in North China

  • Wencheng LI
Expand
  • School of History, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089

Received date: 2020-12-11

  Revised date: 2021-04-15

  Online published: 2022-06-16

摘要

盘状石核以两面交互打击、向心剥片为主要特征,在中国旧石器文化发展中具有重要地位。本文针对华北石片石器中盘状石核与非定型石核长期共存这一文化现象,展开剥片实验,分析了这两种剥片策略所获得的石片之间的差异。研究发现,石片的台面类型、背面片疤方向、保留石核台面边缘特征石片比例这三个指标可以有效区分这两种剥片策略,石片的技术分析对于理解华北石片石器工业的剥片策略同样具有重要价值。

本文引用格式

李文成 . 盘状石核剥片实验及对华北石片石器研究的启示[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(03) : 514 -522 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0055

Abstract

The discoidal core characterized by the bifacial centripetal flaking method has played an essential role in the Chinese Paleolithic. This research focused on the long-term coexistence of discoidal and amorphous cores in Flake Tool Industry discovered in Northern China, and highlighted the differences between flakes produced by these two different methods. As a result, this study shows that three indexes can be used to distinguish the two methods: platform type, dorsal scar direction, and the proportion of flakes retaining the edge of the core platform. This study also implies technological analysis on flake is important to understand the reductional strategy of the Flake Tool Industry in North China.

参考文献

[1] Terradas X. Discoid flaking method: conception and technological variability[A]. In: Peresani M (Eds.). Discoid Lithic Technology: Advances and Implications[C]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1120, 2003, 19-32
[2] Inizan M L, Roche H, Tixier J. Technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary[M]. Meudon: CREP, 1992, 47
[3] 陈淳, 沈辰, 陈万勇, 等. 小长梁石工业研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 21(1): 23-40
[4] Yang S X, Petraglia M D, Hou Y M, et al. The lithic assemblages of Donggutuo, Nihewan basin: Knapping skills of Early Pleistocene hominins in North China[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(9): e0185101
[5] 贾兰坡, 卫奇. 阳高许家窑旧石器时代文化遗址[J]. 考古学报, 1976 (2): 97-114
[6] 高星. 周口店第 15 地点剥片技术研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(3): 199-215
[7] Li H, Lotter M G. Lithic production strategies during the late Middle Pleistocene at Dali, Shaanxi Province, China: implications for understanding late archaic humans[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11(5): 1701-1712
[8] Li H, Li Z, Gao X, et al. Technological behavior of the early Late Pleistocene archaic humans at Lingjing (Xuchang, China)[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11(7): 3477-3490
[9] 任进成, 李锋, 王晓敏, 等. 河北阳原县板井子旧石器时代遗址2015年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2018 (11): 3-14
[10] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 盘状石核相关问题探讨[J]. 考古, 2016 (2): 88-94
[11] Kei Y M. The Middle Palaeolithic in China: a review of current interpretations[J]. Antiquity, 2012, 86(333): 619-626
[12] 王社江, 沈辰, 胡松梅, 等. 洛南盆地1995-1999年野外地点发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(2): 87-103
[13] Yang S X, Hou Y M, Pelegrin J. A Late Acheulean Culture on the Chinese Loess Plateau: The techno-economic behavior of the Dingcun lithic industry[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 400: 73-85
[14] Lenoir M, Turq A. Recurrent centripetal debitage (Levallois and Discoidal): continuity and discontinuity[A]. In: Dibble H, Bar-Yosef O (Eds.). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, Monographs in World Archaeology 23[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 249-256
[15] Boëda E. Levallois: a volumetric construction, methods, a technique[A]. In: Dibble H, Bar-Yosef O (Eds.). The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 41-65
[16] Picin A, Vaquero M. Flake productivity in the Levallois recurrent centripetal and discoid technologies: New insights from experimental and archaeological lithic series[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2016, 8: 70-81
[17] 于建军, 王幼平, 何嘉宁, 等. 新疆吉木乃县通天洞遗址[J]. 考古, 2018 (7): 3-14
[18] Li F, Kuhn S L, Chen F, et al. The easternmost middle paleolithic (Mousterian) from Jinsitai cave, north China[J]. Journal of human evolution, 2018, 114: 76-84
[19] Toth N. The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985, 12(2): 101-120
[20] 卫奇. 裴树文石片研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(4): 454-469
[21] 王幼平. 织机洞的石器工业与古人类活动[J]. 考古学研究, 2008, 136-148
[22] 刘扬, 侯亚梅. 石英岩硬锤直接剥片的实验考古学研究[J]. 考古学报, 2019 (2): 283-300
[23] Driscoll K. Vein quartz in lithic traditions: an analysis based on experimental archaeology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, 38(3): 734-745
[24] Debenath A, Dibble HL. Handbook of Paleolithic Typology-Volume One: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe[M]. Philadelphia: University Museum University of Pennsylvania, 1994, 10-20
[25] 李炎贤. 关于石片台面的分类[J]. 人类学学报, 1984 (3): 253-258
[26] 李炎贤. 关于石片台面研究的一些问题——兼与卫奇先生商榷[J]. 江汉考古, 2004 (2): 35-42
[27] 卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A]. 见: 第八届古脊椎动物学术年会文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218
[28] 卫奇. 关于石片台面研究问题的问题[J]. 文物春秋, 2006 (4): 1-12
[29] 卫奇. 就石片台面研究问题答李炎贤[J]. 江汉考古, 2006(4): 86-91
[30] de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Proffitt T. The impact of hydraulic processes in Olduvai Beds I and II, Tanzania, through a particle dimension analysis of stone tool assemblages[J]. Geoarchaeology, 2018, 33(2): 218-236
文章导航

/