研究论文

河南淅川沟湾遗址仰韶时期的动物遗存

  • 侯彦峰 ,
  • 张建 ,
  • 曹艳朋 ,
  • 靳松安
展开
  • 1.郑州大学历史学院,郑州 45001
    2.河南省文物考古研究院,郑州 45000
侯彦峰,副研究馆员,主要从事动物考古学研究。Email: houyanfeng@126.com

收稿日期: 2020-12-10

  修回日期: 2021-01-20

  网络出版日期: 2022-10-13

基金资助

国家社科基金(13BKG003);郑州大学“中华文明根系研究”(XKZDJC202006);中国博士后科学基金(2019M662563);河南省文物保护专项(豫文物保[2019]71号);国家重点研发计划“中华文明起源进程中的生业、资源与技术研究”(2020YFC1521606)

Faunal remains of the Yangshao period from the Gouwan site, Xichuan county, Henan province

  • Yanfeng HOU ,
  • Jian ZHANG ,
  • Yanpeng CAO ,
  • Songan JIN
Expand
  • 1. The History College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001
    2. Henan Provincial Institute of Heritage and Archaeology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000

Received date: 2020-12-10

  Revised date: 2021-01-20

  Online published: 2022-10-13

摘要

沟湾遗址位于河南省淅川县上集镇西南,老灌河东岸二级台地上。2007-2009年共发掘5000 m2,出土了7700多件仰韶时期动物骨骼。可鉴定标本至少代表5纲11目19科23个属种,包括猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)、犬(Canis familiaris)、水牛(Buballus buballus)、犀牛(Rhinoceros sp.)、亚洲象(Elephas maximus)、中华竹鼠(Rhizomys sinensis)、花面狸(Paguma larvata taivana)等。动物群统计结果表明,仰韶文化一至三期含犀牛、亚洲象、竹鼠等喜温动物,四期中无喜温动物;根据动物生境,可判断该地区仰韶文化一至三期气候温暖湿润,四期相对干冷。仰韶文化一、二期狩猎动物的数量稍多于或等于家养动物,说明该时期“狩猎采集”比“饲养家畜”的活动多或并重;三、四期家猪骨骼占比分别是90.7%和87.9%,说明饲养家畜是一项主要的生业方式,狩猎和捕捞仅起辅助作用。仰韶文化三期3个兽骨坑内各埋藏了1具完整的成年母猪骨架,其中K15内为孕晚期母猪,怀仔猪数为7或稍多,为研究我国早期家猪繁育情况提供了十分宝贵的材料。总之,该遗址出土的丰富动物遗骸可为研究汉水中游地区仰韶时期的古环境、生业模式、动物资源利用、畜牧史等提供重要资料。

本文引用格式

侯彦峰 , 张建 , 曹艳朋 , 靳松安 . 河南淅川沟湾遗址仰韶时期的动物遗存[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(05) : 913 -926 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0034

Abstract

This article focuses on the identification and analysis of faunal remains unearthed from the Gouwan site between 2007 and 2009 in Xichuan county, Henan Province. In the total excavation area of 5000 m2, more than 7700 faunal bone specimens were discovered, representing at least 23 species, including pig (Sus scrofa domesticus), dog (Canis familiaris), buffalo (Buballus buballus), rhinoceros (Rhinoceros sp. ), Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), bamboo rat (Rhizomys sinensis), masked civet (Paguma larvata taivana) and mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Based on the stratigraphy and the typology of unearthed artifacts, the cultural remains belongs to the Yangshao Culture period from the Gouwan site can be divided into four phases. Some thermophilic species, such as rhinoceros, Asian elephants and bamboo rats were discovered in the earlier three phases, but no thermophilic animals were found in the fourth phase. This contrast suggests that the climate of the earlier phases were warmer than that of the fourth phase. The numbers of hunted animals in the first and second phases are more than or equal to those of domestic animals, indicating that hunting outweighed or equaled with raising domestic animals in local subsistence. However, pig bones account for 90.7% and 87.9% of NISP in the third and the fourth phases respectively, showing that animal husbandry, instead of hunting and fishing became dominated in subsistence economy. In particular, three burials of animal bones were found dated to the third phase. Each has a complete skeleton of adult sow, among which one was in late pregnancy carrying at least 7 babies (No.K15), providing important materials for studying the early domestic pig breeding in China.

参考文献

[1] Elizabeth JR, Elizabeth SW. Zooarchaeology Second Edition[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 1
[2] 黄蕴平. 动物骨骼数量分析和家畜驯化发展初探[A]. 见:河南省文物考古研究所(编).动物考古(第1辑)[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2010, 1-31
[3] 袁靖. 中国古代家养动物的动物考古学研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2010, 30(2): 298-306
[4] Brunson KR, He N, Dai X. Sheep, Cattle, and Specialization: New Zooarchaeological Perspectives on the Taosi Longshan[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2015, 26(3): 460-475
[5] 李志鹏, Brunson KR, 戴玲玲. 中原地区新石器时代到青铜时代早期羊毛开发的动物考古学研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 149-157
[6] Campbell R, Li ZHP, He YL, et al. Consumption,Exchange and Production at the Great Settlement Shang: Bone-working at Tiesanlu, Anyang[J]. Antiquity, 2011, 85(330): 1279-1297
[7] Hou YF, Campbell R, Li ZHP, et al. The Guandimiao Bone Assemblage (and What it Says about the Shang Economy)[J]. Asian Perspectives, 2018, 57(2): 281-310
[8] 靳松安. 河南淅川县沟湾遗址仰韶文化遗存发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2010, 6: 7-21
[9] 西蒙•赫森. 哺乳动物骨骼和牙齿鉴定方法指南[M].译者:侯彦峰,马萧林. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012, 1-117
[10] 伊丽莎白•施密德. 动物骨骼图谱[M].译者:李天元. 北京: 中国地质大学出版社, 1992, 1-105
[11] Matsui A. Fundamentals of Zooarchaeology in Japan and East Asia[M]. Nara: Institution National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, 2007, 1-146
[12] 安格拉•冯登德里施. 考古遗址出土动物骨骼测量指南[M].译者:马萧林,侯彦峰. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007, 1-171
[13] Silver IA. The Aging of Domestic Animals[A]. In: Brothwell D, Higgs E(Eds.). Science in Archaeology: A Survey of Progress and Research[M]. New York: Praeger, 1970, 283-302
[14] Grant A. The use of tooth wear as a guide to the age of domestic ungulates[A]. In: Wilson B, Grigson C, Payne S(Eds.). Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites[M]. Oxford: BAR British Series, 1982: 91-108
[15] Halstead P. A study of mandibular teeth from Romano-British contexts at Maxey[A]. In: Pryor F, French C(Eds.). The Fenland Project No. 1: Archaeology and Environment in the Lower Wellan Valley[R]. East Anglian Archaeology 109, 1985, 219-224
[16] Zeder MA, Lemoine X, Payne S. A new system for computing long-bone fusion age profiles in Sus scrofa[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, 55: 135-150
[17] 王育茜, 张萍, 靳桂云, 等. 河南淅川沟湾遗址2007年度植物浮选结果与分析[J]. 四川文物, 2011, 2: 80-92
[18] 付巧妹, 靳松安, 胡耀武, 等. 河南淅川沟湾遗址农业发展方式和先民食物结构变化[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(7): 589-595
[19] 袁靖. 考古遗址出土家猪的判断标准[N]. 中国文物报,2003-08-01(007)
[20] 施雅风, 孔昭宸, 王苏民, 等. 中国全新世大暖期鼎盛阶段的气候与环境[J]. 中国科学B辑, 1993, 23(8): 865-873
[21] 贾兰坡, 张振标. 河南淅川下王岗遗址中的动物群[J]. 文物. 1977, 6: 41-49
[22] 赵卓, 靳松安, 司彬, 等. 淅川沟湾遗址红烧土中植物遗存的辨别[J]. 华夏考古, 2012, 3: 34-37
[23] 张双权. 旧石器遗址动物骨骼表面非人工痕迹研究及其考古学意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 131-140
文章导航

/