研究论文

原料产地对中国东北和韩国旧石器时代晚期黑曜岩石器工业的影响

  • 侯哲 ,
  • 赵宇超 ,
  • 高星 ,
  • 成春泽
展开
  • 1.吉林大学考古学院,长春 130012
    2.山东大学环境与社会考古国际合作联合实验室, 山东大学文化遗产研究院,青岛 266237
    3.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    4.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    5.中国科学院大学,北京100049
    6.庆熙大学历史系,韩国首尔 02447
侯哲,副研究员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: houzhe20@mails.jlu.edu

收稿日期: 2021-04-20

  修回日期: 2021-09-01

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-19

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDB26030203);郑州大学中华文明根系研究(XKZDJC202006);国家重点研发专项(2020YFC1521500);考古中国——吉林东部长白山地区古人类遗址调查与研究

Impact of raw material source on the obsidian lithic industry of Northeast China and South Korea

  • Zhe HOU ,
  • Yuchao ZHAO ,
  • Xing GAO ,
  • Chuntaek SEONG
Expand
  • 1. School of Archaeology Jilin University, Changchun 130012
    2. Joint International Research Laboratory of Environmental and Social Archaeology, Institute of Cultural Heritage, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237
    3. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    4. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    6. Department of History, KyungHee University, South Korea, Seoul 02447

Received date: 2021-04-20

  Revised date: 2021-09-01

  Online published: 2022-12-19

摘要

本文以原料产地距离衰减效应为视角,根据目前中国东北地区和韩国旧石器时代晚期黑曜岩石制品的发现情况以及黑曜岩产源地研究成果,结合狩猎采集人群社交网络模型、民族学、考古学资料,对以长白山为核心的黑曜岩源产地对中韩两地的辐射影响作出了直接供应区(天池火山口为圆心辐射半径150~200 km)和接触区(距离天池火山口200 km以上)的划分。在此基础上对比研究两地的黑曜岩石制品,发现由于距离源头产地较远,韩国黑曜岩石制品的数量以及类型丰度均低于中国东北地区。而又由于原料的长距离损耗以及对于原料更加经济的开发利用,导致韩国典型遗址中黑曜岩细石核与完整石片的体积更小,原料缩减更甚。

本文引用格式

侯哲 , 赵宇超 , 高星 , 成春泽 . 原料产地对中国东北和韩国旧石器时代晚期黑曜岩石器工业的影响[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(06) : 982 -993 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0003

Abstract

Using Renfrew’s distance decay model of obsidian exchange and evidence of Upper Paleolithic obsidian artifacts and sources in northeastern China and South Korea, an obsidian raw material supply zone (r=150~200 km) and a direct supply zone (r>200 km) were identified within crater Lake Tianchi, which represents a radiation core for both northeastern China and Korean Peninsula. Comparative statistical analysis of the distribution and artifacts of this region indicated the following results. 1) The number of obsidian artifacts and artifact types are higher in northwestern Chinese Upper Paleolithic sites; and 2) obsidian microblade core reduction is more intense with the size of complete flakes generally smaller in typical South Korean Upper Paleolithic sites. We argue that significant differences of obsidian distribution and usage between the two regions reflects availability and size of obsidian raw materials, associated to the distance from source localities in the Changbai Mountains.

参考文献

[1] Kuzmin YV. Long-distance obsidian transport in prehistoric northeast Asia[J]. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 2012, 32: 1-5
[2] Kuzmin YV. Obsidian as a commodity to investigate human migrations in the Upper Paleolithic, Neolithic, and Paleometal of Northeast Asia[J]. Quaternary International, 2017, 442, Part B: 5-11
[3] Kuzmin YV. Obsidian provenance studies in the far eastern and northeastern regions of Russia and exchange networks in the prehistory of Northeast Asia[J]. Documenta Praehistorica, 2019, 46: 296-307
[4] 刘爽. 中国东北地区旧石器时代晚期遗址黑曜岩制品原料来源探索[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019
[5] Jwa YJ, Yi S, Jin ME, et al. Two contrasting provenances of prehistoric obsidian artifacts in South Korea: Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics[J]. Open Archaeology, 2019, 5(1): 106-120
[6] Carter T. The contribution of obsidian characterization studies to early prehistoric archaeology[A]. In Yamada M, Ono A (Eds.). Lithic Raw Material Exploitation and Circulation in Prehistory: A Comparative Perspective in Diverse Palaeoenvironments[C]. Lie?ge: ERAUL, 2014: 23-33
[7] 陈全家, 田禾, 陈晓颖, 等. 海林炮台山旧石器遗址发现的石器研究[A].见: 边疆考古研究(第9辑)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 9-24
[8] 陈全家, 田禾, 陈晓颖, 等. 秦家东山旧石器地点发现的石器研究[J]. 北方文物, 2014(2): 3-11
[9] 陈全家, 田禾, 王欢, 等. 黑龙江省海林市杨林西山旧石器遗址(2008)石器研究[J]. 北方文物, 2013(2): 3-14
[10] 田禾, 陈全家, 李有骞. 黑龙江省海林市杨林南山旧石器遗址石器研究[J]. 北方文物, 2010(3): 3-12
[11] 陈全家, 张乐. 吉林延边珲春北山发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(2): 138-145
[12] 陈全家, 李其泰. 吉林桦甸寿山仙人洞旧石器遗址试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1994, 13(1): 12-19
[13] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 王法岗. 吉林桦甸仙人洞旧石器遗址1993 年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2007, 26(3): 222-236
[14] 陈全家, 李有骞, 赵海龙, 等. 吉林辉南邵家店发现的旧石器[J]. 北方文物, 2006(1): 3-9
[15] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 王春雪. 抚松新屯西山旧石器遗址试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(2): 147-153
[16] 徐廷. 吉林抚松发现枫林旧石器遗址[N]. 中国文物报, 2016-10-21(8)
[17] 李万博, 陈全家, 张福有. 吉林枫林旧石器遗址发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 191-199
[18] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 卢悦. 吉林两江镇旧石器地点发现的石器研究[J]. 草原文物, 2001(2): 1-10
[19] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 方启, 等. 延边安图立新发现的砾石石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(1): 45-50
[20] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 方启, 等. 吉林安图沙金沟发现的石器研究[J]. 华夏考古, 2008(4): 51-58
[21] 陈全家, 方启, 李霞, 等. 吉林和龙青头旧石器遗址的新发现及初步研究[J]. 考古与文物, 2008(2): 3-9
[22] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 方启, 等. 吉林省和龙西沟发现的旧石器[J]. 北方文物, 2010(2): 3-9
[23] 吉林省文物考古研究所, 和龙市文物管理所. 吉林省和龙市新发现三处旧石器时代遗址[A].见:边疆考古研究(第23辑)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018: 1-9
[24] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 霍东峰. 和龙市柳洞旧石器地点发现的石制品研究[J]. 华夏考古, 2005(3): 51-59
[25] 陈全家, 王春雪, 方启, 等. 吉林和龙柳洞2004年发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2006, 25(3): 208-219
[26] 李霞. 和龙崇善大洞旧石器遗址2007年发掘的石器研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2008, 1-56
[27] 李万博, 陈全家, 方启, 等. 延边和龙大洞旧石器遗(2007)试掘简报[A].见:边疆考古研究(第20辑)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016, 1-11
[28] 万晨晨, 陈全家, 方启, 等. 吉林和龙大洞遗址的调查与研究[J]. 考古学报, 2017(1): 1-30
[29] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 方启, 等. 石人沟林场旧石器地点试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(4): 373-382
[30] 陈全家, 王春雪, 方启, 等. 延边地区和龙石人沟发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2006, 25(2): 106-114
[31] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 方启, 等. 延边和龙石人沟旧石器遗址2005年试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(2): 105-114
[32] 陈全家, 赵海龙, 王晓阳. 石人沟石器遗址2007年发现的石器研究[J]. 华夏考古, 2014(4): 50-58
[33] Jia PW, Doelman T, Chen CJ, et al. Moving sources: A preliminary study of volcanic glass artifact distributions in northeast China using PXRF[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37(7): 1670-1677
[34] 侯哲. 旧石器时代晚期黑曜岩石器研究—以中国东北地区与南韩地区比较为中心[D]. 首尔: 韩国庆熙大学, 2015
[35] 崔哲慜, 高星, 夏文婷, 等. 晚更新世东北亚现代人迁移与交流范围的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(1): 12-27
[36] Chang YJ, Kim JC. Provenance of obsidian artifacts from the Wolseongdong Paleolithic site, Korea, and its archaeological implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2018, 467, Part B: 360-368
[37] Kuzmin YV, Glascock YV. The neutron activation analysis of volcanic glasses in the Russian Far East and neighbouring Northeast Asia:A summary of the first 20 years of research[A]. In: Ono MD, Glascock YV, Kuzmin YV(Eds.). Methodological Issues for Characterisation and Provenance Studies of Obsidian in Northeast Asia[C]. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2014: 85-93
[38] Popov VK, Kuzmin YV, Grebennikov AV, et al. The “puzzle” of the primary obsidian source in the region of Paektusan (China/DPR Korea)[J]. Quaternary International, 2019, 519: 192-199
[39] Lee GK, Kim JC. Obsidians from the Sinbuk archaeological site in Korea - Evidences for strait crossing and long-distance exchange of raw material in Paleolithic age[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, Reports, 2015(2): 458-466
[40] Kim JC, Kim DK, Yoon M, et al. PIXE provenancing of obsidian artefacts from Paleolithic sites in Korea[J]. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 2007(27): 122-128
[41] Renfrew C, Dixon JE, Cann JR. Further analysis of Near Eastern obsidians[J]. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 1968, 34: 319-331
[42] Whallon R. Social networks and information: Non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2006, 25(2): 259-270
[43] Moutsiou T. Changing scales of obsidian movement and social networking[A]. In: Ruebens K, Romanowska I, Bynoe R(Eds.). Unravelling the Palaeolithic: Ten Years of Research at the Centre for the Archaeology of Human Origins (CAHO, University of Southampton)[C]. Southampton: University of Southampton, Series in Archaeology No. 8, 2012: 85-96
[44] Ambrose SH. Obsidian hydration dating and source exploitation studies in Africa[A]. In: Liritzis I, Stevenson CM (Eds.). The Dating and Provenance of Obsidian and Ancient Manufactured Glasses[C]. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2012: 56-72
[45] 林景胤, 董佩信. 长白山黑曜岩地质特征与成因浅析[J]. 地质与资源, 2016(4): 204-207
[46] Renfrew C. Alternative models for exchange and spatial distribution[A]. In: Earle TK, Ericson JE (Eds.). Exchanges Systems In Prehistory[C]. London: Academic, 1977: 71-90
[47] 中国新闻网. 专家谈黑曜岩石叶石核:遗址可能存在多期文化遗存[N]. 中国新闻网, 2021-03-24
[48] 田川, 徐廷, 关莹, 等. 吉林抚松枫林遗址细石核研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(1): 19-32
[49] Choe B, Kim YB, Kim ND. Excavation report on the Hahwagye Mesolithic site, Hongcheon[R]. In: Research Report on the Jrmgang Highway Construction Area[C]. Chuncheon: Kangwon-do, 1992, 13-260
[50] Lee YJ. Boat-shaped stone artifact from Suyanggae Upper Palaeolithic site[J]. Komunhwa, 1989, 35: 3-77
[51] Seong CT. Microblade technology in Korea and adjacent northeast Asia[J]. Asian Perspectives, 1998, 37(2): 245-278
[52] 王春雪, 陈全家, 赵海龙, 等. 试析东北地区东部与朝鲜半岛旧石器时代晚期细石叶工业之间的文化关系[J]. 内蒙古文物考古, 2009(2): 34-49
文章导航

/