研究论文

安徽禹会村遗址双墩文化时期农业发展的植硅体证据

  • 顾纯光 ,
  • 罗武宏 ,
  • 张东 ,
  • 杨玉璋
展开
  • 1.中国科学技术大学科技史与科技考古系,合肥 230026
    2.中国社会科学院考古研究所,北京 100710
顾纯光,博士研究生,主要从事植物考古学研究。E-mail: gcg1993@mail.ustc.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2021-09-03

  修回日期: 2021-12-22

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41772172);安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(2108085MD124);中国科学院国际伙伴计划项目(132311KYSB20190008);中国科学技术大学新文科基金项目(XWK2019014);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(WK2110000007)

Phytolith evidence for the agricultural development during Shuangdun cultural period from the Yuhuicun site, Anhui Province

  • Chunguang GU ,
  • Wuhong LUO ,
  • Dong ZHANG ,
  • Yuzhang YANG
Expand
  • 1. Department of the History of Science and Scientific Archaeology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026
    2. Institute of Archaeological Research, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100710

Received date: 2021-09-03

  Revised date: 2021-12-22

  Online published: 2023-02-20

摘要

本文利用植硅体分析方法,对安徽蚌埠禹会村遗址双墩文化时期44份土壤样品开展植物考古研究,重点关注典型农作物植硅体类型及其形态特征,以及敏感型与固定型植硅体组合特征等。结果显示,禹会村遗址大部分样品中皆发现有水稻特征型植硅体,并未发现粟、黍等旱地作物遗存;水稻扇型及双峰型植硅体形态特征分析显示,水稻遗存为驯化程度较高的粳型稻。以上研究结果表明,该遗址双墩文化时期的农业结构延续了顺山集文化时期以来种植粳型稻为主的传统。此外,通过水稻植硅体高密度样品中敏感型与固定型植硅体含量比值为0.7±0.2推测,该遗址水稻栽培环境属于“高地势-雨水供给”或“低地势-雨水供给”类型。本文研究结果为探讨淮河中游地区新石器时代农业发展、水稻栽培与驯化以及人类适应策略等问题提供了重要科学依据。

本文引用格式

顾纯光 , 罗武宏 , 张东 , 杨玉璋 . 安徽禹会村遗址双墩文化时期农业发展的植硅体证据[J]. 人类学学报, 2023 , 42(01) : 110 -121 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0055

Abstract

The Shuangdun Culture Period (7.3-6.8 kaBP) is the characteristic culture with distinctive local traits and some foreign factors in the middle Huai River valley. It is an important medium to understand the relationship of civilizations between the Huai River and the Yellow River and Yangtze River. At present, although some researches on the plant remains of Shuangdun period have been carried out in the middle Huai River valley, there are still lack of consistent views about agricultural development and its influencing factors. The Yuhuicun site, located in Bengbu City, Anhui Province, was excavated by Institute of Archaeological Research of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences during 2017. The typical traits of objects unearthed from this site belong to the Shuangdun culture, Dawenkou culture and Longshan culture, respectively. Thus, it is an ideal site for studying the prehistorical agriculture development of the middle Huai River valley. Previous studies showed that millet remains have been used by Yuhuicun people during Shuangdun culture period. However, there are still no systematic archaeobotany research in the site. In this paper, phytolith analysis was conducted on 44 soil samples of Shuangdun time for investigating the plant remains from the Yuhuicun site, which is focused on the crop phytolith types, the percentage of sensitive phytolith types and fixed phytolith ones, the morphological characteristics of rice bulliform and double-peaked phytoliths. The results indicate that most samples found from the Yuhuicun site are rice phytoliths, while no millet phytoliths were discovered. According to morphological analyses of rice bulliform and double-peaked phytoliths, the proportion of rice bulliform phytoliths which have equal or more than nine shallow fish-scale decorations is 45.8%±3.03%, and that of domesticated rice double-peaked phytoliths is 48.75%±2.7%, and the proportion of japonica-type rice bulliform phytoliths is 70.82%±4.33%. These data indicate that rice remains from the Yuhuicun site were mainly domesticated japonica-type. The above results demonstrates that rice farming at Yuhuicun have inherited the agricultural tradition which had been found since the Shunshanji culture in the middle Huai River valley. Besides, the ratio of sensitive types and fixed ones in the phytolith assemblages from the Yuhuicun site was 0.7±0.2, suggesting that the water environment for rice cultivation at the site belonged to “upland rainfed” type or “lowland rainfed” type. The findings in this research can provide significant evidence for studying the evolution of Neolithic agricultural development patterns, rice cultivation and domestication and human adaptation strategies under the background of prehistoric climate and cultural changes in Central and East China.

参考文献

[1] Bellwood P. First farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, 111-127
[2] Zuo XX, Lu HY, Jiang LP, et al. Dating rice remains through phytolith carbon-14 study reveals domestication at the beginning of the Holocene[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(25): 6486-6491
[3] Yang XY, Wan ZW, Perry L, et al. Early millet use in northern China[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(10): 3726-3730
[4] Lu HY, Zhang JP, Liu KB, et al. Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago[J]. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 2009, 106(18): 7367-7372
[5] He KY, Lu HY, Zhang JP, et al. Prehistoric evolution of the dualistic structure mixed rice and millet farming in China[J]. The Holocene, 2017, 27(12): 1885-1898
[6] Yang YZ, Cheng ZJ, Li WY, et al. The emergence, development and regional differences of mixed farming of rice and millet in the upper and middle Huai River Valley, China[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2016, 59(9): 1779-1790
[7] Huang R, Zhu C, Guan Y, et al. Impact of Holocene environmental change on temporal-spatial distribution of Neolithic sites in Huaihe River Basin, Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Geographical Science, 2006, 16(2): 199-208
[8] 韩建业. 早期中国-中国文化圈的形成和发展(第一版)[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2020, 13-188
[9] 安徽省文物考古研究所, 蚌埠市博物馆. 蚌埠双墩——新石器时代遗址发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008, 399-476
[10] Luo WH, Gu CG, Yang YZ, et al. Phytoliths reveal the earliest interplay of rice and broomcorn millet at the site of Shuangdun (ca. 7.3-6.8 ka BP) in the middle Huai River valley, China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2019, 102: 26-34
[11] 管理, 胡耀武, 王昌燧, 等. 食谱分析方法在家猪起源研究中的应用[J]. 南方文物, 2011, 4: 116-124
[12] Zhang YN, Zhang D, Yang YL, et al. Pollen and lipid analysis of coprolites from Yuhuicun and Houtieying, China: Implications for human habitats and diets[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2020, 29: 102135
[13] Piperno DR. Phytoliths: A Comprehensive Guide forArchaeologists and Paleoecologists[M]. New York: AltaMira Press, 2006, 1-248
[14] 吕厚远. 中国史前农业起源演化研究新方法与新进展[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2018, 48(2): 181-199
[15] Piperno DR. Phytolith analysis-an archaeological and geological perspective[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1988, 1-288
[16] Rung F, Laws KR, Neve C. The opal phytolith inventory of soils in central Africa-quantities, shapes, classification and spectra[J]. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 1999, 107(1-2): 23-53
[17] Luo WH, Li J, Yang YZ, et al. Evidence for crop structure from phytoliths at the Dongzhao site on the Central Plains of China from Xinzhai to Erligang periods[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2018, 17: 852-859
[18] 王永吉, 吕厚远. 植物硅酸体研究及应用[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1992, 48-124
[19] Lu HY, Wu NQ, Liu B. Recognition of rice phytoliths[A]. In: Pinilla A, Juan-Tresserras J, Machado MJ. The State-of-the-Art Phytolith in soils and Plants[M]. Madrid: Monografias del Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1997, 159-174
[20] Lu HY, Zhang JP, Wu NQ, et al. Phytoliths analysis for the discrimination of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and common millet (Panicum miliaceum)[J]. PloS One, 2009, 4: e4448
[21] Ge Y, Lu HY, Zhang JP, et al. Phytolith analysis for the identification of barnyard millet (Echinochloa sp.) and its implications[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2018, 10(1): 61-73
[22] 赵志军. 中国古代农业的形成过程-浮选出土植物遗存证据[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 73-84
[23] Madella M, Jones MK, Echlin P, et al. Plant water availability and analytical microscopy of phytoliths: Implications for ancient irrigation in arid zones[J]. Quaternary International, 2009, 193: 32-40
[24] Weisskopf A, Qin L, Ding JL, et al. Phytoliths and rice: From wet to dry and back again in the Neolithic Lower Yangtze[J]. Antiquity, 2015, 89: 1051-1063
[25] Weisskopf A. A wet and dry story: Distinguishing rice and millet arable systems using phytoliths[J]. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2017, 26: 99-109
[26] Zhao ZJ, Pearsall DM, Benfer RA, et al. Distinguishing rice (Oryza sativa Poaceae) from wild Oryza species through phytolith analysis, II, finalized method[J]. Economic Botany, 1998, 52(2): 34-45
[27] Zheng YF, Dong YJ, Matsui A, et al. Molecular genetic basis of determining subspecies of ancient rice using the shape of phytoliths[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2003, 30(10): 1215-1221
[28] Huan XJ, Lu HY, Wang C, et al. Bulliform phytolith research in wild and domesticated rice paddy soil in south China[J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(10): e0141255
[29] 郇秀佳, 吕厚远, 王灿, 等. 水稻扇型植硅体野生——驯化特征研究进展[J]. 古生物学报, 2020, 59(4): 467-478
[30] Wang CL, Udatsu T, Fujiwara H. Relationship between motor cell silica body shape and grain morphological / physiological traits for discriminating indica and japonica rice in China[J]. Japanese Journal of Breeding, 1996, 46(1): 61-66
[31] 程至杰, 杨玉璋, 张居中, 等. 安徽淮南小孙岗遗址炭化植物遗存研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2016, 36(2): 302-311
[32] Zhang JP, Lu HY, Gu WF, et al. Early mixed farming of millet and rice 7800 years ago in the middle Yellow River Region, China[J]. PloS One, 2012, 7(12): e52146
[33] Wang C, Lu HY, Gu WF, et al. Temporal changes of mixed millet and rice agriculture in Neolithic-Bronze Age Central Plain, China: Archaeobotanical evidence from the Zhuzhai site[J]. The Holocene, 2017, 1-17
[34] 张居中, 程至杰, 蓝万里, 等. 河南舞阳贾湖遗址植物考古研究的新进展[J]. 考古, 2018, 4: 100-110
[35] 程至杰, 齐鸣, 曾令园, 等. 河南项城贾庄和后高老家遗址炭化植物遗存分析-兼论豫东地区仰韶时代的原始农业[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(e): 825-836
[36] 易文文, 魏兴涛, 杨玉璋, 等. 河南舞阳张王庄遗址仰韶早期先民食物的淀粉粒分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(5): 411-423
[37] Jin GY, Wu WW, Zhang KS, et al. 8000-Year old rice remains from the north edge of the Shandong Highlands, East China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 51: 34-42
[38] Crawford GW, Chen XX, Luan FS, et al. People and plant interaction at the Houli Culture Yuezhuang site in Shandong Province, China[J]. The Holocene, 2016, 26(10): 1594-1604
[39] Jin GY, Chen S, Li H, et al. The Beixin Culture: archaeobotanical evidence for a population dispersal of Neolithic hunter-gatherer-cultivators in northern China[J]. Antiquity, 2020, 94 (378): 1426-1443
[40] 胡飞. 淮河中游及巢湖流域史前文化演化及其农业发展的环境背景研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2014, 59-97
[41] 冯晓敏. 不同黍稷品种耐旱性差异及生理生态特性研究[D]. 临汾: 山西师范大学, 2012, 1-61
[42] 韩志平, 张海霞, 张巽, 等. 水分胁迫对黍子幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2019, 40(8): 502-511
[43] 韩建业. 双墩文化的北上与北辛文化的形成——从济宁张山“北辛文化遗存”论起[J]. 江汉考古, 2012, 2: 46-50
[44] Wu Y, Jiang LP, Zheng YF, et al. Morphological trend analysis of rice phytolith during the early Neolithic in the Lower Yangtze[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 49: 326-331
[45] Luo WH, Yang YZ, Yao L, et al. Phytolith records of rice agriculture during the Middle Neolithic in the middle reaches of Huai River region, China[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 426: 133-140
[46] 邱振威, 庄丽娜, 林留根, 等. 江苏泗洪韩井遗址水稻驯化的植硅体证据及相关问题[J]. 东南文化, 2018, 1: 71-80+68-70
[47] Deng ZH, Qin L, Gao Y, et al. From early domesticated rice of the Middle Yangtze Basin to millet, rice and wheat agriculture: archaeobotanical macro-remains from Baligang, Nanyang Basin, Central China (6700-500 BC)[J]. PloS One, 2015, 10 (10): e0139885
[48] Zheng YF, Crawford GW, Jiang LP, et al. Rice domestication revealed by reduced shattering of archaeological rice from the lower Yangtze valley[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 28136
[49] Luo WH, Yang YZ, Zhuang LN, et al. Phytolith evidence of water management for rice growing and processing between 8500 and 7500 cal years bp in the middle Huai river valley, China[J]. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2021, 30: 243-254
[50] 金权. 安徽淮北平原第四系[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1990, 39-141
文章导航

/