研究论文

河南登封方家沟遗址的石料产地

  • 林壹 ,
  • 刘拓 ,
  • 顾万发 ,
  • 汪松枝 ,
  • 王幼平
展开
  • 1.郑州大学,郑州 450001
    2.兰州文理学院,兰州 730000
    3.郑州市文物考古研究院,郑州 450052
    4.北京大学考古文博学院,北京 100871
林壹,讲师,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: 137240991@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-12-01

  修回日期: 2022-04-28

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-20

基金资助

国家社科基金青年项目(20CKG005);郑州大学“中华文明根系研究”项目(XKZDJC202006);郑州中华之源与嵩山文明研究会青年课题(Q2019-5)

Sources of lithic raw materials of the Fangjiagou site in Dengfeng county, Henan Province

  • Yi LIN ,
  • Tuo LIU ,
  • Wanfa GU ,
  • Songzhi WANG ,
  • Youping WANG
Expand
  • 1. Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001
    2. Lanzhou University of Arts and Science, Lanzhou 730000
    3. Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology of Zhengzhou City, Zhengzhou 450002
    4. School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 1 000871

Received date: 2021-12-01

  Revised date: 2022-04-28

  Online published: 2023-02-20

摘要

方家沟遗址主文化层出土了大量石制品,以石片石器工业为特征,年代约在距今5~3万年前。遗址周边是一个石料资源相对丰富的区域,可以通过原料分布、质量和可获性了解当时人类为何选择特定原料。遗址的原料既包括石英砂岩、石英岩和脉石英砾石,又包括脉石英岩块。石料调查显示,遗址附近丘岗顶部的中更新世砾石层可能是砾石原料的来源;西北距遗址约7~11 km处的嵩山东南麓元古宙地层中多见脉石英出露,最有可能是脉石英岩块的采集地。遗址周边区域并不缺乏燧石等质量更好的原料,但极少被当时人类所利用,这说明当地石片石器工业的长期延续不能用缺乏优质原料来解释。

本文引用格式

林壹 , 刘拓 , 顾万发 , 汪松枝 , 王幼平 . 河南登封方家沟遗址的石料产地[J]. 人类学学报, 2023 , 42(01) : 25 -35 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0050

Abstract

The Fangjiagou site, located in the southeast foot of Songshan Mountain and the east of Dengfeng basin, is an open-air Paleolithic site, and yielded abundant lithic artifacts from the main archaeological layer of the site dated to 50-30 ka BP. Its stone industry is characterized by flake tools. Surrounding area of this site presents a number of rock types of varying availability and quality for knapping, which can help to understand why hominins select specific lithic raw materials during MIS3. Here we report the results of investigation of raw material sources at the Fangjiagou site. We identified the lithology of lithic artifacts unearthed from the Fangjiagou site by hand-specimens, and analysed their prototype according to cortex-bearing pieces. The raw materials can be divided to three groups: Vein quartz blocks are dominant in quantity; Pebble/cobble forms including quartz sandstone, quartzite and vein quartz, also account for a certain proportion; In addition, there is a very small amount of flint, which only appears in the form of chips without cortex. We carried out geological survey within a radius of approximately 15 km of the site to identify potential primary and secondary sources for theses raw materials and compare outcrops with archaeological specimens. First, Middle Pleistocene gravel layer is widely distributed on the top of the hills near the site. According to the analysis of the gravel samples from two exposed sections(less than 1 km straight-line distance from the Fangjiagou site), the hominins mainly chose the rock types with relatively good quality from the gravel layer, and probably procure gravels by collecting ones eroded and peeled from stratum. Second, vein quartz are mostly exposed in the Proterozoic stratum at the southeast foot of Songshan Mountain about 7-11 km northwest of the site. The hominins collected vein quartz blocks around primary source areas and brought them back to make tools. We also investigated other rock outcrops in the study area even if they do not or rarely appear in the Fangjiagou site. In fact, there are potentially available tool-stones with higher knapping quality than vein quartz, such as flint outcrops near the Xishi site, and quartzite as vein quartz country rock. These stones are within the exploitation capacity for MIS3 hominins, but until the blade and microblade technology appeared by 26 ka BP in Dengfeng basin, the main raw material had always been vein quartz. This result challenges the explanations that attributing the lack of formalized lithic technology to raw material constraint factors in China.

参考文献

[1] 杨石霞, 岳健平. 史前人类对资源的认知和开发能力——石器原料研究的方法与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(1): 12-20
[2] Andrefsky W Jr. Raw material availability and the organization of technology[J]. American Antiquity, 1994, 59(1): 21-34
[3] 奥德尔. 破译史前人类的技术与行为:石制品分析[M]. 北京: 生活?读书?新知三联书店, 2015, 263-274
[4] 王幼平. 试论石器原料对华北旧石器工业的影响[A].见:北京大学考古学系(编著).“迎接二十一世纪的中国考古学”国际学术讨论会论文集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998, 75-85
[5] 高星, 裴树文. 中国古人类石器技术与生存模式的考古学阐释[J]. 第四纪研究, 2006, 26(4): 504-513
[6] 杜水生. 华北北部旧石器文化[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007, 169-247
[7] 李锋, 王春雪, 刘德成, 等. 周口店第一地点第4-5层脉石英原料产地分析[J]. 第四纪研究, 2011, 31 (5): 900-908
[8] 高星. 周口店第15地点石器原料开发方略与经济形态研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20(3): 186-200
[9] Yang SX, Zhang YX, Zhu TQ, et al. Provenancing hornfels in the Dingcun industry: The exploitation of the vicinity source[J]. Quaternary International, 2017, 434: 138-147
[10] 刘扬, 侯亚梅, 杨泽蒙, 等. 鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦遗址石制品原料产地及其可获性[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(2): 165-175
[11] 李锋, 陈福友, 王山, 等. 甘肃徐家城旧石器时代遗址2009年发掘与研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020, 81-95
[12] Li F, Kuhn SL, Chen FY, et al. Raw material economies and mobility patterns in the Late Paleolithic at Shuidonggou locality 2, North China[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2016, 43: 83-93
[13] 牛东伟, 裴树文, 王惠民, 等. 水洞沟遗址第7地点石制品原料开发与利用策略研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2019, 39(6): 1457-1466
[14] Yue JP, Li YQ, Zhang YX, et al. Lithic raw material economy at the Huayang site in Northeast China: localization and diversification as adaptive strategies in the Late Glacial[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12(6): 107
[15] 王幼平. 嵩山东南麓MIS3阶段古人类的栖居形态及相关问题[A].见:北京大学考古文博学院.考古学研究(十)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013, 287-296
[16] 王幼平, 汪松枝. MIS3阶段嵩山东麓旧石器发现与问题[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 304-314
[17] 王幼平, 顾万发. 从现代人出现到农业起源:郑州地区旧石器时代考古新进展[J]. 中原文物, 2018, 6: 4-7
[18] 北京大学考古文博学院, 郑州市文物考古研究院. 登封方家沟遗址发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020, 1-174
[19] 林壹. 方家沟遗址的石器生产和遗址形成过程研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2016, 100-161
[20] 王益人. 周口店第1地点和第15地点石器原料分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(增刊): 130-144
[21] 刘拓. 我国晚更新世石器原料问题的综合研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2020, 53-61
[22] 河南省地质局区域地质测量队. 中华人民共和国区域地质调查报告?许昌幅平顶山幅[M]. 北京: 中国地质大学出版社, 1977, 1-167
[23] 程胜利, 孙宝玲, 苗雨国(主编). 嵩山地质实习指南[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2008, 12-30
[24] 耿鹏旭, 王卓理(编). 嵩山地质地貌实习指导书[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2012, 8-17
[25] 张光业, 周华山. 嵩山构造地貌分析[J]. 河南师大学报, 1981, 2: 33-41
[26] 林壹. 河南登封方家沟遗址的埋藏学观察[J]. 中原文物, 2018, 6: 62-68
[27] 赵潮. 登封东施遗址石制品研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2015, 101-109
[28] 郑州市文物考古研究院, 北京大学考古文博学院, 2013年河南登封东施旧石器晚期遗址发掘简报[J]. 中原文物, 2018, 6: 46-53
[29] Zhao C, Wang YP, Gu WF, et al. The emergence of early microblade technology in the hinterland of northern China: a case study based on the Xishi and Dongshi site in Henan Province[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2021, 13: 98
[30] 北京大学考古文博学院, 郑州市文物考古研究院. 2017年登封西施东区旧石器晚期遗址发掘简报[J]. 中原文物, 2018, 6: 54-61
文章导航

/