中国古代先民遗骸人工改形的发现与研究
收稿日期: 2021-06-28
修回日期: 2022-07-26
网络出版日期: 2023-08-10
基金资助
国家社科基金资助(19BKG039);国家社科基金资助(19VJX066)
Discovery and study of artificial deformation in ancient Chinese human remains
Received date: 2021-06-28
Revised date: 2022-07-26
Online published: 2023-08-10
李海军 , 刘力铭 , 张一丹 , 肖小勇 . 中国古代先民遗骸人工改形的发现与研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023 , 42(04) : 540 -553 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0016
Through the study of artificial deformation of ancient ancestral remains, it is not only helpful to understand past cultural customs, aesthetic orientation and ancient medical treatment and technological abilities, but also beneficial to infer possible organizational structure and hierarchical differentiation of past society. Studying the origin and spread of various artificial deformations can also be helpful to reveal cultural exchanges and differences between regions and ethnic groups. At present, there are several types of artificial deformation discovered in China, such as cranial perforations, intentional cranial modification, mouth-plugging practices, artificial modification of teeth, foot binding, etc. However, these kinds of artificial deformation lack a general summary, and suffer from various inetrpretations such as origin, purpose and meaning of artificial deformations. This paper attempts to systematically sort relevant cases of artificial deformation, summarizing main types, and analyzing characteristics including spatial and temporal distribution, sex and age distribution, and tools and methods used in artificial deformation activities. This paper also summarizes specific debates such as purpose and meaning of cranial perforations; whether cranial trepanation existed in prehistory; meanings and relationships of intentional cranial modifications; purpose and meaning of mouth-plugging practice, reasons for Neolithic tooth extraction; and origins of foot binding. Furthermore, this paper uses specific cases to analyze and explain the value of ethnological perspectives and methods in the study of artificial deformation, affirming its important role.
Key words： Ancestors; Human remains; Transformation
| [1] | 夏洛特·罗伯茨, 基思·曼彻斯特. 疾病考古学(第3版)[M]. 译者:张桦. 济南: 山东画报出版社, 2010 |
| [2] | 韩康信, 谭婧泽, 何传坤. 中国远古开颅术[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2007 |
| [3] | 陈星灿, 傅宪国. 史前时期的头骨穿孔现象研究[J]. 考古, 1996, 11: 62-74 |
| [4] | 羊毅勇. 试析新疆古代葬俗[J]. 新疆社会科学, 1990, 4: 93-101 |
| [5] | Lisowski FP. Prehistoric and Early Historic Trepanation[A]. In: Brothwell D (Ed). Diseases in Antiquity, A Survey of the Diseases, Injuries and Surgery of Early Populations[C]. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1967, 651-672 |
| [6] | Zhou YW, Lin S, Gu WF, et al. Early evidence of trepanation along the Yellow River Basin in Neolithic China[J], Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12(8): 176 |
| [7] | Zhang Q, Wang Q, Kong B, et al. A scientific analysis of cranial trepanation from an Early Iron Age cemetery on the ancient Silk Road in Xinjiang, China[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2018, 10: 1319-1327 |
| [8] | Li HJ, Xiao XY, Huang YQ, et al. First case of boring-and-cutting trepanation in ancient China[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2022, 14: 1-11 |
| [9] | 韩康信, 陈星灿. 考古发现的中国古代开颅术证据[J]. 考古, 1999, 7: 63-68+101 |
| [10] | Li HJ, He LT, Gibbon VE, et al. Individual centred social-care approach: Using computer tomography to assess a traumatic brain injury in an Iron Age individual from China[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2021, 1: 99-107 |
| [11] | Weidenreich F. On the earliest representatives of modern mankind recovered on the soil of East Asia[J]. Peking Natural History Bulletin, 1939(13): 161-174 |
| [12] | 吴新智. 周口店山顶洞人化石的研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1961, 3: 181-211 |
| [13] | Ni XJ, Li Q, Stidham TA, et al. Earliest-known intentionally deformed human cranium from Asia[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12(4): 93 |
| [14] | 张振标, 尤玉柱. 中国史前人类的一风俗:有意识的改形颅骨[J]. 史前研究, 1985, 3: 81-86+72+114 |
| [15] | Zhang Q, Liu P, Yeh HY, et al. Intentional cranial modification from the Houtaomuga Site in Jilin, China: Earliest evidence and longest in situ practice during the Neolithic Age[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2019, 169(4): 747-756 |
| [16] | 颜訚. 大汶口新石器时代人骨的研究报告[J]. 考古学报, 1972, 1: 97 |
| [17] | 颜訚. 西夏侯新石器时代人骨的研究报告[J]. 考古学报, 1973, 2: 91-126+130-141 |
| [18] | 刘超, 刘树伟, 王芬, 等. 北阡遗址人类颅骨的形态学研究[J]. 东方考古, 2013, 10: 91-98 |
| [19] | 王一如. 沟湾遗址新石器时代人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015 |
| [20] | 李法军. 河北阳原姜家梁新石器时代人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2004 |
| [21] | 潘其风, 原海兵, 朱泓. 牛河梁遗址红山文化积石冢砌石墓出土人骨研究[A].见:辽宁省文物考古研究所. 牛河梁:红山文化遗址发掘报告(1983-2003年度)[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2012, 490-504 |
| [22] | 赵永生, 曾雯, 魏成敏, 等. 大汶口文化居民枕部变形研究[J]. 东南文化, 2017, 3: 64-72 |
| [23] | 吕恩国. 论颅骨穿孔和变形[J]. 新疆文物, 1993, 1: 107-121 |
| [24] | 宋兆麟. 满族睡扁头习俗探讨[J]. 中央民族大学学报, 2001, 2: 45-48 |
| [25] | 韩康信, 潘其风. 大墩子和王因新石器时代人类颌骨的异常变形[J]. 考古, 1980, 2: 185-191 |
| [26] | 原海兵. 大汶口文化人群口颊含球行为研究[J]. 考古学报, 2020, 1: 43-66 |
| [27] | 逄振镐. 史前东夷头骨人工变形拔齿、含球习俗[J]. 民俗研究, 1993, 1: 84-88+20 |
| [28] | 袁珂(编). 山海经校注[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社,1992 |
| [29] | 韩康信, 潘其风. 我国拔牙风俗的源流及其意义[J]. 考古, 1981, 1: 64-76 |
| [30] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所山东工作队, 济宁地区文化局. 山东兖州王因新石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 1979, 1: 5-26 |
| [31] | 韩康信, 陆庆伍, 张振标. 江苏邳县大墩子新石器时代人骨的研究[J]. 考古学报, 1974, 2: 133-144 |
| [32] | 赵永生, 张晓雯, 董文斌, 等. 海岱地区史前居民的拔牙习俗[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 5: 837-847 |
| [33] | 常州市博物馆. 江苏常州圩墩村新石器时代遗址的调查和试掘[J]. 考古, 1974, 2: 109-115 |
| [34] | 彭书琳. 岭南古代居民拔牙习俗的考古发现[J]. 南方文物, 2009, 3: 80-88+79 |
| [35] | 彭书琳. 河池古代崖洞葬所见拔牙风俗[J]. 河池学院学报, 2007, 6: 67-73 |
| [36] | 李培聪. 云南宜良纱帽山墓地人骨拔牙习俗初探[J]. 黄河·黄土·黄种人, 2020, 6: 29-32 |
| [37] | 周亚威, 刘明明. 试论河南登封南洼遗址古代居民的拔牙现象[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2017, 2: 367-376 |
| [38] | 张振标. 古代的凿齿民:中国新石器时代居民的拔牙风俗[J]. 江汉考古, 1981, S1: 106-109+119 |
| [39] | 何星亮. 近代台湾高山族诸族群的拔牙风俗源流与分布[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2020, 41(7): 57-63 |
| [40] | 昌潍地区艺术馆, 中国科学院考古研究所. 山东胶县三里河遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 1977, 4: 262-267 |
| [41] | Aufderheide AC, Rodríguez-Martìn C. The Cambridge encyclopaedia of human palaeopatholegy[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1998: 411 |
| [42] | Torres-Rouff C. Oral implications of labret use: a case from pre-Columbian Chile[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2003, 13: 247 |
| [43] | Zias J, Numeroff K. Operative dentistry in the 2nd century BC[J]. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1987, 114: 665 |
| [44] | Bennike P, Fredebo L. Dental treatment in the Stone Age[J]. Tandlaegebladet. 1985, 89(12): 459-465 |
| [45] | 赤峰学院口腔医学系. 敖汉旗兴隆沟遗址出土人颅牙齿窝洞鉴定报告[J]. 引自:席永杰,张国强,吕广辉.内蒙古赤峰市兴隆沟遗址8000年前牙病治疗的研究报告[J]. 北方文物, 2009, 4: 102-103+106+113 |
| [46] | 李涛. 中国口腔医学发展大纲[J]. 中华口腔科杂志, 1955, 4: 237-241 |
| [47] | 王松灵著. 口腔医学(一)[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2017 |
| [48] | 彭华. 中国缠足史考辨[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 13(3): 6-16+24 |
| [49] | 高洪兴. 缠足史[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2007 |
| [50] | 赵永生, 郭林, 郝导华, 等. 山东地区清墓中女性居民的缠足现象[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(3): 344-358 |
| [51] | Zhao YS, Guo L, Xiao YN, et al. Osteological characteristics of Chinese foot-binding in archaeological remains[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2020, 28: 48-58 |
| [52] | 朱泓, 侯侃, 王晓毅. 从生物考古学角度看山西榆次明清时期平民的两性差异[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2017, 57(4):117-124+206 |
| [53] | Sun XF, Man XY, Liao XZ, et al. Footbinding and non-footbinding Han Chinese females in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912 CE) Xifengbu cemetery: a skeletal and mortuary analysis[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2021, 13: 18 |
| [54] | Berger E, Yang LP, Ye W. Foot binding in a Ming dynasty cemetery near Xi’an, China[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2019, 24:79-88 |
| [55] | 邱林欢, 李法军. 天津蓟县桃花园墓地明清时期缠足女性足骨的形态观察[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(5): 787-800 |
| [56] | Dittmar JM, Zhan XY, Berger E, 等. 甘肃齐家文化中仪式性开颅手术初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(3): 389-397 |
| [57] | Zhan XY, Mu AJ, Chen L, et al. Differential diagnosis of the cranial perforations on the Early Iron Age along the ancient Silk Road in Xinjiang, China[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 12: 6829-6839 |
| [58] | C·N·鲁金科. 论中国与阿尔泰部落的古代关系[J]. 考古学报, 1957, 2: 37-48+108-111 |
| [59] | 刘学堂. 新疆史前头骨穿孔习俗试析[J]. 西北民族研究, 1999, 1: 43-55+279 |
| [60] | 李仰松. 谈谈仰韶文化的瓮棺葬[J]. 考古, 1976, 6: 356-360 |
| [61] | 戴尔·布朗. 印加人:黄金和荣耀的主人[M]. 译者:段长城. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2002, 98 |
| [62] | 王东海, 徐淑军, 鲍修风. 5000年前开颅手术标本的医学研究[J]. 中华医史杂志, 2008, 3: 135-136 |
| [63] | 何星亮. 生前开颅,还是死后穿孔?:关于“中国五千年前开颅术”之商榷[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 32(1): 58-70 |
| [64] | 李朝全. 口含物习俗研究[J]. 考古, 1995, 8: 724-730 |
| [65] | 匡吉. 拔牙风俗之巫术意义初探:兼论凿齿[J]. 南方文物, 1993, 4: 94-100 |
| [66] | 陈星灿. 中国新石器时代拔牙风俗新探[J]. 考古, 1996, 4: 59-62 |
| [67] | 严文明. 大汶口文化居民的拔牙习俗和族属问题[A]. 见:山东大学历史系考古教研室.大汶口文化讨论文集[C]. 济南: 齐鲁书社, 1979, 245-265 |
| [68] | 刘慧. 也说大汶口文化拔牙习俗的因由[J]. 民俗研究, 1996, 4: 26-29 |
| [69] | 张溯, 王绚. 论大汶口文化的拔牙和崇獐习俗[J]. 东南文化, 2018, 1: 81-87 |
| [70] | 王晖. 古“凿齿民”写照:史前獠牙人头像玉雕属性考兼释史前东南方拔牙习俗与古“凿齿民”形象之矛盾[J]. 文史哲, 2015, 4: 52-64+166 |
| [71] | [元]陶宗仪撰. 李梦生(校点). 南村辍耕录[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2012 |
| [72] | 冯少波, 王毓红. 胡旋舞与缠足之起源[J]. 唐史论丛, 2013, 1: 111-125 |
| [73] | 邱瑞中. 中国妇女缠足考[J]. 内蒙古师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 1993, 3: 35-44 |
| [74] | 湖北省文物考古研究所, 襄阳市文物考古研究所, 枣阳市文物考古队. 湖北枣阳九连墩M2发掘简报[J]. 江汉考古, 2018, 6: 3-55+2 |
| [75] | 湖北省荆州地区博物馆. 江陵马山一号楚墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1985, 24-25 |
| [76] | 凤凰山一六七号汉墓发掘整理小组. 江陵凤凰山一六七号汉墓发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1976, 10: 31-35, 50, 36-37, 96 |
| [77] | 益阳市文物管理处, 益阳市博物馆. 益阳楚墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2008, 206 |
| [78] | 湖南省博物馆, 中国科学院考古研究所. 长沙马王堆一号汉墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2008, 70 |
| [79] | 新疆维吾尔自治区博物馆. 新疆吐鲁番阿斯塔那北区墓葬发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1960, 6: 13-21+2+1-4 |
| [80] | 新疆维吾尔自治区博物馆考古部, 吐鲁番地区文物局阿斯塔那文物管理所. 新疆吐鲁番阿斯塔那古墓群西区考古发掘报告[J]. 考古与文物, 2016, 5: 31-50 |
| [81] | 李庚善. 从考古发现的人骨架谈古代女性的裹足问题[J]. 长江文化论丛, 2009, 1: 99-105 |
| [82] | 刘永春. 缠足:从审美到道德的嬗变:兼论审美的泛道德化现象[J]. 理论月刊, 2016, 1: 33-37 |
| [83] | 邱志诚. 国家、身体、社会:宋代身体史研究[D]. 北京: 首都师范大学, 2012 |
| [84] | 李荣楣. 中国妇女缠足史谭. 姚灵犀(编).采菲录[M]. 天津: 天津书局, 1934, 14 |
| [85] | 秦为径, 雷伟, 吴子祥, 等. 缠足畸形的形态学特征[J]. 第四军医大学学报, 2008, 14: 1328-1330 |
| [86] | 郭祥. 云南缠足畸形形态及影像学特征及与骨质疏松相关性研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明医学院, 2011, 33-34 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
京ICP证05002819号-3