安徽省宣城麻村旧石器遗址调查及发掘简报

  • 董哲 ,
  • 战世佳
展开
  • 1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    2.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
    4.安徽省文物考古研究所,合肥 230601
    5.西北大学文化遗产学院,西安 710069
董哲(1987-),男,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所博士研究生,安徽省文物考古研究所文博馆员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。Email: jludongzhe@sina.com

收稿日期: 2018-12-04

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-17

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB26000000);国家自然科学基金项目(41630102);国家自然科学基金项目(41872029)

A preliminary report on the survey and excavation at Macun Paleolithic Site in Xuancheng, Anhui Province

  • Zhe DONG ,
  • Shijia ZHAN
Expand
  • 1.Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2.CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing, 100044
    3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    4.Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Relics, Anhui Province, Hefei 230601
    5.School of Cultural Heritage at Northwestern University,Xi’an 710069

Received date: 2018-12-04

  Online published: 2020-07-17

摘要

水阳江流域是长江下游右岸的一条重要支流,以上世纪80-90年代发现“水阳江旧石器地点群”为学术界所关注。2004年,安徽省文物考古研究所主持对流域内宣城麻村旧石器遗址进行考古调查与发掘工作,其中调查采集石制品71件,发掘出土石制品78件。遗址埋藏于水阳江右岸第二级河流阶地的红色黏土层中;石制品原料取自河流阶地下部的河卵石且以石英岩占绝对优势。石制品制作以锤击法为主,砸击法少量;石制品类型包括打击类、剥片类、废片类和小型工具等。石核剥片程度较低,石片多为初级剥片产品,总体显示中国南方砾石工业的特点。虽然技术组合处于模式I范畴内,但部分长度超过10 cm的石片和手镐及石刀等大型切割工具的发现,表明早期人类具备生产模式II产品的能力。根据石制品埋藏于网纹红土及上部均质红土的特点以及同长江中下游相关地区的地貌和年代对比,推测麻村遗址时代为大致为中更新世晚期至晚更新世早期。

本文引用格式

董哲 , 战世佳 . 安徽省宣城麻村旧石器遗址调查及发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2020 , 39(01) : 74 -85 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0050

Abstract

Shuiyangjiang River system, as an important branch in the right bank of the Yangtze River, has got great attention for discovering “Shuiyangjiang Paleolithic site complex” since 1980-90’s. In 2004, archaeological survey and excavation were carried out by the staffs from the Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Relics of Anhui Province at Macun site, Xuancheng. Seventy-one lithic artifacts were collected from the surface and seventy-eight lithic artifacts were unearthed from the deposit. The site is buried in the red clay of the second terrace of the right bank of the Shuiyangjiang River. Lithic raw materials were procured from the local river beds and quartzite was the dominant type of rocks. Most of the stone artifacts were manufactured by freehand hammer percussion, followed by bipolar technique. Typologically, the lithic artifacts comprise Pounded Pieces, Flaked Pieces, Detached Pieces, and Small retouched pieces etc. The Macun lithic assemblage can be assigned to the Pebble Tool Industry in South China which indicated by the low reduction sequence of core and early stage of flake attributes. Although the lithic technique falling in the scope of ModeI industry, some large flakes (with more than 10cm in maximum length or width) and large cutting tools (big knife and picks) indicate that early hominin bear the ability of making Mode II productions. Judging from the reticulate red clay of the site context, geomorphological and chronological comparison among the regions in the middle to lower reaches of the Yangtze River, the Macun site can be deduced to the late Middle Pleistocene to early Late Pleistocene.

参考文献

[1] 房迎三 . 安徽省宣州市陈山旧石器地点1988年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1997,16(2):96-106
[2] 房迎三, 黄蕴平, 梁任又 , 等. 安徽宁国毛竹山发现的旧石器早期遗存[J]. 人类学学报, 2001,20(2):115-124
[3] 房迎三 . 水阳江旧石器地点群的考古发掘与研究[J]. 文物研究, 1998(1):2-9
[4] Leaky MD . Olduvai Gorge, Volume 3: Excavation in Beds I and II, 1960~1963[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971: 5-7
[5] Toth N . The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora: An Experimental Approach[D]. Berkeley: The PhD Dissertation of University of California, 1982: 48-101
[6] Toth N . The Olduvai ressessed: A closer look at early stone artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985,12(2):101-120
[7] Goren-Inbar N, Alperson-Afil N, Sharon G . et al. The Acheulian Site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov Volume IV: The Lithic Asseblages[M]. Springer: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series, 2018
[8] Sharon G . Acheulian Large Flake Industries: Technology, Chronology, and Significance[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1701, 2007
[9] de la Torre I, Mora R, Martínez-Moreno J . The early Acheulean in Peninj (Lake Natron, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2008,27:244-264
[10] 张森水 . 近20 年来中国旧石器考古学的进展与思考[J]. 第四纪研究, 2002,22(1):11-19
[11] 张森水 . 管窥中国旧石器考古学的重大发现[J]. 人类学学报, 1999,18(3):35-56
[12] 杨浩, 赵其国, 李小平 , 等. 安徽宣城风成沉积——红土系列剖面ESR年代学研究[J]. 土壤学报, 1996,33(3):293-300
[13] 韩立刚 . 安徽宣城麻村羊山发现旧石器早期人类石器制造场[N]. 中国文物报, 2005-05-06(1)
[14] 李意愿 . 澧水流域晚更新世石器工业与人类生存适应行为[D]. 北京大学博士学位论文, 2014
[15] Kuman K, Li CR, Li H . Large cutting tools in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014,76:129-153
[16] 黄万波 . 安徽和县猿人化石及有关问题的初步研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1982,20(3):248-256
[17] 许春华, 张银运, 陈才第 , 等. 安徽巢县发现的人类枕骨化石和哺乳动物化石[J]. 人类学学报, 1984,3(3):202-209
[18] 许春华, 张银运, 方笃生 . 安徽巢县人类化石地点的新材料[J]. 人类学学报, 1986,5(4):305-310
[19] 吴汝康, 李星学, 吴新智 , 等. 南京直立人[M]. 江苏科学技术出版社, 南京, 2002
[20] 陈胜前, 罗虎 . 安徽东至华龙洞旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2013(4):7-13
[21] 房迎三 . 皖南水阳江旧石器地点群调查简报[J]. 文物研究, 1988(3):74-83
[22] Semaw S, Rogers M, Stout D. The Oldowan-Acheulian transition: is there a “Developed Oldowan” artifact transition[C]. In: Camps M, Chauhan P. eds, Sourcebook of Paleolithic transitions[M]. Springer Science Business Media, LLC, 2009: 173-193
[23] de la Torre I, Mora R, Domíngguez-Rodrigo M , et al. The Oldowan industry of Peninj and its bearing on the reconstruction of the technological skills of Lower Pleistocene hominids[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003,44:203-224
[24] de la Torre I . The Early Stone Age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the Developed Oldowan/early Acheulean in East Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011,60:768-812
[25] de la Torre I . The origins of the Acheulean: past and present perspectives on a major transition in human evolution[J]. Philosophical Transactions B, 2016,371:1-13
[26] Pante MC, de la Torre I . A hidden treasure of the Lower Pleistocene at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania: The Leakey HWK EE assemblage[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018,120:114-139
[27] de la Torre I . Mora R. Oldowan technological behaviour at HWK EE (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018,120:236-273
[28] Stiles D . Early Acheulean and Developed Oldowan[J]. Current Anthropology, 1979,20(1):126-129
[29] Li H, Li CR, Kuman K . Rethinking the “Acheulean” in East Asia: Evidence from recent investigations in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China. Quaternary International, 2014,347:163-175
[30] Pei SW, Niu DW, Guan Y . et al. Middle Pleistocene hominin occupation in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China: studies of formation processes and stone technology of Maling 2A site. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015,53:391-407
[31] Wang SJ . Perspectives on hominid behaviour and settlement patterns: A study of the Lower Paleolithic sites in the Luonan Basin, China [M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1406, 2005
[32] Hou YM, Potts R, Yuan BY . et al. Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-like stone technology of the Bose basin, south China. Science, 2000,287(5458):1622-16263
[33] Wang W, Bae CJ , et al.Huang SM. Middle Pleistocene bifaces from Fengshudao (Bose Basin, Guangxi, China)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014,69:110-122
[34] Yang SX, Hou YM, Pelegrin J . A Late Acheulean Culture on the Chinese Loess Plateau: The techno-economic behavior of the Dingcun lithic industry[J]. Quaternary International, 2016,400:73-85
[35] Yang SX, Huang WW, Hou YM , et al. Is the Dingcun lithic assembly a “chopper-chopping tool industry”, or “Late Acheulian”?[J] Quaternary International, 2014,321:3-11
文章导航

/