Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (06): 1047-1057.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0088
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
SONG Huanting(), TANG Wei, ZHANG Limei, ZHANG Zhongliang(), ZHANG Jiayu, CHEN Shitao
Received:
2021-06-28
Revised:
2021-10-21
Online:
2022-12-15
Published:
2022-12-19
Contact:
ZHANG Zhongliang
E-mail:s15535002374@163.com;771023416@qq.com
CLC Number:
SONG Huanting, TANG Wei, ZHANG Limei, ZHANG Zhongliang, ZHANG Jiayu, CHEN Shitao. Quantitative analysis of the correlation between fingerprint and age[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(06): 1047-1057.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0088
测量指标 Measurement indicators | 年龄段 Age Group | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Average | 标准差Standard deviation | 皮尔逊相关性Pearson Correlation | 显著性(双尾)Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中心点左侧5 mm乳突纹线数Number of friction ridge 5 mm left of center point (n) | 11-25 | 5 | 17 | 11.69 | 1.654 | -0.527** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 6 | 14 | 10.12 | 1.312 | |||
41-50 | 4 | 14 | 10.01 | 1.468 | |||
51- | 4 | 13 | 9.31 | 1.165 | |||
横向皱纹条数Number of transverse wrinkles (n) | 11-25 | 0 | 4 | 1.633 | 0.480 | 0.118* | 0.019 |
26-40 | 0 | 8 | 2.080 | 0.830 | |||
41-50 | 0 | 5 | 1.595 | 0.648 | |||
51- | 0 | 9 | 2.611 | 1.589 | |||
纵向皱纹条数Number of longitudinal wrinkles (n) | 11-25 | 0 | 4 | 1.538 | 0.504 | 0.398** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0 | 9 | 2.103 | 0.876 | |||
41-50 | 0 | 6 | 2.125 | 1.025 | |||
51- | 0 | 11 | 3.425 | 2.280 | |||
最长皱纹长度Length of the longest wrinkle (mm) | 11-25 | 1.191 | 16.379 | 5.499 | 3.500 | 0.083 | 0.100 |
26-40 | 1.219 | 19.707 | 5.166 | 3.271 | |||
41-50 | 1.000 | 12.632 | 4.350 | 2.262 | |||
51- | 1.344 | 27.101 | 6.069 | 4.296 |
Tab.1 Number of friction ridges, wrinkle-related variables and age correlations of 5 mm on the left side of the fingermark center for each age group
测量指标 Measurement indicators | 年龄段 Age Group | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Average | 标准差Standard deviation | 皮尔逊相关性Pearson Correlation | 显著性(双尾)Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中心点左侧5 mm乳突纹线数Number of friction ridge 5 mm left of center point (n) | 11-25 | 5 | 17 | 11.69 | 1.654 | -0.527** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 6 | 14 | 10.12 | 1.312 | |||
41-50 | 4 | 14 | 10.01 | 1.468 | |||
51- | 4 | 13 | 9.31 | 1.165 | |||
横向皱纹条数Number of transverse wrinkles (n) | 11-25 | 0 | 4 | 1.633 | 0.480 | 0.118* | 0.019 |
26-40 | 0 | 8 | 2.080 | 0.830 | |||
41-50 | 0 | 5 | 1.595 | 0.648 | |||
51- | 0 | 9 | 2.611 | 1.589 | |||
纵向皱纹条数Number of longitudinal wrinkles (n) | 11-25 | 0 | 4 | 1.538 | 0.504 | 0.398** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0 | 9 | 2.103 | 0.876 | |||
41-50 | 0 | 6 | 2.125 | 1.025 | |||
51- | 0 | 11 | 3.425 | 2.280 | |||
最长皱纹长度Length of the longest wrinkle (mm) | 11-25 | 1.191 | 16.379 | 5.499 | 3.500 | 0.083 | 0.100 |
26-40 | 1.219 | 19.707 | 5.166 | 3.271 | |||
41-50 | 1.000 | 12.632 | 4.350 | 2.262 | |||
51- | 1.344 | 27.101 | 6.069 | 4.296 |
测量指标Measurement indicators | 年龄段 Age Group | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Average | 标准差 Standard deviation | 皮尔逊相关性Pearson Correlation | 显著性(双尾)Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乳突纹线宽度Width of friction ridge | 11-25 | 0.182 | 0.571 | 0.320 | 0.057 | 0.108** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0.211 | 0.457 | 0.319 | 0.046 | |||
41-50 | 0.213 | 0.435 | 0.315 | 0.046 | |||
51- | 0.227 | 0.524 | 0.335 | 0.047 | |||
小犁沟宽度Width of small furrow | 11-25 | 0.042 | 0.317 | 0.138 | 0.0488 | 0.210** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0.078 | 0.309 | 0.185 | 0.042 | |||
41-50 | 0.076 | 0.281 | 0.193 | 0.041 | |||
51- | 0.058 | 0.293 | 0.161 | 0.146 | |||
乳突纹线与小犁沟宽度比值Friction ridge and small furrow width ratio | 11-25 | 0.832 | 11.119 | 2.724 | 1.456 | -0.166** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0.801 | 4.705 | 1.852 | 0.676 | |||
41-50 | 0.909 | 5.723 | 1.760 | 0.706 | |||
51- | 0.923 | 7.465 | 2.291 | 0.918 |
Tab.2 Statistical description of variables for the friction ridge and small furrow
测量指标Measurement indicators | 年龄段 Age Group | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Average | 标准差 Standard deviation | 皮尔逊相关性Pearson Correlation | 显著性(双尾)Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乳突纹线宽度Width of friction ridge | 11-25 | 0.182 | 0.571 | 0.320 | 0.057 | 0.108** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0.211 | 0.457 | 0.319 | 0.046 | |||
41-50 | 0.213 | 0.435 | 0.315 | 0.046 | |||
51- | 0.227 | 0.524 | 0.335 | 0.047 | |||
小犁沟宽度Width of small furrow | 11-25 | 0.042 | 0.317 | 0.138 | 0.0488 | 0.210** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0.078 | 0.309 | 0.185 | 0.042 | |||
41-50 | 0.076 | 0.281 | 0.193 | 0.041 | |||
51- | 0.058 | 0.293 | 0.161 | 0.146 | |||
乳突纹线与小犁沟宽度比值Friction ridge and small furrow width ratio | 11-25 | 0.832 | 11.119 | 2.724 | 1.456 | -0.166** | 0.000 |
26-40 | 0.801 | 4.705 | 1.852 | 0.676 | |||
41-50 | 0.909 | 5.723 | 1.760 | 0.706 | |||
51- | 0.923 | 7.465 | 2.291 | 0.918 |
年龄段 Age Group | 样本数Sample Size (n) | 有效样本数Effective sample size (n) | 屈肌褶纹分支条数Number of branches of the flexor creases (n) | 皮尔逊相关性Pearson Correlation | 显著性(双尾)Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-25 a | 450 | 199 | 2.176 | 0.460** | 0.000 |
26-40 a | 451 | 166 | 2.157 | ||
41-50 a | 300 | 93 | 2.172 | ||
51+ a | 309 | 67 | 3.426 |
Tab.3 Statistical number of flexor crease branches by age group
年龄段 Age Group | 样本数Sample Size (n) | 有效样本数Effective sample size (n) | 屈肌褶纹分支条数Number of branches of the flexor creases (n) | 皮尔逊相关性Pearson Correlation | 显著性(双尾)Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-25 a | 450 | 199 | 2.176 | 0.460** | 0.000 |
26-40 a | 451 | 166 | 2.157 | ||
41-50 a | 300 | 93 | 2.172 | ||
51+ a | 309 | 67 | 3.426 |
模型序号Model No. | 回归方程Regression equation | R2 调整后Adjusted | 标准估算误差Standard estimation error | F显著性Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | y=-4.606n1+84.01 | 0.273 | 12.628 | 0.000 |
2 | y=-4.234n1+3.234n3+78.507 | 0.350 | 11.941 | 0.000 |
3 | y=-4.115n1+3.237n3-0.994x+79.432 | 0.355 | 11.896 | 0.001 |
4 | y=-4.002n1+3.254n3+0.292n4-0.968b2+77.774 | 0.359 | 11.859 | 0.001 |
5 | y=-3.996n1+1.053n2+2.977n3+0.291n4-0.959x+77.546 | 0.362 | 11.830 | 0.005 |
Tab.4 Model for age estimation based on related index
模型序号Model No. | 回归方程Regression equation | R2 调整后Adjusted | 标准估算误差Standard estimation error | F显著性Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | y=-4.606n1+84.01 | 0.273 | 12.628 | 0.000 |
2 | y=-4.234n1+3.234n3+78.507 | 0.350 | 11.941 | 0.000 |
3 | y=-4.115n1+3.237n3-0.994x+79.432 | 0.355 | 11.896 | 0.001 |
4 | y=-4.002n1+3.254n3+0.292n4-0.968b2+77.774 | 0.359 | 11.859 | 0.001 |
5 | y=-3.996n1+1.053n2+2.977n3+0.291n4-0.959x+77.546 | 0.362 | 11.830 | 0.005 |
变量Variable | 11-25 a | 26-40 a | 41-50 a | 51+ a |
---|---|---|---|---|
中心点左侧5 mm乳突纹线数Number of friction ridge 5 mm left of center point | 11.685 | 10.120 | 10.010 | 9.306 |
横向皱纹数量Number of transverse wrinkles | 1.633 | 2.080 | 1.595 | 2.611 |
纵向皱纹数量Number of longitudinal wrinkles | 1.538 | 2.103 | 2.125 | 3.425 |
细点线数量Number of fine dotted point lines | 3.988 | 4.960 | 6.000 | 7.149 |
屈肌褶纹的分支条数Number of branches of the flexor creases | 2.176 | 2.157 | 2.172 | 3.426 |
中心乳突纹线宽度Width of central friction ridge(mm) | 0.320 | 0.319 | 0.315 | 0.335 |
小犁沟宽度Width of small furrow(mm) | 0.138 | 0.185 | 0.193 | 0.161 |
乳突纹线与小犁沟宽度比值Friction ridge and small furrow width ratio | 2.724 | 1.852 | 1.760 | 2.291 |
Tab.5 Mean values for each variable by age
变量Variable | 11-25 a | 26-40 a | 41-50 a | 51+ a |
---|---|---|---|---|
中心点左侧5 mm乳突纹线数Number of friction ridge 5 mm left of center point | 11.685 | 10.120 | 10.010 | 9.306 |
横向皱纹数量Number of transverse wrinkles | 1.633 | 2.080 | 1.595 | 2.611 |
纵向皱纹数量Number of longitudinal wrinkles | 1.538 | 2.103 | 2.125 | 3.425 |
细点线数量Number of fine dotted point lines | 3.988 | 4.960 | 6.000 | 7.149 |
屈肌褶纹的分支条数Number of branches of the flexor creases | 2.176 | 2.157 | 2.172 | 3.426 |
中心乳突纹线宽度Width of central friction ridge(mm) | 0.320 | 0.319 | 0.315 | 0.335 |
小犁沟宽度Width of small furrow(mm) | 0.138 | 0.185 | 0.193 | 0.161 |
乳突纹线与小犁沟宽度比值Friction ridge and small furrow width ratio | 2.724 | 1.852 | 1.760 | 2.291 |
[1] | 赵向欣, 刘文. 中国刑事科学技术——指纹技术[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2003, 403-408 |
[2] | 钟新文, 张忠良. 手印学[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2014, 223-225 |
[3] |
Baniuk K. Determination of age of fingerprints[J]. Forensic Science International, 1990, 46(1-2): 133-137
doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(90)90151-N URL |
[4] | Wertheim K. Fingerprint age determination: is there any hope?[J]. Journal of Forensic Identification, 2003, 53(1): 42-49 |
[5] | 宋志刚, 云小龙. 浅谈指纹的特性——指纹终身不变[J]. 科技资讯, 2013(13): 232 |
[6] | 彭小军. 古代指纹与陶工年龄分析—— 以二里头遗址出土陶器资料为例[J]. 南方文物, 2011(1): 54-62 |
[7] | 庄振西, 高秀珍. 辽宁满族和汉族指纹白线正常值分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1993(3): 264-268 |
[8] | 陆国芳, 李树宁, 高丽荣, 等. 抑郁症患者的皮纹特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 202-206 |
[9] | 皮建辉, 戴丹, 邓莉, 等. 湖南苗族指纹白线正常值分析[J]. 解剖学杂志, 2007(2): 238-240 |
[10] | 陆宏, 霍正浩, 钟慧军, 等. 宁夏回、汉族指纹白线的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2005(1): 77-81 |
[11] | 廖岳华. 细点线的识别与检验研究[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版), 2003(6): 19-21 |
[12] | 贺晨鸽. 指纹三级特征在指印鉴定中的应用研究[D]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2018, 2-7 |
[13] | 郭少波, 王芫, 王炎, 等. 探析高分辨率指纹特定条件下三级特征的稳定性[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2013(1): 56-61 |
[14] | 李实喆, 毛钟荣, 徐玖瑾, 等. 中国十一个少数民族的皮纹研究(I):指纹[J]. 人类学学报, 1984(1): 37-43 |
[15] | 李晋, 刘再群, 花兆合, 等. 安徽淮北平原地区汉族手纹特点[J]. 解剖学报, 2019, 50(3): 358-362 |
[16] | 邵紫菀, 袁林, 刁红. 优秀体操运动员的指纹研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(4): 345-356 |
[17] | 全跃龙, 刘忠华, 许平芳, 等. 智力超常儿童的皮纹学分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1995(1): 48-50 |
[18] | Falohun AS, Fenwa OD, Ajala FA. A fingerprint-based age and gender detector system using fingerprint pattern analysis[J]. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 136(4): 975-8887 |
[19] | Merkel R, Pocs M, Dittmann J, et al(Eds.). Proposal of Non-invasive Fingerprint Age Determination to Improve Data Privacy Management in Police Work from a Legal Perspective Using the Example of Germany[C]. Berlin:Springer, 2012: 61-74 |
[1] | HE Jianing, RAN Zhiyu. Cranial modifications in prehistoric China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(05): 575-589. |
[2] | SUN Lei, LI Yanzhen, WU Zhijiang. Craniofacial morphology of human remains from the Zhanmatun site of the late Yangshao Period [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 331-341. |
[3] | ZHANG Xianpeng, WEN Youfeng, LI Wenhui, LI Xin, QU Quanying, XU Guochang. Phenotypic characteristics of the head and face of Chinese Altaic-speaking peoples [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 342-358. |
[4] | WANG Bangyan, WANG Jiucun, WEN Shaoqing. Diagnostic criteria of ancient ankylosing spondylitis and a research review in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 422-434. |
[5] | FU Weiwei, WANG Xiaowei, YANG Chenxi, WANG Chengliang, HE Shujun, LI Baoguo. Behavioral laterality during the early developmental phase in non-human primates [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 435-444. |
[6] | ZHAO Yongsheng, SUN Tianlu, YANG ZhangQiaochu, WANG Zimeng, LIU Wentao, ZENG Wen. Observation of the ossified thyroid cartilage in ancient Shandong residents [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 214-224. |
[7] | LI Nan, SUN Zhanwei, ZHAO Yipeng, HE Jianing, LING Liangyou, CHENG Zhihan, RAN Zhiyu. Transition analysis as an age estimation method and its application to the skeletons of Yuejiazhuang cemetery [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 75-86. |
[8] | CHEN Xiaoying, YOU Haijie, SONG Meiling, GUO Mingxiao, XIAO Yuni, ZENG Wen. Oral health of prehistoric inhabitants from the Ganzao site, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 98-109. |
[9] | LIU Xin, ZHANG Xinghua, YU Keli, LIU Yanxia, BAO Jinping, ZHENG Lianbin. Determination of body composition of the Jing in Guangxi using bioelectrical impedance analysis [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(06): 1028-1036. |
[10] | SHAREN Gaowa, CHENG Huizhen, WEI Lanhai. Early position of the Daur language branch in the Mongolian language group [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(06): 1037-1046. |
[11] | XING Song. Fossil evidence of the emergence of modern humans and their evolution [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(06): 1069-1082. |
[12] | RAO Huiyun. An application prospect of paleoproteomic analysis in the evolution of East Asian populations [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(06): 1083-1096. |
[13] | LI Yonglan, ZHENG Lianbin. Body indexes of the Chinese population [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 848-861. |
[14] | ZHANG Jiafu. Reliability and upper age limit of luminescence dating for the Paleolithic and paleoanthropological sites [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(04): 712-730. |
[15] | HOU Kan. Application of the transition analysis in estimation of human skeleton age of the Pre-Qin period [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(03): 439-449. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||