Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 245-253.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2018.0027
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xiaowen1(), GUO Junfeng2, WANG Zimeng3, HAO Daohua3, ZHAO Yongsheng4, ZHU Chao3, CHEN Xuexiang4, ZENG Wen4
Received:
2017-01-17
Revised:
2017-11-27
Online:
2019-05-15
Published:
2020-09-10
Contact:
ZENG Wen
E-mail:m13842036352@163.com
CLC Number:
ZHANG Xiaowen, GUO Junfeng, WANG Zimeng, HAO Daohua, ZHAO Yongsheng, ZHU Chao, CHEN Xuexiang, ZENG Wen. Observations and discussions of arachnoid granulation pits on the ancient human skeletons from Shandong Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(02): 245-253.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2018.0027
时代Dynasty | 存在Yes(n) | 不存在No(n) | 样本量Sample(n) | 出现率OR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
商周Shang and Zhou | 27 | 9 | 36 | 75.00% |
战国至两汉Warring States to Han | 51 | 10 | 61 | 83.61% |
宋元明清Song to Qing | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.35% |
合计Total | 92 | 22 | 114 | 80.70% |
Tab.1 The occurrence rate(OR) of arachnoid granulation pits in different period
时代Dynasty | 存在Yes(n) | 不存在No(n) | 样本量Sample(n) | 出现率OR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
商周Shang and Zhou | 27 | 9 | 36 | 75.00% |
战国至两汉Warring States to Han | 51 | 10 | 61 | 83.61% |
宋元明清Song to Qing | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.35% |
合计Total | 92 | 22 | 114 | 80.70% |
组别Groups | 存在Yes(n) | 不存在No(n) | 样本量Sample(n) | 出现率OR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
男性Male | 26 | 6 | 32 | 81.25% |
女性Female | 26 | 3 | 29 | 89.66% |
合计Total | 52 | 9 | 61 | 85.25% |
Tab.2 The occurrence rate of arachnoid granulation pits in different sex group
组别Groups | 存在Yes(n) | 不存在No(n) | 样本量Sample(n) | 出现率OR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
男性Male | 26 | 6 | 32 | 81.25% |
女性Female | 26 | 3 | 29 | 89.66% |
合计Total | 52 | 9 | 61 | 85.25% |
组别Groups | 存在Yes(n) | 不存在No(n) | 样本量Sample(n) | 出现率OR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
青年组Youth | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.00% |
壮年组Prime | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.00% |
中年组Middle | 25 | 3 | 28 | 89.29% |
合计Total | 48 | 10 | 58 | 82.76% |
Tab.3 The occurrence rate of arachnoid granulation pits in different age group
组别Groups | 存在Yes(n) | 不存在No(n) | 样本量Sample(n) | 出现率OR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
青年组Youth | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.00% |
壮年组Prime | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.00% |
中年组Middle | 25 | 3 | 28 | 89.29% |
合计Total | 48 | 10 | 58 | 82.76% |
遗址 Sites | 墓号 Tomb No. | 样本量 Sample(n) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 σ | 变异系数 CV | 四分位差 δ4 | 极差 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
广饶十村Shicun | M21西 | 6 | 7.926 | 2.024 | 4.340 | 2.225 | 51.30% | 2.700 | 5.902 |
M23 | 5 | 4.078 | 1.918 | 2.760 | 0.917 | 33.20% | 1.204 | 2.160 | |
济南刘家庄Liujiazhuang | M11 | 4 | 2.722 | 2.068 | 2.389 | 0.283 | 11.80% | 0.333 | 0.654 |
M21 | 3 | 4.110 | 1.898 | 2.665 | 1.252 | 47.00% | —— | 2.212 | |
M30 | 3 | 3.250 | 2.232 | 2.807 | 0.522 | 18.60% | —— | 1.018 | |
M50 | 6 | 3.478 | 2.378 | 2.890 | 0.369 | 12.80% | 0.267 | 1.100 | |
M110 | 3 | 6.236 | 2.890 | 4.091 | 1.862 | 45.50% | —— | 3.346 | |
M111 | 3 | 1.690 | 1.346 | 1.560 | 0.187 | 12.00% | —— | 0.344 |
Tab.4 Max diameter of arachnoid granulation pits in youth group
遗址 Sites | 墓号 Tomb No. | 样本量 Sample(n) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 σ | 变异系数 CV | 四分位差 δ4 | 极差 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
广饶十村Shicun | M21西 | 6 | 7.926 | 2.024 | 4.340 | 2.225 | 51.30% | 2.700 | 5.902 |
M23 | 5 | 4.078 | 1.918 | 2.760 | 0.917 | 33.20% | 1.204 | 2.160 | |
济南刘家庄Liujiazhuang | M11 | 4 | 2.722 | 2.068 | 2.389 | 0.283 | 11.80% | 0.333 | 0.654 |
M21 | 3 | 4.110 | 1.898 | 2.665 | 1.252 | 47.00% | —— | 2.212 | |
M30 | 3 | 3.250 | 2.232 | 2.807 | 0.522 | 18.60% | —— | 1.018 | |
M50 | 6 | 3.478 | 2.378 | 2.890 | 0.369 | 12.80% | 0.267 | 1.100 | |
M110 | 3 | 6.236 | 2.890 | 4.091 | 1.862 | 45.50% | —— | 3.346 | |
M111 | 3 | 1.690 | 1.346 | 1.560 | 0.187 | 12.00% | —— | 0.344 |
遗址 Sites | 墓号 Tomb No. | 样本量 Sample(n) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 σ | 变异系数 CV | 四分位差 δ4 | 极差 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
章丘城子崖Chengziya | M3 | 11 | 5.654 | 2.246 | 3.153 | 0.989 | 31.36% | 0.558 | 3.408 |
广饶十村Shicun | M11中 | 9 | 7.368 | 2.574 | 5.030 | 1.771 | 35.20% | 2.664 | 4.794 |
M19中 | 5 | 3.638 | 1.728 | 2.389 | 0.729 | 30.50% | 0.156 | 1.910 | |
M19西 | 7 | 5.318 | 2.058 | 2.798 | 1.144 | 40.90% | 0.558 | 3.260 | |
济南刘家庄Liujiazhuang | M13 | 6 | 7.636 | 1.680 | 3.596 | 2.175 | 60.50% | 1.768 | 5.956 |
M39 | 4 | 2.626 | 1.966 | 2.212 | 0.289 | 13.10% | 0.237 | 0.660 | |
M82 | 11 | 6.610 | 1.758 | 4.035 | 1.696 | 42.00% | 2.509 | 4.852 | |
M89 | 3 | 2.698 | 1.452 | 2.171 | 0.645 | 29.70% | —— | 1.246 |
Tab.5 Max diameter of arachnoid granulation pits in prime group
遗址 Sites | 墓号 Tomb No. | 样本量 Sample(n) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 σ | 变异系数 CV | 四分位差 δ4 | 极差 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
章丘城子崖Chengziya | M3 | 11 | 5.654 | 2.246 | 3.153 | 0.989 | 31.36% | 0.558 | 3.408 |
广饶十村Shicun | M11中 | 9 | 7.368 | 2.574 | 5.030 | 1.771 | 35.20% | 2.664 | 4.794 |
M19中 | 5 | 3.638 | 1.728 | 2.389 | 0.729 | 30.50% | 0.156 | 1.910 | |
M19西 | 7 | 5.318 | 2.058 | 2.798 | 1.144 | 40.90% | 0.558 | 3.260 | |
济南刘家庄Liujiazhuang | M13 | 6 | 7.636 | 1.680 | 3.596 | 2.175 | 60.50% | 1.768 | 5.956 |
M39 | 4 | 2.626 | 1.966 | 2.212 | 0.289 | 13.10% | 0.237 | 0.660 | |
M82 | 11 | 6.610 | 1.758 | 4.035 | 1.696 | 42.00% | 2.509 | 4.852 | |
M89 | 3 | 2.698 | 1.452 | 2.171 | 0.645 | 29.70% | —— | 1.246 |
遗址 Sites | 墓号 Tomb No. | 样本量 Sample(n) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 σ | 变异系数 CV | 四分位差 δ4 | 极差 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
章丘城子崖Chengziya | M8 | 5 | 3.072 | 2.118 | 2.532 | 0.408 | 0.161 | 0.570 | 0.954 |
济南大辛庄Daxinzhuang | M55 | 5 | 3.826 | 1.916 | 2.829 | 0.833 | 0.294 | 1.248 | 1.910 |
M84乙② | 8 | 5.174 | 2.032 | 3.697 | 1.133 | 0.307 | 1.645 | 3.142 | |
广饶十村Shicun | M2 | 12 | 6.160 | 1.744 | 3.273 | 1.128 | 0.345 | 0.911 | 4.416 |
M11西 | 5 | 4.260 | 2.456 | 3.221 | 0.795 | 0.247 | 1.294 | 1.804 | |
M15 | 21 | 9.806 | 2.016 | 4.715 | 2.269 | 0.481 | 2.158 | 7.790 | |
M22东 | 5 | 5.986 | 1.650 | 4.059 | 1.890 | 0.466 | 3.064 | 4.336 | |
济南刘家庄Liujiazhuang | M12 | 5 | 3.440 | 2.160 | 2.780 | 0.562 | 0.202 | 0.836 | 1.280 |
M31 | 7 | 3.812 | 1.656 | 3.124 | 0.772 | 0.247 | 0.869 | 2.156 | |
M40 | 20 | 7.408 | 1.832 | 3.830 | 1.492 | 0.390 | 2.586 | 5.576 | |
M41 | 5 | 6.998 | 2.388 | 4.061 | 1.904 | 0.469 | 2.134 | 4.610 | |
M45 | 4 | 3.324 | 2.644 | 3.090 | 0.319 | 0.103 | 0.355 | 0.680 | |
M60 | 5 | 3.990 | 1.716 | 3.181 | 0.912 | 0.287 | 0.806 | 2.274 | |
M63 | 7 | 5.668 | 2.632 | 3.723 | 1.133 | 0.304 | 1.530 | 3.036 | |
M65 | 4 | 7.160 | 1.814 | 3.967 | 2.578 | 0.650 | 3.602 | 5.346 | |
M72 | 16 | 10.110 | 2.148 | 3.476 | 1.965 | 0.565 | 1.143 | 7.962 | |
M76 | 5 | 4.834 | 1.838 | 3.014 | 1.329 | 0.441 | 2.066 | 2.996 | |
M79 | 5 | 4.744 | 1.878 | 2.737 | 1.178 | 0.431 | 0.744 | 2.866 | |
M96 | 14 | 5.166 | 1.786 | 2.926 | 1.064 | 0.364 | 1.430 | 3.380 | |
H35 | 4 | 3.214 | 2.410 | 2.809 | 0.450 | 0.160 | 0.767 | 0.804 |
Tab.6 Max diameter of arachnoid granulation pits in middle-aged group
遗址 Sites | 墓号 Tomb No. | 样本量 Sample(n) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 σ | 变异系数 CV | 四分位差 δ4 | 极差 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
章丘城子崖Chengziya | M8 | 5 | 3.072 | 2.118 | 2.532 | 0.408 | 0.161 | 0.570 | 0.954 |
济南大辛庄Daxinzhuang | M55 | 5 | 3.826 | 1.916 | 2.829 | 0.833 | 0.294 | 1.248 | 1.910 |
M84乙② | 8 | 5.174 | 2.032 | 3.697 | 1.133 | 0.307 | 1.645 | 3.142 | |
广饶十村Shicun | M2 | 12 | 6.160 | 1.744 | 3.273 | 1.128 | 0.345 | 0.911 | 4.416 |
M11西 | 5 | 4.260 | 2.456 | 3.221 | 0.795 | 0.247 | 1.294 | 1.804 | |
M15 | 21 | 9.806 | 2.016 | 4.715 | 2.269 | 0.481 | 2.158 | 7.790 | |
M22东 | 5 | 5.986 | 1.650 | 4.059 | 1.890 | 0.466 | 3.064 | 4.336 | |
济南刘家庄Liujiazhuang | M12 | 5 | 3.440 | 2.160 | 2.780 | 0.562 | 0.202 | 0.836 | 1.280 |
M31 | 7 | 3.812 | 1.656 | 3.124 | 0.772 | 0.247 | 0.869 | 2.156 | |
M40 | 20 | 7.408 | 1.832 | 3.830 | 1.492 | 0.390 | 2.586 | 5.576 | |
M41 | 5 | 6.998 | 2.388 | 4.061 | 1.904 | 0.469 | 2.134 | 4.610 | |
M45 | 4 | 3.324 | 2.644 | 3.090 | 0.319 | 0.103 | 0.355 | 0.680 | |
M60 | 5 | 3.990 | 1.716 | 3.181 | 0.912 | 0.287 | 0.806 | 2.274 | |
M63 | 7 | 5.668 | 2.632 | 3.723 | 1.133 | 0.304 | 1.530 | 3.036 | |
M65 | 4 | 7.160 | 1.814 | 3.967 | 2.578 | 0.650 | 3.602 | 5.346 | |
M72 | 16 | 10.110 | 2.148 | 3.476 | 1.965 | 0.565 | 1.143 | 7.962 | |
M76 | 5 | 4.834 | 1.838 | 3.014 | 1.329 | 0.441 | 2.066 | 2.996 | |
M79 | 5 | 4.744 | 1.878 | 2.737 | 1.178 | 0.431 | 0.744 | 2.866 | |
M96 | 14 | 5.166 | 1.786 | 2.926 | 1.064 | 0.364 | 1.430 | 3.380 | |
H35 | 4 | 3.214 | 2.410 | 2.809 | 0.450 | 0.160 | 0.767 | 0.804 |
组别Groups | 样本量Sample(n) | 额骨位置Frontal bone | 顶骨位置Parietal bone | 枕骨位置Occipital bone | 检验Test χ2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
青年组Youth | 8 | 8(100.00%) | 5(62.50%) | 0(0) | P=0.061>0.05 |
壮年组Prime age | 18 | 7(43.75%) | 15(93.75%) | 4(28.57%) | P=0.011<0.05 |
中年组Middle age | 26 | 14(60.87%) | 22(88.00%) | 7(31.82%) | P=0.011<0.05 |
Tab.7 The location of arachnoid granulation pits in different age groups
组别Groups | 样本量Sample(n) | 额骨位置Frontal bone | 顶骨位置Parietal bone | 枕骨位置Occipital bone | 检验Test χ2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
青年组Youth | 8 | 8(100.00%) | 5(62.50%) | 0(0) | P=0.061>0.05 |
壮年组Prime age | 18 | 7(43.75%) | 15(93.75%) | 4(28.57%) | P=0.011<0.05 |
中年组Middle age | 26 | 14(60.87%) | 22(88.00%) | 7(31.82%) | P=0.011<0.05 |
[1] |
Brunori A, Vagnozzi R, Giuffre R. Antonio Pacchioni: early studies of the dura mater[J]. Journal of neurosurgery, 1993,78(3):515-518
doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.3.0515 URL pmid: 8442786 |
[2] | Pereda-Rodríguez J, González-Llorente J, Pérez-Tapia L, et al. Arachnoid Granulations as Cause of Tegmen Tympani Defects[J]. Acta Otorrinolaringologica, 2014,65(1):61-63 |
[3] |
Grossman CB, Potts DG. Arachnoid granulations: radiology and anatomy[J]. Radiology, 1974,113(1):95-100
doi: 10.1148/113.1.95 URL pmid: 4608236 |
[4] | 朱靓, 郑汉朋, 王旭荣, 等. 易误诊为骨质破坏的枕骨蛛网膜颗粒压迹的CT表现[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2015,24(6):892-895 |
[5] | 李卫星. 枕骨蛛网膜颗粒压迹的CT表现及临床价值[J]. 中国医药导报, 2006,3(3):74 |
[6] | 韩慧敏, 王清涛. 颅骨蛛网膜颗粒压迹的MRI表现[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2010,38(5):810-812 |
[7] | 李彬祥. 蛛网膜颗粒的解剖和X线的研究[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 1978,24(1):40-41 |
[8] | Mann RW, Hunt DR. Photographic Regional Atlas of Bone Disease[W]. Charles C Thomas Publisher, 2012, 34-38 |
[9] | Chan WC, Lai V, Wong YC, et al. Focal brain herniation into giant arachnoid granulation: A rare occurrence[J]. European journal of radiology extra, 2011,78(2):e111-e113 |
[10] | Mafee MF, Jr WGB, Almutairi A, et al. Arachnoid granulations and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea: Role of imaging[J]. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology, 2014,25(1):74-86 |
[11] | Emon ST, Orakdogen M, Akpinar E, et al. Arachnoid granulations: a rare cause of lytic occipital bone lesion[J]. Neurologia Neurochirurgia Polska, 2012,46(6):603-606 |
[12] | Leach JL, Meyer K, Jones BV, et al. Large arachnoid granulations involving the dorsal superior sagittal sinus: findings on MR imaging and MR venography[J]. Ajur American journal of neuroradiology, 2008,29(7):1335-1339 |
[13] | 梁靖, 高航, 李传良. 大蛛网膜颗粒的MRI及CT诊断[J]. 医学信息旬刊, 2014,24(8):3811-3812 |
[14] |
Okamoto K, Ito J, Tokiguchi S, et al. Arachnoid granulations of the posterior fossa: CT and MR finding[J]. Clinical Imaging, 1997,21(1):1-5
doi: 10.1016/0899-7071(95)00093-3 URL pmid: 9117924 |
[15] | Clark LG. On the pacchionian bodies[J]. Journal of anatomy, 1920,55(1):40-48 |
[16] |
Fox RJ, Walji AH, Mielke B, et al. Anatomic details of intradural channels in the parasagittal dura: A possible pathway for flow of cerebrospinal fluid[J]. Neurosurgery, 1996,39(1):84-91
doi: 10.1097/00006123-199607000-00017 URL pmid: 8805143 |
[17] | 蒋尚武. 济南刘家庄遗址商周时期居民人口与疾病状况研究[D]. 山东大学硕士学位论文, 2016 |
[18] | 济南市考古研究所. 济南市刘家庄遗址商代墓葬发掘报告[J]. 海岱考古, 2018: 243-334 |
[19] | 济南市考古研究所, 章丘市博物馆, 山东省文物考古研究所. 山东章丘马安遗址的发掘[J]. 东方考古(第5集), 2009: 372-464 |
[20] | 张馨月, 赵永生. 广饶县十村遗址出土人骨鉴定报告[J]. 海岱考古, 2016: 145-153 |
[21] | 山东省文物考古研究所, 东营市历史博物馆. 广饶县十村遗址发掘报告[J]. 海岱考古, 2016: 49-136 |
[22] |
Basmajian JV. The depressions for the arachnoid granulations as a criterion of age[J]. Anatomical Record, 1952,112(4):843-846
doi: 10.1002/ar.1091120409 URL pmid: 14924259 |
[23] | 朱建国, 徐晓琳. 枕骨蛛网膜颗粒压迹的CT诊断[J]. 影像诊断与放射学, 2004,13(2):84-8 |
[24] | 文华, 李黎明, 李武铭, 等. 颅骨板障表皮样囊肿的影像诊断[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2014,12(5):28-30 |
[25] | 傅筱敏, 韩本谊. 颅骨嗜酸性肉芽肿的CT和MRI诊断[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2007,26(3):248-250 |
[26] | 陈星荣, 沈天真, 耿道颖, 等. 脑膜瘤[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2003,9(3):147-190 |
[27] |
Bikmaz K, Mrak R, Al-Mefty O. Management of bone-invasive, hyperostotic sphenoid wing meningiomas[J]. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2007,107(5):905-912
doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/11/0905 URL pmid: 17977259 |
[28] | 牛树江. 侵蚀性脑膜瘤的临床特点与外科治疗[D]. 山东大学硕士学位论文, 2011 |
[1] | LI Yinan, ZHAO Fangchao, ZHOU Yawei. Characteristics of human burnt bones from the Balizhuang site of Changle, Shandong Province and the cremation styles reflected by it [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(03): 367-379. |
[2] | ZHANG Zhen, WANG Ying, LI Yuecong. Research progress on the relationship between Paleolithic hominid activities and environmental changes in the Nihewan Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(01): 184-198. |
[3] | ZHANG Baoshuai, WU Xiaotong, WU Gao, JIN Zhengyao, FAN Anchuan. Verification and optimization of micro-destructive proteomics method for sex determination of archaeological human remains [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(04): 472-487. |
[4] | ZHANG Jinke, DONG Wei, TANG Guangfeng, HUANG Xiaoliang, YANG Zhen, WANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Yingjian, ZHU Yiqing, JIANG Li. Paternal genetic structure of Han and Hui male populations in Shandong [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(01): 65-72. |
[5] | YU Keli, XIANG Xiaoxue, LI Yonglan, ZHANG Hongming, DU Huimin. A study of physical characteristics of the Sherpas [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 801-810. |
[6] | BAO Jinping, ZHENG Lianbin, YU Keli, JIA Yalan. The physical characteristics and its changes of Jino in 35 years [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(02): 261-271. |
[7] | MA Dongdong, PEI Shuwen. A general review on the bipolar flaking technique and related issues in Paleolithic archaeology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(04): 584-597. |
[8] | LEE Heonjong, LEE Sangseok. Chronology and characteristics of the Upper Palaeolithic blade tool industry in Korea [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(03): 373-388. |
[9] | CHEN Yuling, LI Min, ZHAO Zhenmin, Li Yanan, BAO Yun, ZHU Ruxin, SHENG Xiang, WANG Yali, MA Xingyuan. Genetic Polymorphism of 13 RM Y-STR Loci in Shandong Population [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(02): 292-303. |
[10] | CHEN Fuyou1, LI Gang, LI Yu, LI Feng, ZHANG Shuangquan, YI Mingjie. A preliminary report on excavation of the Huangniliang site in Rizhao, Shandong Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(04): 542-552. |
[11] | LI Gang, REN Yapeng, Su Jianjun, Ma Yong, Xu Xicun. A preliminary report on reconnaissance of the Yuanyichang Paleolithic locality in Mengyin county of Shandong province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(01): 88-95. |
[12] | TU Chunjing, JIANG Chongmin, CAI Rui. Physical characteristics of Uygur and Han adults in Karamay, the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2017, 36(03): 370-379. |
[13] | WANG Bin, YANG Shengmin. Uygur ethnic composition and evolution based on incidences of typical Mongoloid physical characteristics [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2017, 36(02): 227-235. |
[14] | CHEN Fuyou, LI Gang, LI Yu, LI Feng. A Preliminary Report of the Huangniliang Paleolithic Site, Shandong Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2015, 34(01): 21-27. |
[15] | ZHANG Ji-zong. Research of forensic anthropology for 30 years in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2013, 32(03): 256-263. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||