Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (03): 435-449.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0009
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yajun1(), ZHANG Xu1, ZHAO Xin1, TONG Tao1, LI Linhui2
Received:
2020-03-01
Revised:
2020-06-24
Online:
2020-08-15
Published:
2020-08-31
CLC Number:
ZHANG Yajun, ZHANG Xu, ZHAO Xin, TONG Tao, LI Linhui. Craniometric evidence and ancient DNA analysis of the population origin of Ngari prefecture of Tibet Autonomous Region between 3rd and 4th century AD[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(03): 435-449.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0009
序号 | 墓号 | 性别 | 年龄 | 序号 | 墓号 | 性别 | 年龄 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2012 M1 | 男性 | 30-35 | 17 | 2013 M2:2 | 女性? | 35-40 |
2 | 2012 M2 | 女性 | 25± | 18 | 2013 M2:3 | 女性 | 40-45 |
3 | 2012 M3:1 | 男性 | 25-30 | 19 | 2013 M2:4 | 女性 | 25± |
4 | 2012 M3:2 | 女性 | 30± | 20 | 2013 M2:5 | 男性 | 35-40 |
5 | 2012 M3:3 | 男性 | 25± | 21 | 2013 M2:6 | 男性 | 35-40 |
6 | 2012 M3:4 | 女性 | 4± | 22 | 2013 M2:7 | 女性 | 35-40 |
7 | 2012 M4 | 男性 | 25± | 23 | 2013 M2:8 | 女性 | 5± |
8 | 2013 M1:1 | 女性 | 25± | 24 | 2013 M3 | 女性 | 35± |
9 | 2013 M1:2 | 男性 | 40± | 25 | 2014M1:1 | 男性 | 4± |
10 | 2013 M1:3 | 男性 | 40-45 | 26 | 2014M1:2 | 女性 | 5± |
11 | 2013 M1:4 | 男性 | 25± | 27 | 2014M1:3 | 女性 | 25-30 |
12 | 2013 M1:5 | 女性 | 30-35 | 28 | 2014M1:4 | 女性 | 30± |
13 | 2013 M1:6 | 女性 | 30-35 | 29 | 2014M1:5 | 男性? | 无法判断 |
14 | 2013 M1:7 | 男性 | 35-40 | 30 | 2014M1:6 | 女性? | 30-35 |
15 | 2013 M1:8 | 男性 | 40-45 | 31 | 2014M1:7 | 男性 | 30± |
16 | 2013 M2:1 | 女性? | 20-25 | 32 | 2014M1:8 | 性别不详 | 未成年 |
Tab.1 Sex and age of Gurugyam people
序号 | 墓号 | 性别 | 年龄 | 序号 | 墓号 | 性别 | 年龄 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2012 M1 | 男性 | 30-35 | 17 | 2013 M2:2 | 女性? | 35-40 |
2 | 2012 M2 | 女性 | 25± | 18 | 2013 M2:3 | 女性 | 40-45 |
3 | 2012 M3:1 | 男性 | 25-30 | 19 | 2013 M2:4 | 女性 | 25± |
4 | 2012 M3:2 | 女性 | 30± | 20 | 2013 M2:5 | 男性 | 35-40 |
5 | 2012 M3:3 | 男性 | 25± | 21 | 2013 M2:6 | 男性 | 35-40 |
6 | 2012 M3:4 | 女性 | 4± | 22 | 2013 M2:7 | 女性 | 35-40 |
7 | 2012 M4 | 男性 | 25± | 23 | 2013 M2:8 | 女性 | 5± |
8 | 2013 M1:1 | 女性 | 25± | 24 | 2013 M3 | 女性 | 35± |
9 | 2013 M1:2 | 男性 | 40± | 25 | 2014M1:1 | 男性 | 4± |
10 | 2013 M1:3 | 男性 | 40-45 | 26 | 2014M1:2 | 女性 | 5± |
11 | 2013 M1:4 | 男性 | 25± | 27 | 2014M1:3 | 女性 | 25-30 |
12 | 2013 M1:5 | 女性 | 30-35 | 28 | 2014M1:4 | 女性 | 30± |
13 | 2013 M1:6 | 女性 | 30-35 | 29 | 2014M1:5 | 男性? | 无法判断 |
14 | 2013 M1:7 | 男性 | 35-40 | 30 | 2014M1:6 | 女性? | 30-35 |
15 | 2013 M1:8 | 男性 | 40-45 | 31 | 2014M1:7 | 男性 | 30± |
16 | 2013 M2:1 | 女性? | 20-25 | 32 | 2014M1:8 | 性别不详 | 未成年 |
年龄阶段 | 男性 | 女性 | 性别不详 | 合计 |
---|---|---|---|---|
幼儿期(3-6岁) | 1(7.1%) | 3(17.6%) | 0 | 4(12.5%) |
青年期(15-23岁) | 0 | 1(5.9%) | 0 | 1(3.1%) |
壮年期(24-35岁) | 6(42.9%) | 10(58.8%) | 0 | 16(50%) |
中年期(36-55岁) | 6(42.9%) | 3(17.6%) | 0 | 9(28.1%) |
未成年(年龄不详) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1(3.1%) |
无法判断 | 1(7.1%) | 0 | 0 | 1(3.1%) |
总计 | 14 | 17 | 1 | 32 |
Tab.2 Age distribution of Gurugyam people
年龄阶段 | 男性 | 女性 | 性别不详 | 合计 |
---|---|---|---|---|
幼儿期(3-6岁) | 1(7.1%) | 3(17.6%) | 0 | 4(12.5%) |
青年期(15-23岁) | 0 | 1(5.9%) | 0 | 1(3.1%) |
壮年期(24-35岁) | 6(42.9%) | 10(58.8%) | 0 | 16(50%) |
中年期(36-55岁) | 6(42.9%) | 3(17.6%) | 0 | 9(28.1%) |
未成年(年龄不详) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1(3.1%) |
无法判断 | 1(7.1%) | 0 | 0 | 1(3.1%) |
总计 | 14 | 17 | 1 | 32 |
序号No. | 对比组Groups | 时代 Age | 地理位置Location |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 布塔雄曲组Tsige Dartso | BP2460±30 | 西藏那曲Tibet |
2 | 卡莎湖组Kasha Lake | BP3500-3000 | 四川炉霍Sichuan |
3 | 宴尔龙组Yanerlong | BP3500-3000 | 四川甘孜Sichuan |
4 | 阿哈特拉山组Ahatelashan | BP2710-3550 | 青海循化Qinghai |
5 | 李家山组Lijiashan | BP2740±150 | 青海湟中Qinghai |
6 | 察吾呼四号墓组Chawuhu No.4 | BP2500-3200 | 新疆和静Xinjiang |
7 | 多岗组Duogang | BC400-1000 | 新疆拜城Xinjiang |
8 | 营盘组yingpan | 汉晋时期Han-Jin Dynasty | 新疆尉犁Xinjiang |
9 | 山普拉组Shanpula | BC217-AD283 | 新疆和田Xinjiang |
10 | 殷墟中小墓A组Yinxu(A) | 商代Shang Dynasty | 河南安阳Henan |
11 | 西屯组Xitun | 汉代Han Dynasty | 北京延庆Beijing |
12 | 大保当组Dabaodang | 汉代Han Dynasty | 陕西神木Shaanxi |
13 | 大同北魏组Datong | 北魏时期Northern Wei Dynasty | 山西大同Shanxi |
Tab.3 Comparison groups used in the study
序号No. | 对比组Groups | 时代 Age | 地理位置Location |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 布塔雄曲组Tsige Dartso | BP2460±30 | 西藏那曲Tibet |
2 | 卡莎湖组Kasha Lake | BP3500-3000 | 四川炉霍Sichuan |
3 | 宴尔龙组Yanerlong | BP3500-3000 | 四川甘孜Sichuan |
4 | 阿哈特拉山组Ahatelashan | BP2710-3550 | 青海循化Qinghai |
5 | 李家山组Lijiashan | BP2740±150 | 青海湟中Qinghai |
6 | 察吾呼四号墓组Chawuhu No.4 | BP2500-3200 | 新疆和静Xinjiang |
7 | 多岗组Duogang | BC400-1000 | 新疆拜城Xinjiang |
8 | 营盘组yingpan | 汉晋时期Han-Jin Dynasty | 新疆尉犁Xinjiang |
9 | 山普拉组Shanpula | BC217-AD283 | 新疆和田Xinjiang |
10 | 殷墟中小墓A组Yinxu(A) | 商代Shang Dynasty | 河南安阳Henan |
11 | 西屯组Xitun | 汉代Han Dynasty | 北京延庆Beijing |
12 | 大保当组Dabaodang | 汉代Han Dynasty | 陕西神木Shaanxi |
13 | 大同北魏组Datong | 北魏时期Northern Wei Dynasty | 山西大同Shanxi |
组别Groups→ 编码Code↓ | 故如甲木 Gurugyam | 布塔雄曲 Tsige Dartso | 卡莎湖 Kasha Lake | 宴尔龙 Yanerlong | 阿哈特拉山Ahatelashan | 李家山Lijiashan | 察吾乎四号墓Chawuhu No.4 | 多岗组 Duogang | 营盘 Yingpan | 山普拉 Shanpula | 殷墟中小墓A Yinxu(Citizens A) | 西屯 Xitun | 大保当 Dabaodang | 大同北魏 Datong | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 颅长(g-op) | 187.00 (6) | 183.00 | 178.00 | 190.30 | 182.90 | 182.20 | 183.40 | 178.40 | 183.60 | 188.48 | 183.99 | 181.79 | 183.10 | 182.50 |
8 | 颅宽(eu-eu) | 141.60 (5) | 142.00 | 134.70 | 140.30 | 140.30 | 140.00 | 136.50 | 131.80 | 140.80 | 137.55 | 139.91 | 140.28 | 148.10 | 144.40 |
17 | 颅高(ba-b) | 129.60 (5) | 131.00 | 124.00 | 139.50 | 138.20 | 136.50 | 135.80 | 132.20 | 140.90 | 140.23 | 139.23 | 139.78 | 137.50 | 137.90 |
45 | 颧宽(zy-zy) | 128.00 (2) | 137.80 | 126.00 | 139.00 | 133.70 | 138.60 | 131.10 | 130.10 | 137.10 | 131.65 | 135.94 | 135.85 | 138.30 | 137.10 |
48 | 上面高(n-sd) | 66.43 (3) | 70.00 | 72.00 | 75.00 | 74.80 | 77.30 | 70.70 | 68.40 | 77.20 | 74.96 | 73.75 | 74.10 | 75.40 | 72.60 |
51 | 眶宽(mf-ek)R | 41.46 (3) | 41.50 | 39.30 | 42.00 | 42.80 | 43.20 | 42.20 | 40.50 | 42.60 | 41.45 | 43.21 | 44.30 | 43.20 | 41.60 |
52 | 眶高R | 33.08 (3) | 34.50 | 33.30 | 33.00 | 35.20 | 35.40 | 31.80 | 31.60 | 34.70 | 33.05 | 33.71 | 35.20 | 34.90 | 34.10 |
54 | 鼻宽 | 24.45 (4) | 29.00 | 25.80 | 26.00 | 26.10 | 26.70 | 24.80 | 26.20 | 24.80 | 25.03 | 27.16 | 27.23 | 26.70 | 27.20 |
55 | 鼻高(n-ns) | 50.19 (3) | 59.50 | 51.80 | 52.50 | 55.20 | 57.00 | 51.30 | 51.20 | 55.10 | 54.38 | 53.32 | 54.58 | 55.90 | 54.80 |
8:1 | 颅指数 | 75.39 (5) | 77.60 | 76.70 | 73.80 | 76.70 | 76.93 | 74.40 | 73.90 | 77.30 | 73.03 | 76.19 | 77.24 | 80.90 | 79.12 |
17:1 | 颅长高指数 | 69.23 (5) | 71.58 | 69.70 | 73.30 | 75.60 | 74.96 | 74.20 | 74.30 | 77.30 | 74.42 | 75.51 | 76.88 | 75.20 | 75.56 |
17:8 | 颅宽高指数 | 89.01 (4) | 92.25 | 91.90 | 100.00 | 98.80 | 97.60 | 99.90 | 100.60 | 100.20 | 101.98 | 99.10 | 99.60 | 92.80 | 95.94 |
48:45 | 上面指数(sd) | 51.46 (2) | 50.80 | 52.40 | 54.70 | 56.00 | 55.88 | 54.00 | 52.80 | 54.20 | 56.94 | 53.82 | 55.12 | 54.50 | 55.50 |
52:51 | 眶指数R | 79.85 (3) | 83.13 | 84.80 | 78.60 | 82.60 | 82.02 | 75.30 | 78.00 | 81.30 | 81.54 | 77.75 | 79.34 | 80.20 | 81.30 |
54:55 | 鼻指数 | 50.62 (3) | 48.74 | 48.90 | 49.60 | 47.40 | 47.01 | 48.70 | 51.50 | 45.30 | 46.14 | 51.23 | 49.86 | 47.80 | 49.63 |
平均数组间差异均方根 | 1.31 | 1.01 | 1.29 | 1.33 | 1.53 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.52 | 1.35 | 1.29 | 1.53 | 1.45 | 1.35 | ||
欧氏距离系数 | 16.490 | 15.581 | 21.588 | 20.144 | 22.580 | 16.850 | 18.987 | 24.469 | 22.119 | 19.852 | 21.928 | 21.169 | 19.213 |
Tab.4 The cranial metric data of all ancient groups used in the study (males)
组别Groups→ 编码Code↓ | 故如甲木 Gurugyam | 布塔雄曲 Tsige Dartso | 卡莎湖 Kasha Lake | 宴尔龙 Yanerlong | 阿哈特拉山Ahatelashan | 李家山Lijiashan | 察吾乎四号墓Chawuhu No.4 | 多岗组 Duogang | 营盘 Yingpan | 山普拉 Shanpula | 殷墟中小墓A Yinxu(Citizens A) | 西屯 Xitun | 大保当 Dabaodang | 大同北魏 Datong | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 颅长(g-op) | 187.00 (6) | 183.00 | 178.00 | 190.30 | 182.90 | 182.20 | 183.40 | 178.40 | 183.60 | 188.48 | 183.99 | 181.79 | 183.10 | 182.50 |
8 | 颅宽(eu-eu) | 141.60 (5) | 142.00 | 134.70 | 140.30 | 140.30 | 140.00 | 136.50 | 131.80 | 140.80 | 137.55 | 139.91 | 140.28 | 148.10 | 144.40 |
17 | 颅高(ba-b) | 129.60 (5) | 131.00 | 124.00 | 139.50 | 138.20 | 136.50 | 135.80 | 132.20 | 140.90 | 140.23 | 139.23 | 139.78 | 137.50 | 137.90 |
45 | 颧宽(zy-zy) | 128.00 (2) | 137.80 | 126.00 | 139.00 | 133.70 | 138.60 | 131.10 | 130.10 | 137.10 | 131.65 | 135.94 | 135.85 | 138.30 | 137.10 |
48 | 上面高(n-sd) | 66.43 (3) | 70.00 | 72.00 | 75.00 | 74.80 | 77.30 | 70.70 | 68.40 | 77.20 | 74.96 | 73.75 | 74.10 | 75.40 | 72.60 |
51 | 眶宽(mf-ek)R | 41.46 (3) | 41.50 | 39.30 | 42.00 | 42.80 | 43.20 | 42.20 | 40.50 | 42.60 | 41.45 | 43.21 | 44.30 | 43.20 | 41.60 |
52 | 眶高R | 33.08 (3) | 34.50 | 33.30 | 33.00 | 35.20 | 35.40 | 31.80 | 31.60 | 34.70 | 33.05 | 33.71 | 35.20 | 34.90 | 34.10 |
54 | 鼻宽 | 24.45 (4) | 29.00 | 25.80 | 26.00 | 26.10 | 26.70 | 24.80 | 26.20 | 24.80 | 25.03 | 27.16 | 27.23 | 26.70 | 27.20 |
55 | 鼻高(n-ns) | 50.19 (3) | 59.50 | 51.80 | 52.50 | 55.20 | 57.00 | 51.30 | 51.20 | 55.10 | 54.38 | 53.32 | 54.58 | 55.90 | 54.80 |
8:1 | 颅指数 | 75.39 (5) | 77.60 | 76.70 | 73.80 | 76.70 | 76.93 | 74.40 | 73.90 | 77.30 | 73.03 | 76.19 | 77.24 | 80.90 | 79.12 |
17:1 | 颅长高指数 | 69.23 (5) | 71.58 | 69.70 | 73.30 | 75.60 | 74.96 | 74.20 | 74.30 | 77.30 | 74.42 | 75.51 | 76.88 | 75.20 | 75.56 |
17:8 | 颅宽高指数 | 89.01 (4) | 92.25 | 91.90 | 100.00 | 98.80 | 97.60 | 99.90 | 100.60 | 100.20 | 101.98 | 99.10 | 99.60 | 92.80 | 95.94 |
48:45 | 上面指数(sd) | 51.46 (2) | 50.80 | 52.40 | 54.70 | 56.00 | 55.88 | 54.00 | 52.80 | 54.20 | 56.94 | 53.82 | 55.12 | 54.50 | 55.50 |
52:51 | 眶指数R | 79.85 (3) | 83.13 | 84.80 | 78.60 | 82.60 | 82.02 | 75.30 | 78.00 | 81.30 | 81.54 | 77.75 | 79.34 | 80.20 | 81.30 |
54:55 | 鼻指数 | 50.62 (3) | 48.74 | 48.90 | 49.60 | 47.40 | 47.01 | 48.70 | 51.50 | 45.30 | 46.14 | 51.23 | 49.86 | 47.80 | 49.63 |
平均数组间差异均方根 | 1.31 | 1.01 | 1.29 | 1.33 | 1.53 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.52 | 1.35 | 1.29 | 1.53 | 1.45 | 1.35 | ||
欧氏距离系数 | 16.490 | 15.581 | 21.588 | 20.144 | 22.580 | 16.850 | 18.987 | 24.469 | 22.119 | 19.852 | 21.928 | 21.169 | 19.213 |
组别Groups→ 编码Code↓ | 故如甲木 Gurugyam | 藏族A Tibetan A | 藏族B Tibetan B | 华北(步达生)North China | 华南(哈罗维)South China | 蒙古(杰别茨)Mongolian | 抚顺(岛五郎)Fushun | 广西壮族Guangxi | 香港 Hong Kong | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 颅长(g-op) | 187.00 (6) | 174.80(17) | 185.50(15) | 178.50(86) | 179.90(36) | 182.20(80) | 180.80(76) | 178.28(68) | 179.31(144) |
8 | 颅宽(eu-eu) | 141.60 (5) | 139.40(17) | 139.40(15) | 138.20(86) | 140.90(36) | 149.00(80) | 139.70(75) | 140.58(69) | 139.58(144) |
17 | 颅高(ba-b) | 129.60 (5) | 131.20(17) | 134.10(15) | 137.20(86) | 137.80(36) | 131.40(80) | 139.20(77) | 136.61(69) | 140.19(144) |
9 | 最小额宽(ft-ft) | 94.10 (6) | 92.60(17) | 94.30(15) | 89.40(85) | 91.50(36) | 94.30(80) | 90.80(77) | 94.29(70) | 92.36(143) |
45 | 颧宽(zy-zy) | 128.00 (2) | 130.40(17) | 137.50(15) | 132.70(83) | 132.60(36) | 141.80(80) | 134.30(77) | 135.48(70) | 133.36(136) |
48 | 上面高(n-sd) | 66.43 (3) | 69.40(17) | 76.50(15) | 75.30(83) | 73.82(36) | 78.00(69) | 76.20(63) | 69.38(64) | 72.85(145) |
51 | 眶宽(mf-ek)R | 41.46 (3) | 41.70(17) | 44.00(15) | 44.00(62) | 42.10(35) | 43.20(81) | 42.90(77) | 43.03(67) | 43.84(144) |
52 | 眶高R | 33.08 (3) | 35.00(17) | 36.50(15) | 35.50(74) | 34.60(36) | 35.80(81) | 35.50(77) | 33.89(69) | 33.78(144) |
54 | 鼻宽 | 24.45 (4) | 25.30(17) | 27.10(15) | 25.00(86) | 25.25(36) | 27.40(81) | 25.70(75) | 26.23(65) | 26.18(143) |
55 | 鼻高(n-ns) | 50.19 (3) | 51.65(17) | 55.00(15) | 55.30(86) | 52.60(36) | 56.50(81) | 55.10(76) | 51.77(66) | 53.26(144) |
8:1 | 颅指数 | 75.39 (5) | 79.80(17) | 75.30(15) | 77.56(86) | 78.75(36) | 82.00(80) | 77.30(75) | 79.06(68) | 77.84(144) |
17:1 | 颅长高指数 | 69.23 (5) | 75.10(17) | 72.10(15) | 77.02(86) | 77.02(36) | 72.12 | 77.01(76) | 76.57(68) | 78.18(144) |
17:8 | 颅宽高指数 | 89.01 (4) | 94.12(17) | 96.20(15) | 99.53(86) | 97.80(36) | 88.19 | 100.00(75) | 94.82(69) | 100.44(144) |
48:45 | 上面指数(sd) | 51.46 (2) | 53.22(17) | 55.64(15) | 56.80(82) | 55.67(36) | 55.01 | 56.80(62) | 51.31(64) | 54.63(136) |
52:51 | 眶指数R | 79.85 (3) | 84.30(17) | 83.00(15) | 80.66(62) | 84.90(36) | 82.90 | 83.00(77) | 79.01(67) | 77.05(144) |
54:55 | 鼻指数 | 50.62 (3) | 49.30(17) | 49.40(15) | 45.23(86) | 49.40(36) | 48.60(81) | 46.90(75) | 53.82(65) | 49.16(143) |
平均数组间差异均方根 | 1.03 | 1.32 | 1.52 | 1.26 | 1.58 | 1.51 | 1.12 | 1.41 | ||
欧氏距离系数 | 16.86 | 18.87 | 23.18 | 20.10 | 23.30 | 23.48 | 17.66 | 22.44 |
Tab.5 The cranial metric data of 8 modern groups and Gurugyam
组别Groups→ 编码Code↓ | 故如甲木 Gurugyam | 藏族A Tibetan A | 藏族B Tibetan B | 华北(步达生)North China | 华南(哈罗维)South China | 蒙古(杰别茨)Mongolian | 抚顺(岛五郎)Fushun | 广西壮族Guangxi | 香港 Hong Kong | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 颅长(g-op) | 187.00 (6) | 174.80(17) | 185.50(15) | 178.50(86) | 179.90(36) | 182.20(80) | 180.80(76) | 178.28(68) | 179.31(144) |
8 | 颅宽(eu-eu) | 141.60 (5) | 139.40(17) | 139.40(15) | 138.20(86) | 140.90(36) | 149.00(80) | 139.70(75) | 140.58(69) | 139.58(144) |
17 | 颅高(ba-b) | 129.60 (5) | 131.20(17) | 134.10(15) | 137.20(86) | 137.80(36) | 131.40(80) | 139.20(77) | 136.61(69) | 140.19(144) |
9 | 最小额宽(ft-ft) | 94.10 (6) | 92.60(17) | 94.30(15) | 89.40(85) | 91.50(36) | 94.30(80) | 90.80(77) | 94.29(70) | 92.36(143) |
45 | 颧宽(zy-zy) | 128.00 (2) | 130.40(17) | 137.50(15) | 132.70(83) | 132.60(36) | 141.80(80) | 134.30(77) | 135.48(70) | 133.36(136) |
48 | 上面高(n-sd) | 66.43 (3) | 69.40(17) | 76.50(15) | 75.30(83) | 73.82(36) | 78.00(69) | 76.20(63) | 69.38(64) | 72.85(145) |
51 | 眶宽(mf-ek)R | 41.46 (3) | 41.70(17) | 44.00(15) | 44.00(62) | 42.10(35) | 43.20(81) | 42.90(77) | 43.03(67) | 43.84(144) |
52 | 眶高R | 33.08 (3) | 35.00(17) | 36.50(15) | 35.50(74) | 34.60(36) | 35.80(81) | 35.50(77) | 33.89(69) | 33.78(144) |
54 | 鼻宽 | 24.45 (4) | 25.30(17) | 27.10(15) | 25.00(86) | 25.25(36) | 27.40(81) | 25.70(75) | 26.23(65) | 26.18(143) |
55 | 鼻高(n-ns) | 50.19 (3) | 51.65(17) | 55.00(15) | 55.30(86) | 52.60(36) | 56.50(81) | 55.10(76) | 51.77(66) | 53.26(144) |
8:1 | 颅指数 | 75.39 (5) | 79.80(17) | 75.30(15) | 77.56(86) | 78.75(36) | 82.00(80) | 77.30(75) | 79.06(68) | 77.84(144) |
17:1 | 颅长高指数 | 69.23 (5) | 75.10(17) | 72.10(15) | 77.02(86) | 77.02(36) | 72.12 | 77.01(76) | 76.57(68) | 78.18(144) |
17:8 | 颅宽高指数 | 89.01 (4) | 94.12(17) | 96.20(15) | 99.53(86) | 97.80(36) | 88.19 | 100.00(75) | 94.82(69) | 100.44(144) |
48:45 | 上面指数(sd) | 51.46 (2) | 53.22(17) | 55.64(15) | 56.80(82) | 55.67(36) | 55.01 | 56.80(62) | 51.31(64) | 54.63(136) |
52:51 | 眶指数R | 79.85 (3) | 84.30(17) | 83.00(15) | 80.66(62) | 84.90(36) | 82.90 | 83.00(77) | 79.01(67) | 77.05(144) |
54:55 | 鼻指数 | 50.62 (3) | 49.30(17) | 49.40(15) | 45.23(86) | 49.40(36) | 48.60(81) | 46.90(75) | 53.82(65) | 49.16(143) |
平均数组间差异均方根 | 1.03 | 1.32 | 1.52 | 1.26 | 1.58 | 1.51 | 1.12 | 1.41 | ||
欧氏距离系数 | 16.86 | 18.87 | 23.18 | 20.10 | 23.30 | 23.48 | 17.66 | 22.44 |
[1] | 仝涛, 李林辉, 黄珊. 西藏阿里地区噶尔县故如甲木墓地2012年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2014(4):563-587 |
[2] | 仝涛, 李林辉, 赤列次仁 等. 西藏阿里地区故如甲木墓地和曲踏墓地[J]. 考古, 2015(7):29-50 |
[3] | 张雅军, 仝涛, 李林辉 等. 从牙齿磨耗看西藏阿里故如甲木墓地人群的食物结构[J]. 人类学学报, 2019(1):107-118 |
[4] | 原海兵, 索朗•秋吉尼玛, 吕红亮, 等. 西藏那曲布塔雄曲青铜时代石室墓出土人骨研究[J]. 藏学学刊, 2017(1):273-301 |
[5] | 中桥孝博, 冈崎健治, 高椋浩史. 川西高原青铜时代的人[A].西南地区北方谱系青铜器及石棺葬文化研究[M]. 科学出版社, 2013: 164-191 |
[6] | 韩康信. 青海循化阿哈特拉山古墓地人骨研究[J]. 考古学报, 2000(3):395-420 |
[7] | 张君. 青海李家山卡约文化墓地人骨种系研究[J]. 考古学报, 1993(3):381-413 |
[8] | 韩康信. 新疆和静察吾乎三号、四号墓地人骨的体质人类学研究[A].新疆察吾乎大型氏族墓地发掘报告[M], 东方出版社, 1999: 299-337 |
[9] | 张君. 新疆拜城县多岗墓地人骨的种系研究[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2012(2):397-422 |
[10] | 陈靓. 新疆尉犁县营盘墓地古人骨的研究[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2002(00):323-341 |
[11] | 邵兴周, 崔静, 杨振江 等. 洛浦县山普拉出土颅骨的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1988(1):26-38 |
[12] | 原海兵. 殷墟中小墓人骨的综合研究[D]. 吉林大学, 2010: 143-176 |
[13] | 周亚威. 北京延庆西屯墓地人骨研究[D]. 吉林大学, 2014: 77-100 |
[14] | 王昉. 陕西神木大保当汉代墓葬人骨再分析[D]. 吉林大学, 2014: 24-35 |
[15] | 韩巍. 山西大同北魏时期居民的种系类型分析[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2005(4):270-280 |
[16] |
Morant GM. A First Study of the Tibetan Skull[J]. Biometrika, 1923,14(3-4):193-260
doi: 10.1093/biomet/14.3-4.193 URL |
[17] | 转引自韩康信 潘其风. 安阳殷墟中小墓人骨的研究[A].安阳殷墟头骨研究[M]. 文物出版社, 1985: 50-81 |
[18] | 中国科学院考古研究所体质人类学组. 赤峰、宁城夏家店上层文化人骨研究[J]. 考古学报, 1975(2):157-169 |
[19] | 朱芳武, 卢为善, 雷一鸣. 广西壮族颅骨的测量与研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1989(2):139-146 |
[20] | 王令红. 香港地区现代人头骨的研究——性别和地区类型的判别分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1989(3):28-36 |
[21] | Tildesley ML. A First Study of the Burmese Skull[J]. Biometrika, 1921,13(2-3):176-262 |
[22] | 王培英, 汪连兴, 史庆礼等译. 人类学[M]. 警官教育出版社, 1993: 376 |
[23] |
Torroni A, Richards M, Macaulay V, et al. MtDNA haplgroups and frequency patterns in Europe[J]. Am J Hum Genet 2000,66:1173-1177
doi: 10.1086/302789 URL pmid: 10712231 |
[24] |
Kivisild T, Bamshad MJ, Kaldma K, et al. Deep common ancestry of Indian and western-Eurasian mitochondrial DNA lineages[J]. Curr Biol 1999,9(22):1331-1334
doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)80057-3 URL pmid: 10574762 |
[25] |
Kivisild T, Tolk H-V, Parik J, et al. The emerging limbs and twigs of the East Asian mtDNA tree[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2002,19(10):1737-1751
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003996 URL pmid: 12270900 |
[26] |
Kong QP, Yao YG, Liu M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA sequence polymorphisms of five ethnic population from northern China[J]. Human Genetics, 2003,113(5):391-405
doi: 10.1007/s00439-003-1004-7 URL |
[27] |
Tanaka M, Cabrera VM, González AM, et al. Mitochondrial genome variation in Eastern Asia and the peopling of Japan[J]. Genome Research, 2004,14(10A):1832-1850
doi: 10.1101/gr.2286304 URL pmid: 15466285 |
[28] |
Comas D, Plaza S, Wells RS, et al. Admixture, migrations, and dispersals in Central Asia: evidence from maternal DNA lineages[J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2004,12:495-504
doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201160 URL pmid: 14872198 |
[29] |
Ricaut FX, Razafindrazaka H, Cox MP, et al. A new deep branch of eurasian mtDNA macrohaplogroup M reveals additional complexity regarding the settlement of Madagascar[J]. BMC Genomics, 2009,10:605
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-605 URL pmid: 20003445 |
[30] |
Ji F, Sharpley MS, Derbeneva O, et al. Mitochondrial DNA variant associated with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy and high-altitude Tibetans[J]. PNAS, 2012,109(19):7391-7396
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202484109 URL pmid: 22517755 |
[31] |
Yao YG, Kong QP, Wang CY, et al. Different Matrilineal Contributions to Genetic Structure of Ethnic Groups in the Silk Road Region in China[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2004,21(12):2265-2280.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh238 URL pmid: 15317881 |
[32] |
Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Denisova G, et al. Complete Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Eastern Eurasian Haplogroups Rarely Found in Populations of Northern Asia and Eastern Europe[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012,7(2):e32179
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032179 URL pmid: 22363811 |
[33] |
Fedorova SA, Reidla M, Metspalu E, et al. Autosomal and uniparental portraits of the native populations of Sakha (Yakutia): implications for the peopling of Northeast Eurasia[J]. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2013,13:127
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-127 URL pmid: 23782551 |
[34] |
Fagundes NJ, Kanitz R, Eckert R, et al. Mitochondrial population genomics supports a single pre-Clovis origin with a coastal route for the peopling of the Americas[J]. Am J Hum Genet. 2008,82(3):583-592
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.11.013 URL pmid: 18313026 |
[35] |
Comas D, Calafell F, Mateu E, et al. Trading genes along the Silk Road: mtDNA sequences and the origin of central Asian populations[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 1998,63(6):1824-1838
doi: 10.1086/302133 URL pmid: 9837835 |
[36] | Kolman C, Sambuughin N, Bermingham E. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Mongolian populations and implications for the origin of New World founders[J]. Genetics, 1996,142(2):1321-1334 |
[37] |
Malyarchuk B, Grzybowski T, Derenko M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny in Eastern and Western Slavs[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2008,25(8):1651-1658
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn114 URL pmid: 18477584 |
[38] |
Roostalu U, Kutuev I, Loogväli EL, et al. Origin and Expansion of Haplogroup H, the Dominant Human Mitochondrial DNA Lineage in West Eurasia: The Near Eastern and Caucasian Perspective[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2007,24(2):436-448
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl173 URL pmid: 17099056 |
[39] |
Rudbeck L, Gilbert MT, Willerslev E, et al. MtDNA analysis of human remains from an early Danish Christian cemetery[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2005,128(2):424-429
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20294 URL pmid: 15838837 |
[40] |
Metspalu M, Kivisild T, Metspalu E, et al. Most of the extant mtDNA boundaries in south and southwest Asia were likely shaped during the initial settlement of Eurasia by anatomically modern humans[J]. BMC Genet, 2004,5:26
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-5-26 URL pmid: 15339343 |
[41] |
Ranaweera L, Kaewsutthi S, Win Tun A, et al. Mitochondrial DNA history of Sri Lankan ethnic people: their relations within the island and with the Indian subcontinental populations[J]. J Hum Genet, 2014,59(1):28-36
doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.112 URL pmid: 24196378 |
[42] | 韩康信, 张君. 藏族体质人类学特征及其种族源[J]. 文博, 1991(6):6-15 |
[43] | 张振标. 藏族的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 1985(3):250-258 |
[44] | 林一璞. 西藏塔工林芝村发现的古代人类遗骸[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1961(3):241-243 |
[45] | 潘其风. 曲贡遗址及石室墓出土人骨鉴定和研究报告[A].拉萨曲贡[M]. 中国大百科全书出版社, 1999: 234-236 |
[46] | 张雅军. 西藏那曲古代祭祀人骨[A].青藏铁路西藏段田野考古报告[M]. 科学出版社, 2005: 199-207 |
[47] | 仝涛, 李林辉. 欧亚视野内的喜马拉雅黄金面具[J]. 考古, 2015(2):92-102 |
[1] | ZHANG Ming, PING Wanjing, YANG Melinda Anna, FU Qiaomei. Ancient genomes reveal the complex genetic history of Prehistoric Eurasian modern humans [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 412-421. |
[2] | ZHANG Xinghua, ZHENG Lianbin, XU Fei, BAO Jinping, YU Keli. Overweight and obesity in Tibetan Burmese adults in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 272-276. |
[3] | LI Yonglan, YU Keli, ZHANG Xinghua, BAO Jinping, LI Chong, ZHENG Lianbin. Physical types and ethnological characteristics of Tibetans [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(04): 698-711. |
[4] | BAO Jinping, YU Keli, LI Yonglan, LI Chong, ZHANG Xinghua, ZHENG Lianbin. A study of Weizang and Kham Tibetans’ somatotype by Heath-Carter method [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 834-846. |
[5] | DING Manyu, HE Wei, WANG Tianyi, Shargan Wangdue, ZHANG Ming, CAO Peng, LIU Feng, DAI Qingyan, FU Qiaomei. A study of the mitochondrial genome of ancient inhabitants from the Latuotanggu cemetery, Tibet, China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 1-11. |
[6] | CHEN Youcheng, HOU Guangliang, GAO Jingyi, CHEN Xiaoliang. A new microblade assemblage from Dongjicuona Lakeside in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its technological relationship with adjacent areas [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 28-39. |
[7] | XIANG Xiaoxue, DU Huimin, YU Keli, ZHENG Lianbin. Characteristics and comparison of body composition of the Monba, Lhoba and Sherpa peoples [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 109-117. |
[8] | WANG Tianyi, ZHAO Dongyue, ZHANG Ming, QIAO Shiyu, YANG Fan, WAN Yang, YANG Ruowei, CAO Peng, LIU Feng, FU Qiaomei. Ancient DNA capture techniques and genetic study progress of early southern China populations [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(04): 680-694. |
[9] | ZHAO Jing, WANG Chuanchao. Comparison and summary of ancient DNA extraction technology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(04): 706-716. |
[10] | LI Chunxiang, ZHANG Fan, MA Pengcheng, WANG Lixin, CUI Yinqiu. Ancient mitogenomes reveals Holocene human population history in the Nenjiang River valley [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(04): 695-705. |
[11] | ZHANG Yajun, TONG Tao, LI Linhui, Trinle Tsering. The relationship between tooth wear and diet of the Gurugyam people in Tibet [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(01): 107-118. |
[12] | ZHANG Ming, FU Qiaomei. Prehistoric interbreeding between archaic human groups and anatomically modern humans [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(02): 206-218. |
[13] | WANG Shejiang, ZHANG Xiaoling, CHEN Zujun, YI Mingjie, GE Junyi, Dawa, HE Wei, ZHANG Jianlin, LI Jingshu, Luosang, Habibu, LI Linhui, GAO Xing. Acheulian-like tools found at Nyade site in North Tibet—With discussions on human occupation of Tibetan Plateau in Late Pleistocene [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(02): 253-269. |
[14] | WEN Shaoqing, WANG Chuanchao, AO Xue, WEI Lanhai, TONG Xinzhu, WANG Lingxiang, WANG ZhanFeng, HAN Sheng, LI Hui. Ancient DNA supports Emperor Cao’s paternal genetic lineage belonging to haplogroup O2 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2016, 35(04): 617-625. |
[15] | XI Huanjiu, LI Wenhui, ZHAO Hong. Preliminary Review of the Biological Anthropology Trait of Tibetan Peoples [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2015, 34(02): 260-266. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||