Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (02): 208-225.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0078
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LEI Shuai1,2(), CHEN Liang1, ZHAI Linlin1
Received:
2019-05-27
Revised:
2019-08-07
Online:
2021-04-15
Published:
2021-04-13
CLC Number:
LEI Shuai, CHEN Liang, ZHAI Linlin. A study on the characteristics of prehistoric deciduous teeth of infants in Yuhuazhai village, Xi’an[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(02): 208-225.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0078
观察齿/Teeth | ui1 | ui2 | uc | um1 | um2 | li1 | li2 | lc | lm1 | lm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
标本数/n | 14 | 13 | 12 | 22 | 26 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 24 | 28 |
Tab.1 The deciduous teeth used in the present study
观察齿/Teeth | ui1 | ui2 | uc | um1 | um2 | li1 | li2 | lc | lm1 | lm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
标本数/n | 14 | 13 | 12 | 22 | 26 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 24 | 28 |
观察齿/Teeth | 分级范围 /Grades | 性状出现 /Breakpoint | 样本总 数/n0 | 0级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 出现率/Frequency | n | 出现率/Frequency | n | 出现率/Frequency | n | 出现率/Frequency | |||||||
上颌中门齿/ui1 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 14 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 28.57% | 7 | 50.00% | 3 | 21.43% | |||
上颌侧门齿/ui2 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 13 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 15.39% | 9 | 69.23% | 2 | 15.38% | |||
上颌犬齿/uc | 0-2 | 0-2 | 12 | 2 | 16.67% | 3 | 25.00% | 7 | 58.33% | |||||
下颌犬齿/lc | 0-3 | 1-3 | 15 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 26.67% | 10 | 66.67% | 1 | 6.66% |
Tab.2 The occurrence of shovel in different deciduous teeth of the present study
观察齿/Teeth | 分级范围 /Grades | 性状出现 /Breakpoint | 样本总 数/n0 | 0级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 出现率/Frequency | n | 出现率/Frequency | n | 出现率/Frequency | n | 出现率/Frequency | |||||||
上颌中门齿/ui1 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 14 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 28.57% | 7 | 50.00% | 3 | 21.43% | |||
上颌侧门齿/ui2 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 13 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 15.39% | 9 | 69.23% | 2 | 15.38% | |||
上颌犬齿/uc | 0-2 | 0-2 | 12 | 2 | 16.67% | 3 | 25.00% | 7 | 58.33% | |||||
下颌犬齿/lc | 0-3 | 1-3 | 15 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 26.67% | 10 | 66.67% | 1 | 6.66% |
组别/Groups | ui1 | ui2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n0 | n | 性状出现率 /Frequency | n0 | n | 性状出现率 /Frequency | ||
日本组/J | 124 | 95 | 76.60% | 163 | 152 | 93.30% | |
Pima印第安组/PI | 78 | 48 | 61.60% | 98 | 63 | 64.30% | |
因纽特组/I | 16 | 8 | 50.00% | 5 | 3 | 60.00% | |
美国白人组/AW | 20 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | |
美国黑人组/AN | 10 | 1 | 10.00% | 22 | 3 | 15.00% | |
长阳组/CY | 32 | 25 | 78.10% | 50 | 42 | 84.00% | |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 14 | 10 | 71.43% | 13 | 11 | 84.61% |
Tab.3 The occurrence of shovel ui1 and ui2 in different populations
组别/Groups | ui1 | ui2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n0 | n | 性状出现率 /Frequency | n0 | n | 性状出现率 /Frequency | ||
日本组/J | 124 | 95 | 76.60% | 163 | 152 | 93.30% | |
Pima印第安组/PI | 78 | 48 | 61.60% | 98 | 63 | 64.30% | |
因纽特组/I | 16 | 8 | 50.00% | 5 | 3 | 60.00% | |
美国白人组/AW | 20 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | |
美国黑人组/AN | 10 | 1 | 10.00% | 22 | 3 | 15.00% | |
长阳组/CY | 32 | 25 | 78.10% | 50 | 42 | 84.00% | |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 14 | 10 | 71.43% | 13 | 11 | 84.61% |
组别/Groups | 样本总 数/n0 | 2 | 3M | 3H | 4 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | F | n | F | n | F | n | F | |||||
日本组/J | 184 | 28 | 15.20% | 111 | 60.30% | 8 | 4.30% | 37 | 20.10% | |||
美国白人组/AW | 55 | 33 | 60.00% | 13 | 23.60% | 9 | 16.40% | 0 | 0.00 | |||
美国黑人组/AN | 50 | 14 | 28.00% | 18 | 36.00% | 8 | 16.00% | 10 | 20.00% | |||
长阳组/CY | 33 | 6 | 18.20% | 18 | 54.50% | 3 | 9.10% | 6 | 18.20% | |||
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 22 | 2 | 9.10% | 10 | 45.45% | 0 | 0.00 | 10 | 45.45% |
Tab.4 The occurrence of the cusp number of um1 in different populations
组别/Groups | 样本总 数/n0 | 2 | 3M | 3H | 4 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | F | n | F | n | F | n | F | |||||
日本组/J | 184 | 28 | 15.20% | 111 | 60.30% | 8 | 4.30% | 37 | 20.10% | |||
美国白人组/AW | 55 | 33 | 60.00% | 13 | 23.60% | 9 | 16.40% | 0 | 0.00 | |||
美国黑人组/AN | 50 | 14 | 28.00% | 18 | 36.00% | 8 | 16.00% | 10 | 20.00% | |||
长阳组/CY | 33 | 6 | 18.20% | 18 | 54.50% | 3 | 9.10% | 6 | 18.20% | |||
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 22 | 2 | 9.10% | 10 | 45.45% | 0 | 0.00 | 10 | 45.45% |
组别/Groups | 样本总数/n0 | 性状出现率/Breakpoint Frequency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0级 | 1级 | 2+3级 | 4+5级 | 6+7级 | ||
日本组/J | 185 | 32.40% | 30.80% | 24.90% | 6.50% | 5.40% |
美国白人组/AW | 56 | 5.40% | 19.60% | 39.30% | 14.30% | 21.40% |
美国黑人组/AN | 51 | 19.60% | 29.40% | 39.20% | 2.00% | 9.80% |
长阳组/CY | 34 | 67.60% | 17.70% | 2.90% | 8.80% | 2.90% |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 26 | 42.31% | 46.15% | 3.85% | 7.69% | 0.00 |
Tab.5 The occurrence of the Carabelli’s cusp of um2 in different populations
组别/Groups | 样本总数/n0 | 性状出现率/Breakpoint Frequency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0级 | 1级 | 2+3级 | 4+5级 | 6+7级 | ||
日本组/J | 185 | 32.40% | 30.80% | 24.90% | 6.50% | 5.40% |
美国白人组/AW | 56 | 5.40% | 19.60% | 39.30% | 14.30% | 21.40% |
美国黑人组/AN | 51 | 19.60% | 29.40% | 39.20% | 2.00% | 9.80% |
长阳组/CY | 34 | 67.60% | 17.70% | 2.90% | 8.80% | 2.90% |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 26 | 42.31% | 46.15% | 3.85% | 7.69% | 0.00 |
组别/Groups | 样本总数/n0 | 6尖/Cusp 6 | 7尖/Cusp 7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | F | n | F | |||
日本组/J | 156 | 58 | 36.90% | 115 | 73.70% | |
Pima印第安组/PI | 118 | 43 | 36.80% | 86 | 72.90% | |
因纽特组/I | 63 | 24 | 37.70% | 50 | 79.40% | |
美国白人组/AW | 54 | 4 | 7.30% | 22 | 40.70% | |
美国黑人组/AN | 47 | 7 | 14.00% | 22 | 46.80% | |
Ainu人组/AI | 25 | 6 | 23.80% | 18 | 71.40% | |
长阳组/CY | 37 | 16 | 42.90% | 17 | 46.00% | |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 28 | 9 | 32.14% | 10 | 35.71% |
Tab.6 The occurrence of cusp 6 and cusp 7 of lm1 and lm2 in different populations
组别/Groups | 样本总数/n0 | 6尖/Cusp 6 | 7尖/Cusp 7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | F | n | F | |||
日本组/J | 156 | 58 | 36.90% | 115 | 73.70% | |
Pima印第安组/PI | 118 | 43 | 36.80% | 86 | 72.90% | |
因纽特组/I | 63 | 24 | 37.70% | 50 | 79.40% | |
美国白人组/AW | 54 | 4 | 7.30% | 22 | 40.70% | |
美国黑人组/AN | 47 | 7 | 14.00% | 22 | 46.80% | |
Ainu人组/AI | 25 | 6 | 23.80% | 18 | 71.40% | |
长阳组/CY | 37 | 16 | 42.90% | 17 | 46.00% | |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 28 | 9 | 32.14% | 10 | 35.71% |
组别/Groups | 样本总 数/n0 | 出现率/Breakpoint Frequency | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0+1级 | 2+3级 | 4+5级 | 6级 | ||
日本组/J | 152 | 55.30% | 41.40% | 3.30% | 0 |
美国白人组/AW | 54 | 87.00% | 13.00% | 0 | 0 |
美国黑人组/AN | 47 | 83.00% | 14.90% | 2.10% | 0 |
长阳组/CY | 32 | 75.00% | 18.80% | 3.10% | 3.10% |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 28 | 75.00% | 17.86% | 3.57% | 3.57% |
Tab.7 The occurrence of protostylid of lm 2 in different populations
组别/Groups | 样本总 数/n0 | 出现率/Breakpoint Frequency | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0+1级 | 2+3级 | 4+5级 | 6级 | ||
日本组/J | 152 | 55.30% | 41.40% | 3.30% | 0 |
美国白人组/AW | 54 | 87.00% | 13.00% | 0 | 0 |
美国黑人组/AN | 47 | 83.00% | 14.90% | 2.10% | 0 |
长阳组/CY | 32 | 75.00% | 18.80% | 3.10% | 3.10% |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 28 | 75.00% | 17.86% | 3.57% | 3.57% |
观察齿/Teeth | BL | MD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | X | Sd | Cv | n | X | Sd | Cv | ||
ui1 | 16 | 5.50 | 1.30 | 23.73 | 16 | 6.88 | 0.73 | 10.55 | |
ui2 | 13 | 4.87 | 0.30 | 6.19 | 13 | 5.54 | 0.31 | 5.54 | |
uc | 12 | 5.92 | 0.47 | 7.86 | 12 | 7.03 | 0.24 | 3.40 | |
um1 | 19 | 9.00 | 0.59 | 6.50 | 19 | 6.86 | 0.47 | 6.93 | |
um2 | 27 | 9.62 | 0.62 | 6.44 | 27 | 9.30 | 0.84 | 9.02 | |
li1 | 4 | 3.82 | 0.48 | 12.58 | 4 | 4.17 | 0.36 | 8.59 | |
li2 | 12 | 4.29 | 0.34 | 7.94 | 12 | 4.70 | 0.30 | 6.42 | |
lc | 13 | 5.44 | 0.32 | 5.82 | 13 | 5.89 | 0.25 | 4.19 | |
lm1 | 24 | 7.38 | 0.81 | 10.97 | 24 | 8.55 | 0.68 | 7.97 | |
lm2 | 30 | 9.13 | 0.67 | 7.30 | 28 | 10.30 | 0.61 | 5.92 |
Tab.8 Measured values of deciduous teeth of prehistoric infants in Yuhuazhai
观察齿/Teeth | BL | MD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | X | Sd | Cv | n | X | Sd | Cv | ||
ui1 | 16 | 5.50 | 1.30 | 23.73 | 16 | 6.88 | 0.73 | 10.55 | |
ui2 | 13 | 4.87 | 0.30 | 6.19 | 13 | 5.54 | 0.31 | 5.54 | |
uc | 12 | 5.92 | 0.47 | 7.86 | 12 | 7.03 | 0.24 | 3.40 | |
um1 | 19 | 9.00 | 0.59 | 6.50 | 19 | 6.86 | 0.47 | 6.93 | |
um2 | 27 | 9.62 | 0.62 | 6.44 | 27 | 9.30 | 0.84 | 9.02 | |
li1 | 4 | 3.82 | 0.48 | 12.58 | 4 | 4.17 | 0.36 | 8.59 | |
li2 | 12 | 4.29 | 0.34 | 7.94 | 12 | 4.70 | 0.30 | 6.42 | |
lc | 13 | 5.44 | 0.32 | 5.82 | 13 | 5.89 | 0.25 | 4.19 | |
lm1 | 24 | 7.38 | 0.81 | 10.97 | 24 | 8.55 | 0.68 | 7.97 | |
lm2 | 30 | 9.13 | 0.67 | 7.30 | 28 | 10.30 | 0.61 | 5.92 |
观察齿/Teeth | 鱼化寨组/YHZ | 长阳组/CY | 现代中国组/MC | 现代印度组/MI | 澳大利亚土著组/AA | 美国白人组/AW | 北京猿人组/Bm | 淅川人组/Xm | 史前印度组/PI | 史前巴基斯坦组/PP | 斯里兰卡铁器时代组/IS | 欧洲中石器时代组/ME | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数/n | 87 | 156 | 100 | 29-114 | 69 | 19-34 | 4-9 | 7-27 | |||||
ui1 | BL | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.40 | 5.20 | 5.50 | 5.10 | 5.30 | 5.20 | 5.30 | |||
MD | 6.88 | 6.80 | 7.30 | 6.60 | 7.40 | 6.40 | 6.80 | 6.60 | 7.00 | 7.20 | |||
ui2 | BL | 4.87 | 4.70 | 5.60 | 4.80 | 5.20 | 4.70 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 6.40 | 5.10 | ||
MD | 5.54 | 5.30 | 6.00 | 5.40 | 6.00 | 5.20 | 5.50 | 5.40 | 5.90 | 5.70 | |||
uc | BL | 5.92 | 5.60 | 6.20 | 6.10 | 6.60 | 6.10 | 5.90 | 5.80 | 7.20 | 6.40 | ||
MD | 7.03 | 6.60 | 7.30 | 6.70 | 7.40 | 6.80 | 6.70 | 6.80 | 9.10 | 7.30 | |||
um1 | BL | 9.00 | 7.40 | 9.20 | 8.80 | 9.10 | 8.30 | 9.00 | 9.10 | 7.30 | 8.60 | ||
MD | 6.86 | 8.90 | 7.40 | 7.30 | 7.60 | 6.70 | 7.40 | 7.60 | 9.40 | 7.40 | |||
um2 | BL | 9.62 | 9.40 | 10.10 | 9.90 | 10.70 | 9.50 | 10.00 | 9.80 | 9.10 | 10.30 | ||
MD | 9.30 | 9.70 | 9.40 | 9.20 | 9.70 | 8.80 | 9.50 | 9.00 | 2-7 | 9.10 | |||
例数/n | 81 | 163 | 100 | 18-115 | 69 | 1-5 | 20-39 | 3-14 | 1-5 | 7-27 | |||
li1 | BL | 3.82 | 3.90 | 4.40 | 3.90 | 4.30 | 3.90 | 3.60 | 4.10 | 3.80 | 5.30 | ||
MD | 4.17 | 4.40 | 4.80 | 4.10 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.30 | 4.30 | 4.00 | 7.20 | |||
li2 | BL | 4.29 | 4.10 | 4.90 | 4.30 | 4.80 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.90 | 5.10 | ||
MD | 4.70 | 4.50 | 5.30 | 4.70 | 5.00 | 4.60 | 4.90 | 4.70 | 5.30 | 5.70 | |||
lc | BL | 5.44 | 5.30 | 5.80 | 5.50 | 6.10 | 5.60 | 5.30 | 5.40 | 5.50 | 5.10 | 6.40 | |
MD | 5.89 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.80 | 6.30 | 5.80 | 6.10 | 5.80 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.30 | ||
lm1 | BL | 7.38 | 7.20 | 7.20 | 7.50 | 7.90 | 7.40 | 6.60 | 7.40 | 7.00 | 7.20 | 8.60 | |
MD | 8.55 | 8.50 | 8.50 | 8.00 | 8.20 | 7.90 | 7.70 | 8.40 | 8.30 | 8.80 | 7.40 | ||
lm2 | BL | 9.13 | 9.10 | 9.10 | 9.10 | 9.90 | 8.90 | 10.10 | 10.50 | 9.10 | 8.90 | 8.60 | 10.30 |
MD | 10.30 | 10.60 | 10.60 | 10.10 | 10.90 | 9.90 | 12.20 | 12.50 | 10.60 | 10.10 | 10.40 | 9.10 |
Tab.9 Comparison of the measured values of deciduous teeth of prehistoric infants in Yuhuazhai with those of other populations
观察齿/Teeth | 鱼化寨组/YHZ | 长阳组/CY | 现代中国组/MC | 现代印度组/MI | 澳大利亚土著组/AA | 美国白人组/AW | 北京猿人组/Bm | 淅川人组/Xm | 史前印度组/PI | 史前巴基斯坦组/PP | 斯里兰卡铁器时代组/IS | 欧洲中石器时代组/ME | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数/n | 87 | 156 | 100 | 29-114 | 69 | 19-34 | 4-9 | 7-27 | |||||
ui1 | BL | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.40 | 5.20 | 5.50 | 5.10 | 5.30 | 5.20 | 5.30 | |||
MD | 6.88 | 6.80 | 7.30 | 6.60 | 7.40 | 6.40 | 6.80 | 6.60 | 7.00 | 7.20 | |||
ui2 | BL | 4.87 | 4.70 | 5.60 | 4.80 | 5.20 | 4.70 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 6.40 | 5.10 | ||
MD | 5.54 | 5.30 | 6.00 | 5.40 | 6.00 | 5.20 | 5.50 | 5.40 | 5.90 | 5.70 | |||
uc | BL | 5.92 | 5.60 | 6.20 | 6.10 | 6.60 | 6.10 | 5.90 | 5.80 | 7.20 | 6.40 | ||
MD | 7.03 | 6.60 | 7.30 | 6.70 | 7.40 | 6.80 | 6.70 | 6.80 | 9.10 | 7.30 | |||
um1 | BL | 9.00 | 7.40 | 9.20 | 8.80 | 9.10 | 8.30 | 9.00 | 9.10 | 7.30 | 8.60 | ||
MD | 6.86 | 8.90 | 7.40 | 7.30 | 7.60 | 6.70 | 7.40 | 7.60 | 9.40 | 7.40 | |||
um2 | BL | 9.62 | 9.40 | 10.10 | 9.90 | 10.70 | 9.50 | 10.00 | 9.80 | 9.10 | 10.30 | ||
MD | 9.30 | 9.70 | 9.40 | 9.20 | 9.70 | 8.80 | 9.50 | 9.00 | 2-7 | 9.10 | |||
例数/n | 81 | 163 | 100 | 18-115 | 69 | 1-5 | 20-39 | 3-14 | 1-5 | 7-27 | |||
li1 | BL | 3.82 | 3.90 | 4.40 | 3.90 | 4.30 | 3.90 | 3.60 | 4.10 | 3.80 | 5.30 | ||
MD | 4.17 | 4.40 | 4.80 | 4.10 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.30 | 4.30 | 4.00 | 7.20 | |||
li2 | BL | 4.29 | 4.10 | 4.90 | 4.30 | 4.80 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.90 | 5.10 | ||
MD | 4.70 | 4.50 | 5.30 | 4.70 | 5.00 | 4.60 | 4.90 | 4.70 | 5.30 | 5.70 | |||
lc | BL | 5.44 | 5.30 | 5.80 | 5.50 | 6.10 | 5.60 | 5.30 | 5.40 | 5.50 | 5.10 | 6.40 | |
MD | 5.89 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.80 | 6.30 | 5.80 | 6.10 | 5.80 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.30 | ||
lm1 | BL | 7.38 | 7.20 | 7.20 | 7.50 | 7.90 | 7.40 | 6.60 | 7.40 | 7.00 | 7.20 | 8.60 | |
MD | 8.55 | 8.50 | 8.50 | 8.00 | 8.20 | 7.90 | 7.70 | 8.40 | 8.30 | 8.80 | 7.40 | ||
lm2 | BL | 9.13 | 9.10 | 9.10 | 9.10 | 9.90 | 8.90 | 10.10 | 10.50 | 9.10 | 8.90 | 8.60 | 10.30 |
MD | 10.30 | 10.60 | 10.60 | 10.10 | 10.90 | 9.90 | 12.20 | 12.50 | 10.60 | 10.10 | 10.40 | 9.10 |
组别/Groups | 铲形门齿/Shoveling Incisor | 原副尖/protostylid | 转向皱纹 / Defecting Wrinkle | 6尖/Cusp 6 | 7尖/Cusp 7 | 卡氏尖 / Carabelli’s Cusp | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ui1 | ui2 | lm2 | lm2 | lm2 | lm2 | um2 | ||
日本组/J | 76.60% | 93.30% | 44.70% | 71.60% | 36.90% | 73.70% | 11.90% | |
Pima印第安组/PI | 61.60% | 64.30% | 89.00% | 84.30% | 36.80% | 72.90% | 0.00 | |
因纽特组/I | 50.00% | 60.00% | 67.30% | 67.90% | 37.70% | 79.40% | 0.00 | |
美国白人组/AW | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.50% | 13.00% | 7.30% | 40.70% | 35.70% | |
美国黑人组/AN | 10.00% | 15.00% | 17.00% | 19.10% | 14.00% | 46.80% | 11.80% | |
Ainu人组/AI | 50.00% | 66.70% | 45.50% | 70.00% | 23.80% | 71.40% | 16.00% | |
长阳组/CY | 78.10% | 84.00% | 25.00% | 92.30% | 42.90% | 46.00% | 11.70% | |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 71.43% | 84.61% | 25.00% | 89.30% | 32.14% | 35.71% | 7.69% |
Tab.10 The occurrence of 5 traits of Mongoloid dental complex and Carabelli’s cusp in the deciduous teeth of different populations
组别/Groups | 铲形门齿/Shoveling Incisor | 原副尖/protostylid | 转向皱纹 / Defecting Wrinkle | 6尖/Cusp 6 | 7尖/Cusp 7 | 卡氏尖 / Carabelli’s Cusp | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ui1 | ui2 | lm2 | lm2 | lm2 | lm2 | um2 | ||
日本组/J | 76.60% | 93.30% | 44.70% | 71.60% | 36.90% | 73.70% | 11.90% | |
Pima印第安组/PI | 61.60% | 64.30% | 89.00% | 84.30% | 36.80% | 72.90% | 0.00 | |
因纽特组/I | 50.00% | 60.00% | 67.30% | 67.90% | 37.70% | 79.40% | 0.00 | |
美国白人组/AW | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.50% | 13.00% | 7.30% | 40.70% | 35.70% | |
美国黑人组/AN | 10.00% | 15.00% | 17.00% | 19.10% | 14.00% | 46.80% | 11.80% | |
Ainu人组/AI | 50.00% | 66.70% | 45.50% | 70.00% | 23.80% | 71.40% | 16.00% | |
长阳组/CY | 78.10% | 84.00% | 25.00% | 92.30% | 42.90% | 46.00% | 11.70% | |
鱼化寨组/YHZ | 71.43% | 84.61% | 25.00% | 89.30% | 32.14% | 35.71% | 7.69% |
组别/Groups | 鱼化寨组~日本组 | 鱼化寨组~ Pima印第安组 | 鱼化寨组~ 因纽特组 | 鱼化寨组~ 美国白人组 | 鱼化寨组~ 美国黑人组 | 鱼化寨组~Ainu人组 | 鱼化寨组~ 长阳组 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
δm值 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 1.83 | 1.30 | 0.42 | 0.09 |
Tab.11 Comparison of δm values between Yuhuazhai group and other groups
组别/Groups | 鱼化寨组~日本组 | 鱼化寨组~ Pima印第安组 | 鱼化寨组~ 因纽特组 | 鱼化寨组~ 美国白人组 | 鱼化寨组~ 美国黑人组 | 鱼化寨组~Ainu人组 | 鱼化寨组~ 长阳组 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
δm值 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 1.83 | 1.30 | 0.42 | 0.09 |
因子/Fcators | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
特征值/Total | 4.419 | 1.759 | 0.508 | 0.180 |
贡献率/Of Variance | 63.128% | 25.133% | 7.254% | 2.577% |
累计贡献率/Cumulative | 63.128% | 88.261% | 95.514% | 98.092% |
因子载荷矩阵/ Factor loading Matrix | ||||
铲形门齿/Shoveling Incisor(ui1) | 0.938 | -0.233 | 0.233 | -0.039 |
铲形门齿/Shoveling incisor(ui2) | 0.927 | -0.226 | 0.275 | -0.096 |
原副尖/Protostylid(lm2) | 0.635 | 0.705 | -0.145 | 0.274 |
转向皱纹/Defecting Wrinkle(lm2) | 0.951 | -0.200 | 0.099 | 0.113 |
6尖/Cusp 6(lm2) | 0.696 | -0.611 | -0.287 | 0.119 |
7尖/Cusp 7(lm2) | 0.481 | 0.827 | 0.215 | -0.082 |
卡氏尖/Carabelli’s Cusp (um2) | -0.809 | -0.245 | 0.468 | 0.247 |
Tab.12 Results of factor analysis
因子/Fcators | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
特征值/Total | 4.419 | 1.759 | 0.508 | 0.180 |
贡献率/Of Variance | 63.128% | 25.133% | 7.254% | 2.577% |
累计贡献率/Cumulative | 63.128% | 88.261% | 95.514% | 98.092% |
因子载荷矩阵/ Factor loading Matrix | ||||
铲形门齿/Shoveling Incisor(ui1) | 0.938 | -0.233 | 0.233 | -0.039 |
铲形门齿/Shoveling incisor(ui2) | 0.927 | -0.226 | 0.275 | -0.096 |
原副尖/Protostylid(lm2) | 0.635 | 0.705 | -0.145 | 0.274 |
转向皱纹/Defecting Wrinkle(lm2) | 0.951 | -0.200 | 0.099 | 0.113 |
6尖/Cusp 6(lm2) | 0.696 | -0.611 | -0.287 | 0.119 |
7尖/Cusp 7(lm2) | 0.481 | 0.827 | 0.215 | -0.082 |
卡氏尖/Carabelli’s Cusp (um2) | -0.809 | -0.245 | 0.468 | 0.247 |
[1] | 西安市文物保护研究所. 西安鱼化寨遗址仰韶文化瓮棺葬墓发掘简报[J]. 文博, 2012(1): 3-11 |
[2] | 陈靓. 西安鱼化寨遗址出土人骨研究[A].见:西安市文物保护考古研究院(编).西安鱼化寨[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017 |
[3] | Share E Bailey, Stefano Benazzi, JeanJacques Hublin. Allometry, Merism, and Tooth Shape of the Upper Deciduous M2 and Permanent M1[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2014(154): 104-114 |
[4] | Edgar HJH, Lease LR. Correlations between deciduous and permanent tooth morphology in a European American sample[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2007(133): 726-734 |
[5] | Sofaer JA, MacLean CJ, Bailit HL. Heredity and morphological variation in early and late developing human teeth of the same morphological class[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1972(17): 811-816 |
[6] | Sofaer JA. A model relating developmental interaction and differential evolutionary reduction of tooth size[J]. Evolution, 1973(27): 427-434 |
[7] | Jorgensen KD. The Dryopithecus pattern in recent Danes and Dutchmen[J]. J Dent Res, 1955(34): 195-208 |
[8] | Smith P, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E, Kalderon W, et al. Directionality of dental trait frequency between human second deciduous and first permanent molars[J]. 1987(32): 59 |
[9] | Von Koenigswald G. Evolutionary trends in the deciduous molars of the hominoidea[J]. J Dent Res, 1967(46): 779-786 |
[10] | Hanihara K. Criteria for classification of crown characters of the human deciduous dention[J]. Anthropol Soc Nippon, 1961(69): 27-45 |
[11] | 刘武, 王善才. 湖北长阳青铜时代人类乳齿特征的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1998(3): 176-190 |
[12] | Louise Scheuer, Sue Black. The Juvenile Skeleton[M]. Elsevier Academic Press, 2004 |
[13] | Tim D White, Pieter A Folkens. The Human Bone Manual[M]. Elsevier Academic Press, 2005 |
[14] | 贾静涛. 法医人类学[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 1993 |
[15] | 朱泓. 体质人类学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004 |
[16] | Simon Hillson. Tooth Development in Human Evolution and Bioarchaeology[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2014 |
[17] | 邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 辞书出版社, 1985: 367-370 |
[18] |
Irish JD. The mean measure of divergence: Its utility in model-free and model-bound analyses relative to the mahalanobis D2 distance for nonmetric traits[J]. American Journal Of Human Biology, 2010(3): 378-395
URL pmid: 19918917 |
[19] | 李法军. 河北阳原姜家梁新石器时代人骨研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学博士学位论文, 2004 |
[20] | Weidenreich F. The dentition of Sinanthropus pekinensis: A comparative odontog raphy of the hominids[J]. Pal Sin, New Series D, No.1, Peking, 1937. |
[21] | 刘武. 华北新石器时代人类牙齿形态特征及其在现代中国人起源与演化上的意义[J]. 人类学学报, 1995(4): 360-380 |
[22] | Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the deciduous dentition[J]. J Anthropol Soc Nippon, 1966(74): 61-71 |
[23] | Dahllberg AA. The dentition of the American Indian[A]. In: Laughlin WS (Ed.). Papaers on the Physical Anthropology of the American Indian[C]. New York: Vikin Fund, 1951: 138-176 |
[24] | Turner CG II. Major features of Sundadonty and Sinodonty, including suggestions about East Asian microevolution, population history, and late Pleistocene relationship with Australian Aboriginals[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1990(82): 295-317 |
[25] | Turner CG II. The dentition of Arctic peoples[D]. Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1967 |
[26] | Hanihara K. The deflecting wrinkle on the lower molars in recent man[J]. J Anthropol Soc Nippon, 1964(72): 1-8 |
[27] | Hanihara K. Criteria for classification of crown characters of the human deciduous dention[J]. Anthropol Soc Nippon, 1961(69): 27-45 |
[28] | Hilton S. Dental Anthropology[M].Cambridge University Press, 1996, 1-366 |
[29] | 刘武, 周蜜, 邢松. 卡氏尖在中国古人类化石中出现及其演变意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2018(5): 159-175 |
[30] | Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the deciduous dentition with special reference to the dentition of the Ainu[J]. J Anthropol Soc Nippon, 1970(78): 3-17 |
[31] | Weidenreich F. The dentition of Sinanthropus pekinensis:A comparative odontog raphy of the hominids[J]. Pal Sin, New Series D, No.1, Peking, 1937 |
[32] | von Koenigswald GHR. Gigantopithecus blacki von Koenigwald, a giant fossil hominid from the Pleistocene of southern China[J]. Anthrop Pap Am M us Nat Hist, 1952(43): 295-325 |
[33] | Turner CG II. Late Pleistocene and Holocene population history of East Asia based on dental variation[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1987(73): 305-321 |
[34] | 王惠芸. 口腔解剖生理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1965 |
[35] | 吴汝康, 吴新智. 河南淅川的人类牙齿化石[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1982(20): 1-9 |
[36] | Lukacs JR. Crown dimensions of deciduous teeth from prehistoric India[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1981(55): 261-266 |
[37] | Lukacs JR, Makhija PG. Crown diemssions of deciduous teeth of prehistoric and living populations of western India[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1983(61): 383-387 |
[38] | 刘武, 曾祥龙. 陕西陇县战国时代人类牙齿形态特征[J]. 人类学学报, 1996(4): 302-313. |
[39] | Ryan W, Schmidt, Seguchi Noriko. Jomon Culture and the peopling of the Japanesearchipelago: advancements in the fields of morphometrics and ancient DNA[J]. Japanese Journal of Archaeology, 2014(2): 34-59 |
[40] | Turner CG II. Dental anthropological indication of agriculture among the Jomon of central Japan[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1979(51): 619-636 |
[41] | Hanihara K, T Masuda, T Tanaka, et al. Morphological status of the Ainu: Comparative studies of dentition[M]. Tokyo Press Tokyo, 1975: 256-264 |
[42] | Bandelt HJ, Lahermo P, Richards M, et al. Detecting errors in mtDNA data by phylogenetic analysis[J]. Int J Leg Med, 2001,115(2): 64-69 |
[43] | 吴新智. 中国远古人类的进化[J]. 人类学学报, 1990(4): 312-320 |
[44] | 吴新智. 中国晚旧石器时代人类与其南邻(尼阿人及塔邦人)的关系[J]. 人类学学报, 1987(3): 180-182 |
[45] | 考古研究所体质人类学组. 陕西华县横阵的仰韶文化人骨[J]. 考古, 1977(4): 247-256 |
[46] | 韩康信, 潘其风. 古代中国人种成分研究[J]. 考古学报, 1984(2): 245-263 |
[47] | 吴茂霖. 中国的晚期智人[A].见:吴汝康,吴新智,张森水(主编).中国远古人类[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 42-58 |
[48] | 张振标. 中国新石器时代人类遗骸[A].见:吴汝康,吴新智,张森水(主编).中国远古人类[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 62-80 |
[49] | 颜誾. 从人类学上观察中国旧石器时代晚期与新石器时代的关系[J]. 考古, 1965(10): 513-516 |
[50] | 张振标, 王善才. 湖北长阳青铜时代人骨的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1992(11): 230-240 |
[1] | ZHAO Dongyue, LYU Zheng, XING Fulai, MIAO Yifei, CHEN Liang. Craniofacial morphology of the skulls unearthed from the Tongwan City site [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 816-825. |
[2] | HOU Yanfeng, ZHANG Jian, CAO Yanpeng, JIN Songan. Faunal remains of the Yangshao period from the Gouwan site, Xichuan county, Henan province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 913-926. |
[3] | HE Jianing, LI Nan, ZHANG Chi. Bioarchaeology of Neolithic Yangshao human skeletal remains from Baligang, Dengzhou: A diachronic approach [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(04): 686-697. |
[4] | YANG Fan, GU Wanfa, DUAN Qimeng, ZHENG Xiaoqu, JIA Yin, JIN Guiyun. Phytolith from the Wanggou site in Zhengzhou, Henan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(03): 429-438. |
[5] | YUAN Haibing, GU Wanfa, WEI Qingli, WU Qian, DING Lanpo, CAO Doudou. Analysis of dental caries in the Yangshao population at the Qingtai site, Zhengzhou city [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 226-237. |
[6] | GUO Xiaoqi, SUN Xuefeng, WANG Shejiang, XU Xinghua, ZENG Qiongxuan, LU Yiming, LU Huayu. Pedostratigraphy and luminescence dating of the newly discovered Paleolithic sites along the Hanjiang River Valley, Central China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 319-333. |
[7] | YI Wenwen, WEI Xingtao, YANG Yuzhang, YAO Ling, LAN Wanli, ZHANG Xiaohu, ZHANG Juzhong. An analysis of the starch grains from the Zhangwangzhuang site of early Yangshao culture [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 867-878. |
[8] | HE Xinlong, MEI Hongcheng, WAMG Jifen, ZHU Jun, GUO Pengran, HU Can, HE Ya, GONG Xiaoxiao, HU Zhanlun. Comparison of stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen in fingernails of the residents in Hotan, Hami and Altai, Xinjiang [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 888-894. |
[9] | ZHOU Yawei, ZHANG Xiaoran, GU Wanfa. A study of skull morphology of Yangshao Culture residents from the Sunzhuang site in Zhengzhou [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(04): 611-627. |
[10] | YANG Luya, ZHU Jian, YUE Chaolong, TANG Jigeng. Classification and analysis of micro wears in the jade tunnels of Yin Ruins [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(02): 249-260. |
[11] | ZHOU Yawei, ZHANG Xiaoran, GU Wanfa. Teeth abrasion and health status of Yangshao culture residents in the Wanggou site, Zhengzhou [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 49-62. |
[12] | BIE Jingjing, WANG Shejiang, XIA Nan, LU Huayu, WANG Xianyan, YI Shuangwen, XIA Wenting, ZHANG Gaike, Mathew L FOX, ZHANG Hongyan, ZHUO Haixin, ZHANG Wenchao. Lithic artifacts excavated from the Jinshuihekou site in the Hanzhong Basin, Shaanxi Province, China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(03): 344-361. |
[13] | XIA Wenting, WANG Shejiang, XIA Nan, LU Huayu, WANG Xianyan, SUN Xuefeng, ZHANG Hongyan, ZHANG Wenchao, ZHUO Haixing, XING Luda, YU Qingyao, FENG Wuming. Lithic artifacts excavated from Locality 3 of the Longgangsi site in Hanzhong Basin, Shaanxi Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(04): 529-541. |
[14] | YU Keli, ZHENG Lianbin, LI Yonglan. Ethnographic type of Dai in Xishuangbanna: Data from anthropometrics [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2017, 36(04): 553-560. |
[15] | LI Hao, LI Chaorong, Kathleen KUMAN, ZHOU Xingming, WANG Gang. Field investigation report of the Paleolithic sites discovered in the fourth terraces of the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2017, 36(02): 145-153. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||