Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 51-56.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0005
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Tongjun1,2(), XIANG Jianmei3, TENG Shaokang1,2(), LUO Baoying1,2, HUANG Zhongqing1,2, LI Xiaoliang1, HUANG Liping1, CHEN Huihua1,2, XIE Jiyu4
Received:
2020-04-13
Online:
2022-02-15
Published:
2021-04-09
Contact:
TENG Shaokang
E-mail:cctj1122@sina.com;441392021@qq.com
CLC Number:
CHEN Tongjun, XIANG Jianmei, TENG Shaokang, LUO Baoying, HUANG Zhongqing, LI Xiaoliang, HUANG Liping, CHEN Huihua, XIE Jiyu. Finger length ratio of Han and She peoples in Southern Fujian[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(01): 51-56.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0005
指长比 Digit ratio | 汉族 Han ($\bar{X}\pm \sigma$) | 畲族 She ($\bar{X}\pm \sigma$) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 Male(n=231) | 女 Female(n=333) | 男 Male(n=231) | 女 Female(n=219) | ||
左 Left | R2/3 | 0.878±0.028 | 0.884±0.030* | 0.886±0.039* | 0.899±0.061△▲ |
R2/4 | 0.946±0.041 | 0.959±0.044* | 0.958±0.049* | 0.972±0.067△▲ | |
R2/5 | 1.195±0.069 | 1.223±0.091* | 1.222±0.082* | 1.239±0.108△ | |
R3/4 | 1.077±0.034 | 1.084±0.034* | 1.080±0.035 | 1.082±0.039 | |
R3/5 | 1.362±0.072 | 1.383±0.101* | 1.379±0.083* | 1.380±0.934 | |
R4/5 | 1.263±0.057 | 1.276±0.090 | 1.276±0.064* | 1.276±0.755 | |
右 Right | R2/3 | 0.886±0.032# | 0.892±0.030#* | 0.894±0.037#* | 0.908±0.04#△▲ |
R2/4 | 0.953±0.046 | 0.962±0.043* | 0.969±0.051#* | 0.980±0.055△▲ | |
R2/5 | 1.209±0.076 | 1.225±0.086* | 1.244±0.092#* | 1.260±1.102#▲ | |
R3/4 | 1.076±0.036 | 1.078±0.033# | 1.083±0.036 | 1.079±0.035 | |
R3/5 | 1.366±0.077 | 1.373±0.082 | 1.391±0.091* | 1.387±0.091 | |
R4/5 | 1.269±0.059 | 1.273±0.066 | 1.284±0.065* | 1.286±0.078▲ |
Tab.1 Mean and standard deviation of digit ratio of Han and She ethnic groups in southern Fujian
指长比 Digit ratio | 汉族 Han ($\bar{X}\pm \sigma$) | 畲族 She ($\bar{X}\pm \sigma$) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 Male(n=231) | 女 Female(n=333) | 男 Male(n=231) | 女 Female(n=219) | ||
左 Left | R2/3 | 0.878±0.028 | 0.884±0.030* | 0.886±0.039* | 0.899±0.061△▲ |
R2/4 | 0.946±0.041 | 0.959±0.044* | 0.958±0.049* | 0.972±0.067△▲ | |
R2/5 | 1.195±0.069 | 1.223±0.091* | 1.222±0.082* | 1.239±0.108△ | |
R3/4 | 1.077±0.034 | 1.084±0.034* | 1.080±0.035 | 1.082±0.039 | |
R3/5 | 1.362±0.072 | 1.383±0.101* | 1.379±0.083* | 1.380±0.934 | |
R4/5 | 1.263±0.057 | 1.276±0.090 | 1.276±0.064* | 1.276±0.755 | |
右 Right | R2/3 | 0.886±0.032# | 0.892±0.030#* | 0.894±0.037#* | 0.908±0.04#△▲ |
R2/4 | 0.953±0.046 | 0.962±0.043* | 0.969±0.051#* | 0.980±0.055△▲ | |
R2/5 | 1.209±0.076 | 1.225±0.086* | 1.244±0.092#* | 1.260±1.102#▲ | |
R3/4 | 1.076±0.036 | 1.078±0.033# | 1.083±0.036 | 1.079±0.035 | |
R3/5 | 1.366±0.077 | 1.373±0.082 | 1.391±0.091* | 1.387±0.091 | |
R4/5 | 1.269±0.059 | 1.273±0.066 | 1.284±0.065* | 1.286±0.078▲ |
组别 Groups | 总计Total | 左侧 Left | 右侧 Right | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2>L4 | L2=L4 | L2<L4 | L2>L4 | L2=L4 | L2<L4 | ||||
汉族Han | 男 Male | 例数 n | 173 | 16 | 6 | 151 | 20 | 7 | 146 |
占比% | 100% | 9.25% | 3.47% | 87.28% | 11.56% | 4.05% | 84.39% | ||
女 Female | 例数 n | 333 | 58 | 8 | 267 | 69 | 14 | 250 | |
占比% | 100% | 17.42% | 2.40% | 80.18% | 20.72% | 4.20% | 75.08% | ||
畲族She | 男 Male | 例数 n | 231 | 33 | 14 | 184 | 49 | 15 | 167 |
占比% | 100% | 14.29% | 6.06% | 79.65% | 21.21% | 6.49% | 72.30% | ||
女Female | 例数 n | 219 | 44 | 5 | 170 | 69 | 10 | 140 | |
占比% | 100% | 20.09% | 2.28% | 77.63% | 31.51% | 4.57% | 63.92% |
Tab.2 The proportion of distribution of R2/4 of Han and She ethnic groups in southern Fujian
组别 Groups | 总计Total | 左侧 Left | 右侧 Right | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2>L4 | L2=L4 | L2<L4 | L2>L4 | L2=L4 | L2<L4 | ||||
汉族Han | 男 Male | 例数 n | 173 | 16 | 6 | 151 | 20 | 7 | 146 |
占比% | 100% | 9.25% | 3.47% | 87.28% | 11.56% | 4.05% | 84.39% | ||
女 Female | 例数 n | 333 | 58 | 8 | 267 | 69 | 14 | 250 | |
占比% | 100% | 17.42% | 2.40% | 80.18% | 20.72% | 4.20% | 75.08% | ||
畲族She | 男 Male | 例数 n | 231 | 33 | 14 | 184 | 49 | 15 | 167 |
占比% | 100% | 14.29% | 6.06% | 79.65% | 21.21% | 6.49% | 72.30% | ||
女Female | 例数 n | 219 | 44 | 5 | 170 | 69 | 10 | 140 | |
占比% | 100% | 20.09% | 2.28% | 77.63% | 31.51% | 4.57% | 63.92% |
人群 Groups | 男性 Male | 例数 n | 女性 Female | 例数 n | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
英格兰 England | 0.980 | 189 | 0.990 | 214 | [ |
印度 India | 0.940 | 80 | 0.960 | 80 | [ |
南非祖鲁 Zulu | 0.940 | 66 | 0.965 | 72 | [ |
巴基斯坦 Pakistan | 0.958 | 42 | 0.978 | 44 | [ |
波兰 Poland | 0.975 | 173 | 0.985 | 76 | [ |
土耳其 Turkish | - | - | 0.980 | 133 | [ |
伊朗 Iran | - | - | 0.958 | 150 | [ |
阿富汗 Afghanistan | - | - | 0.959 | 150 | [ |
辽宁汉族 Liaoning Han | 0.961 | 270 | 0.967 | 458 | [ |
拉萨藏族 Lasa Zang | 0.907 | 682 | 0.915 | 683 | [ |
云南哈尼族 Yunnan Hani | 0.940 | 275 | 0.944 | 259 | [ |
云南布依族 Yunnan Bouyei | 0.961 | 153 | 0.985 | 159 | [ |
贵州毛南族 Guizhou Maonan | 0.940 | 132 | 0.955 | 415 | [ |
贵州汉族 Guizhou Han | 0.943 | 132 | 0.955 | 412 | [ |
宁夏回族 Ningxia Hui | 0. 946 | 193 | 0.957 | 198 | [ |
宁夏汉族 Ningxia Han | 0. 948 | 241 | 0.958 | 219 | [ |
福建闽南汉族 Han in southern Fujian | 0.950 | 173 | 0.961 | 333 | |
福建闽南畲族 She in southern Fujian | 0.964 | 231 | 0.976 | 219 |
Tab.3 The R2/4 mean values of Han and She ethnic groups among female in southern Fujian and different countries and region
人群 Groups | 男性 Male | 例数 n | 女性 Female | 例数 n | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
英格兰 England | 0.980 | 189 | 0.990 | 214 | [ |
印度 India | 0.940 | 80 | 0.960 | 80 | [ |
南非祖鲁 Zulu | 0.940 | 66 | 0.965 | 72 | [ |
巴基斯坦 Pakistan | 0.958 | 42 | 0.978 | 44 | [ |
波兰 Poland | 0.975 | 173 | 0.985 | 76 | [ |
土耳其 Turkish | - | - | 0.980 | 133 | [ |
伊朗 Iran | - | - | 0.958 | 150 | [ |
阿富汗 Afghanistan | - | - | 0.959 | 150 | [ |
辽宁汉族 Liaoning Han | 0.961 | 270 | 0.967 | 458 | [ |
拉萨藏族 Lasa Zang | 0.907 | 682 | 0.915 | 683 | [ |
云南哈尼族 Yunnan Hani | 0.940 | 275 | 0.944 | 259 | [ |
云南布依族 Yunnan Bouyei | 0.961 | 153 | 0.985 | 159 | [ |
贵州毛南族 Guizhou Maonan | 0.940 | 132 | 0.955 | 415 | [ |
贵州汉族 Guizhou Han | 0.943 | 132 | 0.955 | 412 | [ |
宁夏回族 Ningxia Hui | 0. 946 | 193 | 0.957 | 198 | [ |
宁夏汉族 Ningxia Han | 0. 948 | 241 | 0.958 | 219 | [ |
福建闽南汉族 Han in southern Fujian | 0.950 | 173 | 0.961 | 333 | |
福建闽南畲族 She in southern Fujian | 0.964 | 231 | 0.976 | 219 |
[1] | 罗桐秀, 黄春霞. 人类HOX基因改变导致肢体畸形的研究进展[J]. 国外医学遗传学分册, 2005, 28(2): 105-108 |
[2] |
Manning JT, Callow M, Bundred PE. Finger and toe ratios in humans and mice: implications for the aetiology of diseases influenced by HOX gene[J]. Med Hypotheses, 2003, 60(3): 340-343
pmid: 12581609 |
[3] |
Ertuğrul B, Özener B, Pawłowski B. Prenatal exposure to oestrogens estimated by digit ratio (2d/4d) and breast size in young nulliparous women[J]. Annals of human biology, 2020, 47(1): 81-84
doi: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1699955 pmid: 31830808 |
[4] |
Manning J, Cook C, Crewther B. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and testosterone supplementations[J]. Early Human Development, 2019, 139: 104843
doi: S0378-3782(19)30354-8 pmid: 31493670 |
[5] |
Lu H, Ma ZB, Shi ZY, et al. Digit ratio (2D:4D) in Chinese women with breast cancer[J]. Am J Hum Biol, 2014, 26(4): 562-564
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22546 URL |
[6] |
Kasielska-Trojan A, Stabryła P, Antoszewski B. Can body proportions serve as a predictor of risk-taking behaviours in women and men?[J]. J Biosoc Sci, 2017, 49(5): 567-577
doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000420 pmid: 27573972 |
[7] |
Abbo O, Ferdynus C, Kalfa N, et al. Male infants with hypospadias and/or cryptorchidism show a lower 2D/4D digit ratio than normal boys[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2015, 100(7): 643-647
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306454 pmid: 25688099 |
[8] |
Wu XL, Yang DY, Chai WH, et al. The ratio of second to fourth digit length (2D:4D) and coronary artery disease in a Han Chinese population[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2013, 10(11): 1584-1588
doi: 10.7150/ijms.6360 URL |
[9] | Bunevicius A. The association of digit ratio (2D:4D) with cancer: a systematic review and meta -analysis[J]. Disease Markers, 2018, 2018: 1-9 |
[10] | Manning JT, Barley L, Walton J, et al. The 2nd: 4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?[J]. Evol Hum Behav, 2000, 2(3): 163-183 |
[11] |
Manning JT, Henzi P, Venkatramana P, et al. Second to fourth digit ratio: ethnic differences and family size in English, Indian and South African populations[J]. Ann Human Biol, 2003, 30(5): 579-588
doi: 10.1080/0301446032000112689 URL |
[12] | Zirik KM, Hammad MM, Roshaan A. 2D:4D digit ratios in males and females and its correlation with simple reaction time: A cross sectional Study at Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Lahore, Pakistan[J]. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2019, 69(11): 1714-1716 |
[13] |
Marek K, Raja C, Zofia I, et al. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the change in handgrip strength on an aggressive stimulus: A study among Polish young adults[J]. Early Human Development, 2019, 128: 62-68
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.11.009 URL |
[14] |
Hamid AA, Babak F, Mina A, et al. Digit ratios and motor and health-related fitness in pre-adolescent females[J]. Annals of Human Biology, 2019, 46(3): 225-230
doi: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1620332 URL |
[15] | 席焕久, 胡荣, 温有锋, 等. 辽宁汉族指长及指长比特点[J]. 解剖学报, 2010, 41(2): 447-479 |
[16] | 李明, 席焕久, 任甫, 等. 拉萨藏族青少年左手指长比和指长/身高的特点[J]. 解剖学杂志, 2009, 32(2): 260-262 |
[17] | Zhao D, Yu K, Zhang X, et al. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and handgrip strength in Hani ethnicity[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(10): 77958 |
[18] | 李建富, 骆文斌, 余跃生. 布依族群体指长比的研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2011, 38(1): 97-99 |
[19] | 陈芳, 余跃生, 李建富, 等. 贵州毛南族儿童指长比的研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2012, 39(21): 5549-5551 |
[20] | 张庆忠, 李湄红, 龙思方. 贵州汉族学生指长比遗传特点[J]. 生物学通报, 2012, 47(8): 4-6 |
[21] | 陆宏, 霍正浩, 师志云, 等. 宁夏回族和汉族群体指长比的研究[J]. 解剖学报, 2008, 39(2): 267-271 |
[22] | 张兴华, 郑连斌, 宇克莉, 等. 闽南人的体质特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 516-527 |
[23] | 禄佳妮, 王传超. 分子人类学视域中畲族族源新探[J]. 北方民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2019(1): 98-107 |
[24] | 邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1985 |
[25] |
Zheng Z, Cohn MJ. Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108(39): 16289-16294
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108312108 URL |
[26] |
Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2004, 77(1-2): 23-28
pmid: 15113628 |
[27] |
Brown WM, Hines M, Fane BA, et al. Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia[J]. Horm Behav, 2002, 42(4): 380-386
doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1830 URL |
[28] |
Mclntyre MH, Cohn BA, Ellison PT. Sex dimorphism in digital formulae of children[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2006, 129(1): 143-150
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644 URL |
[1] | HUANG Ming, ZUO Zhiqiang, LI Hao, GAO Yu, SUN Xuefeng, LI Guo, XIAO Peiyuan. An excavation report of the Locality 1 of Wangjiayan Paleolithic site, Chengdu [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(04): 514-522. |
[2] | PENG Fei, TIE Weidong, QIN Bin, WANG Huiming, GAO Xing. New discoveries from the Nansi Canyon Paleolithic site, Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(04): 531-539. |
[3] | SUN Lei, LI Yanzhen, WU Zhijiang. Craniofacial morphology of human remains from the Zhanmatun site of the late Yangshao Period [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 331-341. |
[4] | ZHAO Wenjie, JIA Zhenxiu, LI Sanling, LI Hao. A report of the 2020 excavation of the Shanghu Paleolithic site in Gaoan city, Jiangxi Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 373-380. |
[5] | LI Sanling, LI Xuedong, GUO Junliang, DU Shuisheng. A preliminary report of the Shengwangping Paleolithic site in Xicheng Mountain, Shanxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 390-397. |
[6] | MEI Huijie, ZHANG Bei, LEI Huarui, TONG Haowen. Antler fossil of Sinomegaceros ordosianus from Nanbaishan site of Late Pleistocene age in Yüxian, Hebei Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 225-237. |
[7] | FAN Wentian, YANG Xiaodong. A preliminary report on the excavation of Nanshangen Paleolithic Locality in the Nihewan Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 260-271. |
[8] | YANG Shixia, HUAN Faxiang, WANG Hong, WU Zhenyu, LU Xiaohong, LI Jingya. Reduction strategy of the microblade cores from the Xiqiaoshan site in Guangdong [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 804-815. |
[9] | GE Lihua, ZHU Chao, AN Jingping, WANG Zhenxiang, JIN Guiyun. Subsistence economy model reflected by phytolith from the Chengziya site [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 883-898. |
[10] | LYU Houyuan. Periodic climate change and human adaptation [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(04): 731-748. |
[11] | XIA Wenting, WANG Shejiang, WANG Xianyan, LU Huayu, XIA Nan, ZHANG Gaike, BIE Jingjing, YANG Xun, WU Jiang. A preliminary report on the Fanba paleolithic site at Yangxian County, Hanzhong Basin, central China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(03): 381-393. |
[12] | YANG Miao-miao, HU Song-mei, GUO Xiaoning, WANG Weilin, YANG Tong. Research on the faunal remains from Muzhuzhuliang Site in Shenmu city Shaanxi Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(03): 394-405. |
[13] | YANG Shiyu, ZHANG Qun, WANG Long, ZHANG Quanchao. Dental microwear analysis of human teeth in Shengjindian cemetery, Turpan, Xinjiang [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 218-225. |
[14] | WEI Pianpian, ZHANG Quanchao. Biomechanical comparison of the middle femur between the Tuchengzi agricultural people and the Jinggouzi nomadic people from Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 238-247. |
[15] | SHI Chongyang, GUO Yi. Discussion on the utilization of fishery resources by the ancestors of Tianluoshan and liangwangcheng sites based on the diet analysis [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 308-318. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||