Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (02): 177-190.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0011
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUAN Faxiang1,2(), YANG Shixia1(), CHEN Wei3, CHEN Weiju2, ZHU Lidong4, ZHANG Yuxiu5
Received:
2021-06-29
Revised:
2021-12-01
Online:
2023-04-15
Published:
2023-04-03
CLC Number:
HUAN Faxiang, YANG Shixia, CHEN Wei, CHEN Weiju, ZHU Lidong, ZHANG Yuxiu. A restudy of stone artifacts from the Fulin site in Hanyuan, Sichuan[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 177-190.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2022.0011
类型Class | 数量Quantity(n) | 占比Percentage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
锤击产品Hard-hammer percussion product | 1823 | 93.97% | ||
石片石核Flake core | 108 | 5.57% | ||
锤击石片Hard-hammer percussion flake | 1498 | 77.22 | ||
完整石片Complete flake | 1352 | 69.69% | ||
石片断片Broken flake | 146 | 7.53% | ||
似石叶石核Bladelet-like core | 32 | 1.65% | ||
锤击似石叶Hard-hammer percussion bladelet-like | 185 | 9.54% | ||
完整似石叶Complete bladelet-like | 156 | 8.04% | ||
似石叶断片Broken bladelet-like | 29 | 1.49% | ||
砸击产品Bipolar product | 11 | 0.57% | ||
砸击石核Bipolar core | 1 | 0.05% | ||
砸击石片Bipolar flake | 5 | 0.26% | ||
砸击似石叶Bipolar bladelet-like | 5 | 0.26% | ||
完整似石叶Complete bladelet-like | 4 | 0.21% | ||
似石叶断片Broken bladelet-like | 1 | 0.05% | ||
石器Tool | 90 | 4.64% | ||
刮削器Scraper | 53 | 2.73% | ||
凹缺器Notch | 6 | 0.31% | ||
钻Borer | 6 | 0.31% | ||
尖状器Point | 2 | 0.10% | ||
雕刻器Burin | 2 | 0.10% | ||
未定名石器/Unidentified tool | 21 | 1.08% | ||
石锤/Hammer | 3 | 0.15% | ||
断块/Chunk | 10 | 0.52% | ||
碎屑/Debris | 3 | 0.15% | ||
总计/Total | 1940 | 100% |
Tab.1 Technological composition of the Fulin lithic assemblage
类型Class | 数量Quantity(n) | 占比Percentage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
锤击产品Hard-hammer percussion product | 1823 | 93.97% | ||
石片石核Flake core | 108 | 5.57% | ||
锤击石片Hard-hammer percussion flake | 1498 | 77.22 | ||
完整石片Complete flake | 1352 | 69.69% | ||
石片断片Broken flake | 146 | 7.53% | ||
似石叶石核Bladelet-like core | 32 | 1.65% | ||
锤击似石叶Hard-hammer percussion bladelet-like | 185 | 9.54% | ||
完整似石叶Complete bladelet-like | 156 | 8.04% | ||
似石叶断片Broken bladelet-like | 29 | 1.49% | ||
砸击产品Bipolar product | 11 | 0.57% | ||
砸击石核Bipolar core | 1 | 0.05% | ||
砸击石片Bipolar flake | 5 | 0.26% | ||
砸击似石叶Bipolar bladelet-like | 5 | 0.26% | ||
完整似石叶Complete bladelet-like | 4 | 0.21% | ||
似石叶断片Broken bladelet-like | 1 | 0.05% | ||
石器Tool | 90 | 4.64% | ||
刮削器Scraper | 53 | 2.73% | ||
凹缺器Notch | 6 | 0.31% | ||
钻Borer | 6 | 0.31% | ||
尖状器Point | 2 | 0.10% | ||
雕刻器Burin | 2 | 0.10% | ||
未定名石器/Unidentified tool | 21 | 1.08% | ||
石锤/Hammer | 3 | 0.15% | ||
断块/Chunk | 10 | 0.52% | ||
碎屑/Debris | 3 | 0.15% | ||
总计/Total | 1940 | 100% |
项目Item | 单台面石核(n=29)Single platform core | 双台面石核(n=14)Double platform core | 多台面石核(n=29) Multiple platform core | 耗尽石核(n=15)Polyhedral core | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | Mean | |
长L(mm) | 215.00 | 10.72 | 27.80 | 125.56 | 10.98 | 25.93 | 94.81 | 7.48 | 21.51 | 23.32 | 8.36 | 14.86 |
宽b(mm) | 210.00 | 15.21 | 39.73 | 79.40 | 16.42 | 30.90 | 90.13 | 15.91 | 28.34 | 23.36 | 10.23 | 17.04 |
厚d(mm) | 95.56 | 8.07 | 29.83 | 43.01 | 8.48 | 18.43 | 60.25 | 10.77 | 20.55 | 15.20 | 7.06 | 11.30 |
质量Mass(g) | >5000 | 3.21 | 228.86 | 557.5 | 2.03 | 49.30 | 590.80 | 2.00 | 34.39 | 4.15 | 1.43 | 3.01 |
剥片数量scars(n) | 10 | 1 | 4.10 | 10 | 3 | 6.07 | 13 | 4 | 7.17 | 13 | 5 | 9.6 |
最终片疤长L of scars(mm) | 56.80 | 4.16 | 15.84 | 22.18 | 6.62 | 13.18 | 28.58 | 5.64 | 12.62 | 12.11 | 3.80 | 7.95 |
最终片疤宽b of scars(mm) | 65.13 | 4.59 | 15.54 | 35.62 | 7.00 | 13.87 | 27.27 | 4.51 | 12.39 | 10.82 | 3.35 | 6.65 |
Tab.2 Flake-like cores from the Fulin site
项目Item | 单台面石核(n=29)Single platform core | 双台面石核(n=14)Double platform core | 多台面石核(n=29) Multiple platform core | 耗尽石核(n=15)Polyhedral core | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | Mean | |
长L(mm) | 215.00 | 10.72 | 27.80 | 125.56 | 10.98 | 25.93 | 94.81 | 7.48 | 21.51 | 23.32 | 8.36 | 14.86 |
宽b(mm) | 210.00 | 15.21 | 39.73 | 79.40 | 16.42 | 30.90 | 90.13 | 15.91 | 28.34 | 23.36 | 10.23 | 17.04 |
厚d(mm) | 95.56 | 8.07 | 29.83 | 43.01 | 8.48 | 18.43 | 60.25 | 10.77 | 20.55 | 15.20 | 7.06 | 11.30 |
质量Mass(g) | >5000 | 3.21 | 228.86 | 557.5 | 2.03 | 49.30 | 590.80 | 2.00 | 34.39 | 4.15 | 1.43 | 3.01 |
剥片数量scars(n) | 10 | 1 | 4.10 | 10 | 3 | 6.07 | 13 | 4 | 7.17 | 13 | 5 | 9.6 |
最终片疤长L of scars(mm) | 56.80 | 4.16 | 15.84 | 22.18 | 6.62 | 13.18 | 28.58 | 5.64 | 12.62 | 12.11 | 3.80 | 7.95 |
最终片疤宽b of scars(mm) | 65.13 | 4.59 | 15.54 | 35.62 | 7.00 | 13.87 | 27.27 | 4.51 | 12.39 | 10.82 | 3.35 | 6.65 |
项目Item | 单台面石核Single platform core(n=16) | 双台面石核Double platform core(n=8) | 多台面石核Multiple platform core(n=8) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xmax | Xmin | Xave | Xmax | Xmin | Xave | Xmax | Xmin | Xave | |||
长L(mm) | 21.20 | 10.15 | 16.03 | 27.79 | 10.69 | 17.14 | 28.01 | 11.33 | 18.28 | ||
宽b(mm) | 38.88 | 16.58 | 24.54 | 39.47 | 18.01 | 26.17 | 40.1 | 16.52 | 26.33 | ||
厚d(mm) | 29.35 | 8.71 | 15.76 | 23.86 | 9.81 | 16.58 | 42.68 | 9.81 | 22.80 | ||
质量Mass(g) | 13.47 | 3.12 | 6.49 | 19.34 | 2.96 | 8.26 | 48.52 | 3.14 | 14.49 | ||
剥片数量scars(n) | 7 | 2 | 4.88 | 11 | 5 | 7.13 | 12 | 5 | 8.63 | ||
最终片疤长L of scars(mm) | 16.86 | 7.21 | 11.98 | 14.33 | 9.33 | 11.73 | 23.2 | 8.81 | 13.13 | ||
最终片疤宽b of scars(mm) | 13.74 | 3.20 | 7.35 | 10.51 | 4.02 | 6.95 | 13.71 | 4.53 | 7.82 |
Tab.3 Bladelet-like cores from the Fulin site
项目Item | 单台面石核Single platform core(n=16) | 双台面石核Double platform core(n=8) | 多台面石核Multiple platform core(n=8) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xmax | Xmin | Xave | Xmax | Xmin | Xave | Xmax | Xmin | Xave | |||
长L(mm) | 21.20 | 10.15 | 16.03 | 27.79 | 10.69 | 17.14 | 28.01 | 11.33 | 18.28 | ||
宽b(mm) | 38.88 | 16.58 | 24.54 | 39.47 | 18.01 | 26.17 | 40.1 | 16.52 | 26.33 | ||
厚d(mm) | 29.35 | 8.71 | 15.76 | 23.86 | 9.81 | 16.58 | 42.68 | 9.81 | 22.80 | ||
质量Mass(g) | 13.47 | 3.12 | 6.49 | 19.34 | 2.96 | 8.26 | 48.52 | 3.14 | 14.49 | ||
剥片数量scars(n) | 7 | 2 | 4.88 | 11 | 5 | 7.13 | 12 | 5 | 8.63 | ||
最终片疤长L of scars(mm) | 16.86 | 7.21 | 11.98 | 14.33 | 9.33 | 11.73 | 23.2 | 8.81 | 13.13 | ||
最终片疤宽b of scars(mm) | 13.74 | 3.20 | 7.35 | 10.51 | 4.02 | 6.95 | 13.71 | 4.53 | 7.82 |
Lmax(mm) | Lmin(mm) | Lave(mm) | bmax(mm) | bmin(mm) | bave(mm) | dmax(mm) | dmin(mm) | dave(mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
刮削器Scraper(n=53) | 50.38 | 8.07 | 19.13 | 75.86 | 9.37 | 23.04 | 23.11 | 1.70 | 9.24 |
凹缺器Notch(n=6) | 28.51 | 8.07 | 17.77 | 31.82 | 15.44 | 20.76 | 14.75 | 3.38 | 7.33 |
钻Borer(n=6) | 27.01 | 13.26 | 20.20 | 24.54 | 10.65 | 16.27 | 12.02 | 6.10 | 8.08 |
尖状器Point(n=2) | 24.13 | 18.67 | 21.40 | 18.43 | 14.66 | 16.55 | 10.10 | 5.47 | 7.79 |
雕刻器Burin(n=2) | 18.66 | 12.26 | 15.46 | 10.48 | 10.25 | 10.37 | 4.16 | 3.77 | 3.97 |
未定名石器Unidentified tool(n=21) | 24.51 | 5.50 | 15.38 | 31.41 | 7.79 | 20.41 | 11.51 | 3.17 | 7.17 |
Tab.4 Sizes of stone tools from the Fulin site
Lmax(mm) | Lmin(mm) | Lave(mm) | bmax(mm) | bmin(mm) | bave(mm) | dmax(mm) | dmin(mm) | dave(mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
刮削器Scraper(n=53) | 50.38 | 8.07 | 19.13 | 75.86 | 9.37 | 23.04 | 23.11 | 1.70 | 9.24 |
凹缺器Notch(n=6) | 28.51 | 8.07 | 17.77 | 31.82 | 15.44 | 20.76 | 14.75 | 3.38 | 7.33 |
钻Borer(n=6) | 27.01 | 13.26 | 20.20 | 24.54 | 10.65 | 16.27 | 12.02 | 6.10 | 8.08 |
尖状器Point(n=2) | 24.13 | 18.67 | 21.40 | 18.43 | 14.66 | 16.55 | 10.10 | 5.47 | 7.79 |
雕刻器Burin(n=2) | 18.66 | 12.26 | 15.46 | 10.48 | 10.25 | 10.37 | 4.16 | 3.77 | 3.97 |
未定名石器Unidentified tool(n=21) | 24.51 | 5.50 | 15.38 | 31.41 | 7.79 | 20.41 | 11.51 | 3.17 | 7.17 |
[1] | 杨玲. 四川汉源县富林镇旧石器时代文化遗址[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1961, 4: 353-359 |
[2] | 张森水. 富林文化[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1977, 15(1): 14-27+83-85 |
[3] | 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器时代考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 3: 193-214 |
[4] | 王幼平. 中国南方与东南亚旧石器工业的比较[A].见:北京大学考古系(编).考古学研究(三)[C].北京:科学出版社, 1997: 1-18 |
[5] | 张森水. 中国北方旧石器工业的区域渐进与文化交流[J]. 人类学学报, 1990, 4: 322-333 |
[6] |
Xie GM, Lin Q, Wu Y, et al. The Late Paleolithic industries of southern China (Lingnan region)[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 535: 21-28
doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.043 URL |
[7] | 张森水. 我国南方旧石器时代晚期文化的若干问题[J]. 人类学学报, 1983, 3: 218-230 |
[8] | 王幼平. 石器技术与早期人类的迁徙扩散[A].见:北京大学考古文博学院,北京大学中国考古学研究中心(编).考古学研究(十一)[C]. 2019: 1-12 |
[9] | 李英华, 周玉端, 郝思德, 等. 海南三亚落笔洞遗址石器工业新研究——与东南亚和平文化遗址的比较[J]. 考古, 2020, 1: 68-81 |
[10] | 李英华, 林美蓉, 邓鸿山, 等. 越南和平文化石器技术分析及对华南东南亚砾石石器工业研究的启示[J]. 南方文物, 2020, 5: 90-105 |
[11] | 王幼平. 砾石工业传统与华南旧石器晚期文化[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 91-97 |
[12] | 王幼平. 中国南方旧石器时代考古:进展与问题[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 55-61 |
[13] | 邓婉文. 晚更新世末岭南及越南北部的石器工业[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 134-141 |
[14] |
Li YH, Lam T, Deng HS, et al. New technological analysis on Vietnamese Hoabinhian stone artifacts and its implication on examination of cultural homogeneity and variability between mainland southeast Asia and South China[J]. Asian Perspectives, 2021, 60(1): 71-96
doi: 10.1353/asi.2020.0037 URL |
[15] |
Li YH, Hao SD, Huang WB, et al. Luobi Cave, South China: A comparative perspective on a novel cobble-tool industry associated with bone tool technology during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2019, 32(2): 143-178
doi: 10.1007/s10963-019-09130-3 |
[16] | 刘吉颖, 黄永梁, 陈虹. 石制品研究中的定量分析方法:组合间对比[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(3): 331-343 |
[17] | 李浩. 中国旧石器时代早、中期石器技术多样性研究的新进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 602-612 |
[18] | 黄超, 张双权. 旧石器遗址出土烧骨的技术分析及其考古学的启示[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 249-260 |
[19] | 沈辰, 陈淳. 微痕研究(低倍法)的探索与实践——兼谈小长梁遗址石制品的微痕观察[J]. 考古, 2001, 7: 62-73+103-104 |
[20] | 何锟宇, 丁燕飞. 四川盆地旧石器时代晚期石器工业[J]. 华夏考古, 2013, 4: 27-33+77 |
[21] | 陈苇, 李勤学, 成婷, 等. 四川汉源县富林遗址发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2020, 5: 4-12+2 |
[22] | 马东东, 裴树文. 旧石器时代砸击法剥片技术相关问题探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 584-597 |
[23] |
Diez-Martín F, Yustos PS, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, et al. An experimental study of bipolar and freehand knapping of Naibor Soit quartz from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania)[J]. American Antiquity, 2011, 76(4): 690-708
doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.76.4.690 URL |
[24] | 李锋. 石叶概念探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(1): 41-50 |
[25] | Shi F, Lu HY, Guo ZT, et al. The position of the current warm period in the context of the past 22,000 years of summer climate in China[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(5): e2020GL091940 |
[26] | 余官玥, 仪明洁, 张晓凌, 等. 水洞沟地区白云岩细石叶的微痕实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 193-207 |
[27] | 高星, 沈辰. 石器微痕分析的考古学实验研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008 |
[28] |
Bar-Yosef O, Kuhn SL. The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution[J]. American Anthropologist, 1999, 101(2): 322-338
doi: 10.1525/aa.1999.101.issue-2 URL |
[29] |
Pargeter J, Shea JJ. Going big versus going small: Lithic miniaturization in hominin lithic technology[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2019, 28(1): 72-85
doi: 10.1002/evan.v28.2 URL |
[30] | 王仁湘. 四川广元市中子铺细石器遗存[J]. 考古, 1991, 4: 289-299 |
[31] | 张兴永. 三十年来云南发现的古猿、古人类和旧石器[J]. 史前研究, 1983, 2: 23-33 |
[32] | 陈卫东, 郑万泉, 赵建, 等. 四川宣汉县罗家坝遗址2015-2016年度新石器时代遗存发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2018, 4: 5-17+2 |
[33] | 曹桂梅, 陈学志, 李俊, 等. 四川金川县刘家寨遗址调查简报[J]. 四川文物, 2012, 5: 3-7 |
[34] | 傅宪国, 付永旭, 张兴龙, 等. 贵州贵安新区牛坡洞遗址[J]. 考古, 2017, 7: 3-17 |
[35] | 陈祖军, 雷雨, 代强, 等. 雅安沙溪遗址发掘及调查报告[A].见:四川大学博物馆,四川大学考古学系,成都市文物考古研究所.南方民族考古(第3辑)[C].北京:科学出版社, 1991: 293-339 |
[36] | 陈显双, 札西次仁. 四川炉霍卡莎湖石棺墓[J]. 考古学报, 1991, 2: 207-238+273-278 |
[37] |
Pargeter J, Faith JT. Lithic miniaturization as adaptive strategy: A case study from Boomplaas Cave, South Africa[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12(9): 183-374
doi: 10.1007/s12520-020-01135-w |
[38] | 封剑平. 湖南澧县十里岗旧石器时代晚期地点[A].见:英德市博物馆,中山大学人类学系,广东省博物馆(编).中石器文化及有关问题研讨会论文集[C].广州:广东人民出版社, 1999: 284-291 |
[39] | 李意愿. 十里岗遗址石制品微痕初步研究[A].见:湖南省文物考古研究所(编).湖南考古辑刊(第12集)[C].北京:科学出版社, 2016: 196-214 |
[40] | 李意愿. 湖南澧县彭头山遗址燧石石制品的技术、功能与相关问题[J]. 江汉考古, 2017, 6: 42-51 |
[41] | 湖南省文物考古研究所. 彭头山与八十垱[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006 |
[42] | 李意愿. 石器工业与适应行为——澧水流域晚更新世古人类文化研究[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2020 |
[43] | 曹泽田. 猫猫洞旧石器之研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1982, 2: 155-164+189-192 |
[44] | 曹泽田. 兴义猫猫洞文化[J]. 贵州文史丛刊, 1981, 3: 106-109 |
[45] | 北京大学考古文博学院, 江西省文物考古研究所. 仙人洞与吊桶环[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014 |
[46] | 王幼平. 华南晚更新世晚期人类行为复杂化的个案——江西万年吊桶环遗址的发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(3): 397-406 |
[47] | 广西柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆. 柳州白莲洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009 |
[48] | 周玉端. 柳州白莲洞遗址石器工业的技术分析[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2017 |
[49] |
Zhou YD, Ji XP, Li YH, et al. Tangzigou open-air site: A unique lithic assemblage during the Early Holocene in Yunnan Province, southwest China[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 563: 105-118
doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.11.011 URL |
[50] | Zhou YD. Diversity and homogeneity: The lithic technology in southwest China from the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene and its implication to southeast Asia prehistory[D]. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 2021 |
[1] | CUI Zuowen, WANG Chunxue, CHEN Quanjia, ZENG Qingshuo, ZHANG Nan. New paleolithic discoveries in Nanzhao, Henan in 2021 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(05): 853-864. |
[2] | WANG Jiaqi, ZHANG Xuewei, WANG Chunxue, SHENG Lishuang. A preliminary report of the 2021 excavation at the Taiziling locality in Jizhou County, Tianjin City [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(03): 440-447. |
[3] | XIAO Peiyuan, RUAN Qijun, GAO Yu, JIA Zhenxiu, ZHANG Ming, YANG Lijing, LIU Jianhui, LI Sanling, LI Hao. 2022 survey report of Paleolithic sites in the Binchuan Basin in Yunnan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(03): 448-457. |
[4] | Hiroyuki SATO, Kazuki MORISAKI. On the beginning of the Japanese Upper Paleolithic: A review of recent archaeological and anthropological evidence [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(03): 470-487. |
[5] | AI Lan, TIAN Chun, LI Dawei, LI Jinyan, WANG Wei. An excavation report of the Dingmo site in Tiandong of Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 298-313. |
[6] | WEI Tianxu, WANG Chunxue, ZHANG Xuewei, WANG Jiaqi, SHENG Lishuang. A preliminary report of the excavation of Chaoyang Cave 2 in Jizhou County, Tianjin City [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 314-320. |
[7] | ZHAO Qingpo, MA Huanhuan. Preliminary report on Paleolithic archaeological surveys in Lingbao, central China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 321-330. |
[8] | GAO Xing, ZHANG Yueshu, LI Feng, CHEN Fuyou, WANG Xiaomin, YI Mingjie. Preliminary Report on the 2016-2019 Excavation of the Donggutuo Paleolithic Site in the Nihewan Basin, North China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(01): 106-121. |
[9] | ZHOU Shihang, HE Xiangdong, XU Jingyue, LI Xiaoli, NIU Dongwei. 2017 Excavation of the Donggou Paleolithic site in the Yuxian Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(01): 132-142. |
[10] | LIU Lianqiang, PU Yuxiao, HOU Jiaqi, WANG Fagang. Stone artifacts from the Yuzuigou Locality 1 of the Majuangou Paleolithic site excavated in 2017 and 2018 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(01): 40-54. |
[11] | TONG Guang, LI Feng, ZHAO Hailong, YAN Xiaomeng, GAO Xing. Heat treatment experiments on the volcanic breccia materials from the Nihewan Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(01): 81-90. |
[12] | HE Cunding, ZHANG Jin, GAO Lei, HE Xinyi, LI Dadi. An archaeological investigation of Paleolithic materials in the Fujiang River Basin, Northwest Chongqing [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(06): 815-826. |
[13] | Omry BARZILAI. The origins and destinations of the Levantine Initial Upper Paleolithic: A view from the Negev Desert, Israel [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(05): 626-637. |
[14] | ZHAO Yuchao, LI Feng, ZHOU Jing, CHEN Fuyou, GAO Xing. Technology and strategy of core reduction at the Yangshang site, Gansu [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(05): 604-615. |
[15] | YE Canyang, CHEN Shengqian, ZHAO Chao, HU Xiaonong, GUO Mingjian, BAO Qingchuan. Manufacturing technology of adze-shaped stone tools of the Yumin Culture in the border between Hebei and Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 317-330. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||