Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 232-244.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Taphonomic observation of faunal remains from the Gezishan Locality 10 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

ZHANG Shuangquan1,2,3(), PENG Fei1,2, ZHANG Yue1,2, GUO Jialong4, WANG Huimin4, HUANG Chao1,3, DAI Jingwen5, ZHANG Yuzhe5, GAO Xing1,2,3   

  1. 1. Laboratory for Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of CAS at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    4. Ningxia Institute of Archaeology and Cultural relics, Yinchuan 750001
    5. Jilin University, Changchun 130012
  • Received:2018-08-16 Revised:2019-02-13 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2020-09-10

Abstract:

Located in the foothills of Helan Mountain, roughly 20 km to the northwest of Qingtongxia City, locality 10(QG10) of the Gezishan site was systematically excavated in 2014-2017. Along with thousands of lithic tools of microblade technology and dozens of perforated beads and bone artifacts, a large number of faunal remains was recovered from the site. Based on preliminary observations of taphonomic features of the animal bones identifiable to a specific taxon and/or skeletal element from the site, it could be argued that humans are the main agent responsible for the accumulation and modification of the faunal remains at QG10, and they procured the main prey animals through active hunting rather than aggressive scavenging. In addition, hunter-gatherers transported complete carcasses to the site to be processed, butchering the middle/large-sized animals and breaking open their bones mainly for nutritional purposes. However, it seems clear that in addition to their nutritional value, small animals at the site were probably exploited to manufacture bone artifacts as well.

Key words: Gezishan site, Taphonomy, Zooarchaeology, Paleolithic, Adaptive strategy

CLC Number: