Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (04): 664-678.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0011
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Jiawang(), YAN Jun, LI Liming, QIAO Hui, SUN Chang, WEN Shaoqin, TAN Jingze()
Received:
2019-01-18
Revised:
2019-11-08
Online:
2021-08-15
Published:
2021-08-17
Contact:
TAN Jingze
E-mail:caojiawang168@163.com;jztan@fudan.edu.cn
CLC Number:
CAO Jiawang, YAN Jun, LI Liming, QIAO Hui, SUN Chang, WEN Shaoqin, TAN Jingze. Analysis of sexual dimorphism based on three-dimensional face model and artificial measurement data of maxillofacial morphology in modern Chinese population[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(04): 664-678.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0011
ID | 性别Gender | Y_en | Y_prn | Y_en_prn-2 (①) | Y_zy (②) | ②-① |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | M | 21.882 | -17.620 | 0.131 | -0.728 | -0.859 |
3 | M | 22.524 | -9.454 | 4.535 | 5.758 | 1.223 |
4 | M | 16.613 | -18.978 | -3.183 | -2.110 | 1.073 |
5 | M | 24.957 | -6.436 | 7.261 | 6.020 | -1.241 |
6 | M | 35.766 | -2.063 | 14.852 | 12.070 | -2.782 |
8 | M | 15.074 | -17.576 | -0.749 | -0.738 | 0.011 |
9 | M | 15.380 | -12.626 | 0.754 | -0.829 | -1.583 |
10 | M | 12.158 | -21.971 | -11.813 | -11.300 | 0.513 |
11 | M | 20.797 | -15.098 | 3.699 | 3.660 | -0.039 |
14 | M | 15.844 | -19.676 | -5.832 | -5.373 | 0.459 |
1 | F | 14.501 | -16.336 | -2.918 | -3.835 | -0.917 |
7 | F | 17.296 | -15.22 | -0.962 | 1.407 | 2.369 |
12 | F | 11.84 | -23.136 | -7.648 | -4.61 | 3.038 |
13 | F | 9.143 | -23.045 | -8.951 | -8.769 | 0.182 |
30 | F | 4.436 | -25.304 | -12.434 | -13.105 | -0.671 |
31 | F | 24.17 | -5.693 | 7.239 | 6.355 | -0.884 |
32 | F | 18.509 | -19.882 | -2.687 | -1.797 | 0.890 |
33 | F | 13.157 | -20.433 | -5.638 | -5.612 | 0.026 |
34 | F | 18.287 | -14.693 | -0.203 | -1.522 | -1.319 |
35 | F | 15.395 | -15.704 | -1.155 | -2.063 | -0.908 |
Tab.1 Y-value of the marked points
ID | 性别Gender | Y_en | Y_prn | Y_en_prn-2 (①) | Y_zy (②) | ②-① |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | M | 21.882 | -17.620 | 0.131 | -0.728 | -0.859 |
3 | M | 22.524 | -9.454 | 4.535 | 5.758 | 1.223 |
4 | M | 16.613 | -18.978 | -3.183 | -2.110 | 1.073 |
5 | M | 24.957 | -6.436 | 7.261 | 6.020 | -1.241 |
6 | M | 35.766 | -2.063 | 14.852 | 12.070 | -2.782 |
8 | M | 15.074 | -17.576 | -0.749 | -0.738 | 0.011 |
9 | M | 15.380 | -12.626 | 0.754 | -0.829 | -1.583 |
10 | M | 12.158 | -21.971 | -11.813 | -11.300 | 0.513 |
11 | M | 20.797 | -15.098 | 3.699 | 3.660 | -0.039 |
14 | M | 15.844 | -19.676 | -5.832 | -5.373 | 0.459 |
1 | F | 14.501 | -16.336 | -2.918 | -3.835 | -0.917 |
7 | F | 17.296 | -15.22 | -0.962 | 1.407 | 2.369 |
12 | F | 11.84 | -23.136 | -7.648 | -4.61 | 3.038 |
13 | F | 9.143 | -23.045 | -8.951 | -8.769 | 0.182 |
30 | F | 4.436 | -25.304 | -12.434 | -13.105 | -0.671 |
31 | F | 24.17 | -5.693 | 7.239 | 6.355 | -0.884 |
32 | F | 18.509 | -19.882 | -2.687 | -1.797 | 0.890 |
33 | F | 13.157 | -20.433 | -5.638 | -5.612 | 0.026 |
34 | F | 18.287 | -14.693 | -0.203 | -1.522 | -1.319 |
35 | F | 15.395 | -15.704 | -1.155 | -2.063 | -0.908 |
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 男性 Males (Manual) | P-value | 女性 Females(3D) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 39.46 | > 0.50 | 37.65 | 36.99 | > 0.50 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 50.77 | > 0.50 | 47.94 | 47.28 | > 0.50 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 41.17 | > 0.50 | 38.07 | 38.08 | > 0.50 |
Tab.2 Comparison between three-dimensional face model measurements and manual measurements of geometric morphometric features (mm)
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 男性 Males (Manual) | P-value | 女性 Females(3D) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 39.46 | > 0.50 | 37.65 | 36.99 | > 0.50 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 50.77 | > 0.50 | 47.94 | 47.28 | > 0.50 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 41.17 | > 0.50 | 38.07 | 38.08 | > 0.50 |
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 女性 Females (3D) | P-value | 男性 Males (Manual) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 37.65 | < 0.01 | 39.46 | 36.99 | < 0.01 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 47.94 | < 0.01 | 50.77 | 47.28 | < 0.01 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 38.07 | < 0.01 | 41.17 | 38.08 | < 0.01 |
鼻深 Nasal depth | 16.95 | 15.62 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻侧深度Nasal lateral depth | 24.51 | 19.66 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻根高度 Nasion height | 8.96 | 7.19 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
面宽 Face breadth | — | — | — | 148.25 | 141.77 | < 0.01 |
形态面高 Morphological facial height | — | — | — | 114.91 | 108.05 | < 0.01 |
额最小宽 Minimum frontal breadth | — | — | — | 108.80 | 108.28 | 0.317 |
Tab.3 Comparison of measurement results between sexes (mm)
性状Variable | 男性 Males (3D) | 女性 Females (3D) | P-value | 男性 Males (Manual) | 女性 Females (Manual) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽 Interocular breadth | 39.53 | 37.65 | < 0.01 | 39.46 | 36.99 | < 0.01 |
鼻高 Nose height | 51.82 | 47.94 | < 0.01 | 50.77 | 47.28 | < 0.01 |
鼻宽 Nose breadth | 41.10 | 38.07 | < 0.01 | 41.17 | 38.08 | < 0.01 |
鼻深 Nasal depth | 16.95 | 15.62 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻侧深度Nasal lateral depth | 24.51 | 19.66 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
鼻根高度 Nasion height | 8.96 | 7.19 | < 0.01 | — | — | — |
面宽 Face breadth | — | — | — | 148.25 | 141.77 | < 0.01 |
形态面高 Morphological facial height | — | — | — | 114.91 | 108.05 | < 0.01 |
额最小宽 Minimum frontal breadth | — | — | — | 108.80 | 108.28 | 0.317 |
截面Profiles/Items | Y_en_prn+2 | Y_en_prn | Y_en_prn-2 | Y_en_prn-4 | Y_en_prn-6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 Males | 0.1498 | 0.1579 | 0.1570 | 0.1714 | 0.1771 |
女性 Females | 0.1140 | 0.1153 | 0.1169 | 0.1202 | 0.1178 |
P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Tab.4 The average value of facial flatness in different lateral profile
截面Profiles/Items | Y_en_prn+2 | Y_en_prn | Y_en_prn-2 | Y_en_prn-4 | Y_en_prn-6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 Males | 0.1498 | 0.1579 | 0.1570 | 0.1714 | 0.1771 |
女性 Females | 0.1140 | 0.1153 | 0.1169 | 0.1202 | 0.1178 |
P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
性状Variable | 男性Males | 女性Females | P-value | (M-F):F(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽/形态面高 | 0.3440 | 0.3429 | 0.696 | 0.32 |
鼻高/形态面高 | 0.4422 | 0.4378 | 0.044 | 1.01 |
鼻高(3D)/形态面高 | 0.4512 | 0.4441 | 0.004 | 1.60 |
鼻宽/形态面高 | 0.3590 | 0.3531 | 0.010 | 1.67 |
鼻宽(3D)/形态面高 | 0.3585 | 0.3528 | 0.014 | 1.62 |
鼻根高度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.0783 | 0.0667 | < 0.01 | 17.27 |
鼻深(3D)/形态面高 | 0.1476 | 0.1436 | < 0.01 | 2.79 |
鼻侧深度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.2136 | 0.1822 | < 0.01 | 17.23 |
鼻根高度(3D)/鼻侧深度(3D) | 0.3646 | 0.3682 | 0.634 | 0.99 |
额最小宽/形态面高 | 0.9380 | 1.001 | < 0.01 | -6.29 |
面宽/形态面高 | 1.2921 | 1.3143 | < 0.01 | -1.69 |
Tab.5 The comparison of standardized geometric morphometric features between sexes
性状Variable | 男性Males | 女性Females | P-value | (M-F):F(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
眼内角间宽/形态面高 | 0.3440 | 0.3429 | 0.696 | 0.32 |
鼻高/形态面高 | 0.4422 | 0.4378 | 0.044 | 1.01 |
鼻高(3D)/形态面高 | 0.4512 | 0.4441 | 0.004 | 1.60 |
鼻宽/形态面高 | 0.3590 | 0.3531 | 0.010 | 1.67 |
鼻宽(3D)/形态面高 | 0.3585 | 0.3528 | 0.014 | 1.62 |
鼻根高度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.0783 | 0.0667 | < 0.01 | 17.27 |
鼻深(3D)/形态面高 | 0.1476 | 0.1436 | < 0.01 | 2.79 |
鼻侧深度(3D)/形态面高 | 0.2136 | 0.1822 | < 0.01 | 17.23 |
鼻根高度(3D)/鼻侧深度(3D) | 0.3646 | 0.3682 | 0.634 | 0.99 |
额最小宽/形态面高 | 0.9380 | 1.001 | < 0.01 | -6.29 |
面宽/形态面高 | 1.2921 | 1.3143 | < 0.01 | -1.69 |
[1] |
Fagertun J, Harder S, Rosengren A, et al. 3D facial landmarks: Inter-operator variability of manual annotation[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2014, 14(1):35
doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-35 URL |
[2] |
Hutton TJ, Buxton BF, Hammond P, et al. Estimating average growth trajectories in shape-space using kernel smoothing[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2003, 22(6):747-53
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.814784 URL |
[3] |
Hammond P. The use of 3D face shape modeling in dysmorphology[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2007, 92(12):1120-1126
doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.103507 URL |
[4] |
Hammond P, McKee S, Suttie M, et al. Opposite effects on facial morphology due to gene dosage sensitivity[J]. Hum Genet, 2014, 133:1117-1125
doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1455-z pmid: 24889830 |
[5] |
Guo JY, Mei X, Tang K. Automatic landmark annotation and dense correspondence registration for 3D human facial images[J]. Bmc Bioinformatics, 2013, 14(14):227-235
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-227 URL |
[6] |
Chen W, Qian W, Wu G, et al. Three-dimensional human facial morphologies as robust aging markers[J]. Cell Research, 2015, 25:574-587
doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.36 URL |
[7] | Wirthlin J, Kau CH, English JD, et al. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging[J]. International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2013, 42(9):1100-1107 |
[8] | Matthew CC, Wendy WW, Zachary F, et al. A quantitative analysis of periorbital aging with three-dimensional surface imaging[J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2011, 64:148-154 |
[9] |
Anic-Milosevic S, Mestrovic S, Prlić A, et al. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method[J]. Journal of CranioMaxilloFacial Surgery, 2010, 38(2):90-95
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.013 URL |
[10] |
Liu Y, Kau CH, Pan F, et al. A 3-Dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology Among Chinese and Greek Population[J]. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2013, 24(4).e353-8
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182902e5d URL |
[11] | Wong WW, Davis DG, Camp MC, et al. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: A three-dimensional analysis[J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2009, 63:2032-2039 |
[12] | Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, et al. Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology[J]. Forensic Science International, 2010, 200(1-3).182.e1-7 |
[13] | Lu X, Colbry D, Jain AK. Three-dimensional model based face recognition[A]. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition[C]. 2004, 1:362-366 |
[14] |
Hennessy RJ, Mclearie S, Kinsella A. Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral-craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 2005, 207(3):283-295
pmid: 16185253 |
[15] |
Gor T, Kau CH, English JD, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas[J]. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010, 137(3):424-432
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.022 URL |
[16] |
Hayley G, Darren C. Sexual dimorphism in Southeast Asian crania: A geometric morphometric approach[J]. HOMO, 2009, 60:517-534
doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.001 pmid: 19853250 |
[17] |
Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex[J]. HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 2010, 61:16-32
doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.004 URL |
[18] |
Coquerelle M, Bookstein FL, Braga J, et al. Sexual Dimorphism of the Human Mandible and Its Association With Dental Development[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2010, 145:192-202
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.v145.2 URL |
[19] | McDonald JH. Earlobes ranging from unattached (upper left) to attached (lower right)[EB/OL]. URL: http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/mythearlobe.html. 2011-12-8 |
[20] | Moreno AB, Sanchez A, Velez FJ, et al. Face recognition using 3D surface extracted descriptors[A]. In: Irish Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference[C]. 2003 |
[21] |
Colombo A, Cusano C, Schettini R. 3D face detection using curvature analysis[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2006, 39(3):444-455
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.09.009 URL |
[22] |
Nair P, Cavallaro A. 3D Face Detection, Landmark Localization, and Registration Using a Point Distribution Model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2009, 11(4):611-623
doi: 10.1109/TMM.2009.2017629 URL |
[23] | 吴汝康, 吴新智, 张振标. 人体测量方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984, 32-38. |
[24] | Rogers T. Sex determination and age estimation: skeletal evidence fromSt. Thomas’ Cemetery Belleville, Ontario [M.A. thesis][D]. Hamilton: McMaster University, 1991 |
[25] |
Rosas A, Bastir M. Thin-Plate Spline Analysis of Allometry and Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Craniofacial Complex[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2002, 117(3):236-245
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644 URL |
[26] | Hutton TJ, Buxton BF, Hammond P. Automated Registration of 3D Faces using Dense Surface Models[A]. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference[C]. Surrey: BMVA Press, 2003, 439-448 |
[27] |
Besl P, McKay N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes[J]. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell, 1992, 14:239-256
doi: 10.1109/34.121791 URL |
[28] |
Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, et al. Active shape models—their trainingand application[J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1995, 61(1):38-59
doi: 10.1006/cviu.1995.1004 URL |
[1] | LI Haijun, YAO Xuechun, WENG Minjie, YANG Xiaoyu. An overview of human nasal morphology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(04): 687-700. |
[2] | ZHOU Yawei, WANG Yu, HOU Xiaogang, LI Shuyun. Morphology of the people's skulls from the Jinmaoyuan site in Datong, Shanxi Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 233-246. |
[3] | HE Letian, CHEN Guoke, YANG Yishi. Changes of the prehistoric people reflected by their remains from the Wuba cemetery in Gansu Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 247-258. |
[4] | YE Ziqi, HE Anyi, LIANG You, LI Fajun. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of patella morphology of the Neolithic people from Huiyaotian site in South China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(02): 259-272. |
[5] | LIU Wu, HE Jianing, YAN Yi, ZHANG Ziliang, CHEN Yiying, WU Xiujie. Morphological variation in the circum-nasal region of modern human [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(04): 445-457. |
[6] | ZHANG Baoshuai, WU Xiaotong, WU Gao, JIN Zhengyao, FAN Anchuan. Verification and optimization of micro-destructive proteomics method for sex determination of archaeological human remains [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(04): 472-487. |
[7] | SUN Lei, LI Yanzhen, WU Zhijiang. Craniofacial morphology of human remains from the Zhanmatun site of the late Yangshao Period [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(03): 331-341. |
[8] | DU Baopu, YIN Yuzhe, TAN Yi, ZHANG Yuge, FAN Bo, YAO Zhizheng, GUO Hang. Distribution of sexual stature dimorphism in modern Chinese populations and its influencing factors [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 191-200. |
[9] | LI Haijun, WENG Minjie, DUAN Wanqi, LIU Liming. The study progress of the morphological variation of human orolabial region [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 137-148. |
[10] | ZHANG Yingqi, Terry HARRISON. Phalangeal curvature and locomotor behavior of fossil hominoids [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(04): 659-673. |
[11] | ZHANG Quanchao, SUN Yuze, HOU Liangliang, JI Ping, ZHU Yonggang. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis of the human and animal bones from the Haminmangha site [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 261-273. |
[12] | LIANG Zhidong. Characteristics of finger length ratio and its fluctuation asymmetry of college students majoring in physical education [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(01): 57-64. |
[13] | HE Jianing. Progress and prospects on osteological study of ancient human remains in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(02): 165-180. |
[14] | ZHANG Rufan, WU Chengfeng, CHEN Tao, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Peng. Morphological Characteristics of Macaca Mulatta Brevicaudus [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 97-108. |
[15] | ΖΗΑΟ Yuhao, ΖHOU Mi, WEI Pianpian, XING Song. 2D visualization and quantitative analysis of the humeral diaphysis cortical thickness [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(04): 632-647. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||