Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (05): 788-803.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0080
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Xiaochun1,2,3(), GAO Xing1,2,3()
Received:
2021-06-08
Revised:
2021-09-08
Online:
2022-10-15
Published:
2022-10-13
Contact:
GAO Xing
E-mail:huxiaochun@ivpp.ac.cn;gaoxing@ivpp.ac.cn
CLC Number:
HU Xiaochun, GAO Xing. A preliminary study of the stone artifacts unearthed from the Ma’anshan site of Guizhou province in 1986[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 788-803.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0080
实验室编号 Lab No. | 层位Layer | 样品Sample | 方法Method | 结果Result (BP) | 14C校正年代Calibrated date (BP cal,95.4%) | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BK-82062 | 3 | 碎骨Broken bone | 14C | 15100±1500 | 23010-14521 | [ |
BKY-82037 | 3 | 鹿牙Deer tooth | 铀系法 | 18000±1000 | [ | |
BA-07624 | 3 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 19295±65 | 23705-23005 | [ |
BA-07625 | 4 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 29170±110 | 34130-33315 | [ |
BA-07626 | 5 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 29480±135 | 34371-33739 | [ |
BA-07627 | 6 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 31155±140 | 35995-35231 | [ |
BA-07628 | 7 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 19260±90 | 23709-22966 | [ |
BA-07629 | 8 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 25310±125 | 29928-29232 | [ |
不详Unknow | ?(下文化层) | 不详Unknow | 不详 | 53000 | [ |
Tab.1 The dating results of the Ma’anshan site
实验室编号 Lab No. | 层位Layer | 样品Sample | 方法Method | 结果Result (BP) | 14C校正年代Calibrated date (BP cal,95.4%) | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BK-82062 | 3 | 碎骨Broken bone | 14C | 15100±1500 | 23010-14521 | [ |
BKY-82037 | 3 | 鹿牙Deer tooth | 铀系法 | 18000±1000 | [ | |
BA-07624 | 3 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 19295±65 | 23705-23005 | [ |
BA-07625 | 4 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 29170±110 | 34130-33315 | [ |
BA-07626 | 5 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 29480±135 | 34371-33739 | [ |
BA-07627 | 6 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 31155±140 | 35995-35231 | [ |
BA-07628 | 7 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 19260±90 | 23709-22966 | [ |
BA-07629 | 8 | 碎骨Broken bone | AMS14C | 25310±125 | 29928-29232 | [ |
不详Unknow | ?(下文化层) | 不详Unknow | 不详 | 53000 | [ |
类型Class → 层位 Unit & Layer ↓ | 石核 Core | 石片 Flake | 断块 Chunk | 碎屑Debris | 石器Tool | 石锤 Hammer | 人工痕迹不明显石料Unmodified material | 合计 Total | 百分比 Percent(%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上文化层 Upper unit | L2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 1.8% |
L3 | 12 | 73 | 94 | 26 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 225 | 17.4% | |
L4 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1.0% | |
L5 | 14 | 151 | 150 | 56 | 19 | 0 | 16 | 406 | 31.4% | |
L6 | 4 | 68 | 52 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 172 | 13.3% | |
下文化层 Lower unit | L7 | 33 | 166 | 125 | 2 | 71 | 0 | 42 | 439 | 34.0% |
L8 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1.1% | |
合计Total | 65 | 484 | 433 | 122 | 114 | 1 | 73 | 1292 | 100% | |
百分比Percent(%) | 5.0% | 37.5% | 33.5% | 9.4% | 8.9% | 0.1% | 5.7% |
Tab.2 Class and frequency of stone artifacts from different layers of the Ma’anshan site excavated in 1986
类型Class → 层位 Unit & Layer ↓ | 石核 Core | 石片 Flake | 断块 Chunk | 碎屑Debris | 石器Tool | 石锤 Hammer | 人工痕迹不明显石料Unmodified material | 合计 Total | 百分比 Percent(%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上文化层 Upper unit | L2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 1.8% |
L3 | 12 | 73 | 94 | 26 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 225 | 17.4% | |
L4 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1.0% | |
L5 | 14 | 151 | 150 | 56 | 19 | 0 | 16 | 406 | 31.4% | |
L6 | 4 | 68 | 52 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 172 | 13.3% | |
下文化层 Lower unit | L7 | 33 | 166 | 125 | 2 | 71 | 0 | 42 | 439 | 34.0% |
L8 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1.1% | |
合计Total | 65 | 484 | 433 | 122 | 114 | 1 | 73 | 1292 | 100% | |
百分比Percent(%) | 5.0% | 37.5% | 33.5% | 9.4% | 8.9% | 0.1% | 5.7% |
原料Raw material → 类型Class ↓ | 燧石 Chert | 硅质灰岩 Siliceous limestone | 灰岩 Limestone | 砂岩 Sandstone | 粉砂岩 Siltstone | 石英岩 Quartzite | 玄武岩 Basalt | 其他 Other | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
石核Core(n=33) | 13 | 2.9% | 17 | 3.8% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石片Flake(n=176) | 46 | 10.2% | 103 | 22.7% | 8 | 1.8% | 8 | 1.8% | 6 | 1.3% | 3 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 |
断块Chunk(n=127) | 56 | 12.4% | 70 | 15.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
碎屑Debris(n=2) | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石器Tool (n=73) | 31 | 6.8% | 40 | 8.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
人工痕迹不明显石料Unmodified material(n=42) | 11 | 2.4% | 18 | 4.0% | 12 | 2.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% |
合计Total | 159 | 35.1% | 248 | 54.8% | 21 | 4.6% | 10 | 2.2% | 9 | 2.0% | 3 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% |
Tab.3 Class and frequency of raw materials for stone artifacts from the lower unit of the Ma’anshan site excavated in 1986
原料Raw material → 类型Class ↓ | 燧石 Chert | 硅质灰岩 Siliceous limestone | 灰岩 Limestone | 砂岩 Sandstone | 粉砂岩 Siltstone | 石英岩 Quartzite | 玄武岩 Basalt | 其他 Other | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
石核Core(n=33) | 13 | 2.9% | 17 | 3.8% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石片Flake(n=176) | 46 | 10.2% | 103 | 22.7% | 8 | 1.8% | 8 | 1.8% | 6 | 1.3% | 3 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 |
断块Chunk(n=127) | 56 | 12.4% | 70 | 15.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
碎屑Debris(n=2) | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石器Tool (n=73) | 31 | 6.8% | 40 | 8.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
人工痕迹不明显石料Unmodified material(n=42) | 11 | 2.4% | 18 | 4.0% | 12 | 2.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% |
合计Total | 159 | 35.1% | 248 | 54.8% | 21 | 4.6% | 10 | 2.2% | 9 | 2.0% | 3 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% |
大小与质量Size and mass → 类型Class ↓ | 最大长Length/L(mm) | 质量Mass/m(g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值Lmin | 最大值Lmax | 平均值 | 标准差σL | 最小值mmin | 最大值mmax | 平均值 | 标准差σm | ||
石核Core (n=33) | 40.1 | 153.5 | 74.4 | 22.3 | 23.6 | 1661.7 | 216.9 | 294.9 | |
石片Flake (n=176) | 20.8 | 147.0 | 55.2 | 21.9 | 0.5 | 494.5 | 45.2 | 56.0 | |
断块Chunk(n=127) | 20.0 | 97.2 | 41.8 | 16.0 | 1.3 | 203.6 | 26.2 | 33.0 | |
碎屑Debris( n=2) | 19.1 | 19.7 | 19.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | |
石器Tool(n=73) | 28.7 | 98.5 | 57.9 | 16.8 | 5.9 | 243.9 | 52.8 | 42.7 |
Tab.4 Size and mass of stone artifacts from the lower unit of the Ma’anshan site excavated in 1986
大小与质量Size and mass → 类型Class ↓ | 最大长Length/L(mm) | 质量Mass/m(g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值Lmin | 最大值Lmax | 平均值 | 标准差σL | 最小值mmin | 最大值mmax | 平均值 | 标准差σm | ||
石核Core (n=33) | 40.1 | 153.5 | 74.4 | 22.3 | 23.6 | 1661.7 | 216.9 | 294.9 | |
石片Flake (n=176) | 20.8 | 147.0 | 55.2 | 21.9 | 0.5 | 494.5 | 45.2 | 56.0 | |
断块Chunk(n=127) | 20.0 | 97.2 | 41.8 | 16.0 | 1.3 | 203.6 | 26.2 | 33.0 | |
碎屑Debris( n=2) | 19.1 | 19.7 | 19.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | |
石器Tool(n=73) | 28.7 | 98.5 | 57.9 | 16.8 | 5.9 | 243.9 | 52.8 | 42.7 |
原料Raw material → 类型Class ↓ | 燧石 Chert | 硅质灰岩 Siliceous limestone | 灰岩 Limestone | 砂岩 Sandstone | 石英岩 Quartzite | 粉砂岩 Siltstone | 硅质白云岩 Siliceous dolomite | 其他 Other | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
石核Core( n=32) | 22 | 2.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石片Flake (n=308) | 231 | 27.5% | 45 | 5.4% | 23 | 2.7% | 4 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% |
断块Chunk(n=306) | 247 | 29.4% | 38 | 4.5% | 16 | 1.9% | 5 | 0.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
碎屑Debris(n=120) | 109 | 13.0% | 7 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石器Tool(n=41) | 35 | 4.2% | 5 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石锤Hammer(n=1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
人工痕迹不明显石料Unmodified material(n=31) | 21 | 2.5% | 5 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.1% |
合计Total | 665 | 79.3% | 102 | 12.2% | 52 | 6.2% | 13 | 1.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.3% |
Tab.5 Raw materials for stone artifacts from the upper unit of the Ma’anshan site excavated in 1986
原料Raw material → 类型Class ↓ | 燧石 Chert | 硅质灰岩 Siliceous limestone | 灰岩 Limestone | 砂岩 Sandstone | 石英岩 Quartzite | 粉砂岩 Siltstone | 硅质白云岩 Siliceous dolomite | 其他 Other | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
石核Core( n=32) | 22 | 2.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石片Flake (n=308) | 231 | 27.5% | 45 | 5.4% | 23 | 2.7% | 4 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% |
断块Chunk(n=306) | 247 | 29.4% | 38 | 4.5% | 16 | 1.9% | 5 | 0.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
碎屑Debris(n=120) | 109 | 13.0% | 7 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石器Tool(n=41) | 35 | 4.2% | 5 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
石锤Hammer(n=1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
人工痕迹不明显石料Unmodified material(n=31) | 21 | 2.5% | 5 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.1% |
合计Total | 665 | 79.3% | 102 | 12.2% | 52 | 6.2% | 13 | 1.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.3% |
测量项目Measurements → 类型Class ↓ | 最大长Length/L(mm) | 质量Mass/m(g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值Lmin | 最大值Lmax | 平均值 | 标准差σL | 最小值mmin | 最大值mmax | 平均值 | 标准差σm | ||
石核Core (n=32) | 31.2 | 154.9 | 73.3 | 35.1 | 10.2 | 1476.5 | 261.9 | 374.9 | |
石片Flake( n=308) | 20.0 | 100.3 | 33.3 | 13.0 | 0.3 | 389.2 | 11.0 | 31.4 | |
断块Chunk (n=306) | 20.0 | 95.4 | 33.0 | 11.4 | 0.7 | 342.1 | 11.7 | 26.5 | |
碎屑Debris (n=120) | 10.4 | 20.0 | 17.3 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | |
石器Tool(n=41) | 18.3 | 93.5 | 44.2 | 18.6 | 1.3 | 167.9 | 27.3 | 38.2 |
Tab.6 Size and mass of stone artifacts from the upper unit of the Ma’anshan site excavated in 1986
测量项目Measurements → 类型Class ↓ | 最大长Length/L(mm) | 质量Mass/m(g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值Lmin | 最大值Lmax | 平均值 | 标准差σL | 最小值mmin | 最大值mmax | 平均值 | 标准差σm | ||
石核Core (n=32) | 31.2 | 154.9 | 73.3 | 35.1 | 10.2 | 1476.5 | 261.9 | 374.9 | |
石片Flake( n=308) | 20.0 | 100.3 | 33.3 | 13.0 | 0.3 | 389.2 | 11.0 | 31.4 | |
断块Chunk (n=306) | 20.0 | 95.4 | 33.0 | 11.4 | 0.7 | 342.1 | 11.7 | 26.5 | |
碎屑Debris (n=120) | 10.4 | 20.0 | 17.3 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | |
石器Tool(n=41) | 18.3 | 93.5 | 44.2 | 18.6 | 1.3 | 167.9 | 27.3 | 38.2 |
[1] | 张森水. 马鞍山旧石器遗址试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1988, 7(1): 64-74 |
[2] | 龙凤骧. 马鞍山遗址出土碎骨表面痕迹的分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1992, 11(3): 216-229 |
[3] | 张乐, Christopher JN, 张双权, 等. 量化单元在马鞍山遗址动物骨骼研究中的运用[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(1): 79-90 |
[4] | 张乐, 王春雪, 张双权, 等. 切割痕迹揭示马鞍山遗址晚更新世末人类肉食行为[J]. 科学通报, 2009, 54(19): 2871-2878 |
[5] | 张乐, 王春雪, 张双权, 等. 马鞍山旧石器时代遗址古人类行为的动物考古学研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑):地球科学, 2009, 39(9): 1256-1265 |
[6] | 张乐, 王春雪, 张双权, 等. 马鞍山遗址动物群的死亡年龄研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(3): 306-318 |
[7] |
Zhang Y, Stiner MC, Dennell R, et al. Zooarchaeological perspectives on the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic from the Ma’anshan site (Guizhou, South China)[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37: 2066-2077
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.012 URL |
[8] | 张乐. 旧石器时代古人类敲骨取髓行为的确认——以马鞍山遗址为例[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 141-148 |
[9] |
Zhang SQ, d’Errico F, Backwell LR, et al. Ma’anshan cave and the origin of bone tool technology in China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2016, 65: 57-69
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.11.004 URL |
[10] | 张森水. 桐梓县马鞍山旧石器文化遗址[A]. 见:中国考古学会(编).中国考古学年鉴·1987[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1987: 242-243 |
[11] | 原思训, 陈铁梅, 高世君. 华南若干旧石器时代地点的铀系年代[J]. 人类学学报, 1986, 5(2): 179-190 |
[12] | 张乐. 马鞍山遗址古人类行为的动物考古学研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 2008: 144 |
[13] | 张森水. 中国西南地区旧石器考古的主要成果与文化类型的探讨[A]. 见:宿白(主编).苏秉琦与当代中国考古学[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 386-413 |
[14] |
Bronk Ramsey C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates[J]. Radiocarbon, 2009, 51(1): 337-360
doi: 10.1017/S0033822200033865 URL |
[15] |
Reimer PJ, Austin WEN, Bard E, et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0-55 kcal BP)[J]. Radiocarbon, 2020, 62(4): 725-757
doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.41 URL |
[16] | 卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(2): 85-96 |
[17] |
Toth N. The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985, 12(2): 101-120
doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90056-1 URL |
[18] | 张森水. 我国南方旧石器时代晚期文化的若干问题[J]. 人类学学报, 1983, 2(3): 218-230 |
[19] | 王幼平. 更新世环境与中国南方旧石器文化发展[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1997: 95-115 |
[20] | 王幼平. 西南若干旧石器时代考古发现与问题[A]. 见:吕遵谔(主编).中国考古学研究的世纪回顾:旧石器时代考古卷[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 292-310 |
[21] | 李炎贤. 中国旧石器时代晚期文化的划分[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(3): 214-223 |
[22] | 张兴龙, 王新金, 毕忠荣, 等. 贵州省中部和西南部新发现的洞穴遗址调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 503-515 |
[23] | 覃嘉铭, 林玉石, 张美良, 等. 末次冰期东亚季风气候的变迁: 贵州都匀七星洞石笋的δ18O记录[J]. 中国岩溶, 2003, 22(3): 167-173 |
[24] | 覃嘉铭, 袁道先, 程海, 等. 贵州都匀七星洞石笋剖面晚更新世高分辨率的气候地层学[J]. 第四纪研究, 2004, 24(3): 318-324 |
[25] | 彭子成, 张兆峰, 蔡演军, 等. 贵州七星洞晚更新世晚期石笋的古气候环境记录[J]. 第四纪研究, 2002, 22(3): 273-282 |
[26] | 赵增友, 袁道先, 石胜强, 等. 孢粉、炭屑揭示的黔西高原MIS3b期间古植被、古气候演变[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15): 4811-4818 |
[27] | 赵增友, 石胜强, 袁智郴, 等. 黔西高原末次冰期晚期古植被及西南季风演变[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(6): 1013-1024 |
[1] | LI Yao, CHEN Hong, XU Ting. Use-wear characteristics of the obsidian experimental artifacts [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(05): 727-743. |
[2] | CHEN Wei, YI Mingjie, SUN Zhibin, CHEN Jun, XU Linghong. Stone artifacts unearthed from the Longya site in Jianyang, Sichuan Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(06): 955-969. |
[3] | FENG Yue, HUANG Fen, LI Wencheng, DENG Wanwen, LIU Tuo, ZHANG Jiafu, LEI Huarui, YU jianjun, WANG Youping. New discoveries from the Qijiaojing site of Hami, Xijiang in 2019 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(06): 1086-1095. |
[4] | YANG Ziyi, WANG Yiting, SONG Yanhua. A report on the survey of Paleolithic remains in Pinglu, Shanxi Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(04): 685-694. |
[5] | LEI Lei, LI Dawei, MA Xiaorong, LIU Kangti, HOU Yamei, WANG Wei, LI Hao. Production patterns and strategies of the Acheulean large flakes [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(02): 183-192. |
[6] | XU Zhe, ZHANG Xiaoling, PEI Shuwen. An experimental research on dynamic formation of microwears on the shooting projectile points [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(02): 208-222. |
[7] | LI Feng, LI Yinghua, GAO Xing. Re-examination of core reduction strategies of the Guanyindong lithic assemblage in Guizhou [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(01): 1-11. |
[8] | CHEN Shengqian, YE Canyang. Theoretical retrospection on the origin of microblade technology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(04): 547-562. |
[9] | WANG Huimin, GUO Jialong, ZHANG Yanling, HUANG Jincheng, PENG Fei, GAO Xing. Ecological perspective on the points from the Gezishan site in Ningxia [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(04): 575-583. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||