A simulated experiment of use efficiency of the limestone lithics: As an example of the Yumidong site in Wushan, Chongqing
Received date: 2018-04-16
Revised date: 2018-09-20
Online published: 2020-09-10
:In this paper, the Yumidong site in Wushan, Chongqing is studied. With the help of simulated experiments on the duplication and the effectiveness of the use of limestone in the Yumidong site, we obtained results which indicate that some limestone shows good applicability in knapping and use in routine cutting, digging and other behavioral activities, which shows good functional utility and efficiency. Comparing the experimental specimens and the lithics found in the site, we argue that “utilized tools” created by the direct use of preferred natural blanks are present. This type of wear is mainly concentrated on heavy tools, similar to choppers and picks, but the retouched tools in the assemblage are more effective and durable than such utilized pieces. Pointed tools are easy to damaged when they are applied to hard objects due to structural instability and uneven stress exerted on the piece. This situation is consistent with the higher damage rate of excavated pointed tools. Re-shaping the proximal part of the tool for holding is very necessary during use. It provides a reasonable explanation for the universal existence of repaired proximal ends in the lithics founded in the site.
Key words: Three Gorges region; Yumidong site; Limestone tools; Using experiment
Cunding HE , Zhuo ZHAO , Jinsheng YU , Chan WU , Xin HU , Yan WU . A simulated experiment of use efficiency of the limestone lithics: As an example of the Yumidong site in Wushan, Chongqing[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019 , 38(03) : 460 -472 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2018.0042
[1] | Curwen EC. Prehistoric Flint Sickles[J]. Antiquity, 1930,4(14):179-186 |
[2] | Curwen EC. Agriculture and the Flint Sickle in Palestine[J]. Antiquity, 1935,9(33):62-66 |
[3] | Semenov SA. Prehistoric technology: An Experimental Study of The Oldest Tools and Artifacts from Traces of Manufacture and Wear[M]. London: Cory, Adams&Mackay, 1964 |
[4] | Kamminga Johan. Over the Edge: Functional Analysis of Australian Stone Tools[M]. Occasional Papers in Anthropology No.12, Anthropology Museum, University of Queensland, 1982 |
[5] | Odell GH. The application of micro-wear analysis to the lithic component of an entire prehistoric settlement: methods, problems, and functional reconstructions. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, 1977 |
[6] | Keeley LH. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis[M]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980 |
[7] | D.戈尔耶夫. 史前时代技术的研究[J]. 考古, 1959(1):55-58 |
[8] | 童恩正. 石器的微痕研究[J]. 史前研究, 1983(2):151-158 |
[9] | 张森水. 述评《石器使用的试验鉴定——微磨损分析》一书[J]. 人类学学报, 1986(4):392-395 |
[10] | 王幼平. 雕刻器实验研究[A].考古学研究(一)——纪念向达先生诞辰九十周年、夏鼐先生诞辰八十周年[C], 北京: 文物出版社, 1992: 65-90 |
[11] | 李卫东. 燧石尖状器实验研究[A].考古学研究(一)——纪念向达先生诞辰九十周年、夏鼐先生诞辰八十周年[C], 北京: 文物出版社, 1992: 91-123 |
[12] | 侯亚梅. 石制品微磨良分析的实验性研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1992,11(3):202-215 |
[13] | 黄蕴平. 沂源上崖洞石制品的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1994,13(1):1-11 |
[14] | 顾玉才. 海城仙人洞遗址出土钻器的实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1995,14(3):219-226 |
[15] | 夏竞峰. 燧石刮削器的微痕观察[J]. 中国国家博物馆馆刊, 1995(1):22-42 |
[16] | 沈辰, 陈淳. 微痕研究(低倍法)的探索与实践——兼谈小长梁遗址石制品的微痕观察[J]. 考古, 2001(7):62-73 |
[17] | 王小庆. 石器使用痕迹显微观察的研究[A].21世纪中国考古学与世界考古学:纪念中国社会科学院考古研究所成立50周年大会暨21世纪中国考古学与世界考古学国际学术研讨会论文集[C], 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2002: 552-568 |
[18] | 高星, 沈辰. 石器微痕分析的考古学实验研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008 |
[19] | Yerkes RW, Kardulias P N. Recent developments in the analysis of lithic artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Research, 1993,1(2):89-119 |
[20] | Odell GH. Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Classification, Function, and Behavior[J]. Journal of Archaeological Research, 2001,9(1):45-100 |
[21] | Odell GH. Lithic Analysis[M]. Springer US, 2004 |
[22] | Shafer HJ, Holloway R G. Organic residue analysis in determining stone tool function[M]// Lithic usewear analysis. 1979: 385-399 |
[23] | Briuer FL. New clues to stone tool function: Plant and animal residues[J]. American Antiquity, 1976 , 41(4) : 478-484 |
[24] | Loy TH. Prehistoric blood residues: detection on tool surfaces and identification of species of origin[J]. Science, 1983,220:1269-1271 |
[25] | 关莹, 高星. 旧石器时代残留物分析:回顾与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2009,28(4):418-429 |
[26] | Leroi-Gourhan A. Evolution et Techniques 1: L’Homme et la Matière[M]. Paris: Albin Michel(réélité en 1971), 1943: 313-326 |
[27] | Warnier JP. Construire la Culture Matérielle ,L ‘ homme q ui p ensait avec ses doi g ts[M]. Paris: PUF , coll Sciences sociales et sociétés, 1999 |
[28] | 张晓凌. 石器功能与人类适应行为:虎头梁遗址石制品微痕分析[D]. 中国科学院研究生院博士学位论文, 2009 |
[29] | 侯亚梅, 李英华, 黄万波, 等. 龙骨坡遗址第7水平层石制品新材料[J]. 第四纪研究, 2006,26(4):555-561 |
[30] | Bo?da E, Hou YM. Analyse des artefacts lithiques du site de Longgupo[J]. L’Anthropologie 2011,115(1):78-175 |
[31] | 李炎贤, 文本享. 观音洞:贵州黔西旧石器时代初期文化遗址[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1986 |
[32] | 李英华. 贵州黔西观音洞遗址石器工业技术研究[D]. 中国科学院研究生院博士学位论文, 2009 |
[33] | 黄慰文. 盘县大洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012 |
[34] | 贺存定. 玉米洞遗址石器工业与人类行为[D]. 长春:吉林大学博士学位论文, 2016 |
[35] | 沈辰. 石器微痕分析的考古学实验:理论、方法与运用.石器微痕分析的考古学实验研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 26 |
[36] | 贺存定. 重庆玉米洞遗址石灰岩石器加工技术的打制实验研究.边疆考古研究(第23辑)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018 |
[37] | 重庆中国三峡博物馆. 重庆巫山县玉米洞旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2018(1):3-16 |
[38] | Jones P. Experimental Butchery with Modern Stone Tools and its Relevance for Palaeolithic Archaeology[J]. World Archaeology, 1980,12:153-175 |
/
〈 | 〉 |