Excavation/Investigation Reports

2019 excavation report of the Bianfudong Paleolithic site in Heqing, Yunnan

  • Qijun RUAN ,
  • Jianhui LIU ,
  • Rongbo YE ,
  • Qingfeng SHAO ,
  • Sen YANG ,
  • Jianwei ZHOU ,
  • Chunyong HUA ,
  • Jian SUN ,
  • Xiaomei ZHANG ,
  • Xingrong LUO
Expand
  • 1. Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Kunming 650118
    2. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    3. School of History and Archives, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091
    4. School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046
    5. Dali Institute of Cultural Relics Management, Dali 671000
    6. Heqing County Institute of Cultural Relics Management, Heqing 671000

Received date: 2022-10-15

  Revised date: 2023-02-22

  Online published: 2023-08-10

Abstract

The Bianfudong Paleolithic site is located in the middle valley of the Jinshajiang River. Due to early quarrying damage, the roof, entrance and frontal part of the cave were severely destroyed. To accompany basic construction, we conducted a rescue excavation in 2019. The excavation area is approximately 30 m away from the original entrance to the cave. The stratigraphy of the site consists of two parts: cultural deposits and underlying cave fissure deposits. The cultural deposit is 2.3 m in thickness and divided into two cultural stages (upper and lower) comprising ten sub-layers. Some hominin fossils, stone artifacts and plentiful animal fossils have been excavated from the cultural layers, along with some fauna from the natural cave fissure deposits. A large number of stone artifacts were excavated from the lower cultural layer with both core and flake tools identified. In contrast, mainly flake tools were identified from the upper layer. Broken fossil bones excavated from cultural layers are dominated by deer and bovids totalling more than 100 individuals, and some bones preserve artificial marks on the surface. The U-series dating of the site gives the age of the lower cultural layer between 180 kaBP and 140 kaBP, while the top of upper cultural layer is dated to ca. 70 kaBP.

Cite this article

Qijun RUAN , Jianhui LIU , Rongbo YE , Qingfeng SHAO , Sen YANG , Jianwei ZHOU , Chunyong HUA , Jian SUN , Xiaomei ZHANG , Xingrong LUO . 2019 excavation report of the Bianfudong Paleolithic site in Heqing, Yunnan[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(04) : 503 -513 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0024

References

[1] 马丽芳. 中国地质图集[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002, 293-300
[2] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 盘状石核相关问题探讨[J]. 考古, 2016, 2: 88-94
[3] Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya: An Experimental Approach[M]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982
[4] 卫奇. 石制品观察格式讨论[A].见:邓涛,王原.第八届中国古脊椎动物学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218
[5] 李炎贤, 蔡回阳. 贵州白岩脚洞石器的第二步加工[J]. 江汉考古, 1986, 2: 56-64
[6] 阮齐军, 刘建辉, 胡越, 等. 云南鹤庆天华洞旧石器遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 2: 166-181
[7] Xing S, Martinón-Torres M, Bermúdez de Castro JM. Late Middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Tongzi, southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2019, 130: 96-108
[8] Liu W, Schepartz L, Xing S, et al. Late Middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Panxian Dadong, South China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2013, 64: 337-355
[9] 刘武, 吴秀杰. 中更新世晚期中国古人类化石的形态多样性及其演化意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 4: 563-575
[10] Hu Y, Ruan QJ, Liu JH, et al. Luminescence chronology and lithic technology of Tianhuadong Cave, an early Upper Pleistocene Paleolithic site in southwest China[J]. Quaternary Research, 2020, 94: 121-136
[11] 云南省文物考古研究所, 大理白族自治州文物管理所, 鹤庆县文物管理所. 云南鹤庆龙潭旧石器遗址2019-2020年度发掘简报[J]. 南方文物, 2020, 1: 105-118
Outlines

/