Reviews

Current status and reflection on the study of microblade function

  • Chenru ZENG ,
  • Mingjie YI ,
  • Xing GAO
Expand
  • 1. School of Culture Heritage, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069
    2. School of History, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
    3. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2022-11-15

  Revised date: 2022-12-07

  Online published: 2023-08-10

Abstract

A microblade is a flake pressed from a prepared microcore with straight ridges on the dorsal surface, and characterized by parallel sides. The length of the microblade is generally more than twice its width. Study of the function of microblades is an important way to explore the function of Paleolithic and Neolithic sites, livelihood patterns of ancient humans, and migration and dispersal of human populations. Through efforts of scholars in recent decades, research on the function of microblades has achieved some results. It is generally believed that the functional use of microblades is found at the tip and edge, with the object of action to be mainly animal remains, or possible hunting, processing meat, etc. Some microblades were used directly to process plant materials through collecting and harvesting as ancient humans may have used plant resources as a supplement to meat. A few microblades were used for drilling, grooving, or other processing.

In the early 20th century, Nels C. Nelson and other scholars first discovered remains of microblade cores and microblade during scientific investigations on the Mongolian plateau. The spread of this technology in Northeast Asia and North America involves the transformation of livelihood and behavioral patterns of hominins during the Last Glacial Period. After years of exploration, scholars have made a series of researches on source, type, production process and other aspects of microblade technology, but technical research is weak in terms of how ancient humans adapted to the harsh ecological environments of the Last Glacial Period often involving migration and diffusion of people.

Combining studies of relevant literature of microwear and residue analysis, these studies have assessed the origin and spread of microblade technology, determination of site function and modes of adaptation to environmental change of environment, etc. At the same time, there are still problems in this research including sampling and analysis methods, few experiments and research cases, and limitations in usewear and residue research. On this basis, it is suggested that future research on microblade function should be guided by archeological problems, increasing quantitative experimental research including usewear and residue analysis. Further study of microblades in multiple regions should be carried out and interpretations in the context of site background.

Cite this article

Chenru ZENG , Mingjie YI , Xing GAO . Current status and reflection on the study of microblade function[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(04) : 554 -563 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0021

References

[1] 李锋. 石叶概念探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(1): 41-50
[2] 仪明洁. 细石器研究中几个关键概念的厘定[J]. 考古与文物, 2014, 5: 37-41
[3] 王幼平. 石器研究:旧石器时代考古方法初探[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006, 84-87
[4] 安志敏. 中国细石器研究的开拓和成果:纪念裴文中教授逝世20周年[J]. 第四纪研究, 2002, 1: 6-10
[5] Nelson NC. Notes on the Archaeology of the Gobi[J]. American Anthropologist, 1926, 28(1): 305-308
[6] 陈淳, 张萌. 细石叶工业研究的回顾与再思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 577-589
[7] 王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 565-576
[8] 陈胜前, 叶灿阳. 细石叶工艺起源研究的理论反思[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 547-562
[9] 靳英帅, 张晓凌, 仪明洁. 楔形石核概念内涵与细石核分类初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(2): 307-319
[10] Elston RG, Brantingham PJ. Microlithic technology in northern Asia: A risk-minimizing strategy of the Late Paleolithic and Early Holocene[J]. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2002, 12(1): 103-116
[11] 陈淳. 东亚与北美细石叶遗存的古环境[J]. 第四纪研究, 1994, 4: 369-377
[12] Bleed P. Cheap, Regular, and Reliable: Implications of design variation in Late Pleistocene Japanese microblade technology[J]. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2002, 12(1): 95-102
[13] González-Urquijo J, Beyries S, Ibá?ez JJ. Ethnoarchaeology and functional analysis[A]. In: Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology[C]. Springer, 2015: 27-40
[14] Raab LM, Goodyear AC. Middle-range theory in archaeology: A critical review of origins and applications[J]. American Antiquity, 1984, 49(2): 255-268
[15] 高星, 沈辰. 石器微痕分析的考古学实验研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008, 1-22
[16] Odell GH. Stone tool research at the end of the millennium: procurement and technology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Research, 2000, 8(4): 269-331
[17] 方启. 吉林省东部地区黑曜岩石器微痕研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2009, 10-240
[18] 崔天兴. 东胡林遗址石制品研究--旧新石器时代过渡期的石器工业和人类行为[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2010, 112-136
[19] 余官玥, 仪明洁, 张晓凌, 等. 水洞沟地区白云岩细石叶的微痕实验研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 193-207
[20] Waber NH. Open Lithics: Applying Open Source Technologies to Problems in Lithic Use Wear Experimentation and Analysis[D]. University of British Columbia, 2020, 10-97
[21] Kuhn SL. A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1990, 17(5): 583-593
[22] Hirasawa Y, Holmes CE. The relationship between microblade morphology and production technology in Alaska from the perspective of the Swan Point site[J]. Quaternary International, 2017, 442: 104-117
[23] Owen LR. Hafting microblades: Examples from the Dorset Culture of the North American Arctic[J]. MOM Éditions, 1987, 15(1): 147-150
[24] Hollerman JJ, Fackler ML, Coldwell DM, et al. Gunshot wounds: 1. Bullets, ballistics, and mechanisms of injury[J]. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 1990, 155(4): 685-690
[25] Wood J, Fitzhugh B. Wound ballistics: The prey specific implications of penetrating trauma injuries from osseous, flaked stone, and composite inset microblade projectiles during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition, Alaska USA[J]. Journal of archaeological science, 2018, 91: 104-117
[26] Lynch JJ. Exploring the Function and Adaptive Context of Paleo-Arctic Projectile Points[D]. Texas A&M University, 2020, 30-165
[27] 陈虹. 华北细石叶工艺的文化适应研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2011, 83-182
[28] Song YH, Grimaldi S, Santaniello F, et al. Re-thinking the evolution of microblade technology in East Asia: Techno-functional understanding of the lithic assemblage from Shizitan 29 (Shanxi, China)[J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14(2): e212643
[29] 王小庆. 兴隆洼与赵宝沟遗址出土细石叶的微痕研究:兼论兴隆洼文化和赵宝沟文化的生业形态[J]. 西部考古, 2006, 59-76
[30] 宋艳花, 石金鸣, 沈辰. 山西柿子滩旧石器遗址蚌饰品制作工艺研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(2): 115-123
[31] Monchot H, Houmard C, Dionne M, et al. The modus operandi of walrus exploitation during the Palaeoeskimo period at the Tayara site, Arctic Canada[J]. Anthropozoologica, 2013, 48(1): 15-36
[32] 鹿又喜隆. 細石刃の装着法と使用法--荒屋遺跡タチカルシュナイ第 5 遺跡 C 地点出土資料の分析から[J]. 考古学雑誌, 2004, 88(4): 261-287
[33] Eugénie GR, Auréade H. Which uses for the Late Glacial microblades of Eastern Siberia? Functional analysis of the lithic assemblage of Kovrizhka IV, level 6[J]. Известия Лаборатории древних технологий, 2021, 17(2): 9-22
[34] Kannegaard RN. Quartz Crystal Microblade Function in the Salish Sea Region of Washington State During the Locarno Beach Phase (3500-2400 BP)[J]. 2015, 22-61
[35] Iwase A. A functional analysis of the LGM microblade assemblage in Hokkaido, northern Japan: A case study of Kashiwadai 1[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 425: 140-157
[36] 李占扬, 赵清坡, 鹿又喜隆, 等. 河南灵井许昌人遗址细石器功能研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017, 37(4): 789-796
[37] Liu J, Chen H, Wang J, et al. The function and flexible use of a Neolithic microlithic assemblage from the Huihe dam site, Inner Mongolia: a quantifiable analysis of use-wear evidence[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12(3)
[38] 张晓凌. 石器功能与人类适应行为:虎头梁遗址石制品微痕分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 2009, 18-154
[39] 关莹, 高星. 旧石器时代残留物分析:回顾与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(4): 418-429
[40] Guan Y, Tian C, Peng F, et al. Plant diet during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition in northwest China: Evidence from starch remains from Pigeon Mountain site in Ningxia Province[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 559: 110-118
[41] 崔天兴, 杨琴, 郁金城, 等. 北京平谷上宅遗址骨柄石刃刀的微痕分析:来自环境扫描电镜观察的证据[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2010, 40(6): 737-744
[42] Liu L, Levin MJ, Bonomo MF, et al. Harvesting and processing wild cereals in the Upper Palaeolithic Yellow River valley, China[J]. Antiquity, 2018, 92(363): 603-619
[43] Iwase A, Sato H, Yamada S, et al. A use-wear analysis of the Late Glacial microblade assemblage from Hokkaido, northern Japan: A case study based on the Yoshiizawa site[J]. Japanese Journal of Archaeology, 2016, 4: 3-28
[44] 郭明建, 邱振威, 王刚, 等. 河北康保县兴隆遗址2018-2019年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2021, 1: 3-25
[45] 吕红亮, 韩芳, 何元洪, 等. 青海玉树州参雄尕朔遗址2013年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2021, 10: 3-15
[46] Bae K. Origin and patterns of the Upper Paleolithic industries in the Korean Peninsula and movement of modern humans in East Asia[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, 211(1-2): 103-112
[47] 仪明洁. 中国北方的细石叶技术与社会组织复杂化早期进程[J]. 考古, 2019, 9: 70-78
[48] 赵潮, 王幼平, 吴锦程. 华北早期细石叶工艺遗存的分期与相关问题研究[J]. 考古, 2022, 8: 70-83
[49] 崔天兴, 宋炜玮. 激光共聚焦显微镜在微痕定量分析中的应用综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(1): 180-192
[50] Borel A, Ollé A, Vergès JM, et al. Scanning electron and optical light microscopy: Two complementary approaches for the understanding and interpretation of usewear and residues on stone tools[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 48: 46-59
[51] 仪明洁, 余官玥. 也谈石器研究中的微痕分析[J]. 考古学集刊, 2020, 157-165
[52] 陈胜前. 考古学研究的“透物见人”问题[J]. 考古, 2014, 10: 61-67
[53] 陈胜前. 中国考古学研究的范式与范式变迁[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019, 2: 182-203
Outlines

/