Newly discovered Paleolithic artifacts from the southern Chengdu Plain
Received date: 2022-09-25
Revised date: 2023-02-08
Online published: 2023-10-16
From March to May 2021, the Sichuan Province Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology and other institutions carried out an archaeological survey in a construction area of the southern Chengdu Plain where a new freeway from Tianfuxinqu via Meishan to Leshan is being built. A total of 12 Paleolithic localities were discovered, distributed in the 2nd to 4th terraces of the Minjiang River and the 2nd terrace of the ancient Qingyi River. One hundred lithics mostly from the surface were collected. Most of these artifacts are large and medium in size, and include cores(n=31), flakes(n=12), chunks(n=31) and retouched tools(n=26). More than ten raw materials were utilized for knapping, mainly collected as pebbles from nearby riverbeds or terraces. Quartz sandstone (36%) and quartzite (28%) were predominant. The flaking technique was direct hard hammer percussion without core preparation. Most of the flakes retained cortex on the butt and dorsal surface. Tools identified as choppers, handaxes, picks, cleavers, heavy-duty scrapers, scrapers and notch were mostly manufactured on flakes. Overall, the artifacts were similar to the main industry in South China, but with distinct regional characteristics and showing some similarities to the Acheulean Industry. According to stratigraphic comparisons and technical features of these lithics, the age of these newly discovered localities is around the late stage of Middle Pleistocene to Late Pleistocene.
Key words: Chengdu; Late Pleistocene; Archaeology; Lithics; Acheulean
Xiaoru HONG , Wei CHEN , Guanyue YU , Jiali LI , Yuchun YANG , Hongliang LYU , Fang XIANG , Huixin CHEN . Newly discovered Paleolithic artifacts from the southern Chengdu Plain[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(05) : 667 -678 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0039
[1] | 西南师范学院地理系四川地理研究室. 四川地理[Z]. 重庆:西南师范学院学报编辑部, 1982, 59 |
[2] | 中国科学院《中国自然地理》编辑委员会. 地学经典丛书·第1辑·中国自然地理总论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018, 289 |
[3] | 梁斌, 朱兵, 王全伟, 等. 成都平原第四纪地质与环境[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014, 2-8+92-96 |
[4] | 四川省文物考古研究院, 中国人民大学历史学院, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 等. 四川眉山市东坡区坛罐山遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 6: 4-16+26 |
[5] | 四川省地方志编纂委员会编纂. 四川省志·地理志·下[M]. 成都: 成都地图出版社, 1996, 381-389 |
[6] | 卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A]. 见:邓涛,王原,等(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218 |
[7] | Toth N. The stone technologies of early hominids at Koobi Fora: An experimental approach[D]. Berkeley: The PhD Dissertation of University of California, 1982, 48-101 |
[8] | 王社江. 洛南盆地的薄刃斧[J]. 人类学学报, 2006, 25(4): 332-342 |
[9] | 陈虹. 鉴微寻踪:旧石器时代石英岩石制品的微痕与功能研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2020, 3 |
[10] | 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 18(3): 193-214 |
[11] | 李宣民, 张森水. 铜梁旧石器文化之研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1981, 4: 359-371+386-389 |
[12] | 李宣民, 张森水. 资阳人B地点发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(3): 215-224+302-304 |
[13] | 陈苇, 仪明洁, 孙智彬, 等. 四川简阳龙垭遗址出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(6): 955-969 |
[14] | 高星, 裴树文. 三峡远古人类的足迹三峡库区旧石器时代考古的发现和研究[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2010, 163-171 |
[15] | 王社江, 孙雪峰, 鹿化煜, 等. 汉水上游汉中盆地新发现的旧石器及其年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(2): 125-136 |
[16] | 四川省文物考古研究院, 北京大学考古文博学院. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14+2 |
[17] | 冯金良, 赵振宏, 赵翔, 等. “成都粘土”的成因、物源、时代及其古环境问题[J]. 山地学报, 2014, 32(5): 513-525 |
[18] | 葛璐月, 文星跃. 成都粘土与其下伏粘土粒度特征对比及古环境意义[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(5): 681-692 |
/
〈 | 〉 |