Philosophical issues in the study of human origins
Received date: 2023-09-11
Accepted date: 2023-11-13
Online published: 2023-12-14
The question of human origins is one of the ultimate questions of human existence, and the study of human origins touches on many philosophical issues. Based on recent advances in paleoanthropology and biology, this paper briefly reviews the history of human origins and evolution, and discusses philosophical issues such as the nature of being, the purpose and meaning of human existence, divine creation and evolution, the driving force of human origins and evolution, the nature and role of labor, and contingency and necessity. Counting from the origin of primates, human evolution has a history of at least 56 million years, or 7-8 million years if we count from the human-ape divergence in the sense of evolutionary biology. As a class of biological organisms and the bearer of the subjective world, the nature of being has always been a very complex subject, and it is even impossible for most people to have a recognized answer. From a biological point of view, human existence is essentially the existence of nature. Human beings are a part of the nature and greatly influence the existence of the nature. The characteristics of human beings that distinguish them from primates are the essential characteristics of human beings in the biological sense. In the study of human origins, the question of the nature of being should be examined from different angles of the various sub-disciplines of biology. The purpose and meaning of human existence at the philosophical level are not scientific questions, and the test standards of scientific research can not be applied to it. If human existence has a purpose and meaning, then that purpose and meaning is “existence”. Although traditional creationism is no longer a major part of the human knowledge system, the ideas represented by intelligent design still attempt to answer the questions of whether or not supernatural forces and intelligent things exist, and why they exist. As a living creature, the origin and development of human beings are not fundamentally different from those of other living creatures, and the driving force of human evolution is the result of a combination of intrinsic genetic factors and extrinsic environmental factors. There have been heated discussions about the role of “labor” in the origin and evolution of human beings, but from the empirical evidence of modern paleontology, archaeology, zoology, behavior, ecology, and other disciplines, it is impossible to give an accurate definition of “labor”. It can be argued that human labor itself is a state of behavior exhibited by humans in the process of survival and reproduction. The accumulation of contingent events is recorded, that is, the process of obtaining a quantitative change, and when the quantitative change accumulates to a level where order and hierarchy can be recognized, the change can be defined as qualitative change. Qualitative change in human evolution also occurs when the accumulation of countless contingent changes reaches a definable level. Self-awareness and thinking are not unique to humans. The development of complex systems in the universe with the ability to think is a necessity of material development, but the exact form in which it appears in things is controlled by chance.
Key words: Paleoanthropology; Human origins; Philosophy; Labor
Xijun Ni . Philosophical issues in the study of human origins[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(06) : 709 -720 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0072
[1] | Colp R. The contacts between Karl Marx and Charles Darwin[J]. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1974, 35: 329-338 |
[2] | 吴汝康. 关于巨猿和人的系统问题[J]. 科学通报, 1963, 14: 40-46 |
[3] | 吴汝康. 再论人的进化系统[J]. 科学通报, 1964, 15: 701-705 |
[4] | 吴汝康. 人和猿的界限问题[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1974, 12: 181-186 |
[5] | 吴汝康. 关于从猿到人的过渡时期[J]. 科学通报, 1976, 21: 86-89 |
[6] | 安志敏. 巨猿究竟属于猿的系统还是人的系统?:评吴汝康著“巨猿下领骨和牙齿化石”[J]. 科学通报, 1963, 14: 35-40 |
[7] | 安志敏. 人和猿之间的鸿沟是不可逾越的:关于“生物人”和“社会人”的商榷[J]. 科学通报, 1975, 20: 69-75 |
[8] | 安志敏. 关于巨猿以及人和猿的界限问题[J]. 科学通报, 1976, 21: 89-92 |
[9] | 颜訚. 关于巨猿系统和人类起源[J]. 科学通报, 1964, 15: 695-701 |
[10] | 颜訚. 再论人类起源与巨猿[J]. 科学通报, 1965, 16: 714-721 |
[11] | Ni X, Gebo DL, Dagosto M, et al. The oldest known primate skeleton and early haplorhine evolution[J]. Nature, 2013, 498: 60-64 |
[12] | Ni X, Wang Y, Hu Y, et al. A euprimate skull from the early Eocene of China[J]. Nature, 2004, 427: 65-68 |
[13] | Ni X, Li Q, Li L, et al. Oligocene primates from China reveal divergence between African and Asian primate evolution[J]. Science, 2016, 352: 673-677 |
[14] | Ni X, Ji Q, Wu W, et al. Massive cranium from Harbin establishes a new Middle Pleistocene human lineage in China[J]. The Innovation, 2021, 2: 100130 |
[15] | Bae CJ, Douka K, Petraglia MD. On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives[J]. Science, 2017, 358 |
[16] | Bergstr?m A, Stringer C, Hajdinjak M, et al. Origins of modern human ancestry[J]. Nature, 2021, 590: 229-237 |
[17] | Harmand S, Lewis JE, Feibel CS, et al. 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya[J]. Nature, 2015, 521: 310-315 |
[18] | Harmand S, Arroyo A. Linking primatology and archaeology: The transversality of stone percussive behaviors[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 181: 103398 |
[19] | Skinner MM, Stephens NB, Tsegai ZJ, et al. Human-like hand use in Australopithecus africanus[J]. Science, 2015, 347: 395-399 |
[20] | 德日进. 人的现象[M].范一(译). 南京: 译林出版社, 2012, 1-252 |
[21] | Behe MJ. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution[M]. New York: Free Press, 1996, 1-307 |
[22] | Ruse M. The Philosophy of Human Evolution[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 1-282 |
[23] | Schwab IR. The evolution of eyes: Major steps. The Keeler lecture 2017: Centenary of Keeler Ltd[J]. Eye, 2018, 32: 302-313 |
[24] | Fernald RD. Casting a Genetic Light on the Evolution of Eyes[J]. Science, 2006, 313: 1914-1918 |
[25] | 吴新智, 张银运. 关于劳动、社会发生发展的问题:介绍苏联学术界关于这一问题的争论[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1963, 7: 370-375 |
[26] | Mercader J, Barton H, Gillespie J, et al. 4300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104: 3043-3048 |
[27] | Proffitt T, Reeves JS, Braun DR, et al. Wild macaques challenge the origin of intentional tool production[J]. Science Advances, 2023, 9: eade8159 |
[28] | Toth N, Schick K. 21 Overview of Paleolithic Archeology[A]. In: Handbook of Paleoanthropology[C]. 2007, 1943-1963 |
[29] | Haslam M, Luncz L, Pascual-Garrido A, et al. Archaeological excavation of wild macaque stone tools[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2016, 96: 134-138 |
[30] | Kasprak A. “Monkey archaeology” reveals macaque's Stone Age culture[J]. New Scientist, 2016, 230: 9 |
/
〈 | 〉 |