Morphology and influencing factors of Chinese foot binding bones
Received date: 2023-07-18
Revised date: 2024-01-19
Online published: 2024-06-04
Foot is an important organ that supports human movement and its shape is influenced by factors such as age, gender, movement patterns, and some specific cultural practices. Foot-binding, as a kind of artificial foot deformation behavior unique to the ancient feudal society of China, has continued for a long time in the history of China, reflecting the social life and status of women in ancient times. Studies of variation in foot morphology due to foot-binding mainly include the followings below: Skeletal variation in foot-binding, changing times, geographical differences and pathological phenomena caused by foot-binding, and the influence of age, duration, and sociocultural factors on skeletal morphological variation in foot-binding.
Foot-binding has caused great harm to women's physical and mental health, but as a historical and social phenomenon, it reflects the cultural, aesthetic and ethical concepts as well as changes in the status of women in ancient Chinese society. In the field of medicine, analysing the pathologies caused by footbinding can improve the study of bone and joint disorders of the foot and reveal the impact of footbinding on women’s health and quality of life. In the field of history, the study of footbinding is conducive to restoring the history of women’s footbinding and women’s life in ancient China, which can further reveal the picture of the life of the whole ancient society. In the field of archaeology, knowledge of the morphological characteristics of entangled foot bones facilitates the study of skeletal and gender archaeology
Overall, this article provides a brief overview of foot-binding research and the measurement of relevant parameters of the foot skeleton by reviewing and summing up data and findings from the relevant literature. And it also provides a brief review and outlook on domestic foot-binding research.
Key words: foot-binding; foot bones; variation; factors
LI Haijun , YANG Xiaoyu , XIAO Xiaoyong . Morphology and influencing factors of Chinese foot binding bones[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024 , 43(03) : 488 -501 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0027
[1] | 秦为径, 雷伟, 吴子祥, 等. 缠足畸形的形态学特征[J]. 第四军医大学学报, 2008, 14: 1328-1330 |
[2] | 孙晓璠, 张全超, 牟萍媛, 等. 山西洪洞西冯堡清代墓地缠足女性的骨骼损伤和关节疾病[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(2): 1-13 |
[3] | 王美玲. 从缠足习俗看中国古代的女性角色[D]. 硕士研究生学位论文, 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2013, 1-44 |
[4] | 朱泓, 侯侃, 王晓毅. 从生物考古学角度看山西榆次明清时期平民的两性差异[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2017, 57(4): 117-124+206 |
[5] | Michael LR. Chinese foot binding: Radiographic findings and case report.[J]. Radiology Case Reports, 2009, 4(1): 270 |
[6] | 郭祥. 云南缠足畸形形态及影像学特征及与骨质疏松相关性研究[D]. 硕士研究生学位论文, 昆明: 昆明医学院, 2011, 1-52 |
[7] | Stone PK. Binding women: Ethnology, skeletal deformations, and violence against women[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2012, 2(2-3): 53-60 |
[8] | 秦为径. 中国四省部分地区现存缠足畸形抽样调查[D]. 硕士研究生学位论文, 西安: 第四军医大学, 2008, 1-50 |
[9] | 赵永生, 郭林, 郝导华, 等. 山东地区清墓中女性居民的缠足现象[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(3): 344-358 |
[10] | 李法军, 邱林欢, 赵晨, 等. 天津蓟州区桃花园墓地明清时期缠足女性的足骨形变[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 674-685 |
[11] | 邱林欢, 李法军. 天津蓟县桃花园墓地明清时期缠足女性足骨的形态观察[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(5): 787-800 |
[12] | Scheuer L, Black S, Christie A. The juvenile skeleton[M]. Academic Press, 2004, 1-485 |
[13] | Berger E, Yang L, Ye W. Foot binding in a Ming dynasty cemetery near Xi'an, China[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2019, 24: 79-88 |
[14] | Berg EE. Chinese foot binding[J]. National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses, 1995, 14(5): 66-68 |
[15] | Ma JB, Song YQ, Rong M, et al. Bound foot metatarsals skeletal rays kinematics information through inverse modelling[J]. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 2013, 13(2): 147-153 |
[16] | Zhang Y, Li FL, Shen WW, et al. Characteristics of the skeletal system of bound foot: A case study[J]. Biomimetics Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, 2014, 19: 120 |
[17] | 孙晓璠. 山西洪洞西冯堡墓地清代女性居民的缠足研究[D]. 硕士研究生学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2021 |
[18] | Broe KE, Hannan MT, Kiely DK, et al. Predicting fracture using bone mineral density: A prospective study of long-term care residents[J]. Osteoporos International, 2000, 11: 765 |
[19] | Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences[J]. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008, 87(4): 10805-10865 |
[20] | Cummings SR, Ling X, Stone K. Consequences of foot binding among older women in Beijing, China[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 1997, 87(10): 1167-1679 |
[21] | Sun XF, Man XY, Liao XZ, et al. Footbinding and non-footbinding Han Chinese females in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912 CE) Xifengbu cemetery: A skeletal and mortuary analysis[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2021, 13(18): 1-40 |
[22] | 彭华. 中国缠足史考辨[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 13(3): 6-16+24 |
[23] | 黄时鉴. 元代缠足问题新探[J]. 东方博物, 2006, 1: 6-12 |
[24] | 高洪兴. 缠足史[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2007, 1-245 |
[25] | 孙彦贞. 缠足风习与满族马蹄底鞋源起考述[J]. 中国历史文物, 2005, 3: 53-60+97 |
[26] | 邱志诚. 国家、身体、社会:宋代身体史研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018, 333-352 |
[27] | 柯基生. 三寸金莲[M]. 产业情报杂志社,1995 |
[28] | 高世瑜. 缠足再议[J]. 史学月刊, 1999, 2: 20-24+111 |
[29] | 姚灵犀. 采菲录[M]. 上海: 上海书店, 1997, 10-24 |
[30] | 王晶可. 中国女性缠足习俗与整容文化的比较研究[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2020, 41(9): 190-192 |
[31] | Lee C. A bioarchaeological and biocultural investigation of Chinese footbinding at the Xuecun archaeological site, Henan Province, China[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2019, 25: 9-19 |
[32] | Zhao YS, Guo L, Xiao YN, et al. Osteological characteristics of Chinese foot-binding in archaeological remains[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2020, 28: 48-58 |
[33] | 张峰. 古代社会“三寸金莲”习俗长久存在的因素浅析[J]. 文化产业, 2020, 3: 26-27 |
[34] | 杨幼梅. 三寸金莲与闽南男性审美的表征[J]. 大众文艺, 2016, 3: 261-263 |
[35] | 丁梅. 缠足文化的“兴”与“衰”[J]. 大众文艺, 2020, 15: 222-223 |
[36] | Dorothy Y Ko. Cinderella’s Sisters: A revisionist history of foot binding[M]. University of California Press, 2005, 305-311 |
[37] | 张五常. 中国旧家庭的礼教与国家的盛衰[J]. 紫光阁文摘, 2016, 12 |
[38] | 姚遂. 耕织经济与中国灰姑娘:中国缠足兴衰的经济学解释[J]. 经济学报, 2017, 4(2): 96-130 |
[39] | [清] 赵翼. 陔余丛考[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1963, 540 |
[40] | [加]宝森(Laurel Bossen)著. 中国妇女与农村发展:云南禄村六十年的变迁[M]. 译者:胡宝坤. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2005, 40-92 |
[41] | Bossen L, Wang XR, Brown MJ, et al. Feet and fabrication: footbinding and early twentieth-century rural women’s labor in Shaanxi[J]. Modern China, 2011, 37(4): 347-383 |
[42] | 邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1985, 191-192 |
[43] | 罗卓荆, 唐农轩. 国人足弓指数的测定[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 1994, 1: 16-17 |
[44] | Schwend RM, Drennan JC. Cavus foot deformity in children[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2003, 11(3): 201-211 |
[45] | 刘国忠, 王伯雄, 史辉, 等. 激光线扫描足部三维测量方法及其应用[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 5: 820-823 |
[46] | 何晓宇, 王朝强, 周之平, 等. 三维有限元方法构建足部健康骨骼与常见疾病模型及生物力学分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(9): 1410-1415 |
[47] | 石敏, 姚瀚钦, 李淳芃, 等. 基于深度Alignment网络的足部测量[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(7): 1267-1278 |
[48] | 黎刚, 周忠和. 物理之光助力古生物学前行[CP/OL]. URL: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_Qe4qppizQL6Xhq_tzoLQQ. Released on: 2021-09-27 |
[49] | 邓涛. 当古生物遇到新科技[N]. 光明日报,2023-03-02(016) |
[50] | Qutbi M, Soltanshahi M, Shiravand Y, et al. Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review[J]. Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging. 2020, 30(3): 362-371 |
[51] | Li N, Li XM, Xu L, et al. Comparison of QCT and DXA: osteoporosis detection rates in postmenopausal women[J]. International Journal Endocrinology, 2013, 895474 |
[52] | [美]高彦颐, 刘东. 缠足:“金莲崇拜”盛极而衰的演变[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2022 |
[53] | 陈东原. 中国妇女生活史[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1937, 98 |
[54] | 刘妍. 宋代女子缠足的特点及其成因探析[J]. 学理论, 2016, 11: 142-143 |
[55] | 湖北省文物考古研究所, 襄阳市文物考古研究所, 枣阳市文物考古队. 湖北枣阳九连墩M2发掘简报[J]. 江汉考古, 2018, 6: 3-55+2 |
[56] | 湖南省博物馆, 中国科学院考古研究所. 长沙马王堆一号汉墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2008, 70 |
[57] | 湖北省荆州地区博物馆. 江陵马山一号楚墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1985, 24-25 |
[58] | 益阳市文物管理处, 益阳市博物馆. 益阳楚墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2008, 206 |
[59] | 凤凰山一六七号汉墓发掘整理小组. 江陵凤凰山一六七号汉墓发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1976, 10: 31-35, 50, 36-37, 96 |
[60] | 新疆维吾尔自治区博物馆. 新疆吐鲁番阿斯塔那北区墓葬发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1960, 6: 13-21+2+1-4 |
[61] | 新疆维吾尔自治区博物馆考古部, 吐鲁番地区文物局阿斯塔那文物管理所. 新疆吐鲁番阿斯塔那古墓群西区考古发掘报告[J]. 考古与文物, 2016, 5: 31-50 |
[62] | 崔成实. 浙江衢州市南宋墓出土器物[J]. 考古, 1983, 11: 1004-1011+1018+1061-1063 |
[63] | 俞立军. 浙江兰溪市南宋墓[J]. 考古, 1991, 7: 670-672+680 |
[64] | 李科友, 周迪人, 于少先. 江西德安南宋周氏墓清理简报[J]. 文物, 1990, 9: 1-13+97-101 |
[65] | 李庚善. 从考古发现的人骨架谈古代女性的裹足问题[J]. 长江文化论丛, 2009, 99-105 |
[66] | 李海军, 刘力铭, 张一丹, 等. 中国古代先民遗骸人工改形的发现与研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(4): 540-553 |
/
〈 | 〉 |