Loading...

Table of Content

    15 December 1990, Volume 9 Issue 04
    Opening address
    Zhu Xuan
    1990, 9(04):  289-289. 
    Asbtract ( 135 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Review and prospect of paleoanthropology in China
    Li Chuankui
    1990, 9(04):  290-293. 
    Asbtract ( 287 )   PDF (263KB) ( 124 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Discovery of the "Peking Man" and international scientific cooperation
    Zhou Mingzhen
    1990, 9(04):  297-299. 
    Asbtract ( 282 )   PDF (229KB) ( 79 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The proto-handaxe and its tradition in China
    An Zhimin
    1990, 9(04):  303-311. 
    Asbtract ( 443 )   PDF (580KB) ( 139 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Many proto- handaxes have been found in China. Although the classification and denomination differs among scholars. they are important for research on the systems of the Palaeolithic in China.
    These proto-handaxes are made of pebbles and thick flakes. They are large in size and usually irregular in shape and can be divided into various types: bifaces, unifaces and artifacts with a triangular cross-section· A few dozen localities have been discovered and they are distributed in the following areas: 1. Northern China, including parts of Shaanxi, Shanxi and Henan; 2. Central China, including southern Shaanxi, Hunan and Anhui, all in the Changjiang River valley; 3. Southern China, only in part of Guangxi. The localities in Central China are more dense in distribution and more plentiful in number.
    These proto-handaxes were chiefly found in stratigraphical layers of the middle Pleistocene and mostly belong to the early Palaeolithic, some of them may be later, but after the middle Palaeolithic Age they were almost completely disappered. In deposits of the Holocene there are artifacts which look something like proto-handaxes, but they are Neolithic implements and have no direct relation to the proto-handaxes.
    The proto-handaxes discovered in China are fewer than the chopper-chopping tools found there. They are associated with bolas and other artifacts and together with them constitute assemblages of large stone implements. Their shapes and chipping methods and the artifacts assocaited with them are all different from those of the typical handaxe of the Acheulian tradition. We call them proto-handaxes to indicate that they are of another tradition in the world. The handaxes discovered in Korea and Southeastern Asia belong to the proto-handaxe too, but the relationship between them and those in China still needs to be explored.
    There were at least two cultural systems in the early Palaeolithic of China. One is the pebble industry represented by proto-handaxes and the other is the flake industry represented by the Zhoukoudian culture. By the late Palaeolithic Age, proto-handaxes were replaced by the flake industry in North China. In Central and Southern China, however, the pebble industry had been continued until early Neolithic after proto-handaxes disappeared. It is the main course of development of the late Palaeolithic in China.
    The evolution of humankind in China
    Wu Xinzhi
    1990, 9(04):  312-321. 
    Asbtract ( 778 )   PDF (618KB) ( 146 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Many fossils of Homo erectus and Homo sapiens have been found in China. The main results from different chronometric techniques are shown in a table of the present paper.
    This paper deals with human evolution in China in six aspects.
    1. There are common characteristics among human fossils in China. They are: the anterolateral surface of the fronto-sphenoidal process of zygomatic bone facing more forward, the contour of the lower margin of the zygomatic process of maxilla, the high position of the part joining it with the maxillary body, more obtuse zygo- maxillary angle, flat nasal region, lower face, the contour of the suture between frontal bone and the interorbital bones approximating to a horizontal curve, founded infero-lateral orbital margin, sagittal keeling, Inca bone, shovel shaped upper incisor.
    Il. The morphology of the human fossils in China shows almost similar evolutionary trend as those of the other part of the world. But not all of the changes are synchronous with the chronological sequence. For instance, the cranial bones of Homo erectus from Hexian is thicker than that of ZKD, those from Xujiayao are much thicker than those from Yinkou, the postorbital constriction in Hexian specimen is much less evident than those in Homo erectus of ZKD; Mab? skull is more exaggerated than Dali with regard to this feature. These phenomenon may be explained in different ways. For instance, there might be different small populations, in which the development of various features might have different evolutionary sped. The various features of each specimen are not exactly the average status of the subpopulation it belongs.
    III. Mosaic phenomenon of morphology.
    Many possible autapomorphic features of Homo erectus have been suggested by various authors. Among these, several features are worthy to be discussed on the basis of Chinese fossils.
    1, Thick vault bones: the average thicknesses of Dali and Xujiayao specimens are similar to that of the Peking Man. At certain parts such as. parietal tubercle, Dali and Xujiayao specimens are even thicker than that of the Peking Man.
    2, Pronounced postorbital constriction: it presents in Maba skull but very weak in that of Homo erectus of Hexian.
    3. Frontal sagittal keeling: it is present on Dali, Yinkou and Maba early Homo sapiens skulls
    4, Sharply angulated occipital: it appears on Dali and Yinkou skulls.
    5, Prominent angular torus at mastoid angle of parietal bone: it appears on Dali skull,
    б, Low temporal squama. it does not present in Hexian Homo erectus skull.
    The mosaic coexistence of the possible Homo erectus autapomorphic features with the features usually belonging to Homo sapiens in the same specimen indicates that in China, the Homo sapiens had been evolved from Homo erects.
    All of the facts mentioned above supports the continuous evolutionary hypothesis of humankind in China.
    IV. Paleocultural evidence supporting this hypothesis.
    V. Gene exchange with other parts of the world and the dispersal of the modern humans to neighboring regions.
    VI. Short comment on the newly found Tertiary large hominoid fossils in Yunnan.
    The hominoids unearthed from Hudieliangzi and Baozidongqing of Yuanmou, Yunnan are very close in morphology and date. To consider them belonging to the same genus as that for Lufeng large hominoid is much more reasonable than to propose a new genus (Sinopithecus) and to coin a new species: Homo orientalis.
    Regional industrial gradual advance and cultural exchange of paleolithic in North China
    Zhang Senshui
    1990, 9(04):  322-333. 
    Asbtract ( 273 )   PDF (781KB) ( 139 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Since 1920, abundant paleolithic evidences have been found in North China. There are several industrial patterns or assemblages in different stages of paleolithic. Taking Qingling Range as rough boundary, the paleolithic industries found in North China are obviously different with those from South China. In each region there is one industry playing leading role and exerting influence to the regional paleolithic industry development. The industry consisting of many small artifacts was the main one from early to late paleolihic in North China, and the big and crude stone tools spreaded in a wide region and Iasted for a long time in South China. Other assemblages are only local one which distributed in limited areas and are little significant to the evolution of paleolithic culture in China.
    The paleolithic main industry in North China is quite different from those found in Europe, southern and western parts of Asia. In North China the stone artifacts of main industry become smaller with irregular change of the length/breadth index while the stone artifacts develop along becoming small-sized with irregular change of the length/breadth index in Europe. In addition, the artifacts of different stages exist some disparities in the type and technique between the East and the West.
    In North China, people of middle paleolithic produced stone artifacts with techniques similar to those prevailing in early paleolithic so that the cultural advance is very slow at that time. In late paleolithic, some prehistorical people still used the traditional techniques for producing artifacts and the industry is still relatively primitive. After about 30,000 years B.P., other people had clearly adopted some new techniques from the neighboring areas or invented new techniques on the basis of the old tradition, the former is shown by the utilization of Mousterian technique with which stone tools are well trimmed and have regular shape, and pressure technique for flaking blade and micro-blade, they even assimilated the method of making projectile pointed tools, while the latter is shown in producing bone tools and decorative objects. All of these resulted is a great advance in the paleolithic industry in China. At the same time the traditional paleolithic industry in North China spreaded to South China and made the late paleolithic much more diversified in that region.
    The paleolithic industry found in North China did not change step by step as those found in Europe and appeared as a relatively stable in middle paleolithic. How should this really be dealt with? Two causes, at least, are suggested to be responsible for this phenomenon, namely, the cultural succession affecting the cultural creation and the scarcity of cultural exchange with the neighboring areas in early and middle paleolithic. Besides, the quality of raw material is also a factor responsible for it.
    On the stone artifacts from layer 13 of the Sinanthropus site
    Li Yanxian
    1990, 9(04):  334-339. 
    Asbtract ( 217 )   PDF (424KB) ( 91 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    According to Jia (1959) and Zhao et al. (1961), two stone artifacts were found from Layer 13 of the Sinanthropus site respectively in 1958 and 1960. Based upon his knowledge of the typological characteristics of the stone specimens, Zhang (1962) doubts they are fashioned by human agency.
    The present author takes the polymorphism of artifacts in flaking and retouch, as well as stone specimens altered by natural agency, into" consideration. A discussion of the methodology of the stone artifacts is given.
    The pleistocene human environment of North China
    Qi Guoqin
    1990, 9(04):  340-349. 
    Asbtract ( 208 )   PDF (552KB) ( 685 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The analysis of main Quaternary mammalian faunas associated with human fossil and studies of the other disciplines showed that the pleistocene humans of North China lived in the natural environment that Qinghai/Xizang plateau was rapidly rising, the three large stairs in the topography decreasing in height from west to east were gradually created, and the climate became colder and drier but there were multiple fluctuations in this general trend.
    The occurrence of some controversial Homo erectus cranial features in the Zhoukoudian and East African hominids
    Gunter Brauer, Zhang Yinyun
    1990, 9(04):  350-358、377. 
    Asbtract ( 313 )   PDF (1176KB) ( 108 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    On the basis of cladistic analyses, some authors have recently questioned the widely-held view that Homo erectus is a single species which existed in Asia, Africa. and Europe. It has been argued that the Asian sample is characterized by a unique set of derived features (autapomorphies) not present in the African specimens, and may thus represent a side branch of human evolution.
    More precise morphological descriptions and comparisons of these suggested autapomorphic features in hominid samples form various geographic region may help shed light upon this controversy. This paper will show the presence and variability of some critical features in the Zhoukoudian and in the erectus and habilis samples from East Turkana and Olduvai.
    This research was supported by the Kenyan and Tanzanian Governments, the National Museums in Nairobi and Dar-cs-Salaam, and the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) in London as well as by grants of the German Research Council (DFG).
    Zuttiyeh: A new look at an old face
    Songy Sohn, Milford H.Wolpoff
    1990, 9(04):  359-370. 
    Asbtract ( 257 )   PDF (645KB) ( 83 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The frontofacial fragment from Zuttiyeh, Israel is at least 120,000 years old. Recognition of this antiquity suggests that it could be ancestral to any of the later populations of the Levant. Some workers have regarded it as an early Neandertal, and others as an early “anatomically modern Homo sapiens”. We believe the specimen could most profitably be compared with the Zhoukoudian Homo erectus remains. From these systematic comparisons we find a detailed similarity in spite of the difference in time and the spacial distance between these sites. In this paper we discuss the implications of this similarity in terms of the regional continuity explanation for human evolution. This relationship is an important one for understanding the ancestry and relations of the Levantine populations of the Upper Pleistocene. It has significant implications for the “Garden of Eden” theory of modern human origins, since it shows Asia can be an important source area for at least some living populations.