Loading...

Table of Content

    15 March 2006, Volume 25 Issue 01
    New arguments on continuity of human evolution in China
    WU Xinzhi
    2006, 25(01):  17-25. 
    Asbtract ( 253 )   PDF (200KB) ( 107 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Through analysis of morphological features, this article discusses some problems concerning the methodology of thinking in the study of human evolution and provides new evidence to support the Multiregional evolution model as follows. 1) Do not neglect the role played by gene exchange in the formation of certain features of recent skulls, such as orbital shape, the form of infero-lateral margin of the orbit, and the contour composed of the fronto-nasal and fronto-maxillary sutures. These features in recent East Asian skulls are different from those in Pleistocene specimens in China, which indicates that the continuity of them in East Asia has not persisted to nowadays, but does not exclude the continuity of them in the Pleistocene. The difference between recent and Pleistocene skulls in morphological features may be caused by genetic drift andΠor gene exchange between East Asia and outside in the Holocene and Late Pleistocene. 2) Features not unique for a region, are considered as not deserving to be the evidence for continuity of human evolution in that region by some scholars. But it is probable that common ancestry and gene flow between ancient populations of different regions should have caused many features not unique in many regions. Common features of Pleistocene skulls in China are not necessarily unique in this region. The fact that some common features in Pleistocene China also exist in other regions does not weaken the value of them in supporting the evolutionary continuity in East Asia. Discontinuity in evolutionary process would make the earlier population different from the later ones, or there would be no common features shared by them. 3) Do not forget that human evolution is a dynamic process where there was a tendency towards more gracile status for various morphological features throughout human evolution, and various features could experience changes due to the effect of genetic processes such as gene exchange with neighboring populations etc. So it is not reasonable to expect morphological features of the descendants to be completely similar to those of their ancestors in strength and frequency of trait occurrence. The weaknesses of the basal tubercle and the curvature on the labial surface in recent East Asian human upper incisors does not indicate that shovel-shaped incisors could not be one of the features supporting the continuity of human evolution in this region. The decreasing frequencies of chignon and suprainiac fossa in Europeans from Neandertal to modern humans are part of the dynamic process. Cranial indices of Late Paleolithic Liujiang, Ziyang and Lijiang skulls are 75.1, 77.4, and 84.4 respectively, whereas those of three Upper Cave skulls are 70.1, 69.4 and 71.2 respectively. The chignon exists in the former three skulls with their shorter vaults and is absent in the latter with their characteristic long skulls. These facts disprove the opinion that the chignon is most likely caused by a more rapid“posterior growth of the cerebral hemispheres relative to formation of the cranial vault bones”. 4) Do not misinterpret the observation of specimens and opinion of the opposing side. For instance , in the paragraph discussing“Facial size is a vague character”, Lieberman wrote,“the four relatively complete archaic fossils with faces from North China (Dali, Jinniushan, and YunxianⅠandⅡ) are somewhat distorted. ” (p.172) . He hinted that the faces of these skulls are not short as being proposed by anthropologists who advocate the Multiregional model as one of the evidence of continuity. But in fact, although skulls from these sites had experienced different degrees of distortion, any correct reconstruction will not change the status that their upper faces are short. Furthermore, the face of new middle Pleistocene skull from Nanjing is definitely short. 5) The contrast between the presence of mid-sagittal keeling, mandibular oxostosis, pinched nasal saddle and agenesis of third molar in recent East Asians, and their absence in recent African skulls fit better with the Multiregional model rather than the Recent Out of Africa model. The fossil record suggests that mid-sagittal keeling and mandibular oxostosis existing in recent East Asians may derive from Homo erectus of Beijing; the pinched nasal saddle may be traced to Maba early H. sapiens skull and Upper Cave skull 101; and the agenesis of the third molar may be related to the Homo erectus mandible from Lantian and Upper Pleistocene skull from Liujiang. To consider the origin of these features in recent East Asians as effects of genetic drift during the dispersal out of Africa is less convincible.
    The comparisons of cranial non-metric features between upper cave skulls and modern north Chinese populations, and late pleistocene human evolution in China
    LIU Wu, HE Jianing, WU Xiujie, LU Jinyan
    2006, 25(01):  26-41. 
    Asbtract ( 202 )   PDF (364KB) ( 139 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The human remains recovered from Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian are the richest and best preserved late Pleistocene human fossils ever found in east Asia. For decades, as the representative of the late Pleistocene human in east Asia, the Upper Cave skulls have played an important role in research on the origins of modern Mongoloids and American Indians. Recently, more attention has been paid to the details and mechanisms for late Pleistocene human evolution and the formation of modern human populations. Both the origin and diversification of modern humans have been stressed in research. Some studies further the debates on the evolutionary position of Upper Cave Man and this group’s role in the formation of modern human populations in east Asia. To further explore these problems, we examined and compared 12 non-metric features on three Upper Cave skulls and modern Chinese unearthed from two archaeological sites in North China. Our results indicate that 8 features are expressed differently between Upper Cave Man and modern Chinese. We believe that more primitive characteristics define Upper Cave Man when compared to modern Chinese populations. These findings and some problems on late Pleistocene human evolution including intra2group variation and the standard for modern human populations, are discussed.
    Modeling hunter-gatherers of China
    CHEN Shengqian
    2006, 25(01):  42-55. 
    Asbtract ( 198 )   PDF (695KB) ( 165 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    To study adaptations of prehistoric hunter-gatherers, archaeologists almost fully depend on unearthed materials that are generally incomplete, and archaeologists cannot observe the past process of human behavior. Modeling with controlled data ideally provides a useful research tool to reconstruct behavioral patterns of hunter-gatherers. This paper bases on the modeling method of Binford (2001), starts from 431 weather station data of China, and then constructs the habitat and subsistence variables of the assumed hunter-gatherers. Incorporated with the frame of reference from ethnographic hunter-gatherers, it becomes possible to project and predict the adaptive changes of hunter-gatherers in ecological systems within present climatic variables of China. The meaning of this paper lies in a new perspective that it used , to macroscopically view the adaptive patterns of hunter-gatherers. It tentatively defines nine cultural-ecological regions that may stimulate future research of prehistoric hunter-gatherers from such a perspective. Moreover, it presents a theoretical explanation and prediction on origins of food production in China.
    Preliminary report on trial excavation at Wong Tei Tung archaeological site, Sham Chung, Hong Kong SAR
    WU Weihong, WANG Hong, TAN Huizhong, ZHANG Zhenhong
    2006, 25(01):  56-67. 
    Asbtract ( 363 )   PDF (1757KB) ( 110 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The Wong Tei Tung (Huangditong) archaeological site of Sham Chung (Shengchong) was discovered by Mr. Huang Hu and Mr. Wu Weihong in spring, 2003. The site is situated at the northern shore of the Sai King Peninsula, on the eastern part of the Hong Kong SAR, China. To the east to the site, there is a hill named Wong Tei Tung ( 154 m height). The site faces to a bay, namely Three Fathoms Cover to the west. Hong Kong Archaeology Society and the Centre for Lingnan Archaeology of Zhongshan University in Guangzhou conducted a trial excavation at the site during late 2004 to early 2005, funded by the Hong Kong SAR Government.
    Large quantities of lithic artifacts are exposed both at the surface on the pebble beach and the western slope, the extent of lithic exposing area on the pebble beach is about 300 m long and at height of 15 m up the slope. Many lithics found at underwater also indicate the site was much larger than before, sea reached the present level since 6 000 BP.
    The bedrock of the site is mudstone and siltstone observed at soil profile of test pits and auger holes. The bedrock is overlaid by the silicon tuff in dark grey to black colour; an outcrop stands at western slope at height of 40 m to 50 m, facing the sea. Such silicon tuff provides sufficient and high- quality raw materials for lithic manufacturing.
    Around 75 000 BP, a glacial maximum had reached and sea level had fallen to about 77 m lower than at present. The last glaciation at Late Pleistocene commenced about 25 000 BP, reaching a maximum at about 18 000 BP to 17 000 BP, with the sea level at its lowest at this time, falling to around - 120 m or - 130 m. Three Fathoms Cover became a river valley and it is presumed that ancient people inhabited in the site during this time. The site is situated at an underwater river terrace of at least 40 meters to 100 meters wide that face a river branch running into Tolo Hatbour and Mirs Bay of northeastern Hong Kong SAR. According to marine chart, an underwater terrace was found in front of the site at present depth of less than 5 m. It is a hint that ancient people had occupied the terrace before the sea reached present level since 6 000 BP.
    Three squares ( two 5 m×10 m and one 10 m×10 m) were enclosed both at pebble beach and slope for surface artifacts density counting. A total of five test pits had been dug both on pebble beach (T1 and T2) and hill slope (T3 to T5). The lithics are unearthed in four test pits (T1 to T4) except T5. T5 is located at a slope terrace not far from a stream, because the ancient people could have chosen that terrace. No pottery had been found in test pits ( T3 to T5) of slope. Five strata ( L1-L5) are identified containing substantial quantity of chucks, core, flakes, debitages, and lithic tools both in T3 and T4 at slope. L6 is a weathered bedrock without lithics.
    Over 3 600 lithics were found both in pebble beach and test pits. A total of 156 pieces of lithic are classified into nine categories artifacts after preliminary examination, these are adze- like lithic ( or short axe, 57.69%), scraper ( 16.02% ), point ( 8.97%), hand-axe ( biface 5.76% ), chopper ( 5.12%) , arrow-like lithic ( 1.92% ) , aw-l like lithic ( 1.92% ) , pick ( 1.28%) and burin ( 1.28% ).
    Almost all lithics were made on thick transverse flakes ( used as blanks) and are identified as flake tools. The techniques adopted were bifacally sophisticated retouch at edges of flakes (Mousterian- like), few cores being identified as prepared platform cores indicating Levalloisian technology. In terms of morphology, a few lithics have Sumatralith cores traits. According to blades or flake-blades identified in the Wong Tei Tung assemblage, we suggest that the techniques of Late Paleolithic Age to Early Neolithic Age have been adopted for the assemblage.
    Debitages, waste flakes, blades, cores, nodules and chucks were also discovered both on surface and test pits which help to re-construct the entire lithic manufacture progress. Such finding provides a clue and indicates Wong Tei Tung was an ancient lithic manufacturing workshop.
    L1 to L3 of T4 at slope had been dated to 1 938BP, 2 848 BP and 6 800 BP respectively, L4 and L5 dated to 39 000 BP and 35 000 BP respectively by the OSL dating; such datings and stratum are correlating to Fanling Formation of Holocene and Chek Lap Kok Formation of Late Pleistocene stratigraphy respectively.
    According to the lithic techniques, morphology, OSL dating and stratigraphy, a preliminary conclusion can be drawn on the finds. There are two periods, the early period dating back to 40 000 BP and later period to 7 000 BP.
    Although, few traits of Wong Tei Tung assemblage were found similar to Southeast Asia lithics, especially, according to morphology, short axe and Sumatralith cores. We couldn t simply trace them to Hoabinhian, because a lithic assemblage resulted in inter-action between environment and human adaptation, Wong Tei Tung offers a glimpse lithic manufacturing in adaptation of a certain environment. In the initial stage, we suggest that the assemblage is a lithic cluster of certain  techno- complex rather than an archaeological culture.
    Mammalian biostratigraphy of Tianyuan Cave, compared with that of upper cave at Zhoukoudian (Choukoutien)
    TONG Haowen, SHANG Hong, ZHANG Shuangquan, LIU Jinyi, CHEN Fuyou, WU Xiaohong, LI Qing
    2006, 25(01):  68-81. 
    Asbtract ( 240 )   PDF (435KB) ( 117 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The fauna in Tianyuan Cave can be divided into two assemblages. The Upper Assemblage is typical of rodent gnawing marks, and contains more oriental elements. The Lower Assemblage contains the human fossils and almost completely free of gnawing.
    The main deposits in Tianyuan Cave are composed of breccia with mild clay, which resembles that of Upper Cave in Zhoukoudian.
    The Upper Cave deposits were composed of three units: Upper room , Lower Room and the Lower recess. Based on the analysis of the fauna, it seems that there is no difference among these three units. That’s to say, the Upper Cave Fauna is a uniform fauna. But the most interesting elements are without horizon record, such as Hystrix and Paguma as well as Elephas.
    AMS 14C dating on mammalian bones gave the results: 34 —24 ka BP (Chen et al. , 1992). In chronology, they are correlated with the lower portion of the Tianyuan Cave deposits , which dated to 30 500—39 430 a B. P.
    In the composition of fauna, Tianyuan Cave has 27 species in common with the Upper Cave fauna, which accounts for 6912 % of the total fauna. Additionally, both the Tianyuan Cave and Upper Cave are dominated by Cervus nippon; and they contain the earliest records of Aeretes melanopterus, as well as the latest Hystrix in North China. The fossils from the afore mentioned two sites are less fossilized.
    Felis tigris, Lepus and Pseudaxis are the most abundant ones in the Upper Cave fauna. Paguma and Acinonyx jubatus are the rarest ones.
    The Upper Cave fauna is characterized by complete skeletons. In the Lower recess complete skeletons of deer and bear were all piled together ( twenty-five deers).
    Aeretes melanopterus, Arctonyx collaris, Paguma larvata and Capricornis represent the earliest appearance in North China.
    Ochotona dauurica, Cricetinus ( Cricetulus) varians, Hystrix subcristata, Ursus thibetanus, Acinonyx jubatus, Cervus elaphus and Ovis in Tianyuan Cave and Upper Cave represent the latest record of these species in Beijing area.
    The Tianyuan Cave and the Upper Cave faunas should be named after Cervus nippon-Hystrix- Aeretes.
    An issue on the date of fossil human remains from Sala wusu, Inner Mongolia
    SHANG Hong, WEI Qi, WU Xiaohong
    2006, 25(01):  82-86. 
    Asbtract ( 297 )   PDF (269KB) ( 150 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Salawusu site from Inner Mongolia represents a typical profile of the Upper Pleistocene in North China. It is also one of the sites yielding the first evidence of the presence of Homo sapiens in Pleistocene Asia.
    The present paper reviews the results of chronometric studies of Salawusu Formation from which the“Ordos man”and Salawusu culture have been found.
    Qiu Zhonglang (1955) compared the Fluorine content between Salawusu PA. 62 femur bone and other mammalian fossils from Salawusu Formation and indicated that the age of PA. 62 is much younger than the other mammalian remains. Yuan Sixun ( 1983) et al collected some fossilized mammalian teeth and antlers from various stratigraphical position of primary Salawusu sediment and dated with Uranium series method. The result is that the lower Salawusu Formation was accumulated between 30 000 —50 000 BP. Li Xingguo et al (1984) suggested that the date of“Ordos Man”and Salawusu culture should be 35 340±1 900 BP according to the 14 C date of the carbon particles collected from Salawusu Formation of Fanjiagouwan.
    Dong et al (1998) compared the fluvio2lacustrine - aeolian sand sequence from the Dishaogouwan section with loess, deep-sea core records and climatic fluctuations of glacial period according to the stratigraphic subdivision and dating of the Dishaogouwan section. According to their opinions thevfluviolacustrine facies of Salawusu Formation was formed in the last interglacial period from 140 000 to 70 000 BP, roughly corresponding to the fifth stage of deep2sea oxygen isotope record, and developed in the same period as the palaeosol S1 on the Loess Plateau.
    Yin Gongming et al (2004) collected three samples for IRSL dating from the Paleolithic Culture layer of Fanjiagouwan locality, Salawusu site. The IRSL ages indicate that this is older than 61 000±4 900 BP and younger than 68 000±7 300 BP.
    Fan et al (2002) have collected 140 samples from the profile of Dishaogouwan for paleomagnetic dating. The distance between two samples is 20cm. The result is the Salawusu Formation is 180 000—10 000 BP, or roughly corresponding to the period between Late Middle Pleistocene and Late Pleistocene.
    Wei Qi sent a piece of specimen of PA. 62 femur found on the earth surface of Salawusu in 1923 to the AMS laboratory of School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University as well as Arizona University, USA for radiocarbon dating. The results from these laboratories are similar, i. e. 200—300 BP. These results confirm the assertion made by Qiu (1955) based on fluorine content of this specimen that it is not associated with the fauna of Salawusu Formation.
    Many human fossil remains have been found in the area of Salawusu valley in past years. Some of them are found in situ, others are surface findings. In recent years, come chronometric dating have been done for this Formation. Most of the dates obtained are consistent with the geological age of the mammal fossils belonging to the Upper Pleistocene. Generally speaking, the human fossil remains found in situ could be regarded as belonging to this age range. However in terms of the human remains collected from the surface we should not estimate their date only based on its fossilization, colour and contrasting with the other fossils from the stratum. PA. 62 is a prominent example as that. For surface findings only the date from direct dating would have the creditability.